A comparison of 4-Fr with 5-Fr endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage catheters: A randomized, controlled trial

Frequency and predictors of delayed clearance of prophylactic pancreatic stents after ERCP

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Timely evaluation and removal of prophylactic pancreatic stents (PSs) placed during ERCP are recommended. The aim of the study was to examine the proportion of patients whose prophylactic PSs passed or were removed within 4 weeks of ERCP.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who received ERCP with prophylactic PS placement (May 2014 to October 2022) at a tertiary center were identified. The primary endpoint was clearance of the PS ≤4 weeks from ERCP confirmed by radiologic studies or endoscopy. Multivariate analysis was used to identify endoscopist-, patient-, and procedure-related factors associated with the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of 4724 patients undergoing ERCP, 262 (5.5%) received a prophylactic PS (mean age, 56.6 ± 18.5 years; 168 [64%] women). After ERCP, PSs were evaluated in ≤2 weeks in 177 patients (68%; 95% CI, 62-73). Furthermore, PSs were cleared at ≤4 weeks in 135 patients (52%; 95% CI, 46-58) by radiologic studies in 86 (33%) or endoscopic removal in 49 (19%). On multivariate analysis, biliary stent placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8) reduced the odds of timely PS clearance after adjusting for endoscopist-specific clearance rates: top (aOR, 11.1; 95% CI, 4.0-30.5), second (aOR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.5-11.9), and third (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.9-9.0) compared with the bottom quartile. During follow-up of 20.1 ± 23.5 months, 47 of 127 patients (37%) with delayed PS clearance demonstrated a median stent dwelling time of 55 days (range, 29-929).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic PSs were cleared within 4 weeks in only half of the patients after ERCP. In addition to primarily endoscopist-driven factors, biliary stent placement was associated with delayed clearance of prophylactic PSs.

Evaluation of a Novel Easy Loop-Forming Guidewire to Reduce Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis for Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytologic Examination: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether a novel, easy loop-forming guidewire could reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) in patients undergoing endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube placement for serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE).

METHODS

We evaluated patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who underwent SPACE at our institution between January 2015 and April 2023 retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of guidewire used, namely, easy loop-forming and control groups. Propensity score matching was used to compare the incidence of PEP between the groups.

RESULTS

We included 101 patients, with 51 and 50 in the easy loop-forming and control groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 29 pairs of patients were selected from each group. Intraductal ultrasonography of the pancreas was performed more frequently in the easy loop-forming group than in the control group (27.6% vs 0%; P = 0.004); however, PEP incidence was significantly lower in the easy loop-forming group than in the control group (3.4% vs 27.6%; odds ratio, 0.097; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.82; P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the novel easy loop-forming guidewire decreased PEP occurrence in patients who underwent endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage tube placement for SPACE.

Diagnostic Ability and Safety of Repeated Pancreatic Juice Cytology Using an Endoscopic Nasopancreatic Drainage Catheter for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Pathological examination is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Moreover, a reliable pathological diagnosis is extremely important for improving prognosis, especially in early-stage PDAC. This study prospectively evaluated the usefulness of repeated pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) using an endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (ENPD) catheter for the diagnosis of PDAC. We enrolled 82 patients suspected of having resectable PDAC, based on imaging studies, and judged the necessity for cytology. The diagnostic yield of up to six repeated PJCs and the incidence of complications, such as pancreatitis, was evaluated. A total of 60 patients were diagnosed with PDAC. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 46.7% and 95.5%, respectively. The cumulative positivity rate increased with the number of sampling sessions, reaching 58.3% in the sixth session. The sensitivity was significantly higher in the pancreatic head than in the pancreatic tail (p = 0.043). Additionally, it was 100% in four patients with a tumor size ≤10 mm. Pancreatitis occurred in six patients (7.3%), all of whom were treated conservatively. In the diagnosis of PDAC, repeated PJC using an ENPD catheter revealed a cumulative effect of sensitivity up to six times and an excellent diagnostic yield for small PDAC.

Pancreatic Juice Cytology Evaluations Using Synthetic Secretin and Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytological Examination for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pathological examination by endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration is not possible in approximately 10% of pancreatic tumor cases. Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is considered an alternative diagnostic method. However, its diagnostic capability is insufficient, and PJC has been repeatedly redevised. Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytological examination (SPACE) and secretin-loaded PJC (S-PJC) have been recently introduced as alternative diagnostic methods. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic capacity and safety of SPACE and S-PJC using a propensity score-matched analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 75.0%, 100%, and 92.3% for S-PJC, respectively, and 71.4%, 100%, and 92.3% for SPACE, respectively, meaning that there was no significant difference between the groups. Four patients (15.4%) each in the S-PJC and SPACE groups experienced complications, including postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. Overall, there was no difference in efficacy and safety between the SPACE and S-PJC groups.

Diagnostic Yield of Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytologic Examination With Brush Cytology for Pancreatic Ductal Stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) is useful for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal stenosis. This study investigates the utility of adding brush cytology to SPACE during the same procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent SPACE with brush cytology for pancreatic ductal stenosis between February 2014 and July 2020 in our hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included. Eleven had lesions in the pancreatic head lesions, and 23 had lesions in the pancreatic body or tail. Malignancies were found in 22 patients. Endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging showed distal pancreatic duct dilation in 81.8% to 90.6% of cases, with a sensitivity of 63.0% to 65.5%. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of SPACE, brush cytology, and SPACE with brush cytology were 63.6%, 50.0%, and 77.3% (P = 0.19) and 73.5%, 67.6%, and 82.4% (P = 0.42), respectively. No significant differences in diagnostic yield were observed for either pancreatic head lesions or pancreatic body/tail lesions. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis was observed in 4 cases (11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The utility of adding brush cytology to SPACE was limited.

