1
|
Dumitrescu I, Casteels M, De Vliegher K, Mortelmans L, Dilles T. Home care nurses’ management of high-risk medications: a cross-sectional study. J Pharm Policy Pract 2022; 15:88. [PMID: 36414977 PMCID: PMC9682630 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-022-00476-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High-risk medications use at home entails an increased risk of significant harm to the patient. While interventions and strategies to improve medications care have been implemented in hospitals, it remains unclear how this type of medications care is provided in the home care setting. The objective was to describe home care nurses’ management of high-risk medications. Methods A cross-sectional, descriptive design was set up in home care nurses in Flanders, Belgium. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling and could be included in the study if they provided medications care and worked as a home care nurses. Participants completed an online structured questionnaire. Questions were asked about demographic information, work experience, nurses’ general attitude regarding high-risk medications, contact with high-risk medications and the assessment of risk and severity of harm, specific initiatives undertaken to improve high-risk medications care and the use of additional measures when dealing with high-risk medications. Descriptive statistics were used. Results A total of 2283 home care nurses participated in this study. In our study, 98% of the nurses reported dealing high-risk medications. Home care nurses dealt the most with anticoagulants (96%), insulin (94%) and hypnotics and sedatives (87%). Most nurses took additional measures with high-risk medications in less than 25% of the cases, with the individual double check being the most performed measure for all high-risk medications except lithium. Nurses employed by an organization received support mostly in the form of a procedure while self-employed nurses mostly look for support through external organizations and information sources.
Conclusions The study shows several gaps regarding high-risk medications care, which can imply safety risks. Implementation and evaluation of more standardized high-risk medications care, developing and implementing procedures or guidelines and providing continuous training for home care nurses are advised. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-022-00476-2.
Collapse
|
2
|
Damschroder LJ, Sussman JB, Pfeiffer PN, Kurlander JE, Freitag MB, Robinson CH, Spoutz P, Christopher MLD, Battar S, Dickerson K, Sedgwick C, Wallace-Lacey AG, Barnes GD, Linsky AM, Ulmer CS, Lowery JC. Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS): protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of implementation strategies to optimize and sustain use of evidence-based practices in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) patients. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:53. [PMID: 35568903 PMCID: PMC9107220 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00297-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The adoption and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is a challenge within many healthcare systems, especially in settings that have already strived but failed to achieve longer-term goals. The Veterans Affairs (VA) Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program was funded as a series of trials to test multi-component implementation strategies to sustain optimal use of three EBPs: (1) a deprescribing approach intended to reduce potentially inappropriate polypharmacy; (2) appropriate dosing and drug selection of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs); and (3) use of cognitive behavioral therapy as first-line treatment for insomnia before pharmacologic treatment. We describe the design and methods for a harmonized series of cluster-randomized control trials comparing two implementation strategies. Methods For each trial, we will recruit 8–12 clinics (24–36 total). All will have access to relevant clinical data to identify patients who may benefit from the target EBP at that clinic and provider. For each trial, clinics will be randomized to one of two implementation strategies to improve the use of the EBPs: (1) individual-level academic detailing (AD) or (2) AD plus the team-based Learn. Engage. Act. Process. (LEAP) quality improvement (QI) learning program. The primary outcomes will be operationalized across the three trials as a patient-level dichotomous response (yes/no) indicating patients with potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among those who may benefit from the EBP. This outcome will be computed using month-by-month administrative data. Primary comparison between the two implementation strategies will be analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with clinic-level monthly (13 to 36 months) percent of PIMs as the dependent variable. Primary comparative endpoint will be at 18 months post-baseline. Each trial will also be analyzed independently. Discussion MIDAS QUERI trials will focus on fostering sustained use of EBPs that previously had targeted but incomplete implementation. Our implementation approaches are designed to engage frontline clinicians in a dynamic optimization process that integrates the use of actional clinical data and making incremental changes, designed to be feasible within busy clinical settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05065502. Registered October 4, 2021—retrospectively registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00297-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Damschroder
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
| | - Jeremy B Sussman
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Paul N Pfeiffer
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jacob E Kurlander
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michelle B Freitag
