CAD/CAM single-retainer monolithic zirconia ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures bonded with two different resin cements: Up to 40 months clinical results of a randomized-controlled pilot study

Fiber-reinforced composite or zirconia in cantilever fixed dental prosthesis? 36-month follow-up clinical study

OBJECTIVES

This clinical study evaluated the survival rate of different designs of single-retainer inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IR-FDPs) made from monolithic zirconia (Z) and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC).

METHODS

A total of 40 IR-FDPs (n = 40) were placed for 32 female patients who presented with missing mandibular second premolar teeth. In the current study, the mandibular first molar was selected as a retainer for the cantilever IR-FDPs. The participants were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20) according to the design: lingual coverage (LC) and occlusal coverage (OC). Each group was then divided according to the material used (n = 10 Z and n = 10 FRC). All restorations were bonded with adhesive resin cement and evaluated clinically and radiographically for 36 months following modified FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. Statistical analysis was conducted using Monte Carlo and the Student (Cochran Q) tests.

RESULTS

All restorations showed non-significant differences (P > 0.05) regarding the clinical behavior with satisfactory final aesthetic, functional, and biological results based on the criteria of modified FDI scores. Over a 36-month observation period, one restoration that belonged to group OC-Z fractured at the connector after 30 months and was replaced. Only one restoration in group LC-Z was debonded after 10 months and re-bonded, and one abutment in group LC-FRC was endodontically treated after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Zirconia and FRC cantilever IR-FDPs demonstrated high survival (97.5 %) and success (96.6 %) rates over 36 months, offering a minimally invasive solution for posterior tooth replacement with improved aesthetics and function.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Lingual and occlusal coverage designs significantly enhance the strength and longevity of cantilever IR-FDPs while offering a reliable, minimally invasive solution with function, durability, and aesthetics. These designs effectively withstand occlusal forces when the cantilever pontic has a contact point.

Biomechanical analysis of stress distribution and failure risk in mandibular incisors restored with resin-bonded fixed partial dentures using CAD/CAM materials and restoration designs

Background

Computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials are widely used in resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs), but their suitability across different designs has not been fully assessed. This study compares the stress distribution and failure probability of mandibular incisors restored by RBFPDs with various CAD/CAM materials.

Materials and methods

Finite-element models of single- and double-ended RBFPDs were created using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. Five CAD/CAM materials (IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.max ZirCAD, Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Vitablocs MarkII) were tested under vertical and oblique (45°) loading with a 100 N force. Stress distribution and failure risk were evaluated for each material and design.

Results

Oblique loading produced the highest stress and displacement for single-ended RBFPDs. Lava Ultimate had the largest displacement and principal stress, while IPS e.max ZirCAD showed the highest equivalent stress. IPS e.max CAD exhibited the lowest displacement and principal stress among double-ended RBFPDs under oblique loading.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that double-ended RBFPDs experience lower stress and strain compared to single-ended designs, particularly under oblique loading. Vita Enamic had the highest failure risk, while IPS e.max ZirCAD had the lowest. These insights into stress distribution and material performance offer valuable guidance for material selection and restoration design, aiming to improve the longevity and success of RBFPDs in mandibular incisor restorations.

Failure and complication rates of different materials, designs, and bonding techniques of ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses for restoring missing anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess clinical trials that have examined the materials, design, and bonding of ceramic cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) as a potential option for replacing missing anterior teeth. The evaluation primarily focuses on the rate of restoration failure and clinical complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough search of databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted. The most recent search was performed in October 2023. Clinical studies that compared ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs with double retainers or cantilevered RBFDPs using different ceramic materials or bonding systems were included. The outcome measures considered were restoration failure and complication rates.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled data showed a statistically significant decrease in complication events when using cantilever designs compared with double retainer designs (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences found between the two designs in terms of restoration failure. The complication and failure rate of cantilever RBFDPs did not show a statistically significant difference with or without ceramic primer application before luting with phosphate monomer-containing luting resin (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs have lower complication rates compared with those with double retainers. The use of a ceramic primer prior to luting composite resin for ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs decreases the occurrence of complications and failures, although this effect was not statistically significant. Additional research is required to confirm these findings. Glass ceramic cantilever RBFDPs showed a decrease in success after 6 years, requiring ongoing monitoring, but both zirconia and glass-infiltrated alumina cantilever RBFDPs have demonstrated durability with excellent long-term success and survival rates for up to 10 and 15 years.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Cantilever ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region are a less invasive and valuable treatment option, providing good esthetic results.

