Updated evidence-based (S2e) European Dermatology Forum guideline on topical corticosteroids in pregnancy

English version of clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis 2024

This is the English version of the 2024 clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis (AD). AD is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. A crucial aspect of AD treatment is the prompt induction of remission via the suppression of existing skin inflammation and pruritus. To achieve this, topical anti-inflammatory drugs, such as topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, delgocitinib ointment, and difamilast ointment, have been used. However, the following treatments should be considered in addition to topical therapy for patients with refractory moderate-to-severe AD: oral cyclosporine, subcutaneous injections of biologics (dupilumab, nemolizumab, tralokinumab), oral Janus kinase inhibitors (baricitinib, upadacitinib, abrocitinib), and phototherapy. In these revised guidelines, descriptions of five new drugs, namely, difamilast, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib, have been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Risk and management of osteoporosis due to inhaled, epidural, intra-articular or topical glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used by several specialties for the treatment of a variety of diseases and conditions. The unfavorable effect of oral GCs on bone health is well-documented. The ensuing from their use glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the most common cause of medication-induced osteoporosis and fractures. It is uncertain, however, if, and in what extent, GCs administered by other routes affect the skeleton. In the present review, we quote current evidence on the effect of inhaled GCs, epidural and intra-articular steroid injections, and topical GCs on bone outcomes. Although evidence is limited and weak, it seems that a small proportion of the administered GCs may be absorbed, enter the systemic circulation, and adversely affect the skeleton. Potent GCs, higher doses, and longer treatment duration seem to infer the greater risk for bone loss and fractures. There are scarce data, and only for inhaled GCs, regarding the efficacy of antiosteoporotic medications in patients receiving GCs through routes other than oral. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between GC administration through these routes and bone outcomes and to help establishing guidelines for the optimal management of such patients.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an overview with focus on its prevention and management

The widespread use of glucocorticoids (GCs) contributes to the effective management of several diseases and conditions. However, it comes at a price in the case of the bones causing glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis and fractures. Several scientific societies have issued comprehensive guidelines on the optimal management of patients receiving GCs with the aim of providing answers to three fundamental questions, namely, whom to treat, when to treat, and how to treat. Both common ground and different approaches exist among them. General preventive measures should start along with GC initiation, and the duration of GC therapy should be limited to the minimal effective range. A pre-existing fracture, age, gender, menopausal status, dose, and duration of GC treatment are key factors in the decision to initiate antiosteoporotic medication. Oral bisphosphonates are typically regarded as the first-line treatment choice for GIOP partly due to their cost-effectiveness. Denosumab is another valid option, but an "exit strategy" should be considered before its initiation due to the risk of rebound-associated vertebral fractures upon its discontinuation. Since impaired bone formation represents the main mechanism by which GCs negatively affect skeletal health, osteoanabolic therapies appear to be pathophysiologically the more appropriate and appealing option, although cost considerations currently limit their use to selected severe cases. Regardless of the agent selected to mitigate the impact of GCs on the skeleton, what is most crucial is that the treating physician correctly stratifies the risk and intervenes at the right time.

Topical glucocorticoid application causing iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome followed by secondary adrenal insufficiency in infants: two case reports

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome induced by oral and parenteral glucocorticoid administration is a well-known complication. Immediate withdrawal from exogenous steroids can lead to life-threatening adrenal insufficiency. However, Cushing's syndrome caused by topical treatment with glucocorticoids, such as dexamethasone eye drops or dermal application, is rarely recognized. Young infants in particular are at high risk of suffering from iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome when treated with highly potent topical glucocorticoids.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 6-month-old Syrian boy with cushingoid face after dermal clobetasol cream treatment and a 2-year-old Iranian girl with severe growth retardation after application of dexamethasone eye drops. Both families have a migration background and language barriers. In both cases no endogenous cortisol secretion was initially detected in serum and in 24-hour collected urine. After dose reduction of glucocorticoids, severity of symptoms was reversible and serum cortisol was detectable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Young infants are at high risk of developing Cushing's syndrome from topically applied highly potent glucocorticoids. Precise recommendations of treatment dosage, duration, and frequency must be given to the parents, and if necessary, with the help of an interpreter. Monitoring of height and weight as well as regular pediatric follow-ups should be scheduled. Physicians should be aware of potential adrenal insufficiency following withdrawal from long-term topical glucocorticoid treatment, and hydrocortisone treatment should be considered.

English Version of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021

This is the English version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. In Japan, from the perspective of evidence-based medicine, the current strategies for the treatment of AD consist of three primary measures: (i) use of topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, and delgocitinib ointment as the main treatment of the inflammation; (ii) topical application of emollients to treat the cutaneous barrier dysfunction; and (iii) avoidance of apparent exacerbating factors, psychological counseling, and advice about daily life. In the present revised guidelines, descriptions of three new drugs, namely, dupilumab, delgocitinib, and baricitinib, have been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Management of allergic diseases in pregnancy

Allergic diseases like asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, hymenoptera allergy, or atopic dermatitis are highly prevalent in women of childbearing age and may affect up to 30% of this age group. This review focuses on the management of allergic diseases during pregnancy. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges of counseling women with allergic diseases in the reproductive age, including considerations relevant to the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To create the optimal milieu for the unborn child, a multitude of immunological changes occur during pregnancy which may favor type 2 responses and aggravate disease phenotypes. In co-occurrence with suboptimal preconception disease control, this elevated Th2 responses may aggravate allergic disease manifestations during pregnancy and pose a risk for mother and child. Due to limitations in conducting clinical trials in pregnant women, safety data on anti-allergic drugs during pregnancy are limited. The lack of information and concerns among pregnant patients demands counseling on the benefits of anti-allergic drugs and the potential and known risks. This includes information on the risk for mother and child of disease aggravation in the absence of treatment. By doing so, informed decisions and shared decision-making can take place.

