Biologic switching between interleukin 17A antagonists secukinumab and ixekizumab: a 12‐week, multicenter, retrospective study

Real-world evidence for ixekizumab in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: literature review 2016-2021

OBJECTIVES

To describe the results of a structured literature review of real-world outcomes with ixekizumab in patients with psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Literature databases, conference proceedings and additional sources were searched for relevant publications. Real-world studies of ≥25 ixekizumab-treated patients with PsO and/or PsA were included. Data on clinical effectiveness, treatment persistence/patterns, economic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were extracted.

RESULTS

Fifty-one publications were included. Most studies focused on patients with PsO, and the number of publications with a focus on PROs was low. Studies of treatment patterns found that in general, ixekizumab had similar or better persistence versus other biologics, and rates or risk of switching similar to or less than comparator drugs. Adherence to ixekizumab was high, and patients were less likely to discontinue ixekizumab than other biologics. Ixekizumab was effective in the real world, with a safety profile consistent with that reported in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world use of ixekizumab in PsO and PsA is effective and safe, with generally high treatment persistence and adherence. Further work is required to determine the impact of ixekizumab on PROs in PsO, and to gather more data on real-world use of ixekizumab in PsA.

Response to Interleukin-17A Inhibitors According to Prior Biologic Exposures: A Danish Nationwide Study

Whether response to an interleukin (IL-17) inhibitor is different in patients with previous exposure to an IL-17 inhibitor compared with patients with exposure to biologics with other cytokine targets remains to be elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to  assess whether previous exposure to an IL-17A inhibitor was associated with worse response than exposure to (an)other biologic(s). All patients in the DERMBIO register treated with an IL-17A inhibitor (secukinumab or ixekizumab) were included. With an absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 as response, the proportion of responders treated with IL-17A inhibitors was assessed in patients previously treated with another IL-17A inhibitor and compared with patients with previous exposure to (an)other biologic(s), using a χ2 test. In total, 100, 93 and 83 patients with  previous exposure to an IL-17A inhibitor and 414, 372 and 314 patients with previous exposure to (an) other biologic(s) were assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. No differences in the proportion of  patients achieving PASI ≤ 2 were observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (54% vs 57%, p = 0.59), 6months (70% vs 66%, p = 0.42) and 12 months (69% vs 60%, p = 0.14). In conclusion, when treating patients with IL-17A inhibitors the cytokine target of the previous biologic does not appear to affect the  response.

Practical update of the Recommendations Published by the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (GPS) on the Treatment of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy. Part 1. Concepts and General Management of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A new, updated AEDV Psoriasis Group consensus document on the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis was needed owing to the approval, in recent years, of a large number of new drugs and changes in the treatment paradigm.

METHODOLOGY

The consensus document was developed using the nominal group technique and a scoping review. First, a designated coordinator selected a group of Psoriasis Group members for the panel. The coordinator defined the objectives and key points for the document and, with the help of a documentalist, conducted a scoping review of articles in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2021. The review included systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical trials not included in those studies and high-quality real-world studies. National and international clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents on the management of moderate to severe psoriasis were also reviewed. Based on these reviews, the coordinator drew up a set of proposed recommendations, which were then discussed and modified in a nominal group meeting. After several review processes, including external review by other GPs members, the final document was drafted.

RESULTS

The present guidelines include general principles for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and also define treatment goals and criteria for the indication of biologic therapy and the selection of initial and subsequent therapies. Practical issues, such as treatment failure and maintenance of response, are also addressed.

Successful IL-17A inhibitor cycling in psoriatic arthritis patient: a case report and a literature review

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis with heterogeneous disease presentation. The most affected clinical domain of the disease determines the therapeutic approach. We report the case of a 34-year-old man with all six crucial domains of psoriatic arthritis (psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial skeletal manifestations, dactylitis, nail changes, and enthesitis) treated unsuccessfully with conventional synthetic DMARDs, NSAID's, and steroids as well as topical treatment and phototherapy. With golimumab as the first line of bDMARD partial remission was achieved. After 24 months the treatment was switched to secukinumab due to secondary inefficacy. The psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis relapsed after 21 months of treatment with secukinumab. The patient was cycled to ixekizumab with an excellent result. IL-17A inhibitor cycling may be a successful treatment option in some difficult to treat psoriatic arthritis patients.

Successful IL-17A inhibitor cycling in psoriatic arthritis patient: a case report and a literature review

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis with heterogeneous disease presentation. The most affected clinical domain of the disease determines the therapeutic approach. We report the case of a 34-year-old man with all six crucial domains of psoriatic arthritis (psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial skeletal manifestations, dactylitis, nail changes, and enthesitis) treated unsuccessfully with conventional synthetic DMARDs, NSAID's, and steroids as well as topical treatment and phototherapy. With golimumab as the first line of bDMARD partial remission was achieved. After 24 months the treatment was switched to secukinumab due to secondary inefficacy. The psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis relapsed after 21 months of treatment with secukinumab. The patient was cycled to ixekizumab with an excellent result. IL-17A inhibitor cycling may be a successful treatment option in some difficult to treat psoriatic arthritis patients.

