Patient-reported outcomes in adult atopic dermatitis are useful in both clinical trials and real-life clinical practice

[Incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into pharmacy and dermatology departments, in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients, as a tool to improve the healthcare quality and health outcomes]

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide subjective information about their disease, treatment, and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new system of work coordinated between pharmacists and dermatologists, based on the collection and analysis of PROs to assess its clinical impact as well as patients satisfaction.

METHOD

A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted under clinical conditions and included adult patients diagnosed with psoriasis (PS) and atopic dermatitis (AD) between April-2021 and February-2022. Pharmacists and dermatologists agreed on this systematic work. A REDCap® database was designed to facilitate data collection and the subsequent analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 288 and 41 patients with PS and AD, respectively, were included. Those who started treatment showed significant improvement with a decrease in PROs and clinical parameters (p < 0.001). The pharmacist made 168 and 7 recommendations to dermatologists for PS and AD patients, respectively, of which 66.07% and 57.1% were accepted. The most common recommendations were «consult with rheumatologist» (20.83%), «extend drug regimen» (19.64%) and «consider change in treatment» (11.90%). Adverse events were reported in 55 and 17 patients with PS and AD, respectively. Of 103 patients, 75% were «very satisfied» and 20% «satisfied» with the system.

CONCLUSIONS

This new working system helps to evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of treatments and also to identify adverse events, alarm symptoms and co-morbidities in order to optimize therapies. Collaboration between pharmacists and dermatologists reduces decision-making time and patients appreciate better clinical care leading to higher patient satisfaction.

Tralokinumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses at Week 16 in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Do Not Achieve IGA 0/1

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) is a difficult endpoint to achieve after short-term treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and does not fully reflect clinically meaningful changes in other parameters. We assessed the impact of tralokinumab versus placebo on other clinically meaningful parameters in patients not achieving IGA 0/1 at week 16 using pooled data from two monotherapy phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included patients (n = 1328) from ECZTRA 1 and 2 who did not achieve the co-primary endpoint, IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Endpoints evaluating atopic dermatitis extent and severity included proportions of patients achieving IGA 0/1, 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50/75/90); endpoints evaluating patient-reported outcomes included a ≥ 3-point improvement in worst daily pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a ≥ 3-point improvement in eczema-related sleep interference (sleep) NRS, a ≥ 4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI ≤ 5. Specifically, clinically meaningful responses were defined as EASI-50, a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS, or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI at week 16.

RESULTS

Among ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (33.0% vs 13.0%), a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS (22.6% vs 9.4%), or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI (41.2% vs 24.5%) at week 16. In addition, compared with placebo, a numerically greater proportion of tralokinumab-treated patients achieved all three measures of clinically meaningful response (30% vs 18%) or a clinically meaningful change in at least one outcome (48.8% vs 28.5%). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved additional clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes, such as EASI-75 (13.5% vs 4.1%), EASI-90 (3.5% vs 1.1%), DLQI ≤ 5 (22.5% vs 12.5%), and a ≥ 3-point improvement in sleep NRS (24.5% vs 11.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tralokinumab provided clinically meaningful responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 and/or used rescue medication. Using multiple validated outcome measures of both efficacy and quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can better characterize tralokinumab treatment responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. [Video abstract available] CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May, 2017; primary completion date: 7 August, 2018; study completion date: 10 October, 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June, 2017; primary completion date: 4 September, 2019; study completion date: 14 August, 2019. Video abstract: Tralokinumab provides clinically meaningful responses at week 16 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who do not achieve IGA 0/1 (MP4 362818 KB).

Dupilumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Routine Clinical Care: Baseline Characteristics of Patients in the PROLEAD Prospective, Observational Study

Introduction

Dupilumab is the first biologic licensed to treat patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who require systemic therapy. PROLEAD was designed to document the real-world effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The present study aims to describe the baseline characteristics of patients treated with dupilumab in Germany.

Methods

PROLEAD is a national, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study, with a 2-year observation period. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab were included. Baseline characteristics, physician assessments, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected.

Results

The study involved 126 sites throughout Germany. Of 839 patients assessed for eligibility, 828 were included, with baseline data available for 817 patients. Mean (standard deviation, SD) age of patients was 43.4 (15.8) years, with 396 (48.5%) patients being female. Overall, 66.6% of patients received their first diagnosis of AD during childhood. In total, 423 (51.8%) patients had co-existing atopic and type 2 inflammatory diseases, including allergic conjunctivitis (36.8%) and bronchial asthma (22.5%). Overall, 61.4% of patients had received systemic therapy, most commonly oral corticosteroids (49.9%). Approximately half of patients (51.3%) had received UV/phototherapy prior to baseline. Treatment with moderate-potent (Class 2) or potent (Class 3) topical corticosteroids was the most common concomitant treatment at baseline. However, 50.4% of patients had not received concomitant AD treatment with dupilumab at baseline. The most reported reason for initiating dupilumab was “Topical therapy alone was not sufficient” (95.1%). Mean (SD) physician assessments: EASI: 22.9 (14.5); SCORAD: 63.3 (16.2); IGA: 3.3 (0.7). Mean (SD) PROs: DLQI: 13.9 (7.1); peak pruritus NRS: 7.4 (2.3).

Conclusions

Patients with moderate-to-severe AD present a long medical history, impaired quality of life, and high prevalence of co-existing type 2 inflammatory diseases. Dupilumab was used as a first-line systemic treatment in 38.6% of patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00791-1.

Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults in Greece: Results from a Nationwide Survey

The objective was to describe the AD burden in terms of quality of life (QoL), sleep, social life, work productivity, and resource utilization in Greece and assess the impact of disease severity. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted. The questionnaire consisted of socioeconomic factors, medical history, AD screening, AD severity, QoL, sleep difficulties, social activities, and work productivity questions. AD was defined using the UK Working Party criteria (UKWP cohort) and a patient-reported AD diagnosis from a physician (Expert Diagnosis cohort). Self-reported moderate/severe AD was estimated using the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). In the UKWP cohort, the AD effect on QoL was moderate/extremely large in 84.3% of moderate/severe AD (vs. 55.7% in mild; p = 0.016), while in the Expert Diagnosis cohort, it was 72.2% (vs. 22.8%; p < 0.001). Disease severity was associated with a higher impact on sleep and social activities. Overall work impairment was high in both mild (32.7%) and moderate/severe (48.5%) AD of the UKWP cohort, while among the Expert Diagnosis cohort, it was significantly higher among those with moderate/severe (31.2%) versus mild AD (11.9%; p < 0.001). The AD burden in Greece is significant, especially for those in moderate/severe AD stages. Acknowledging this burden is the first step toward applying healthcare decisions that will benefit patients and the community.

The efficacy and safety of IL-13 inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of interleukin-13 (IL-13) with lebrikizumab and tralokinumab in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the safety and efficacy of IL-13 inhibitors as a potent biologic for AD remain elusive.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of IL-13 inhibitors in moderate to severe AD.

Method

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing IL-13 inhibitors vs placebo treatment in patients with moderate to severe AD, were identified from public database from its inception to November 9th, 2021. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021254920).

Results

Six studies reporting 7 RCTs involving 2946 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included for the pooled analysis. Compared with placebo, antagonizing IL-13 with lebrikizumab and tralokinumab showed a greater improvement in percentage change of EASI (MD -20.37, 95%CI -32.28, -8.47), and a larger proportion of patients achieving numerical rating scale (NRS) with more than 4-points improvement (RR 1.59, 95%CI 1.23, 2.05). Additionally, IL-13 inhibitors also improved impaired dermatology life quality index (DLQI) (MD -14.49, 95%CI -19.23, -9.75). In terms of safety, both lebrikizumab and tralokinumab were well tolerated, with the except that they were linked to an increased risk of conjunctivitis compared to placebo treatment.

Conclusion

Antagonizing IL-13 with lebrikizumab and tralokinumab have demonstrated encouraging clinical efficacy against moderate-to-severe AD with excellent safety profile, albeit they did come with a higher risk of conjunctivitis than placebo treatment.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier ID=CRD42021254920.

Desire for Alternative Treatment Options in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in Japan: Results of a Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study (AD-JOIN Study)

INTRODUCTION

Treatment satisfaction in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) has been investigated in several studies, but the desire for alternative treatment options is unclear and has not been previously evaluated. We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey aimed at evaluating the desire for alternative treatment options in adults with AD from a patient registry in Japan.

METHODS

Main eligibility criteria were adults aged ≥ 18 years with AD who were receiving treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) and not systemic therapy. Questionnaires included the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and pruritus Numeral Rating Scale. The proportion of patients with a desire for an alternative treatment option was assessed, overall (Overall Desire) and by specific type of alternative treatment option (Specific Desire), including change in medication, hospital transfer, and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use. Patient background factors associated with desire were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1500 patients included in the analysis, 91.5% (n = 1372) had an Overall Desire, with the most common Specific Desire being a change in medication (n = 1213, 80.9%), followed by CAM (n = 593, 39.5%) and hospital transfer (n = 429, 28.6%). Dissatisfaction with current treatment was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with Overall Desire and Specific Desire (p < 0.001 each). Severe disease according to POEM was significantly associated with Overall Desire and a change in medication (p < 0.001 each).

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of Japanese patients with AD being treated with TCS had a desire for alternative treatment options. The desire was greatly affected by patients' satisfaction with their current treatment and perception of disease severity. These findings highlight the importance of assessing patients' satisfaction or perception of disease severity, and facilitating early discussions between patient and doctor on their available treatment options, including new treatment options.

Facial Dermatoses and Use of Protective Mask During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Clinical and Psychological Evaluation in Patients Affected by Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Under Treatment With Dupilumab

During the SARS‐COV‐2 pandemic, using face masks became mandatory in many countries. Although evidence suggests that masks can exacerbate several inflammatory skin diseases, few studies focus on their real impact on eczema localized to the face in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial eczema prevalence during pandemic and its psychological impact in AD patients pre‐assessed for systemic treatment and/or in therapy with dupilumab. This study includes 71 patients affected by moderate–severe AD, treated with dupilumab at SCDU of Dermatology in Novara, Italy. We calculated the number of subjects with facial involvement in pre‐ and post‐pandemic periods and the related localization trend. We evaluated, in the two groups, clinical and psychological indicators recorded at each visit and the score modifications during the observational period. No statistically significant differences were observed in facial eczema prevalence, between pre‐ and post‐pandemic periods (p = 0.7618) and in facial eczema remission among the two groups (p = 0.1903). In post‐pandemic period, psychological scores were significantly lower (DLQI and HADS respectively with p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0025) and the reduction in EASI score during observational period was significantly greater (p = 0.0001). Our analysis revealed a potential protective effect of masks on face eczema, suggesting that they could enhance dupilumab efficacy. Face masks, covering sensitive areas, can positively contribute to mental distress in patients with facial eczema, and being associated with a lower allergic diseases incidence may sustain dupilumab in reducing AD severity.