Research Review: Siblings matter. A multi-level meta-analysis on the association between cannabis use among adolescent siblings

An examination of cannabis use motives among couples with intimate partner violence and alcohol use disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cannabis use is highly prevalent among individuals with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) and among people who drink alcohol. Motives for cannabis use are important correlates of consumption and problem severity. However, no research has examined cannabis use motives among couples with IPV. The goals of the study were to examine (1) the associations between a person and their partner's cannabis use motives; and (2) examine the extent to which each partners' cannabis use motives are related to their own and their partner's cannabis consumption.

METHODS

Participants were 100 couples (n = 92 different-sex couples, n = 8 same-sex couples) who reported physical IPV in their current relationship.

RESULTS

Certain cannabis motives (coping and conformity) and behaviors (cannabis use frequency, quantity and drug-related problems) were positively associated between intimate partners. One's own higher coping motives were associated with greater frequency of cannabis consumption; higher conformity motives were associated with less quantity of consumption; higher social motives were associated with greater quantity of cannabis consumption; and one's partner's social motives were associated with less quantity of cannabis consumption. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that couples report similar motives for cannabis use, and that one's own and their partner's motives may differentially influence frequency and quantity of use.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides novel information on congruency between cannabis use motives and behaviors between intimate partners, as well as how both an individual and their partner's motives for use can influence an individual's cannabis use behaviors.

Editorial: Salutogenic mental health science-A phoenix rising from the pathogenic ashes of psychiatry?

As highlighted by several of the papers featured in this current issue of the Journal, psychiatric research and practice is dominated by a pathogenic focus on understanding the origins of mental ill-health and developing interventions to prevent or treat psychopathology. The World Health Organization has called for a paradigm shift to move away from the almost exclusive focus on the absence of illness towards the promotion of mental, physical and social well-being among those with or at risk of psychiatric disorders. Adoption of a salutogenic approach, which focuses on factors and interventions that promote positive health and improve quality of life, has been heralded as the transformation psychiatry requires to achieve this ambitious aim. Looking forward, salutogenic mental health science should harness the power of longitudinal data and analytical techniques, centre lived experience expertise, and take heed of the cautionary tales of its pathogenic predecessor.