Efficacy and safety of methotrexate, omalizumab and dupilumab for bullous pemphigoid in patients resistant or contraindicated to oral steroids. A monocentric real-life study

Delayed Onset of Bullous Pemphigoid Secondary to Nivolumab

The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, for advanced neoplastic disease has revealed significant cutaneous immune-related adverse effects. Herein, we report a case of bullous pemphigoid (BP) secondary to nivolumab therapy for recurrent metastatic oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. In this patient, the time to development of BP was three years, which represents the most delayed onset of BP secondary to a PD-1 inhibitor that has been reported in the literature. Symptoms were initially controlled on low-dose oral prednisone but recurred after two years. The patient was subsequently treated with a several-month taper of high-dose oral prednisone, during which he was able to resume nivolumab without recurrence of skin lesions. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced BP remains rare, physicians should be aware of this serious cutaneous immune-related adverse event as the use of this drug class continues to expand.

Dupilumab effectively and rapidly treats bullous pemphigoid by inhibiting the activities of multiple cell types

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune skin-blistering disease. Systemic corticosteroids remain the first line treatment for moderate-to-severe BP with the potential for severe adverse events. Dupilumab has emerged as an alternative option for BP patients.

Objective

We evaluated the efficiency and safety of dupilumab on BP treatment and explored a mode of drug action in depth.

Methods and results

A multicenter retrospective cohort included 20 BP patients who received dupilumab with or without systemic corticosteroid in dupilumab group, and 20 matched BP patients who received corticosteroid alone in conventional group. Serum samples were collected from 20 patients (10 from dupilumab group and 10 from conventional group) at baseline and week 4. Compared to systemic corticosteroid alone, dupilumab with or without systemic corticosteroid was similarly efficacious in clinical remission at week4 (complete remission plus partial remission: 100%) and week24 (complete remission plus partial remission:100%), but allowing significant decreases in the cumulative doses of corticosteroids with reducing the incidence of adverse events. However, dupilumab did not decrease BP180 antibody despite an obvious clinical improvement. Comparative plasma proteomic analysis performed before and after treatment in 3 BP patients from dupilumab group revealed that drug use was associated with 30 differentially expressed proteins, including 26 down-regulated and 4 up-regulated proteins. The former consisted of immune related proteins involved in T/B cell interactions (inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand, ICOSL) and in the activation of eosinophils (PRG2), mast cells (S100A12), and complement (CR2). TARC and ICOSL levels correlated with BP severity in patients who received either dupilumab or conventional treatment.

Conclusion

Dupilumab has similar efficacy in treating BP as conventional drugs, by inhibiting the activities of many types of immune cells and complement, and regulating the interactions between T and B cells.

Anti-interleukin 4 receptor α antibody for the treatment of Chinese bullous pemphigoid patients with diverse comorbidities and a 1-year follow-up: a monocentric real-world study

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common subepidermal bullous disorder that lacks adequate treatment alternatives. Dupilumab, an anti-interleukin (IL) 4 receptor α antibody blocking Th2 molecules IL-4 and 13, has been used off-label and shown to be effective in refractory BP cases.

Methods

BP patients with various disease severities and comorbidities were included in this case series. All patients received dupilumab alone or in combination with immunosuppressants in a real-world setting. Complete remission (CR) was defined as the absence of pruritus symptoms and previous BP eruptions, with only hyperpigmentation patches and without newly occurring lesions for at least 4 weeks. Disease relapse was classified as the appearance of three or more new lesions within 1 month or at least one large urticarial or eczematous lesion that did not resolve within a week.

Findings

Ten individuals were enrolled in this case series. Pruritus symptoms and BP eruptions improved significantly in nine patients (90%). Seven patients (70%) attained CR, including all mild-to-moderate (100%) cases and three of six (50%) severe BP cases. At the dupilumab monotherapy stage, eosinophilia was observed in two severe cases. One patient out of seven (14.3%) relapsed after 1 year of follow-up after CR.

Conclusion

Treatment of BP with diverse comorbidities with anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody provides further credentials to a prospective randomized study. More impressive efficacy and safety profiles were observed in patients with mild-to-moderate disease after 1 year of follow-up. Eosinophilia may occur in patients receiving dupilumab monotherapy.

Concomitant use of dupilumab with glucocorticoid in bullous pemphigoid reduces disease severity: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid.

METHODS

From October 2020 to October 2022, the medical records of patients with bullous pemphigoid who were treated with dupilumab in our department were collected retrospectively to analyze the therapeutic effect and changes in laboratory indexes.

RESULTS

The records of a total of 11 patients with bullous pemphigoid who were treated with dupilumab was reviewed. Within 2 weeks of the treatment, 10 (90.9%) of the 11 patients had complete or substantial control of the disease. The BPDAI scores of the patients decreased from baseline 113 (62, 181) to 37 (6, 130) at 2 weeks (p = .001) and 4 (0, 37) at 12 weeks after treatment (p < .001). In the 11 patients treated with dupilumab, the relief time of pruritus was 0-3 days (0.5, 7) days, and the pruritus was significantly alleviated after 2 weeks (t = 15.925, p < .001). The DLQI score decreased from (25.5 ± 2.5) before treatment, to (11.8 ± 4.4) at 2 weeks (t = 10.764, p < .001) and (2.1 ± 1.9) at 12 weeks (t = 30.038, p < .001). The patients had high eosinophil counts, high serum IgE levels, low serum total protein levels, and abnormal blood coagulation function. The aforementioned indicators gradually returned to normal after treatment. No adverse reactions occurred during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab can effectively control the condition of bullous pemphigoid, efficiently relieve pruritus symptoms, and is relatively safe.

