1
|
Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M, Zakavi SS, Ghabili K, Harfouche MN, Jha R, Camacho JC, Shaikh J, Radkani P, Chalhoub WM, Ozen M, Habibollahi P, Smirniotopoulos JB, Nezami N. Percutaneous Interventions and Necrosectomy in the Management of Peripancreatic Collections. Semin Intervent Radiol 2025; 42:82-92. [PMID: 40342377 PMCID: PMC12058290 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2025]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a severe inflammatory condition of the pancreas with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in its necrotizing form. This review explores the management of peripancreatic collections and in particular necrotizing pancreatitis, focusing on the evolution from traditional open surgical methods to contemporary minimally invasive image-guided techniques. AP can lead to various local complications, including pancreatic pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections, and walled-off necrosis. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosing complications of AP, while treatment approaches have shifted toward a step-up strategy involving percutaneous, endoscopic, and minimally invasive methods. Percutaneous necrosectomy, combining mechanical and chemical debridement, has shown promising results. Mechanical necrosectomy uses devices like baskets and retrieval nets, while chemical necrosectomy adds agents like hydrogen peroxide and streptokinase. Current evidence suggests that the step-up approach, starting with percutaneous drainage or necrosectomy and escalating to endoscopic or surgical interventions, if necessary, improves patient outcomes. The review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing complicated AP and highlights ongoing advancements in minimally invasive techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Seyed Sina Zakavi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Kamyar Ghabili
- Department of Radiology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Melike N. Harfouche
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Reena Jha
- Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Juan C. Camacho
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Associates of Florida, Sarasota, Florida
| | - Jamil Shaikh
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Pejman Radkani
- Department of Surgery, The Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Walid M. Chalhoub
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Merve Ozen
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John B. Smirniotopoulos
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
- Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, District of Columbia
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bharath PN, Rana SS. Early Endoscopic Interventions for Pancreatic Necrosis: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:1571-1582. [PMID: 38528209 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08347-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic transmural drainage is usually performed for symptomatic well-encapsulated walled-off necrosis (WON) that usually develops in the delayed phase (> 4 weeks after disease onset) of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). Endoscopic drainage is usually not advocated in the early (< 4 weeks after disease onset) stage of illness because of the risk of complications due to an incompletely formed encapsulating wall and poor demarcation of viable from necrotic tissue. However, emerging data from expert tertiary care centres over the last few years shows that the early endoscopic transluminal drainage approach is effective and safe. The development of lumen-apposing metal stents and better accessories for endoscopic necrosectomy has fuelled the expansion of indications of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis. However, early endoscopic drainage is associated with higher rates of adverse events; therefore, careful patient selection is paramount. This article will review the current indications, techniques and outcomes of early endoscopic transluminal drainage in pancreatic necrotic collections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pardhu Neelam Bharath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
| |
Collapse
|