Treatment with Ixekizumab Following Secukinumab Failure in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-Life Experience from a Resistant Population

Objective

To assess the clinical response to ixekizumab following secukinumab failure in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Methods

A retrospective multi-center observational study included psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with a history of treatment with secukinumab, further treated with ixekizumab. Primary endpoint was primary response to treatment (drug survival > 6 months); secondary endpoints were changes in disease activity indices from initiation of ixekizumab to 6 and 12 months later and overall drug survival.

Results

Of 23 PsA patients, 86% (n = 20) received more than two TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Median secukinumab treatment time was 15 months (IQR 10–21.5 months). Subsequently, 19 patients (83%) had a primary response to ixekizumab. Overall treatment duration during follow-up period for primary responders was 14 months (IQR 10–20.5). Reasons for ixekizumab cessation were worsening psoriasis (27%), peripheral arthritis (27%), both (47%), worsening of axial disease (13%), and adverse events (6%). Articular disease indices including Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), tender joints count (TJC) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) were significantly lower at 6 and 12 months (DAPSA 1.5–2 levels reduction; p = 0.018 and 1–1.5 levels reduction; p = 0.031, respectively; TJC −2.16 [−4.0, −0.3]; p = 0.025 and −1.69 [−3.09, −0.28]; p = 0.022, respectively; SDAI −10.13 [−16.4, −3.8], p = 0.003 and −12.2 [−17.1, −7.2], p = 0.0002, respectively). PASI75 at 6 and 12 months was achieved by 63% and 57%, respectively, and PASI100 at 6 and 12 months by 31% and 21%, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with resistant PsA, including inadequate response to secukinumab, demonstrated a good response to ixekizumab, albeit limited on time. Within class switch from secukinumab to ixekizumab may be a plausible therapeutic option in PsA patients following secukinumab failure.

Gastroenterological safety of IL-17 inhibitors: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Interleukin 17 is a proinflammatory cytokine considered to play a significant role in the immunopathogenesis of many chronic immune-mediated disorders. Interleukin 17 inhibitors provide an excellent treatment option for patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. However, Interleukin 17 inhibitors have been suspected of worsening or triggering new-onset inflammatory bowel disease.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted until March 2021 to investigate reporting prevalence, and characteristics of all gastroenterological adverse events in patients treated with Interleukin 17 inhibitors. One hundred and six clinical randomized trials were included, involving 40,053 patients. Inflammatory bowel disease cases were reported in 0.4% of patients exposed to Interleukin 17 inhibitors. The most frequent other gastrointestinal adverse events were diarrhea (2.5%), nausea or vomiting (0.7%), and gastroenteritis (0.2%). Sixty-one uncontrolled or retrospective studies were included, involving 16,791 patients. Sixty (0.36%) inflammatory bowel disease cases were reported, 0.6% of patients reported other gastrointestinal adverse events.

EXPERT OPINION

Interleukin 17 inhibitors are safe and effective in the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Low incidence rate of developing new-onset inflammatory bowel disease or exacerbating preexisting inflammatory bowel disease with anti-IL-17 agents has been reported. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of these concerns when considering this therapy.

Etablierung des Schwerpunktes Psoriasis an der Universitätshautklinik Rostock und eine praxisbezogene Übersicht über die Biologikatherapie der Psoriasis

Die Diagnostik und Behandlung der Psoriasis stellt einen Schwerpunkt an der Universitätshautklinik Rostock dar. Aufgrund des breiten Spektrums verfügbarer Biologikatherapien für die Behandlung der Psoriasis werden in diesem Artikel praxisbezogene Ratschläge für diese Therapieform gegeben. Dabei wird aufgezeigt, wie das optimale Biologikum für einen individuellen Patienten unter Berücksichtigung möglicher Kontraindikationen, krankheitsspezifischer Aspekte und unerwünschter Wirkungen ausgewählt werden kann. Außerdem wird ein mögliches Vorgehen bei Unterbrechung, Wiederaufnahme oder Umstellung von Biologika erwähnt.

