Conceptualizing and measuring potentially inappropriate drug therapy

Validation of the BOOST Risk Stratification Tool as a Predictor of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission in Elderly Patients

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification tools can identify patients at risk for 30-day readmission, but available tools lack predictive strength. One of these tools is the Better Outcomes by Optimizing Safe Transitions (BOOST) 8 P's tool.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to validate the 8 P's tool as well as measure the predictive strength of variables within this tool.

METHODS

This was a quantitative study that included 1 year of hospitalized elderly patients (n = 6849). Odds ratios were used to determine the strength of the association between variables individually with readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictive strength of the BOOST risk stratification tool.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated that 5 of the 8 variables in the BOOST risk stratification tool showed significant association with 30-day readmission including the variables of health literacy (P = .030), depression (P = .003), problem medications (P = .001), physical limitations (P ≤ .001), and prior hospitalization (P ≤ .001). Combining variables using multivariable logistic regression, the BOOST 8 P's tool had limited predictive capability with a C-statistic of 0.631.

CONCLUSION

This study was the first attempt to validate the BOOST 8 P's tool and to utilize nursing documentation within an electronic medical record to capture social determinants of health.

Are Clinical Outcomes Associated With Medication Regimen Complexity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Current evidence of the influence of the medication regimen complexity (MRC) on the patients’ clinical outcomes are not conclusive. Objective: To systematically and analytically assess the association between MRC measured by the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) and clinical outcomes. Methods: A search was carried out in the databases Cochrane Library, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Open Thesis, and Web of Science to identify studies evaluating the association between MRC and clinical outcomes that were published from January 1, 2004, to April 2, 2018. The search terms included outcome assessment, drug therapy, and medication regimen complexity index and their synonyms in different combinations for case-control and cohort studies that used the MRCI to measure MRC and related the MRCI with clinical outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and mean differences (WMDs) were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Results: A total of 12 studies met the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis showed that MRC is associated with the following clinical outcomes: hospitalization (HR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.27; I2 = 0%) in cohort studies, hospital readmissions (WMD = 7.72; 95% CI = 1.19 to 14.25; I2 = 84%) in case-control studies, and medication nonadherence (adjusted OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.07; I2 = 0%) in cohort studies. Conclusion and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis gathered relevant scientific evidence and quantified the combined estimates to show the association of MRC with clinical outcomes: hospitalization, hospital readmission, and medication adherence.

Patients' clinical information requirements to apply the STOPP/START criteria

Background The STOPP/START criteria are an explicit tool to detect potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Patient clinical information may not be available in all settings. Objective To identify patient clinical information needed to apply the STOPP/START criteria. Setting: Four nursing homes in Portugal. Methods First, a theoretical analysis was performed to identify the patient information required to apply the STOPP/START criteria (v2), according to the following categories: patients' current medication, medication history (previous medication and duration), medical records (current and past medical conditions), and laboratory test results. A verification of the information requirements was conducted through a cross-sectional study on a nursing home population with patients over 65 years old. Patients' medical records were appraised to extract only demographic data and current medication profiles. Main outcome measure Information requirements of STOPP/START. Results For only 29 of the 81 STOPP criteria and 1 of the 34 START criteria, a judgement could be made with only the information in the patient's medication profile. 52 STOPP and 33 START criteria require additional information, (i.e. duration of therapy, previous medication, current and past medical conditions, and laboratory data). The 208 evaluated persons (87 years; 68.75% female) used 1770 medications, with 989 (55.9%) potentially involved in 1629 STOPP criteria. Sufficient information to judge STOPP criteria was available for only 529 (32.5%) potential STOPP criteria situations, with a positive identification of a STOPP PIM in 397 instances (75.0%). Conclusions Although STOPP/START criteria can be considered a high-level tool to identify PIMs, their use may be compromised in scenarios where access to patients' clinical information is limited.

How to Prevent or Reduce Prescribing Errors: An Evidence Brief for Policy

- Preventing prescribing errors is critical to improving patient safety.- We developed an evidence brief for policy to identify effective interventions to avoid or reduce prescribing errors.- Four options were raised: promoting educational actions on prudent prescribing directed to prescribers; incorporating computerized alert systems into clinical practice; implementing the use of tools for guiding medication prescribing; and, encouraging patient care by a multidisciplinary team, with the participation of a pharmacist.- These options can be incorporated into health systems either alone or together, and for that, it is necessary that the context be considered.- Aiming to inform decision makers, we included considerations on the implementation of these options regarding upper-middle income countries, like the Brazilian, and we also present considerations regarding equity.

Consequences of ignoring patient diagnoses when using the 2015 Updated Beers Criteria

BACKGROUND

Beers Criteria are one of the best known explicit criteria to identify inappropriate medication in elderly that can be used in medication review. The access to patients' medical records may be different among healthcare professionals and settings and, subsequently, the identification of patients' diagnoses may be compromised.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the consequences of ignoring patient diagnoses when applying 2015 Beers Criteria to identify potentially inappropriate medication (PIM).

