Education and Imaging. Gastroenterology: A unique endoscopic technique for full-layer histology of jackhammer esophagus

Mast cell infiltration associated with loss of interstitial cells of Cajal and neuronal degeneration in achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a motility disorder of unknown etiology. Previous studies supported the hypothesis that autoimmune-mediated inflammatory responses produce inhibitory neuronal degeneration. This study was designed to explore the role of mast cells in achalasia.

METHODS

We collected information from 116 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy between December 2016 and May 2017. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscle biopsy was performed in all patients with achalasia, as well as 20 control subjects. The number of mast cells, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), nNOS-positive cells, and S-100-positive cells in the LES were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Pathological and clinical data were compared between groups.

KEY RESULTS

Compared with controls, the LES of patients with achalasia had significantly fewer ICCs, nNOS-positive cells, and S-100-positive cells and a higher number of mast cells (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, the increased mast cell infiltration was significantly associated with decreased ICCs, nNOS-positive cells, and S-100-positive cells in patients with achalasia (all P < 0.05). Clinically, the number of strongly positive mast cells was highest in patients with type I achalasia and lowest in those with type III achalasia (P < 0.001). In addition, patients with a history of autoimmune disease or viral infection had greater mast cell infiltration in the LES muscle (P = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In patients with achalasia, mast cell infiltration in the LES muscle is increased, in association with loss of ICCs and neuronal degeneration. Mast cells may thereby play a crucial role in the development of achalasia.

A clinical study of peroral endoscopic myotomy reveals that impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in achalasia is not only defined by high-resolution manometry

Background and aim

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. On high-resolution manometry (HRM), impaired LES relaxation is defined by elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). However, a new category of achalasia within the normal IRP range has been suggested.

Methods

HRM was performed using a Starlet device and an IRP threshold of 26 mmHg. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was performed for cases of achalasia diagnosed using established methods. During POEM, the histology of the LES was assessed. Follow-up was performed 2 months post-operatively.

Results

Forty-one patients with achalasia (18 women, mean age 53 ± 18.6 years) were included. Among them, 27 were placed in the IRP > 26 mmHg subgroup (impaired LES relaxation on HRM) and 14 in the IRP ≤ 26 mmHg subgroup (normal LES relaxation on HRM). In the IRP ≤ 26 mmHg subgroup, patients were older, had longer symptom duration, and had more esophageal dilation. The IRP ≤ 26 mmHg subgroup had the same symptom severity as the higher IRP subgroup and POEM significantly improved symptoms and IRP, although four patients still had severe LES fibrosis.

Conclusions

The clinical presentation of achalasia has a gap between a HRM-defined impaired LES relaxation, with aging or disease progression considered reasons for a lowered LES pressure. POEM can be a feasible treatment option, even for cases of achalasia with a normal IRP. However, patients with severe LES fibrosis need more attention for the therapeutic indication.

Full-layer mucosal histology in achalasia: Histological epithelial wave is characteristic in "pinstripe pattern"-positive achalasia

BACKGROUND

Previously, the mucosal histology in achalasia has only been investigated using superficial biopsy or surgically resected esophageal specimens in end-stage cases. We investigated the histology of the full-layer mucosa in early and advanced achalasia.

METHODS

Endoscopy was performed for the pinstripe pattern (PSP) (an early achalasia indicator) and dilation and thickening of the mucosa (advanced achalasia indicators). A mucosal entry site for peroral endoscopic myotomy was created using cap-fitted endoscopic mucosal resection to access the full-layer mucosa and the submucosa.

