Initiation of droxidopa during hospital admission for management of refractory neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in severely ill patients

Droxidopa or Atomoxetine for Refractory Hypotension in Critically Ill Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of droxidopa or atomoxetine on intravenous (IV) vasoactive agent discontinuation in cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hypotension refractory to midodrine.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary- and quaternary-care university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Included patients who received at least 4 consecutive doses of droxidopa or atomoxetine and remained on concurrent midodrine. Patients were excluded if they received study medication before admission, had clinical deterioration after study medication initiation requiring additional vasoactives/escalation of IV vasoactive dosage for at least 12 hours, had a diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome, were prisoners, or were pregnant.

INTERVENTIONS

Droxidopa, atomoxetine, or both.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was time to discontinuation of IV vasoactive agents after initiation of study medication, analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier estimate with the Wilcoxon method, censoring death within 24 hours of the last dose of study medication. No adjustment for repetitive analyses was made, as the analysis was hypothesis-generating. Of the 72 charts reviewed, 45 patients met inclusion criteria (18 atomoxetine, 17 droxidopa, and 10 both). There were no differences in median time to discontinuation of IV vasoactive agents (21.9 days v 8.0 days v 13.9 days, respectively; p = 0.259) or ICU or hospital length of stay between groups. A higher percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge received both study medications or droxidopa alone (90% v 76.5%) than atomoxetine alone (44.4%, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Droxidopa and atomoxetine are oral vasoactive agents with potential mechanisms to facilitate IV vasopressor weaning for patients in the ICU with hypotension refractory to midodrine, but further prospective research is needed.

Cardiac Amyloidosis

Amyloid deposits are defined by their tinctorial properties. Under the light microscope amyloid deposits are eosinophilic and amorphous when stained with hematoxylin and eosin. With Congo red staining the deposits are positive and under polarized light will exhibit green birefringence. Sixty years later electron microscopy demonstrated that all deposits were fibrillar. All amyloid deposits are protein derived. The clinical characteristics will be driven by the nature of the protein subunit. In cardiology, the 2 most common subunits accounting for well more than 90% of cardiac amyloidosis are either immunoglobulin light chain, amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, or transthyretin; transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis. Although 70% of patients with systemic amyloidosis have cardiac involvement the diagnosis is made by cardiologists only 20% of the time, suggesting significant gaps in knowledge in how to establish a workflow to arrive at a diagnosis in everyday practice.

Management of Orthostatic Hypotension in the Hospitalized Patient: A Narrative Review

Orthostatic hypotension is a frequent cause of falls and syncope, impairing quality of life. It is an independent risk factor of mortality and a common cause of hospitalizations, which exponentially increases in the geriatric population. We present a management plan based on a systematic literature review and understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and relevant clinical pharmacology. Initial treatment measures include removing offending medications and avoiding large meals. Clinical assessment of the patients' residual sympathetic tone can aid in the selection of initial therapy between norepinephrine "enhancers" or "replacers." Role of splanchnic venous pooling is overlooked, and applying abdominal binders to improve venous return may be effective. The treatment goal is not normalizing upright blood pressure but increasing it above the cerebral autoregulation threshold required to improve symptoms. Hypertension is the most common associated comorbidity, and confining patients to bed while using pressor agents only increases supine blood pressure, leading to worsening pressure diuresis and orthostatic hypotension. Avoiding bedrest deconditioning and using pressors as part of an orthostatic rehab program are crucial in reducing hospital stay.

Safety and efficacy of ampreloxetine in symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a phase 2 trial

PURPOSE

In neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, blood pressure falls when upright owing to impaired release of norepinephrine, leading to dizziness. Ampreloxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, increases circulating norepinephrine levels. This study explored the safety of ampreloxetine and its effect on blood pressure and symptoms in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