Management of eosinophil-associated inflammatory diseases: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach

Elevated eosinophil counts in blood and tissue are a feature of many pathological processes. Eosinophils can migrate and accumulate in a wide variety of tissues and, by infiltrating a target organ, can mediate the development of several inflammatory diseases. The normalization of eosinophilia is a common biomarker of a treatable trait and can also be used as a prognostic and predictive biomarker since it implies a reduction in type 2 inflammation that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Biological therapies targeting this cell type and its proinflammatory mediators have been shown to be effective in the management of a number of eosinophilic diseases, and for this reason they constitute a potential common strategy in the treatment of patients with various multimorbidities that present with type 2 inflammation. Various biological options are available that could be used to simultaneously treat multiple target organs with a single drug, bearing in mind the need to offer personalized treatments under the umbrella of precision medicine in all patients with eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs). In addition to reviewing these issues, we also discuss a series of perspectives addressing the management of EAD patients from a multidisciplinary approach, with the collaboration of health professionals from different specialties who manage the different multimorbidities that frequently occur in these patients. We examine the basic principles of care that this multidisciplinary approach must cover and present a multidisciplinary expert opinion regarding the ideal management of patients with EADs, from diagnosis to therapeutic approach and follow-up.

Research progress of omalizumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease associated with anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies. The pathogenic action mechanism of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies in BP has been studied since the 1970s, and IgE antibodies have gradually been confirmed as being important in BP; therefore, anti-IgE therapy may be a new option for the treatment of BP. Omalizumab, as an IgE monoclonal antibody, has been increasingly used clinically to treat BP in recent years. Here, we collected 35 papers investigating omalizumab for BP treatment in a total of 83 patients, and the vast majority of patients showed varying degrees of improvement after treatment, except for a small number of patients with poor clinical outcomes. The patients were then divided into three groups according to dosing frequency and number of doses. Statistical analysis indicated that dosing frequency had little effect on clinical efficacy. While the groups with different numbers of doses were evaluated, the results concluded that clinical efficacy was affected by the number of doses, but there was no positive correlation between the number of doses and clinical efficacy.

Nine cases of refractory bullous pemphigoid treated with dupilumab and literature review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease that affects the elderly mostly. First-line treatment of systemic corticosteroids may cause significant adverse effects, especially in patients with multiple co-morbidities. Dupilumab shows certain effectiveness in treating BP. We aim to profile our experience with dupilumab in a series of patients with BP and review the articles published to date.

METHODS

Medical records of 9 patients with moderate-to-severe BP were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were administered dupilumab. Response to dupilumab was evaluated by NRS scores, number of lesions, and the systemic corticosteroids' dosage. The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible studies.

RESULTS

The 9 patients were identified in this case series with a median age of 68 years (range 42-89) and the median duration of disease before being treated with dupilumab was 6 months (range 1-144). Complete remission was achieved in 6 patients while partial response was achieved in one patient. The NRS score had decreased to varying degrees at week 2 in all patients, and skin lesions improved within 2 to 6 weeks. Fifteen publications were included: 3 retrospective studies and 12 case series or reports, with a total of 63 patients. The overall complete response and partial response rates were 74.6 % and 11.1 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab appears to be a safe alternative for the treatment of patients with refractory BP.

Researching trends in pemphigoid diseases: A bibliometric study of the top 100 most cited publications

Background

In the field of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, different approaches were applied to provide information regarding disease activity, comorbidities, epidemiological reports and risk factors. However, no previous studies had thoroughly analyzed the research trend in the field, and the bibliometric analysis focusing on pemphigoid diseases was available. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the current research trend in the field.

Methods

A search has been conducted for the Web of Science database based on various subcategories of pemphigoid diseases. Detailed information including articles' publication types, Author information, citation, and publication information was attained for further analysis.

Results

Within the 6,995 studies, the top 100 most-cited articles were extracted for analysis. Among the top 100 studies, 70% of the studies focused on bullous pemphigoid. More than 60% of the top 100 studies were studies with original data. Furthermore, 30% of the studies were guidelines and narrative reviews. For the issues primarily focused on, most of the high-impact studies described the molecular mechanism of pemphigoid diseases (26%), managements (19%), risk factors of pemphigoid diseases (17%). Additionally, some other studies provided general review or discussed about the issue of epidemiology, diagnosis/definition, comorbidities and clinical characteristics of pemphigoid diseases.

