Ex vivo assessment of anchoring force of covered biflanged metal stent and covered self-expandable metal stent for interventional endoscopic ultrasound

Is endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy better than surgical gastrojejunostomy or duodenal stenting?

OBJECTIVES

Gastrojejunostomy is a critical procedure for managing gastric outlet obstruction. While surgical gastrojejunostomy has traditionally been the standard approach, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy has emerged as a promising endoscopic alternative. This comprehensive review aims to explore the development, techniques, outcomes, and comparative effectiveness of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in comparison to duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases to identify relevant studies published up to April 2024. The search included keywords related to EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy, surgical gastrojejunostomy, and duodenal stenting. Studies reporting on technical success, clinical success, complications, recurrence rates, quality of life, and long-term outcomes were included for analysis.

RESULTS

The development of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy has evolved significantly over the years, driven by device advancements and improved endoscopic techniques. Comparative studies have shown that the technique offers several advantages, including the ability to create an anastomosis without the need for surgery, reduced invasiveness, shorter hospital stays, and potentially improved patient outcomes as compared to duodenal stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy represents a promising alternative to surgical gastrojejunostomy and duodenal stenting for the management of gastric outlet obstruction. The technique has evolved significantly, offering a less invasive and more effective treatment option.

Radial force and wire structure determine the onset of covered self-expandable metal stent migration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: Measurement of sliding-resistance force using a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) migration after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a severe complication. The migration risk could be related to the surface friction of SEMS, assumed to be affected by the wire structure and mechanical properties, including radial force (RF); however, their relevance remains unclear. This experimental study aimed to assess the mechanical properties of SEMS involved in the onset of stent migration by measuring the sliding-resistance force (SF) as the SEMS moves through the stomach wall.

METHODS

The SF of seven types of 8-mm diameter SEMS (four braided and three laser-cut types) and porcine stomach wall was measured with a universal testing machine. The SF of each SEMS was measured three times, and the average maximum SF (SFmax) was used for analysis. The correlation between SFmax and RF of each SEMS was evaluated.

RESULTS

SFmax and RF showed a very strong positive correlation (r = 0.92). Compared to the regression line predictions in the scatter plots of SFmax and RF, the SFmax of laser-cut and braided type SEMSs had positive and negative residuals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Selecting a laser-cut type SEMS with a higher RF may more effectively prevent the onset of stent migration against the stomach wall in EUS-HGS.

Measurement of the anchoring force of covered self-expandable and lumen-apposing metal stents for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography

OBJECTIVES

Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography is performed for various situations that require drainage, after which stent migration is the most severe adverse event. Several lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) provide antimigration systems; however, their anchoring ability has not been studied well. Therefore, we measured and compared the anchoring force (ACF) of commercially available LAMS and CSEMS.

METHODS

Anchoring force was measured for five types of LAMS (NAGI, SPAXUS, Plumber, and AXIOS 8 and 10 mm) and seven types of CSEMS (BCL, SHCL, BCG, BPD [four types of HANAROSTENT], HILZO, Niti-S [Spring Stopper], and Wallflex). We created a phantom model for inducing stent migration. It has a rotatable part as a curved fixture, and we measured ACF at angles between 0° and 40°.

RESULTS

The mean ACF at 0° and 20° were NAGI 1.50, 1.84 N, SPAXUS 1.73, 1.72 N, Plumber 2.64, 2.03 N, and AXIOS 3.96, 3.61 N, respectively; and BCL 0.48, 0.53 N, Wallflex 0.53, 0.48 N, SHCL 0.64, 0.73 N, HILZO 1.09, 1.09 N, BCG 1.22, 1.20 N, BPD 1.78, 1.67 N, and Spring Stopper 2.29, 2.51 N.

CONCLUSION

We measured ACF in LAMS and CSEMS with a new phantom model. The highest value among the LAMS was for the AXIOS and among the CSEMS was for the Spring Stopper. Some of the ACF values varied with the direction of pull. These findings may have a significant impact on stent selection for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, and this model can be used to evaluate newly developed stents.