Efficacy of a second interleukin 17 inhibitor in patients with psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple biologics for psoriasis exist, and interleukin (IL) 17 inhibitors are among those with the best efficacy. However, switching treatment is often required at some point, and intraclass switch of IL-17 inhibitors is not well investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of a second IL-17 inhibitor in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the databases PubMed and EMBASE for studies reporting on efficacy of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with psoriasis previously exposed to another IL-17 inhibitor. The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 14 publications comprising 655 patients were included. The proportion of patients achieving a reduction of 75%, 90%, and 100% in Psoriasis Area Severity Index were, respectively, 74.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.9-84.0), 69.4% (95% CI, 53.2-83.4), and 46.4 (95% CI, 30.5-62.7) after short-term treatment (weeks 9, 12, and 16 combined).

LIMITATIONS

Most studies included were on ixekizumab and were retrospective chart reviews with no information on the response to the previous IL-17 inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Previous treatment with an IL-17 inhibitor does not appear to affect the efficacy of another IL-17 inhibitor in the treatment of psoriasis. However, further prospective studies are needed.

Ixekizumab Effectiveness and Safety in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Ixekizumab (anti-IL-17A) is a biological agent used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Real-life data on the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab are currently scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a cohort of psoriatic and psoriatic arthritis patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving 201 patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis and treated with ixekizumab at seven Italian University centers. Data analysis focused on 110 patients who started ixekizumab at baseline and completed at least 24 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Significant reduction of mean (± standard deviation) baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score (14.3 ± 5.8) was detected at 4 weeks of ixekizumab therapy (4.9 ± 4.2, p < 0.001), with a further significant improvement at weeks 12 and 24 (1.9 ± 2.9 and 0.9 ± 1.6, respectively) (p < 0.001). Our analysis showed 90%, 72%, and 57% of patients achieving PASI 75, 90, and 100 responses (75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in PASI score), respectively, after 24 weeks' therapy. For patients with arthritis (28%), a significant reduction in the mean (± standard deviation) baseline Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28 score (4.6 ± 5.1) was detected at week 4 (2.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.01), with a further significant improvement at weeks 12 and 24 (2.1 ± 1.2 and 1.4 ± 0.9, respectively) (p < 0.001). The bio-naïve group showed significantly higher PASI 90 and 100 response rates at week 12 than the bio-exposed one (p < 0.05). This trend in terms of PASI 100 response was also maintained at week 24 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, PASI 90 responses were significantly higher in anti-interleukin (IL)-17A-naïve patients at week 24 than in anti-IL-17A-experienced ones (p < 0.05). The dropout rate for adverse events (AEs) was as low as 2% (2/110), while AEs that did not cause treatment interruption were observed in 6% (7/110). Patients withdrawing from the study were defined as non-responders according to the non-responder imputation method. The retrospective design of the study does not allow missing data to be retrieved or homogeneous patient selection.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study illustrates ixekizumab in real-world clinical practice, confirming its usefulness and safety in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Switching biologics in psoriasis - practical guidance and evidence to support

INTRODUCTION

Advances of biologic agents have changed the treatment paradigm of psoriasis to higher efficacy and better quality of life. However, the demand for biologic switch is increasing due to patient's greater expectation and decreasing efficacy in long-term use. Also, biologic-induced adverse effects necessitate the switching of biologics.

AREAS COVERED

This review article was divided into two parts. The first part focused on the biologic switch due to lack of efficacy. The second part provided switching suggestions related to adverse effects.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Biologic switch in psoriasis was mainly due to lack of efficacy, and the subsequent biologic agent was usually given at the next scheduled time point without washout period. In pivotal randomized controlled trials, patients with poor response to TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab achieved better efficacy after switching to IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors. In addition, real-world data showed that intra-class switch could still achieve a 50%-80% of PASI 75 response in individuals with anti-IL-17 failure histories. As for the biologic switch due to adverse effects, washout period was recommended and transition to a biologic agent with different modes of action was preferred, especially class-specific adverse events.

Switching from Secukinumab to Ustekinumab in Psoriasis Patients: Results from a Multicenter Experience

Background: Switching between biologics is commonly performed for the management of plaque psoriasis. However, no evidence about switching from secukinumab to ustekinumab has been reported. Methods: This retrospective observational multicenter study aimed to describe efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in secukinumab nonresponder patients. Results: A total of 21 patients unresponsive to secukinumab were treated with ustekinumab for a mean period of 53.3 weeks. Ustekinumab was effective in reducing disease severity, with significant improvements of both psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and dermatology quality of life index (DLQI) scores. PASI score improvements of 31.8, 44, 77.8, 80.3, 80.5, and 89.6%, at week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and above 60 weeks, respectively, were detected (p < 0.05), achieving PASI 50, 75, and > 90 responses in 93.8, 87.5, and 50% of patients at week 48. Four patients withdrew from ustekinumab treatment because of inefficacy, and failure of multiple biologic agents (> 2) seemed to affect ustekinumab drug survival. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported while 38.1% of patients experienced mild AEs. Conclusion: Ustekinumab was safe and effective in treating patients unresponsive to secukinumab.