Evaluation of Topical Corticosteroid Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Newborns Being Small for Gestational Age and Having Low Birth Weight

Importance

Topical corticosteroids are frequently used during pregnancy. Limited data have raised concerns about an increased risk of the newborn being small for gestational age (SGA) and having low birth weight, in particular with use of potent to very potent agents during pregnancy.

Objective

To evaluate whether topical corticosteroid use in pregnancy is associated with increased risks of SGA and low birth weight.

Design, Setting, and Participants

From a source cohort of 1.1 million pregnancies with individual-level informed data from various registries, this nationwide cohort study identified topical corticosteroid-exposed pregnancies in Denmark from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2016, for a total of 60 497, that were matched with 241 986 unexposed pregnancies on the basis of propensity scores, including a wide set of baseline characteristics. Data analysis was performed from September 8, 2020, to February 23, 2021.

Exposures

Filled prescriptions for topical corticosteroids during pregnancy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were SGA and low birth weight. Association between outcomes and exposure was assessed by relative risk ratios (RRs) and absolute risk differences (ARDs).

Results

Among the 60 497 matched pregnancies exposed to topical corticosteroids, 5678 (9.4%) of the delivered infants were born SGA compared with 22 634 infants (9.4%) among the matched unexposed pregnancies (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03 and ARD, 0.3; 95% CI, -2.3 to 2.9 per 1000 pregnancies). Low birth weight occurred in 2006 (3.3%) of the exposed pregnancies compared with 8675 (3.6%) of the unexposed pregnancies (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97 and ARD, -2.7; 95% CI, -4.3 to -1.1 per 1000 pregnancies). Exposure to potent to very potent topical corticosteroids at any amount was not associated with an increased risk of SGA (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.07) or low birth weight (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1.00). Post hoc analyses did not find a significant increased risk among those receiving large amounts of potent to very potent topical corticosteroids (ie, >200 g throughout pregnancy) compared with unexposed pregnancies (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.95-1.46 for SGA and RR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.81-1.60 for low birth weight).

Conclusions and Relevance

This large cohort study found no association between topical corticosteroid use in pregnancy and an increased risk of SGA or low birth weight. These results suggest that a moderate to large increase in the risk is unlikely, even when large amounts of potent to very potent topical corticosteroids are used in pregnancy.

Macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) gene polymorphisms are associated with disease susceptibility and with circulating MIF levels in active non-segmental vitiligo in patients from western Mexico

Background

The macrophage migration inhibiting factor (MIF) is a protein that promotes the activation of immune cells and the production of other proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IFN‐γ, which have proposed to play an essential role in the pathogenesis of vitiligo. The study aimed to assess the association between MIF polymorphisms (−794 CATT_5‐8 and −173 G>C), MIF in situ expression, and MIF serum concentrations with susceptibility and disease activity in patients with non‐segmental vitiligo (NSV) from western Mexico.

Methods

The study included 111 patients with NSV and 201 control subjects. Genotyping was performed by conventional PCR (−794 CATT_5‐8) and PCR‐RFLP (−173 G>C) methods. MIF mRNA expression was quantified by real‐time PCR and MIF serum concentrations were determined by ELISA kit. Histopathological samples were analyzed by automated immunohistochemistry.

Results

The MIF polymorphisms were associated with NSV susceptibility. Serum concentrations of MIF were higher in patients with active NSV and correlated negatively with the years of evolution. The depigmented skin from patients with active vitiligo showed a high expression of MIF.

Conclusion

MIF polymorphisms increase the risk of NSV in the western Mexican population. The serum concentrations of MIF and in situ expression are associated with active NSV.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis 2018

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. The current strategies to treat AD in Japan from the perspective of evidence-based medicine consist of three primary measures: (i) the use of topical corticosteroids and tacrolimus ointment as the main treatment for the inflammation; (ii) topical application of emollients to treat the cutaneous barrier dysfunction; and (iii) avoidance of apparent exacerbating factors, psychological counseling and advice about daily life. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Autoimmune bullous diseases during pregnancy: Solving common and uncommon issues

Autoimmune bullous diseases during pregnancy pose a therapeutic challenge for medical dermatologists. There are main concerns with regard to the regimen, dose, route of administration, and potential harm to the fetus. Many therapeutic options may be safe during pregnancy despite official classifications. Furthermore, there are always questions regarding management during the lactation period. Additionally, issues exist about male and female fertility and the time of discontinuation of certain medications before conception. In this article, we present an overview of the literature based on answers to these issues to solve common and uncommon management problems that arise about a spectrum of autoimmune bullous diseases before conception, as well as during pregnancy and the lactation period.

Treatment of Autoimmune Bullous Disorders in Pregnancy

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD), including pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and pemphigoid gestationis, pose significant therapeutic challenges, especially in pregnant and post-partum breastfeeding patients or those planning to conceive. Data on the safety and efficacy of therapeutic interventions during the perinatal period are lacking because randomized controlled trials are typically not performed in this setting. However, many of the treatments for AIBD are also used in other diseases, so data can be extrapolated from studies or case reports in these other patient populations. It appears that many of the treatments for AIBD can adversely affect the fetus or neonate, and alterations in immune status caused by pregnancy-associated hormonal changes can negatively impact disease control. This article summarizes and weighs the risks and benefits of the various agents used to treat AIBD during pregnancy. We also present the available information on lactation as well as effects on male fertility.