METHODS

A multicenter ascending-dose trial (range 1-20 mg, Part A) was followed by a 1 day, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (median dose 15 mg, Part B). Eligible patients then enrolled in a 20-week, open-label, steady-state extension phase (median dose 10 mg, Part C) followed by a 4-week withdrawal. Assessments included the Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Scale (item 1), supine/seated/standing blood pressure, and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (age 66 ± 8 years, 22 men) were enrolled. Part A: The proportion of participants with a positive response (i.e., increase from baseline in seated systolic blood pressure of ≥ 10 mmHg) was greater with the 5 and 10 mg ampreloxetine doses than with placebo or other active ampreloxetine doses. Part B: Seated blood pressure increased 15.7 mmHg 4 h after ampreloxetine and decreased 14.2 mmHg after placebo [least squares mean difference (95% CI) 29.9 mmHg (7.6-52.3); P = 0.0112]. Part C: Symptoms of dizziness/lightheadedness improved 3.1 ± 3.0 points from baseline and standing systolic blood pressure increased 11 ± 12 mmHg. After 4 weeks of withdrawal, symptoms returned to pretreatment levels. The effect of ampreloxetine on supine blood pressure was minimal throughout treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

Ampreloxetine was well tolerated and improved orthostatic symptoms and seated/standing blood pressure with little change in supine blood pressure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02705755 (first posted March 10, 2016).

Management of Hypertension and Blood Pressure Dysregulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease-a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review article was to summarize the cardiovascular and blood pressure profile regarding Parkinson disease patients and to provide an update on the recent advancements in the field of the diagnosis and management of blood pressure abnormalities in these patients. Our goal was to guide physicians to avoid pitfalls in current practice while treating patients with Parkinson disease and blood pressure abnormalities. For this purpose, we searched bibliographic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) for all publications published on blood pressure effects in Parkinson disease until May 2020. Furthermore, we highlight some thoughts and potential perspectives for the next possible steps in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Blood pressure dysregulation in patients with Parkinson's disease has several implications in clinical practice and presents an ongoing concern. Compared with chronic essential hypertension, the syndrome of combined neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension in Parkinson's disease has received little attention. If left untreated, hypertension may lead to cardiovascular disease whereas hypotension may lead to fall-related complications, with tremendous impact on the quality of life of affected individuals. The effect of blood Epressure control and the risk of death from cardiovascular disease in Parkinson disease are largely unexplored. Blood pressure abnormalities in Parkinson disease present bidirectional relationship and the rationale for treating and controlling hypertension in persons with Parkinson disease and concurrent neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and/or supine hypertension is compelling. Further research is warranted in order to clarify the mechanisms, clinical implications, and potential reversibility of compromised cardiovascular function, in persons with Parkinson disease.

Management of Orthostatic Hypotension, Postprandial Hypotension, and Supine Hypertension

This review provides recommendations for the treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH), postprandial hypotension, and supine hypertension. It focuses on novel treatment strategies and new insights into the mechanism underlying these conditions. Our goal is to provide practical advice for clinicians on how to screen, diagnose, and treat these conditions with nonpharmacological and pharmacological approaches. For each disorder, we offered a stepwise recommendation on how to apply these new concepts to successfully ameliorate the symptoms associated with OH to prevent syncope and falls. The management of OH in patients who also have supine hypertension requires special considerations and pharmacotherapy. It is noteworthy that there are few therapeutic options for OH and only two Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for the treatment of OH and nOH based on randomized clinical trials. We will use these studies to develop evidence-based guidelines for OH. The research is limited for postprandial hypotension and supine hypertension, and therefore the recommendations will be based on small studies, clinical expertise, and, above all, an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Pharmacologic treatment of orthostatic hypotension

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a disabling disorder caused by impairment of the normal autonomic compensatory mechanisms that maintain upright blood pressure. Nonpharmacologic treatment is always the first step in the management of this condition, but a considerable number of patients will require pharmacologic therapies. Denervation hypersensitivity and impairment of baroreflex buffering makes these patients sensitive to small doses of pressor agents. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology can help in selecting between treatment options. In general, patients with low "sympathetic reserve", i.e., those with peripheral noradrenergic degeneration (pure autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease) and low plasma norepinephrine, tend to respond better to "norepinephrine replacers" (midodrine and droxidopa). On the other hand, patients with relatively preserved "sympathetic reserve", i.e., those with impaired central autonomic pathways but spared peripheral noradrenergic fibers (multiple system atrophy) and normal or slightly reduced plasma norepinephrine, tend to respond better to "norepinephrine enhancers" (pyridostigmine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine). There is, however, a spectrum of responses within these extremes, and treatment should be individualized. Other nonspecific treatments include fludrocortisone and octreotide. The presence of associated clinical conditions, such as supine hypertension, heart failure, postprandial hypotension, PD, MSA, and diabetes need to be considered in the pharmacologic management of these patients.

