Toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by vemurafenib after nivolumab failure

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis-like eruptions in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by targeting immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4, but concerns about severe immune-related adverse events persist. The scarcity of literature on dermatologic implications, especially severe reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), highlights the urgent need for investigation.

OBJECTIVE

Our systematic review aims to address the gap in relevant literature by extensively examining the epidemiologic risk factors and management of SJS/TEN-like illnesses in ICI-treated patients to provide insights for risk assessment and clinical care.

METHODS

We identified 158 case reports that detailed the incidence of SJS/TEN in patients being treated with ICIs, examining demographic patterns, type of malignancy, clinical characteristics, and treatments linked to onset. We assessed mortality rates, risk elements, and the effectiveness of interventions to help guide clinical care.

RESULTS

Analysis of 158 case reports revealed that SJS/TEN in ICI users is typically seen on average at the age of 63 and is more common in males. PD1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are often associated with various mucocutaneous patterns and significant risks with ICI use, especially TEN, which is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates.

LIMITATIONS

Our study notes limitations due to the inclusion of case reports or case series, such as potential publication and reporting biases, leading to skewed findings. Additionally, because of the heterogeneous reporting standards, the retrospective nature limits phenotypic precision, control for confounding variables, and data completeness.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, clinical features, management strategies, and outcomes of ICI-induced SJS/TEN, underscoring the importance of vigilant monitoring and personalized risk assessment in oncology practice. Continued research efforts are essential to optimize patient outcomes and enhance the safety profile of ICIs in cancer therapy.

[Drug-related exanthema under immunotherapy and targeted oncological therapy]

BACKGROUND

Oncological therapies can cause a variety of mucocutaneous adverse events. Exanthematous adverse events can be challenging in the context of the urgent need for cancer treatment due to their spread, sometimes rapid progression, and mucous membrane or organ involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This article provides an overview of the most important exanthematic dermatoses as side effects of modern drug-based tumor therapies with diagnostic and therapeutic information for clinicians, taking into account the current literature and guidelines.

RESULTS

Exanthematous adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors, EGFR antagonists, kinase inhibitors, bispecific T‑cell engagers, and the CCR4 inhibitor mogamulizumab are reviewed in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutaneous side effects are common across all drug classes and cover a broad spectrum. While some adverse events are specific to one drug class, many exanthemas can occur with both oncological immunotherapies and various targeted therapies. A reliable diagnosis, dose adjustment or discontinuation of the offending agent in consultation with the treating oncologists and appropriate symptomatic therapy are important for correct management. In the case of severe, life-threatening drug reactions, however, permanent discontinuation of the drug is essential.

Emerging Insights into Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Tumor-Targeted Therapy

Objective

Anticancer drugs have revolutionized tumor therapy, with cutaneous toxicities such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) being common immune-related adverse events. The debate over the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in treating these conditions persists, while tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors show promise. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy involving the TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab for SJS/TEN induced by anticancer drugs.

Methods

A literature review of SJS/TEN cases induced by anticancer drugs from 1992 to 2023 was conducted, alongside an analysis of patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University during the same period. Clinical characteristics, skin healing time, mortality, and adverse events were evaluated in two treatment groups: SJS/TEN patients treated with targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies.

Results

Among the 27 patients studied (18 with SJS or SJS-TEN overlapping and 9 with TEN), combination therapy with adalimumab significantly reduced mucocutaneous reepithelization time and healing duration compared to corticosteroid monotherapy. Patients receiving adalimumab combined with corticosteroids had lower actual mortality rates than those on corticosteroid monotherapy. The combination therapy also showed a trend towards reducing standardized mortality rates based on the Score of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SCORTEN).

Conclusion

The findings suggest that adalimumab in combination with corticosteroids provides significant clinical benefits and is safer than corticosteroids alone for treating SJS/TEN induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies. This study contributes valuable insights into potential treatment strategies for severe cutaneous adverse reactions to anticancer drugs, highlighting the importance of exploring alternative therapies such as TNF-α inhibitors in managing these conditions effectively.