Conclusion

This comprehensive bibliographic study of pemphigoid diseases provided an overview of current research focuses in the field. Topics such as disease management, molecular mechanism of pathogenesis, and drug-inducing pemphigoid diseases were highly mentioned in the most-cited studies. For researchers and clinicians, the researching trend and study focus in the top-100 cited studies could serve as a potential reference for future investigation and patient management.

Clinical effect of omalizumab as an adjuvant treatment to rituximab in patient with refractory bullous pemphigoid

Patients with refractory bullous pemphigoid (BP) achieve remission after rituximab treatment but require high-dose systemic corticosteroids until the remission. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the clinical efficacy of omalizumab as an adjuvant treatment to rituximab in patients with refractory BP. Patients with BP receiving treatment with either rituximab monotherapy or rituximab plus omalizumab were considered for the study. The total dose of corticosteroids received for 60 days after administration of rituximab, mortality and relapse rates, and median time to relapse were also investigated. Of 49 patients included in the study, 25 received rituximab monotherapy and 17 received the combination therapy with rituximab and omalizumab. The rituximab plus omalizumab group showed shorter time to disease control with minimal treatment (15 days vs. 67.5 days, p < 0.001) and lower corticosteroid dose for 60 days after administration of rituximab (698.4 mg vs. 1087.4 mg of methylprednisolone, p < 0.001) compared to the rituximab monotherapy group. The results of this study suggest that combination therapy with rituximab and omalizumab can achieve disease control status faster than the rituximab monotherapy, reducing the total dose of corticosteroids.

Bullous pemphigoid-What do we know about the most recent therapies?

INTRODUCTION

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common subtype of autoimmune blistering diseases that primarily affects the elderly and is classically defined by the presence of IgG and/or complement C3 against the BP180 and BP230 hemidesmosome proteins. However, most recent studies have introduced the role of specific eosinophil receptors and chemokine mediators in the pathogenesis of BP which are helpful in identifying new targets for future treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This review will focus on the involvement of eosinophils in BP, including the processes that lead to their recruitment, activation, and regulation. Subsequently, covering new therapeutic options in relation to the role of eosinophils. Eotaxin enhances the recruitment of eosinophils in BP, with CCR3 chemoreceptor that is expressed on eosinophils being identified as a key binding site for eotaxin-1. The pathogenic role of IgE and IL-4 in BP is corroborated by successful treatments with Omalizumab and Dupilumab, respectively. IL-5, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be effective given their roles in promoting eosinophilia.

EXPERT OPINION

Further research into inhibitors of eotaxin, IL-4, IL-5, IL-17, IL-23, CCR3, and specific complement factors are warranted as preliminary studies have largely identified success in treating BP with these agents. Learning from novel treatments for other IgG-mediated autoimmune diseases may be beneficial.

High Grade Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves survival in many types of cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung, renal cell, breast, and cervical cancers. However, many of these therapies are also associated with high grade dermatologic adverse events (DAEs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), SJS/TEN-like reactions, high grade maculopapular and psoriasiform rashes, autoimmune bullous eruptions, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), which may limit their tolerability and use. It is important to properly identify and treat DAEs to ICB because these DAEs may be associated with positive anti-tumor response and patients may have limited options for alternative anti-cancer therapeutics. In this review, we describe high grade DAEs to increasingly used ICB agents, which target CTLA-4 and PD-1 or its ligand, PD-L1 and enable the immune system to target cancer cells. We further differentiate life-threatening adverse reactions from mimickers and report cases of serious DAEs which have been recorded in association with ICB through the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), which is an archive of adverse events associated with various drugs and therapeutic biologic products reported voluntarily by consumers and healthcare professionals as well as mandatorily by manufacturers. Lastly, we summarize management recommendations for these adverse events and discuss knowledge and evidence gaps in this area.

Rituximab, Omalizumab, and Dupilumab Treatment Outcomes in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease of the skin. First-line treatment of systemic corticosteroids may cause serious adverse events. Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab should be explored as alternative treatment options to improve outcomes.

Objective

To systematically review the rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab treatment outcomes in bullous pemphigoid.

Methods

A PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library search were conducted on March 10, 2022. A total of 75 studies were included using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results

Use of rituximab (n=122), omalizumab (n=53) and dupilumab (n=36) were reported in 211 patients with BP. Rituximab led to complete remission in 70.5% (n=86/122) and partial remission in 23.8% (n=29/122) of patients within 5.7 months, with a recurrence rate of 20.5% (n=25/122). 9.0% (n=11/122) of patients died and infection (6.6%, n=8/122) was the most common adverse event. Omalizumab led to complete remission in 67.9% (n=36/53) and partial remission in 20.8% (n=11/53) of patients within 6.6 months, with a recurrence rate of 5.7% (n=3/53). 1.9% (n=1/53) of patients died and thrombocytopenia (1.9%, n=1/53) was observed as the most common adverse event. Dupilumab led to complete remission in 66.7% (n=24/36) and partial remission in 19.4% (n=7/36) of patients within 4.5 months of treatment without any reported adverse events, with a recurrence rate of 5.6% (n=2/36).

Conclusions

Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab have similar clinical benefits for BP patients. However, rituximab resulted in higher recurrence rates, adverse events, and mortality rates.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022316454.