Droxidopa as an effective treatment for refractory neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and reflex bradycardia in amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Droxidopa is an oral treatment for the stepwise treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension from autonomic dysfunction. It has been shown to be useful predominantly with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension secondary to Parkinson's disease, but only a few cases have documented its usefulness in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension due to amyloidosis, which is often severe and refractory. In addition, only one source in the literature reports the concomitant use of midodrine and droxidopa for such patients. Finally, we argue that droxidopa seems to have a protective effect against episodes of reflex bradycardia, which is not previously reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old white man was admitted for 1 year of worsening syncopal episodes, diarrhea, failure to thrive, heart failure, and neuropathy. Medical emergencies were called five times on the overhead hospital intercom over a 4-day period in the beginning of his admission due to severe hypotension and bradycardia. He was eventually diagnosed as having amyloid light-chain amyloidosis and myeloma. After starting droxidopa, both his systolic blood pressure and reflex bradycardia improved, and no more medical emergency events were called during the remaining 30 days of admission. He felt much better subjectively and was able to sit upright and engage in physical therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that droxidopa is effective when used with midodrine to treat refractory neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with amyloidosis. There are very few cases reporting the use of droxidopa in amyloidosis, with only one study that uses droxidopa and midodrine concomitantly. In addition, our patient's reflex bradycardia improved drastically after starting droxidopa, which we believe is mediated by increased systemic norepinephrine. There were no side effects to droxidopa, and the benefits lasted well beyond the reported duration of 1-2 weeks that was noted to be a limitation in some studies.

Real-world droxidopa or midodrine treatment persistence in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic hypotension

BACKGROUND

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is a subtype of orthostatic hypotension (OH) observed in the presence of neuropathy and is associated with increased risk of falling, impaired function, and poor quality of life. Droxidopa and midodrine are approved in the United States to treat symptomatic nOH and OH in adults, respectively. In this study, we compared the treatment persistence of droxidopa and midodrine.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients prescribed either droxidopa or midodrine was conducted using the Symphony Health Solutions database (Symphony Health Solutions, Phoenix, AZ, USA). Inclusion criteria were (1) a pharmacy insurance claim in at least 16 consecutive quarters from mid-2014 to 2018 and (2) an active prescription for droxidopa or midodrine of ≥30 days' duration during that period. Treatment persistence was defined as the time to the first break in drug coverage of ≥45 days and was capped at 365 days.

RESULTS

Data from 2305 patients who received droxidopa and 117,243 patients who received midodrine were included in this analysis. Median (95% CI) treatment persistence was significantly longer in the droxidopa cohort versus the midodrine cohort (303 [274-325] vs 172 [169-176] days; P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, patients using droxidopa monotherapy (i.e., without any concomitant midodrine and/or fludrocortisone use) were 16% more likely to be persistent at any time point than patients using midodrine (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world data analysis, patients using droxidopa without concomitant medications for OH were more likely to remain on treatment than patients on midodrine.

Orthostatic hypotension in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management

Purpose

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension is a prominent and disabling manifestation of autonomic dysfunction in patients with hereditary transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis affecting an estimated 40–60% of patients, and reducing their quality of life. We reviewed the epidemiology and pathophysiology of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with hereditary TTR amyloidosis, summarize non-pharmacologic and pharmacological treatment strategies and discuss the impact of novel disease-modifying treatments such as transthyretin stabilizers (diflunisal, tafamidis) and RNA interference agents (patisiran, inotersen).

Methods

Literature review.

Results

Orthostatic hypotension in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis can be a consequence of heart failure due to amyloid cardiomyopathy or volume depletion due to diarrhea or drug effects. When none of these circumstances are apparent, orthostatic hypotension is usually neurogenic, i.e., caused by impaired norepinephrine release from sympathetic postganglionic neurons, because of neuronal amyloid fibril deposition.

Conclusions

When recognized, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension can be treated. Discontinuation of potentially aggravating medications, patient education and non-pharmacologic approaches should be applied first. Droxidopa (Northera^®), a synthetic norepinephrine precursor, has shown efficacy in controlled trials of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with hereditary TTR amyloidosis and is now approved in the US and Asia. Although they may be useful to ameliorate autonomic dysfunction in hereditary TTR amyloidosis, the impact of disease-modifying treatments on neurogenic orthostatic hypotension is still uninvestigated.