Shear Bond Strength of Simulated Single-Retainer Resin-Bonded Bridges Made of Four CAD/CAM Materials for Maxillary Lateral Incisor Agenesis Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVES

 Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA), treated orthodontically by space opening, requires complimentary aesthetic rehabilitation. Resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) can be equated as interim rehabilitation until skeletal maturity is achieved to place an implant-supported crown or as definitive rehabilitation in case of financial restrictions or implant contraindications. Scientific evidence of the best material must be confirmed in specific clinical situations. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials are promising versatile restorative options. This study aimed to identify a straightforward material to deliver interim or definitive RBBs for nonprepared tooth replacement in MLIA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Single-retainer RBB made from CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic [ENA], Suprinity [SUP], and zirconia [Y-ZPT]) and a three-dimensional (3D) printed material (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene [ABS]) were evaluated by shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure, after adherence to an artificial tooth with RelyX Ultimate used in a three-step adhesive strategy.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 The load to fracture (N) was recorded, and the mean shear stress (MPa) was calculated with standard deviations (SD) for each group and compared between materials using boxplot graphics. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used to compare the differences (α = 0.05). A meta-analysis focusing on CAD/CAM materials evaluated the magnitude of the difference between groups based on differences in means and effect sizes (α = 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]; Z-value = 1.96). Failure mode was determined by microscopic observation and correlated with the maximum load to fracture of the specimen.

RESULTS

 The mean ± SD SBS values were ENA (24.24 ± 9.05 MPa) < ABS (24.01 ± 1.94 MPa) < SUP (29.17 ± 4.78 MPa) < Y-ZPT (37.43 ± 12.20 MPa). The failure modes were mainly adhesive for Y-ZPT, cohesive for SUP and ENA, and cohesive with plastic deformation for ABS.

CONCLUSION

 Vita Enamic, Suprinity, Y-ZPT zirconia, and 3D-printed ABS RBBs are optional materials for rehabilitating MLIA. The option for each material is conditioned to estimate the time of use and necessity of removal for orthodontic or surgical techniques.

Evaluation of different designs for posterior cantilever zirconia inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses in missing tooth replacement: Stage one results with 18-month follow-up assessment

OBJECTIVES

This clinical study aimed to investigate the outcomes and survival rates of different variations of inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IR-FDPs) composed of monolithic zirconia ceramic. The IR-FDPs with a single-retainer design were used for replacing missing mandibular second premolars. The research evaluated the effectiveness and longevity of these prostheses in clinical settings.

METHODS

A total of 30 IR-FDPs (n = 30) were placed for 27 female patients who presented with missing mandibular second premolar teeth. For this study, the mandibular first molar was chosen as a retainer for the cantilever IR-FDPs and the study involved a random assignment of participants into three distinct groups, each comprising 10 individuals (n = 10). The criterion for the grouping was the retainer design: inlay ring (IR), lingual coverage (LC), and occlusal coverage (OC). The three groups included mesial inlay box with the same dimensions (3 mm height, 3 mm width and 2 mm depth). All IR-FDPs were manufactured using monolithic high translucent 3Y zirconia and the connector area to the cantilever pontic was adjusted to dimensions of 3 × 3 mm for all designs. The restorations were bonded using adhesive resin cement. The clinical and radiographic evaluations of the restorations were conducted for a duration of 18 months, following the modified FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.

RESULTS

The restorations were observed in stage one for a period of 18 months. Only one restoration in group LC was debonded after 10 months and re-bonded. The clinical quality of all crowns and the patient's satisfaction were high. No adverse soft tissue reactions around the crowns were observed and only one abutment in group IR was endodontically treated after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Zirconia cantilever IR-FDPs offer a viable short-term treatment option for replacing missing posterior teeth, providing esthetic and functional benefits while minimizing invasiveness. Over an 18-month observation period, these prostheses have demonstrated a remarkable survival rate of 100% and a success rate of 96.6%. These findings suggest the effectiveness and reliability of zirconia cantilever IR-FDPs as a short-term solution for replacing missing posterior teeth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Zirconia cantilever IR-FDPs could present a practical solution for addressing posterior tooth loss, especially in cases where implant placement is not recommended and conventional fixed dental prostheses entail excessive invasiveness.

Bonding Performance of Surface-Treated Zirconia Cantilevered Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses: In Vitro Evaluation and Finite Element Analysis

Debonding of zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) remains the main treatment complication, therefore, the present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface pretreatments on the bonding of zirconia RBFDPs. Eighty milled zirconia maxillary central incisors, with complementary zirconia cantilevered RBFDPs, were randomly subjected to four different surface pretreatments (n = 20): as-machined (AM); airborne-particle abraded (APA); coated with nanostructured alumina coating (NAC); incisor air-abraded and RBFDP coated (NAC_APA). After bonding, half of each group (n = 10) was stored in deionized water (150 days/37 °C), thermocycled (37,500 cycles, 5-55 °C), and cyclically loaded (50 N/1.2 × 10⁶). Load-bearing capacity (LBC) was determined using a quasi-static test. Additionally, finite element analysis (FEA) and fractography were performed. t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical-analysis. Before aging, the NAC group provided superior LBC to other groups (p < 0.05). After aging, the AM specimens debonded spontaneously, while other groups exhibited comparable LBC (p ˃ 0.05). The FEA results correlated with the in vitro experiment and fractography, showing highly stressed areas in the bonding interface, cement layer, and in RBFDP's retainer wing and connector. The NAC RBFDPs exhibited comparable long-term bonding performance to APA and should be regarded as a zirconia pretreatment alternative to APA.