Evaluation of Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity to Antineoplastic Drugs-An Overview

Nowadays, clinical practice encounters the problem of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) induced by several drugs. Antineoplastic treatments are among the drugs which show an elevated proportion of DHT reactions, leading to the worsening of patients' quality of life. The range of symptoms in DHT reactions can vary from mild, such as self-limiting maculopapular eruptions, to severe, such as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The development of these reactions supposes a negative impact, not only by limiting patients' quality of life, but also leading to economic loss due to market withdrawal of the affected drugs and high hospitalization costs. However, despite this problem, there are no available standard in vitro or in vivo methods that allow for the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of drugs in the preclinical phase. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize the skin reactions caused by the different antineoplastic families, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo methods used to detect DTHs and that could be suitable to test antineoplastic hypersensitivity reactions.

Nivolumab Hypersensitivity Reactions a Myth or Reality in Solid Tumors-A Systematic Review of the Literature

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the most effective treatments nowadays. Nivolumab was the second ICI used for treating solid tumors with amazing results. Patients treated with Nivolumab may react differently to this treatment. Some people tolerate this treatment very well without experiencing any adverse reactions, whilst some may have mild symptoms and a part of them can present severe reactions. In our research, we sought to identify the answers to four questions: 1. what type of cancer has more severe hypersensitivity reactions to Nivolumab, 2. what is the time frame for developing these severe reactions to Nivolumab, 3. whether it is best to continue or stop the treatment after a severe hypersensitivity reaction to Nivolumab and 4. what severe hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent reported along Nivolumab treatment. This review also highlights another problem with regard to the usage of concomitant and prior medications or other methods of treatment (e.g., radiation therapy), which can also lead to severe reactions. Treatment with Nivolumab is very well tolerated, but patients should also be warned of the possibility of severe hypersensitivity reactions for which they should urgently see a doctor for a personalized evaluation. There are some options for individuals with severe hypersensitivity reactions, for eg. switching the medication or applying a desensitization protocol.

Current Pharmacogenetic Perspective on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Adverse drug reactions are a public health issue that draws widespread attention, especially for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) which have high mortality and lack of efficacious treatment. Though T-cell-mediated HLA-interacted immune response has been extensively studied, our understanding of the mechanism is far from satisfactory. This review summarizes infection (virus, bacterial, and mycoplasma infection), an environmental risk factor, as a trigger for SJS/TEN. The mutations or polymorphisms of drug metabolic enzymes, transporters, receptors, the immune system genes, and T-cell-mediated apoptosis signaling pathways that contribute to SJS/TEN are discussed and summarized. Epigenetics, metabolites, and mobilization of regulatory T cells and tolerogenic myeloid precursors are emerged directions to study SJS/TEN. Ex vivo lymphocyte transformation test has been exploited to aid in identifying the causative drugs. Critical questions on the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN underlying gene polymorphisms and T cell cytotoxicity remain: why some of the patients carrying the risky genes tolerate the drug and do not develop SJS/TEN? What makes the skin and mucous membrane so special to be targeted? Do they relate to skin/mucous expression of transporters? What is the common machinery underlying different HLA-B alleles associated with SJS/TEN and common metabolites?

Differential Changes in Inflammatory Mononuclear Phagocyte and T-Cell Profiles within Psoriatic Skin during Treatment with Guselkumab vs. Secukinumab

