The Clinical Significance of N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide in Detecting the Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension and Other Clinical Conditions and in Predicting Future Cardiovascular Events

N-terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Risk for Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome

CONTEXT

Natriuretic peptide concentrations are inversely associated with risk of diabetes mellitus and may be protective from metabolic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

We studied associations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) with incident diabetes, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and MetS components.

METHODS

A total of 2899 participants with baseline (2003-2007) and follow-up (2013-2016) examinations and baseline NT-proBNP measurement in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study. Logistic regression models were fitted to incident MetS, MetS components, and diabetes; covariates included demographics, risk and laboratory factors. Incident diabetes was defined as fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, random glucose ≥200 mg/dL, or use of insulin or hypoglycemic drugs at follow-up but not baseline. Incident MetS was defined as participants with ≥3 harmonized criteria at follow-up and <3 at baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 310 participants (2364 at risk) developed diabetes and 361 (2059 at risk) developed MetS over a mean 9.4 years of follow-up. NT-proBNP was inversely associated with odds of incident diabetes (fully adjusted OR per SD higher log NT-proBNP 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93) and MetS in the highest vs lowest quartile only (fully adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.92); the linear association with incident MetS was not statistically significant. NT-proBNP was inversely associated with incident dysglycemia in all models (fully adjusted OR per SD log NT-proBNP 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79), but not with other MetS components. Effect modification by sex, race, age, or body mass index was not observed.

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP was inversely associated with odds of diabetes, MetS, and the MetS dysglycemia component. The metabolic implications of B-type natriuretic peptides appear important for glycemic homeostasis.

High residual cardiovascular risk after lipid-lowering: prime time for Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory, and Psycho-cognitive medicine

As time has come to translate trial results into individualized medical diagnosis and therapy, we analyzed how to minimize residual risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by reviewing papers on "residual cardiovascular disease risk". During this review process we found 989 papers that started off with residual CVD risk after initiating statin therapy, continued with papers on residual CVD risk after initiating therapy to increase high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), followed by papers on residual CVD risk after initiating therapy to decrease triglyceride (TG) levels. Later on, papers dealing with elevated levels of lipoprotein remnants and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] reported new risk factors of residual CVD risk. And as new risk factors are being discovered and new therapies are being tested, residual CVD risk will be reduced further. As we move from CVD risk reduction to improvement of patient management, a paradigm shift from a reductionistic approach towards a holistic approach is required. To that purpose, a personalized treatment dependent on the individual's CVD risk factors including lipid profile abnormalities should be configured, along the line of P5 medicine for each individual patient, i.e., with Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory, and Psycho-cognitive approaches.

N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Longitudinal Risk of Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a common condition that increases risk for future cardiovascular disease. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is higher in individuals with hypertension, but studies of its association with hypertension risk have been mixed.

METHODS

The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study enrolled 30,239 U.S. Black or White adults aged ≥45 years from 2003 to 2007. A subcohort included 4,400 participants who completed a second assessment in 2013-2016. NT-proBNP was measured by immunoassay in 1,323 participants without baseline hypertension, defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 or self-reported antihypertensive prescriptions. Two robust Poisson regression models assessed hypertension risk, yielding incidence rate ratios (IRRs): Model 1 included behavioral and demographic covariates and Model 2 added risk factors. A sensitivity analysis using a less conservative definition of hypertension (blood pressure ≥130/80 or self-reported antihypertensive prescriptions) was conducted.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-six participants developed hypertension after mean follow-up of 9.4 years. NT-proBNP was not associated with hypertension (Model 2 IRR per SD log NT-proBNP 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.12), with no differences by sex, body mass index, age, or race. Similar findings were seen in lower-threshold sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

NT-proBNP was not associated with incident hypertension in REGARDS; this did not differ by race or sex.

Obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: new treatment strategies

OBJECTIVES

Obesity has risen in the US and worldwide, and has become a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and mostly HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Also, the prevalence of HF is quite high in the US accounting for 6.6 million adults at present and is projected to reach 8.5 million by the year 2030 and is equally divided between HFpEF and heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients with HFpEF are resistant to treatment with drugs usually used for the treatment of HFrEF, but the reasons for this resistance are not clearly known.

METHODS

In order to get a better perspective on the current status of the underlying pathophysiology and treatment of patients with HFpEF, a Medline search of the English language literature was conducted between 2015 and 2018 using the terms obesity, HFpEF, diabetes, treatment, SGLT2 inhibitors, and neprilysin inhibitors and 24 pertinent papers were selected.

RESULTS

The review of these papers revealed that patients with HFpEF have expanded plasma volume, restricted left ventricular distension with increased end-diastolic volume and depressed natriuretic peptide levels. In this respect, drugs that cause increased diuresis and natriuresis should a reasonable choice to treat these patients. The recently FDA approved sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for the treatment of T2DM, are a good choice, for the treatment of HFpEF, since they cause osmotic diuresis from glucose excretion and increase salt and water excretion and decrease plasma volume. In addition, they produce loss of calories leading to weight and blood pressure reduction and have shown to prevent the new onset HFpEF and decrease hospitalizations and death from this disease.

CONCLUSION

The results of this analysis has shown that HFpEF has different pathophysiology from HFrEF and is difficult to treat. Drugs that block renal tubular glucose reabsorption and cause osmotic diuresis and natriuresis could be a good choice to treat patients with HFpEF alone or in combination with diuretics and other drugs.