Metabolic and sympathovagal effects of bolus insulin glulisine versus basal insulin glargine therapy in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study

Study Protocol for the Pleiotropic Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor on Organ-Specific Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Insulin Sensitivity in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia are associated with exaggerated systemic sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lower insulin levels, whereas sulfonylureas increase insulin levels. We will test whether these two classes of antidiabetic agents have different effects on SNA.

METHODS

The present study is an ongoing, 24-week, one-center (only Kanazawa University Hospital), open-label, randomized, parallel trial (jRCTs 041200035). Participants with type 2 diabetes with multiple atherosclerosis risk factors are randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to receive 2.5 mg luseogliflozin or 0.5 mg glimepiride once daily. The sample size was calculated to be 14 in each group, with a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. The design required 40 evaluable study participants. Our primary endpoint will be the change in muscle SNA (MSNA). The secondary endpoints included organ-specific insulin sensitivity measured by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp study using an artificial pancreas combined with a stable isotope-labeled glucose infusion, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and organ-specific (cardiac, renal, and hepatic) 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) innervation imaging.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

Study recruitment started in April 2020 and will end in June 2024, with 40 participants randomized into the two groups. The treatment follow-up of the participants is currently ongoing and is due to finish by March 2025.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol has been approved by the Certified Review Board, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan, in accordance with the guidelines stipulated in the Declaration of Helsinki (CRB4180005, 2019-001). This trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs 041200035.

Timing Is Important-Management of Metabolic Syndrome According to the Circadian Rhythm

Physiological processes occur in accordance with a rhythm regulated by the endogenous biological clock. This clock is programmed at the molecular level and synchronized with the daily light-dark cycle, as well as activities such as feeding, exercise, and social interactions. It consists of the core clock genes, Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Protein Kaput (CLOCK) and Brain and Muscle Arnt-Like protein 1 (BMAL1), and their products, the period (PER) and cryptochrome (CRY) proteins, as well as an interlocked feedback loop which includes reverse-strand avian erythroblastic leukemia (ERBA) oncogene receptors (REV-ERBs) and retinoic acid-related orphan receptors (RORs). These genes are involved in the regulation of metabolic pathways and hormone release. Therefore, circadian rhythm disruption leads to development of metabolic syndrome (MetS). MetS refers to a cluster of risk factors (RFs), which are not only associated with the development of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), but also with increased all-cause mortality. In this review, we consider the importance of the circadian rhythm in the regulation of metabolic processes, the significance of circadian misalignment in the pathogenesis of MetS, and the management of MetS in relation to the cellular molecular clock.

Insulin-GLP-1 receptor agonist relay and GLP-1 receptor agonist first regimens in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label trial study

Aims/Introduction

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RA) might be less effective in patients with severe hyperglycemia, because hyperglycemia downregulated the GLP‐1 receptor in an animal study. To examine this hypothesis clinically, we compared the glucose‐lowering effects of GLP‐1 receptor agonist liraglutide with and without prior glycemic control.

Materials and Methods

In an open‐label, parallel trial, participants with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes were recruited and randomized to receive once‐daily insulin therapy, degludec (Insulin–GLP‐1 RA relay group, mean 16.8 ± 11.4 IU/day), for 12 weeks and then liraglutide for 12 weeks or subcutaneous injections of GLP‐1 RA, liraglutide (GLP‐1 RA first group, 0.9 mg), for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end‐points consisted of changes in the levels of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Results

The median fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c before the study were 210.0 mg/dL and 9.8%, respectively. The levels of fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c significantly decreased in the Insulin–GLP‐1 RA relay group (P < 0.001) and GLP‐1 RA first group (P < 0.001) by week 24, although no intergroup differences were observed. The reduction of HbA1c in the Insulin–GLP‐1 RA relay group tended to be larger than that in the GLP‐1 RA first group in the lowest CPR (C‐peptide immunoreactivity) quartile (P = 0.072). The adverse events consisted of gastrointestinal problems, followed by hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

The GLP‐1 receptor agonist is overall effective without prior glycemic control with insulin in participants with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. However, in participants with insulinopenic type 2 diabetes, prior glycemic control with insulin might overcome glucose toxicity‐induced GLP‐1 resistance.