Reticuloendothelial activation and phenotypic alteration of peripheral monocytes with enhanced liver recruitment drive liver injury secondary to yellow phosphorus

On-treatment decline in MELD score predicts one-month transplant-free survival in rodenticidal hepatotoxicity patients treated with low-volume plasma exchange

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Plasma exchange (PLEX) improves survival in patients with rodenticidal hepatotoxicity. However, predictors of treatment response are unknown. We aimed at assessing predictors of response to PLEX treatment in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with rodenticidal hepatotoxicity from 2014 to 2023 managed in our department were included in this study. Kochi criteria (model for end-stage liver disease [MELD] score ≥ 36 or international normalized ratio [INR] ≥ 6 with hepatic encephalopathy [HE]) derived specifically for rodenticidal hepatotoxicity (PubMed IDentifier [PMID]: 26310868) were used to assess need for liver transplantation. We analyzed predictors of survival at one month. ∆Bilirubin, ∆MELD score and ∆INR were calculated as percentage change of the parameter after third PLEX session (or after last PLEX if < 3 PLEX sessions done) from baseline pre-PLEX value.

RESULTS

Of 200 patients with rodenticidal hepatotoxicity, 114 patients were treated with low-volume PLEX (PLEX-LV). No patient had liver transplantation. Of 78 patients who fulfilled Kochi criteria, 32 patients were PLEX-LV eligible and underwent PLEX-LV (M: 10; age: 20.5, 7-70 years; median, range; acute liver failure: 24). Twenty-two (69%; acute liver failure: 14) of the 32 patients were alive at one month. Presence of HE (p = 0.03) and ∆MELD (p < 0.001) were significant predictors on univariate analysis, while ∆MELD (aOR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98, p = 0.01) was the only significant independent predictor of one-month transplant-free survival. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for ∆MELD was 0.93 (95% CI:0.85-1.00) and a decrease of ≥ 20% in MELD score while on PLEX-LV had 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity in predicting one-month survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Decline in MELD while on PLEX-LV independently predicted one-month transplant-free survival in rodenticidal hepatotoxicity patients. This may help guide decision on stopping PLEX-LV in patients predicted to respond to treatment and to consider alternate treatment options in non-responders.

Extra-corporeal non-liver transplant therapies for acute liver failure: Focus on plasma exchange and continuous renal replacement therapy

The acute inflammatory milieu in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) results in 'toxic' blood in these patients. In vitro experiments have shown that the plasma obtained from ALF patients is toxic to rabbit hepatocytes and inhibits regeneration of rat hepatocytes. Treatments such as plasma exchange and continuous renal replacement therapy to cleanse the blood have improved survival in ALF patients. In the liver microcirculation, the exchange of fluid across fenestrae in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) is vital for proper functioning of hepatocytes. Clogging of the liver filter bed by inflammatory debris and cells ('traffic jam hypothesis') impeding blood flow in sinusoids may in turn reduce the exchange of fluid across LSEC fenestrae and cause dysfunction and necrosis of hepatocytes in ALF patients. In mouse model of paracetamol overdose, disturbances in microcirculation in the liver preceded the development of injury and necrosis of hepatocytes. This may represent a reversible pathophysiological mechanism in ALF which may be improved by the anti-inflammatory effect of plasma exchange. Wider access to urgent plasma exchange is a major advantage compared to urgent liver transplantation to treat ALF patients worldwide, especially so in resource constrained settings. Continuous hemo-filtration or dialysis is used to reduce ammonia levels and treat cerebral edema in ALF patients. In this review, we discuss the different modalities to cleanse the blood in ALF patients, with an emphasis on plasma exchange, from a hepatology perspective.

Von Willebrand Factor as a Biomarker for Liver Disease - An Update

The von Willebrand factor (vWF) is best known for its role in the hemostatic pathway, aiding platelet adhesion and aggregation, as well as circulating along with coagulation factor VIII, prolonging its half-life. However, vWF is more than a hemostatic protein and is a marker of endothelial dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. The levels of vWF increase progressively as cirrhosis progresses. Despite its qualitative defects, it can support and carry out its hemostatic role and contribute to a pro-coagulant disbalance. Moreover, it has been shown to be a good noninvasive marker for predicting clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). The vWF has been shown to predict decompensation and mortality among cirrhosis patients independently of the stage of liver disease and severity of portal hypertension. Increased vWF levels in the setting of endothelial injury predict bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation. The vWF-to-thrombocyte ratio (VITRO) score adds to the diagnostic ability of vWF alone in detecting CSPH non-invasively. Not only have vWF levels been shown to help predict the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among cirrhosis patients, but they also predict the risk of complications post-resection for HCC and response to systemic therapies. vWF-induced portal microthrombi have been purported to contribute to the pathogenesis of acute liver failure progression as well as non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. The prospect of modulation of vWF levels using drugs such as non-selective beta-blockers, statins, anticoagulants, and non-absorbable antibiotics and its use as a predictive biomarker for the response to these drugs needs to be explored.