Endoscopic approach in the diagnosis of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Early diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential for improving prognosis; however, diagnosing PDAC at an early stage is challenging. In patients with localized high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PanIN), whose tumorous lesion is undetectable on cross-sectional images such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance image, long-term survival is expected. Pancreatic cystic lesions or main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation are important indirect findings for the initial diagnosis of HG-PanIN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) should play important roles in detecting abnormal image findings, such as local irregular MPD stenosis, caliber MPD changes, small cystic lesions, or branch duct dilatation. Additionally, EUS could detect hypoechoic areas around the MPD stenosis in some patients with HG-PanIN. Subsequently, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and its associated pancreatic juice cytology, including serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) after placement of an endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (ENPD) tube, may have high diagnostic accuracy for confirming the malignancy in HG-PanIN. Although ERCP and its associated pancreatic cytology, including SPACE, may be associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), a recent randomized trial suggested that a 4-Fr ENPD tube may reduce the incidence of PEP. In the future, further prospective multicenter studies are required to establish a standard method of SPACE. Additionally, further studies for novel biomarkers could help to establish evolutionary methods with duodenal fluid and pancreatic juice for the early and accurate diagnosis of early-stage PDAC.

Optimal indication of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography-based cytology in the preoperative pathological diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is extremely useful for pathological diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, puncturing is difficult in some cases, and there is a risk of needle tract seeding. This study evaluated the indications for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography-based (ERP)-based cytology for the preoperative diagnosis of PDAC.

METHODS

This study included 267 patients with PDAC who underwent preoperative ERP. The diagnostic performance of ERP-based cytology for PDAC was evaluated based on the sample collection method (pancreatic juice cytology [PJC] during ERP, brush cytology, PJC via endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage [ENPD] catheter), lesion site (pancreatic head, body/tail), and lesion size (≤10 mm, 10-20 mm, >20 mm), and compared with the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity of ERP-based cytology was 54.9%; sensitivity by the sampling method was 34.7% for PJC during ERP, 65.8% for brush cytology, and 30.8% for PJC via an ENPD catheter. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 85.3%. Brush cytology and PJC via an ENPD catheter were performed more often in pancreatic body/tail lesions than in head lesions (P = 0.016 and P < 0.001, respectively), and the overall sensitivity of ERP-based cytology was better for body/tail lesions (63.2% vs. 49.0%, P = 0.025). The sensitivities of ERP-based cytology and EUS-FNA in diagnosing PDAC ≤10 mm were 92.3% and 33.3%, respectively. Post-ERP pancreatitis was observed in 22 patients (8.2%) and significantly less common with ENPD catheters (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

ERP-based cytology may be considered the first choice for pathological diagnosis of PDAC ≤10 mm and in the pancreatic body/tail.

Clinical Analysis of Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer and Proposal for a New Diagnostic Algorithm: A Multicenter Observational Study

Early diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is challenging but essential for improving its poor prognosis. We established a multicenter study to clarify the clinicopathological features, and to propose new algorithm for early diagnosis of PDAC. Ninety-six patients with stage 0 and IA PDAC were enrolled from 13 high-volume centers. Overall, 70% of the patients were asymptomatic. The serum pancreatic enzyme levels were abnormal in half of the patients. The sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for detecting small PDAC was superior to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (82%, 58%, and 38%, respectively). Indirect imaging findings were useful to detect early-stage PDAC; especially, main pancreatic duct stenosis on MRI had the highest positive rate of 86% in stage 0 patients. For preoperative pathological diagnosis, the sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-associated pancreatic juice cytology was 84%. Among the stage IA patients, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration revealed adenocarcinoma in 93% patients. For early diagnosis of PDAC, it is essential to identify asymptomatic patients and ensure close examinations of indirect imaging findings and standardization of preoperative pathological diagnosis. Therefore, a new diagnostic algorithm based on tumor size and imaging findings should be developed.

Predictive Value of Localized Stenosis of the Main Pancreatic Duct for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer

Background/Aims:

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of localized stenosis of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) for early detection of pancreatic cancer.

Methods:

Among 689 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde pancreatography from January 2008 to September 2018, 19 patients with MPD findings were enrolled. These patients showed findings for indicating suspicious pancreatic cancer at an early stage (FiCE); FiCE was defined as a single, localized stenosis in the MPD without a detectable mass (using any other imaging methods) and without other pancreatic diseases, such as definite chronic pancreatitis, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, and autoimmune pancreatitis. Final diagnoses were established by examining resected specimens or through follow-up examinations after an interval of >5 years.

Results:

Among 19 patients with FiCE, 11 underwent surgical resection and 8 were evaluated after a >5-year observation period. The final diagnosis of the MPD stenosis was judged to be pancreatic cancer in 9 patients (47%), including 3 with intraepithelial cancer, and to be a non-neoplastic change in 10. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of preoperative pancreatic juice cytology were 75%, 100%, and 88%, respectively.

Conclusions:

The predictive value of FiCE for pancreatic cancer prevalence was 47%. Histological confirmation with pancreatic juice cytology is necessary before surgical resection.

Roles of ERCP in the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

It has been reported that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is of value in evaluating precise pancreatograms of the pancreatic duct (PD). Recently, institutions have tended to perform magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the diagnosis of PD due to post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). In small pancreatic cancer (PC), including PC in situ (PCIS) which is undetectable on cross sectional images, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRCP serve important roles in detecting local irregular stenosis of the PD or small cystic lesions. Subsequently, ERCP and associated serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) obtained by endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (ENPD) may be useful in the diagnosis of very early-stage PC. Further prospective multicenter studies are required to establish a standard method of SPACE for the early diagnosis of PC.