Cellular sources of IL-23 and IL-17A driving skin inflammation in psoriasis remain unclear. Using high-dimensional unsupervised flow cytometry analysis, mononuclear phagocytes and T cells were examined in the same lesions of patients before and during guselkumab (IL-23p19 blocker) or secukinumab (IL-17A blocker) treatment. Among CD11c⁺HLA-DR⁺ mononuclear phagocytes, CD64^brightCD163^-CD14^brightCD1c^-CD1a^‒ inflammatory monocyte‒like cells were the predominant IL-23-producing cells and, together with CD64^-CD163^-CD14^-IL-23p19^-TNF-α⁺ inflammatory dendritic cell‒like cells, were increased in lesional compared with those in nonlesional skin taken from the same patient. Within T cells, CD8⁺CD49a⁺ and/or CD103⁺ tissue-resident memory T cells, CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells, and CD4⁺CD49a^-CD103^- T cells were increased. Moreover, CD4⁺CD49a^-CD103^- T cells and the relatively rare CD8⁺ memory T cells equally contributed to IL-17A production. Both treatments decreased the frequencies of inflammatory monocyte‒like, inflammatory dendritic cell‒like, and CD4⁺CD49a^-CD103^- T cells. In contrast, guselkumab reduced memory T cells while maintaining regulatory T cells and vice versa for secukinumab. Neither drug modified the frequencies of IL-17A⁺IL^‒17F⁺/^- CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells. This study reveals the identity of the major IL-23⁺ mononuclear phagocyte and IL-17⁺ T-cell subsets in psoriatic skin lesions and paves the way for a better understanding of the mode of action of drugs targeting the IL-23/IL-17A pathway in psoriasis.

Potentially life‑threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Review)

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as a new frontier of cancer therapy. These agents include inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), BRAF, mitogen‑activated protein kinase kinase (also referred to as MEK), bcr‑abl, c‑KIT, platelet‑derived growth factor (PDGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Along with the evolving applications of TKIs, there has been an increased recognition of the breadth of potential cutaneous toxicities to these agents. In this review, we provide an overview of potentially life‑threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) that may occur during therapy with TKIs. These toxicities include Stevens‑Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP).

Anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy-associated bullous disorders: a systematic review of the literature

Bullous disorders are rare adverse events associated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD1) therapy. This paper presents two new cases of bullous disorders under anti-PD1 therapy and systematically reviewed the literature to foster a better understanding of the presentation and pathogenesis of bullous disorders under anti-PD1. A systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and LILACS databases. We identified 29 cases of bullous disorders under anti-PD1 therapy, including our two new cases. This includes 18 cases of bullous pemphigoid (BP), five cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)/Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) spectrum, one case of erythema multiforme (EM), four cases of bullous lichenoid reactions and one case of vesiculobullous eczema. In BP, blistering occurred by a median of 23 weeks after anti-PD1 therapy initiation and is often preceded by a prodrome, which lasts for a median of 9.5 weeks. Limbs and trunk were the most frequently involved body sites. Most cases (76%) achieved remission. In TEN/SJS/EM, blistering was usually preceded by a prodrome of interface dermatitis that lasted for a median of 1.5 weeks. Most cases (80%) died from either TEN/SJS or disease progression. Bullous disorders under anti-PD1 may be classified clinically as BP, SJS/TEN/EM, bullous lichenoid reactions and vesiculobullous eczema and histologically by intraepidermal splitting and subepidermal splitting. BP is usually preceded by a pruritic eruption and has a relatively good prognosis. SJS/TEN is usually preceded by a maculopapular eruption and has a very poor prognosis.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies

With the increasing use of targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies, there have been a substantial number of reports concerning life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Although the potential risks and characteristics for targeted anticancer agent- and immunotherapy-induced SCAR were not well understood, these serious adverse reactions usually result in morbidity and sequela. As a treatment guideline for this devastating condition is still unavailable, prompt withdrawal of causative drugs is believed to be a priority of patient management. In this review, we outline distinct types of SCARs caused by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies. Also, we discuss the clinical course, latency, concomitant medication, tolerability of rechallenge or alternatives, tumor response, and mortality associated with these devastating conditions. Imatinib, vemurafenib, and rituximab were the top three offending medications that most commonly caused SJS/TEN, while EGFR inhibitors were the group of drugs that most frequently induced SJS/TEN. For drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, imatinib was also the most common offending drug. Additionally, we delineated 10 SCAR cases related to innovative immunotherapies, including PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors. There was a wide range of latency periods: 5.5–91 days (median). Only eight of 16 reported patients with SCAR showed clinical responses. Targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies can lead to lethal SCAR (14 deceased patients were identified as suffering from SJS/TEN). The mortality rate of TEN was high: up to 52.4%. The information compiled herein will serve as a solid foundation to formulate ideas for early recognition of SCAR and to discontinue offending drugs for better management.