KEY RESULTS

Mucosal histology was compared between 32 patients with achalasia and 15 controls. Histological esophagitis with findings of inflammatory cell infiltration and dilated intercellular spaces was observed more in patients with achalasia than in controls (87.5% vs 13.3%, P<.001; 84.4% vs 46.7%, P=.049). Muscularis mucosae (MM) atrophy and epithelial wave were only observed in achalasia (40.6% vs 0%, P=.005; 28.1% vs 0%, P=.043). Fibrosis was more common in achalasia, but without statistical significance (31.3% vs 20.0%, P=.503). In achalasia with endoscopic dilation and thickening of the mucosa, MM atrophy was observed histologically, and in cases involving endoscopic PSP, the histological epithelial wave was observed.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Histological findings of esophagitis were observed endoscopically even in early achalasia. Pinstripe pattern corresponds to the epithelial wave observed histologically in achalasia, whereas endoscopic findings in advanced achalasia correspond to MM atrophy. Appropriate management is necessary during early achalasia to prevent progression to advanced achalasia with more severe histological changes.

Muscle layer histopathology and manometry pattern of primary esophageal motility disorders including achalasia

BACKGROUND

Histopathology of muscularis externa in primary esophageal motility disorders has been characterized previously. We aimed to correlate the results of high-resolution manometry with those of histopathology.

METHODS

During peroral endoscopic myotomy, peroral esophageal muscle biopsy was performed in patients with primary esophageal motility disorders. Immunohistochemical staining for c-kit was performed to assess the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs). Hematoxylin Eosin and Azan-Mallory staining were used to detect muscle atrophy, inflammation, and fibrosis, respectively.

KEY RESULTS

Slides from 30 patients with the following motility disorders were analyzed: achalasia (type I: 14, type II: 5, type III: 3), one diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), two outflow obstruction (OO), four jackhammer esophagus (JE), and one nutcracker esophagus (NE). ICCs were preserved in high numbers in type III achalasia (n=9.4±1.2 cells/high power field [HPF]), compared to types I (n=3.7±0.3 cells/HPF) and II (n=3.5±1.0 cells/HPF). Moreover, severe fibrosis was only observed in type I achalasia and not in other types of achalasia, OO, or DES. Four of five patients with JE and NE had severe inflammation with eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal muscle layer (73.8±50.3 eosinophils/HPF) with no epithelial eosinophils. One patient with JE showed a visceral myopathy pattern.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Compared to types I and II, type III achalasia showed preserved ICCs, with variable data regarding DES and OO. In disorders considered as primary esophageal motility disorders, a disease category exists, which shows eosinophilic infiltration in the esophageal muscle layer with no eosinophils in the epithelium.

Immunohistochemical differentiation of eosinophilic esophageal myositis from eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a Th2-mediated allergic disease of the esophageal epithelium, associated with antigen. We previously reported a case series for eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM)-a novel eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder defined as eosinophilic infiltration localized in the esophageal muscle layer-and diagnosed it by peroral endoscopic muscle biopsy. Here, we investigated the immunopathology of EoEM to differentiate it from EoE.

METHODS

Histological analysis was performed for three cases of EoEM and EoE, respectively. The results were compared with those of two control samples (non-eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder full-layer esophagus). Using immunofluorescence, we analyzed the expression of the chemokine receptor CCR3 and its ligands eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-3 to investigate the eosinophilic reaction. Additionally, we determined the expression patterns of desmoglein-1 in the esophageal epithelium, which shows dysregulated expression in EoE.

RESULTS

Eosinophil infiltration was observed in the muscle layer (maximum number, 30, 36, 73/high-power field) and the epithelium (50, 44, 40/high-power field) for EoEM and EoE, respectively. In EoE esophageal epithelium, the number of eotaxin-3-positive epithelial cells was significantly increased together with CCR3-positive infiltrating cells. However, in EoEM, a number of eotaxin-1-positive and eotaxin-3-positive myocytes and vascular endothelial cells were increased in the esophageal muscle layer. A significant loss of desmoglein-1 expression was only observed in EoE, not in EoEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-3 expression on the smooth muscle and vessels plays a role in the pathogenesis of EoEM, while EoE shows an epithelial eotaxin-3-dominant immunoreaction. Thus, the EoEM immunological pattern displays clear differences from that of EoE.