Factors associated with improvement in MELD score after antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Determinants of outcomes in patients with hepatitis B virus-decompensated cirrhosis

The role of pre-treatment HBV DNA levels on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis is unclear. This study investigated the effects of pre-treatment HBV DNA and other determinants on short-term and long-term survival of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with decompensated cirrhosis. A total of 278 cirrhotic decompensated CHB patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were retrospectively enrolled. Cox regression models were used to analyze factors associated with all-cause mortality. The median follow-up time was 17 months (IQR2.17-58.94), during which 132 patients (47.4%) either died or underwent liver transplantation. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 16%, 29%, 34%, 39%, and 51% at the 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 5-year follow-ups, respectively. Risk factors associated with 3-month all-cause mortality were age, presence of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, baseline hepatitis flares, pre-treatment HBV DNA levels, and MELD scores. In the subgroup analysis, for 3-month all-cause mortality, significant associations of age, baseline hepatitis flares, and MELD scores with pre-treatment HBV DNA levels were observed (p for interaction were 0.005, 0.032, and 0.030, respectively). Risk factors associated with 5-year all-cause mortality were age, the presence of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, and MELD scores. Liver functional reserve and age played a critical role in the prognosis of CHB patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Pre-treatment HBV DNA levels had an impact on short-term all-cause mortality, but not on long-term all-cause mortality.

Characterization of acute-on-chronic liver diseases: A multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver disease (AoCLD) accounts for the majority of patients hospitalized in the Department of Hepatology or Infectious Diseases.

AIM

To explore the characterization of AoCLD to provide theoretical guidance for the accurate diagnosis and prognosis of AoCLD.

METHODS

Patients with AoCLD from the Chinese Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) study cohort were included in this study. The clinical characteristics and outcomes, and the 90-d survival rate associated with each clinical type of AoCLD were analyzed, using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 3375 patients with AoCLD were enrolled, including 1679 (49.7%) patients with liver cirrhosis acute decompensation (LC-AD), 850 (25.2%) patients with ACLF, 577 (17.1%) patients with chronic hepatitis acute exacerbation (CHAE), and 269 (8.0%) patients with liver cirrhosis active phase (LC-A). The most common cause of chronic liver disease (CLD) was HBV infection (71.4%). The most common precipitants of AoCLD was bacterial infection (22.8%). The 90-d mortality rates of each clinical subtype of AoCLD were 43.4% (232/535) for type-C ACLF, 36.0% (36/100) for type-B ACLF, 27.0% (58/215) for type-A ACLF, 9.0% (151/1679) for LC-AD, 3.0% (8/269) for LC-A, and 1.2% (7/577) for CHAE.

CONCLUSION

HBV infection is the main cause of CLD, and bacterial infection is the main precipitant of AoCLD. The most common clinical type of AoCLD is LC-AD. Early diagnosis and timely intervention are needed to reduce the mortality of patients with LC-AD or ACLF.

Efficacy of Plasma Exchange and a Double-Plasma Molecular Absorption System for Treating Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Hepatitis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related hepatitis has been increasing in the past decade. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of plasma exchange (PE) and a double-plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) for ICI-related hepatitis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with ICI-related hepatitis treated at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (China). The collected data included biochemical indices, treatments, the use of an artificial liver support system (ALSS), and outcomes. Results: From June 2021 to January 2023, 16 patients were treated and included in the analysis. Eight patients in group A received general support. The other 8 patients in group B received general support, plus 3 rounds of ALSS every 2 - 4 days (4 patients were treated with PE and the others with DPMAS + PE). There was no significant difference in age and treatment days between the two groups. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in direct bilirubin (DBIL), glutamine transpeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), procalcitonin, the international normalized ratio (INR), model for end-stage liver disease scores, albumin, globulin, and hemocyte count between groups A and B (in all cases, P > 0.05). However, the total bilirubin (TBIL) of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P = 0.029). After treatment, TBIL and DBIL were significantly decreased in group B (both P < 0.05), and group B had a significantly lower GGT (P = 0.028) and higher INR (P = 0.004) than group A. The ALP level of group B was also lower, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.068). No allergic reaction or severe adverse effect was observed. Conclusions: Both PE and DPMAS + PE can effectively improve ICI-related hepatitis within the short term and are more effective for patients with hyperbilirubinemia. Liver function should be monitored continuously during treatment.

Two-year risedronate treatment for osteoporosis in patients with esophageal varices: a non-randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of osteoporosis treatment, but their use for patients with esophageal varices has been avoided due to the risk of esophagitis, which may cause variceal bleeding. Since most clinical trials assessing osteoporosis treatment last 2-3 years, this study aimed to evaluate a 2-year risedronate treatment for patients with esophageal varices and liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

The study received Institutional Review Board approval, and the sample was divided into two groups according to bone mineral density (BMD). Cirrhosis severity and endoscopic findings at baseline were similar between the groups. The intervention group had 51 patients with osteoporosis, who received oral risedronate 35 mg weekly plus calcium and vitamin D supplements. The control group had 51 patients with osteopenia, receiving only the supplements. Scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopies and BMD measurements were carried out.

RESULTS

The adjusted esophagitis risk was higher in the intervention group; however, none of the subjects had digestive bleeding. Lumbar spine BMD increased in the intervention group (- 3.06 ± 0.71 to - 2.33 ± 0.90; p < 0.001) and in the control group (- 1.38 ± 0.77 to - 1.10 ± 1.05; p = 0.012). Femoral neck BMD did not change in the intervention group (- 1.64 ± 0.91 to - 1.71 ± 0.95; p = 0.220), but tended to decrease in the control group (- 1.00 ± 0.74 to - 1.09 ± 0.82; p = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

Oral risedronate was effective and did not cause gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices under endoscopic surveillance.

Long-term efficacy and safety of nucleos(t)ides analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Nucleos(t)ide analogues with high barrier to resistance are regarded as the principal therapeutic option for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Treatment with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and the later released tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is highly effective at controlling hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and, in the vast majority of patients, is well tolerated. No significant differences in viral suppression have been described among the different regimens, although an earlier achievement in biochemical response has been suggested first under TDF and recently under TAF. High barrier to resistance NAs rarely achieve hepatitis B surface antigen sero-clearance, and therefore should be maintained life-long in most cases. This has increased concerns about treatment-related toxicity, especially in patients under TDF with additional risk factors for kidney and bone impairment. TAF has shown a better bone and kidney safety profile than TDF, although it is not yet available worldwide due to its higher cost. Emergence of adverse events should be monitored since treatment-switch to ETV/TAF seems to be effective and safe in HBV mono-infected subjects. Finally, although an effective antiviral treatment leads to a clear improvement in clinical outcome of CHB patients; the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not completely avoided with viral suppression. Whether tenofovir-based regimens provide any additional benefit over ETV in HCC prevention remains unclear and requires further investigation.