SETTING

Three nursing homes in Central Portugal.

METHOD

Medical records of nursing home residents over 65 years old were appraised to identify medication profile and medical conditions. 2015 Beers Criteria were used with and without considering patients' diagnoses. To compare the number of PIM and PIM-qualifying criteria complied in these two judgements, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Number of PIMs and number of PIM-qualifying criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients with a mean age of 86.7 years (SD = 7.8) with a majority of female (70.3%) were studied. When assessing the patients with full access to the diagnoses, median number of PIMs was 4 (IQR 0-10) and number of PIM-qualifying criteria was 5 (IQR 0-15). When evaluating only patient current medication, median number of PIMs was 4 (IQR 0-10) and PIM-qualifying criteria was 4 (IQR 0-12). Statistical difference was found in the number of PIM-qualifying criteria identified (p < 0.001), but not in the number of PIMs per patient (p = 0.090). In 171 patients (92.4%) PIMs identified were identical when using or ignoring their medical diagnoses. However, in 80 patients (43.2%) the PIM-qualifying criteria complied were different with and without access to patient diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Although restricted access to patients' diagnoses may limit the judgement of Beers PIM-qualifying criteria, this limitation had no effect on the number of PIM identified.

Interventions to reduce the prescription of inappropriate medicines in older patients

OBJECTIVE:

Identify and critically evaluate systematic reviews addressing the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the number of prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medication to older patients.

METHODS:

This is an overview of systematic reviews. The studies were searched and selected from Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science databases, combining the terms aged, prescriptions, inappropriate prescribing and potentially inappropriate medication list with their entry terms and other related descriptors, published by June 2017. This study included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that addressed the effectiveness of any intervention or combined interventions to reduce the number of prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications to older patients, without restriction in terms of design, language or date of publication of primary studies. AMSTAR – A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews – was used to evaluate the methodological quality of selected systematic reviews. Study selection and the methodological quality evaluation were performed by two independent evaluators, who resolved any divergence by consensus. The main findings were grouped into thematic categories, defined after a content analysis and discussed qualitatively as narrative synthesis.

RESULTS:

This study analyzed 24 systematic reviews. In terms of study design and methodological quality evaluation, most were systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials and studies of moderate quality, respectively. The interventions were analyzed in five thematic categories: medication review services, pharmaceutical interventions, computerized systems, educational interventions, and others. The interventions analyzed showed good results and most of them helped reduce the number of prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medication to older patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

The systematic reviews included in this overview showed potential benefits of different interventions. However, it was not possible to determine the most effective intervention. Combined interventions are likely to provide better results than isolated interventions.

Explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics in older patients: a compilation derived from a systematic review

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) of antibiotics (antibiotic-PIPs) are generally detected by applying implicit definitions based on expert opinion. Explicit definitions are less frequently used, even though this approach would enable the automated detection of antibiotic-PIPs in electronic health records. Here, explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs used in studies of older adults were systematically reviewed. The MEDLINE^®, Scopus^® and Web of Science^TM core collection databases were searched with a combination of three terms and their synonyms: 'potentially inappropriate prescription' AND 'antibiotic treatment' AND 'older patients'. Following standardised selection of publications, explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs were extracted and were classified into infectious diseases domains and subdomains. A total of 600 search queries identified 4270 records, 93 of which were selected for review. A total of 160 mentions of antibiotic-PIPs were found, corresponding to 62 distinct definitions in 19 infectious diseases domains. Nearly one-half of the definitions were related to upper respiratory tract infections (n = 11 definitions; 17.7%), lower respiratory tract infections (n = 8; 12.9%) and drug-drug interactions (n = 11; 17.7%). Almost 75% of definitions (n = 46) were mentioned in a single study only. Only three definitions concerned critically important antibiotics such as third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. This systematic review identified 62 explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs. Most of the definitions were not found in more than one study and they varied in the degree of precision. We advocate the implementation of an expert consensus on explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs that correspond to today's challenges in public health.

Evaluation of pharmacotherapy complexity in residents of long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is a reality in long-term care facilities. However, number of medications used by the patient should not be the only predictor of a complex pharmacotherapy. Although the level of complexity of pharmacotherapy is considered an important factor that may lead to side effects, there are few studies in this field. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complexity of pharmacotherapy in residents of three long-term care facilities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the complexity of pharmacotherapy using the protocols laid out in the Medication Regimen Complexity Index instrument in three long-term care facilities in northeastern Brazil. As a secondary result, potential drug interactions, potentially inappropriate medications, medication duplication, and polypharmacy were evaluated. After the assessment, the association among these variables and the Medication Regimen Complexity Index was performed.

RESULTS

In this study, there was a higher prevalence of women (64.4%) with a high mean age among the study population of 81.8 (±9.7) years. The complexity of pharmacotherapy obtained a mean of 15.1 points (±9.8), with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 59. The highest levels of complexity were associated with dose frequency, with a mean of 5.5 (±3.6), followed by additional instructions of use averaging 4.9 (±3.7) and by the dosage forms averaging 4.6 (±3.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study evaluated some factors that complicate the pharmacotherapy of geriatric patients. Although polypharmacy was implicated as a factor directly related to complexity, other indicators such as drug interactions, potentially inappropriate medications, and therapeutic duplication can also make the use of pharmacotherapy in such patients more difficult.

Potentially inappropriate psychotropic prescription at discharge is associated with lower functioning in the elderly psychiatric inpatients. A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The objectives are to determine the rate of potentially inappropriate psychotropic (PIP) prescription at discharge in the elderly psychiatric inpatients and to determine whether PIP is associated with lowered functioning outcomes.

METHODS

Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment data for all inpatients aged ≥ 65 years consecutively hospitalized during 1 year in 13 psychiatry departments was analyzed. PIP+/PIP- groups were defined according to the French-updated Beers criteria. Daily functioning was evaluated by the daily living (ADL) scale. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios for the association between PIP administration at discharge and respectively functioning and potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Data was obtained for 327 patients. Overall, 124 (37.9 %) patients were males, and the mean age was 73.9 years (SD = 5.6); 163 (49.8 %) patients were diagnosed with affective disorders and 89 (27.2 %) with schizophrenia/schizotypal/delusional disorders. Overall, 249 (76.1 %) had one or more PIP medications, mainly anxiolytics (69.9 %) and hypnotics (17.2 %). In a multivariate analysis, PIP prescription at discharge has been associated with patient lowered personal care functioning, independently of age, gender, and psychiatric or somatic diagnoses (OR = 0.88 (0.79-0.97, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In the current increasingly fragmented health care systems, special attention must be given to PIP prescription in older population suffering from psychiatric disorders. Using the Beers criteria, the present study demonstrates the high prevalence of PIP prescription, which concerns a large panel of drugs but mostly anxiolytics and hypnotics independently of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses and sociodemographic characteristics. Our study has demonstrated for the first time an association between PIP prescription and lowered patient functioning. Further longitudinal studies should confirm a potential causal relation.

Association between drug-specific indicators of prescribing quality and quality of drug treatment: a validation study

Purpose

To evaluate the concurrent validity of three European sets of drug‐specific indicators of prescribing quality

Methods

In 200 hip fracture patients (≥65 years), consecutively recruited to a randomized controlled study in Sahlgrenska University Hospital in 2009, quality of drug treatment at study entry was assessed according to a gold standard as well as to three drug‐specific indicator sets (Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, French consensus panel list, and German PRISCUS list). As gold standard, two specialist physicians independently assessed and then agreed on the quality for each patient, after initial screening with STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment).

Results

According to the Swedish, French, and German indicator sets, 82 (41%), 54 (27%), and 43 (22%) patients had potentially inappropriate drug treatment. A total of 141 (71%) patients had suboptimal drug treatment according to the gold standard. The sensitivity for the indicator sets was 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.43; 0.59), 0.33 (0.26; 0.41), and 0.29 (0.22; 0.37), respectively. The specificity was 0.83 (0.72; 0.91), 0.88 (0.77; 0.94), and 0.97 (0.88; 0.99). Suboptimal drug treatment was 2.0 (0.8; 5.3), 1.9 (0.7; 5.1), and 6.1 (1.3; 28.6) times as common in patients with potentially inappropriate drug treatment according to the indicator sets, after adjustments for age, sex, cognition, residence, multi‐dose drug dispensing, and number of drugs.

Conclusions

In this setting, the indicator sets had high specificity and low sensitivity. This needs to be considered upon use and interpretation. Copyright © 2015 The Authors Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Evaluation of the heterogeneity of studies estimating the association between risk factors and the use of potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the elderly: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of studies estimating the association between risk factors (age, gender, and polypharmacy) and the use of potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the elderly (PIDT).

METHODOLOGY

This study is a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases were reviewed. The following data were extracted from the included studies: country, type of study, characteristics of the sample, practice scenarios, instruments to evaluate potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the older adults, and patient-related variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles (17 cross-sectional and 12 cohort) were included. The majority of the studies were conducted in Europe. Regarding the study durations, 3 to 18 months was necessary to perform the research. As for the sample characteristics, all the studies analyzed involved the older adults and included anywhere from 96 patients to 33,830,599 outpatient consultations. Of the variables analyzed, only polypharmacy presented a positive association with the use of PIDT. All meta-analysis studies showed high heterogeneity, indicating the lack of a methodological standardization of the studies included, among other factors.