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Claire H Robinson
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Patrick Spoutz
- Veterans Health Affairs VISN 20 Pharmacy Benefits Management, Vancouver, WA, USA
| | - Melissa L D Christopher
- Pharmacy Benefits Management Services, Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington DC, 20420, USA
| | - Saraswathy Battar
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Christopher Sedgwick
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Heartland Network (VISN 15), Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey D Barnes
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amy M Linsky
- Section of General Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Health Organizations and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.,Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christi S Ulmer
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Julie C Lowery
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhuang M, Concannon D, Manley E. A Framework for Evaluating Dashboards in Healthcare. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS 2022; 28:1715-1731. [PMID: 35213306 DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2022.3147154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In the era of 'information overload', effective information provision is essential for enabling rapid response and critical decision making. In making sense of diverse information sources, dashboards have become an indispensable tool, providing fast, effective, adaptable, and personalized access to information for professionals and the general public alike. However, these objectives place heavy requirements on dashboards as information systems in usability and effective design. Understanding these issues is challenging given the absence of consistent and comprehensive approaches to dashboard evaluation. In this article we systematically review literature on dashboard implementation in healthcare, where dashboards have been employed widely, and where there is widespread interest for improving the current state of the art, and subsequently analyse approaches taken towards evaluation. We draw upon consolidated dashboard literature and our own observations to introduce a general definition of dashboards which is more relevant to current trends, together with seven evaluation scenarios - task performance, behaviour change, interaction workflow, perceived engagement, potential utility, algorithm performance and system implementation. These scenarios distinguish different evaluation purposes which we illustrate through measurements, example studies, and common challenges in evaluation study design. We provide a breakdown of each evaluation scenario, and highlight some of the more subtle questions. We demonstrate the use of the proposed framework by a design study guided by this framework. We conclude by comparing this framework with existing literature, outlining a number of active discussion points and a set of dashboard evaluation best practices for the academic, clinical and software development communities alike.
Collapse
|
4
|
Damoiseaux-Volman BA, Medlock S, van der Meulen DM, de Boer J, Romijn JA, van der Velde N, Abu-Hanna A. Clinical validation of clinical decision support systems for medication review: A scoping review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:2035-2051. [PMID: 34837238 PMCID: PMC9299995 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this scoping review is to summarize approaches and outcomes of clinical validation studies of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) to support (part of) a medication review. A literature search was conducted in Embase and Medline. In total, 30 articles validating a CDSS were ultimately included. Most of the studies focused on detection of adverse drug events, potentially inappropriate medications and drug‐related problems. We categorized the included articles in three groups: studies subjectively reviewing the clinical relevance of CDSS's output (21/30 studies) resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) for clinical relevance of 4–80%; studies determining the relationship between alerts and actual events (10/30 studies) resulting in a PPV for actual events of 5–80%; and studies comparing output of CDSSs to chart/medication reviews in the whole study population (10/30 studies) resulting in a sensitivity of 28–85% and specificity of 42–75%. We found heterogeneity in the methods used and in the outcome measures. The validation studies did not report the use of a published CDSS validation strategy. To improve the effectiveness and uptake of CDSSs supporting a medication review, future research would benefit from a more systematic and comprehensive validation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit A Damoiseaux-Volman
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Medlock
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Delanie M van der Meulen
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jesse de Boer
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Romijn
- Department of Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nathalie van der Velde
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ameen Abu-Hanna
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
As SARS-CoV-2 stunned and overtook everyone's lives, multiple daily briefings, protocols, policies and incident command committees were mobilized to provide frontline staff with the tools, supplies and infrastructure needed to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical resources were immediately shifted. In light of the necessity for self-isolation, telemedicine was expanded, although there has been concern than non-pandemic disorders were being ignored. Ambulatory care services such as bone densitometry and osteoporosis centered clinics came to a near halt. Progress with fracture prevention has been challenged. Despite the prolonged pandemic and the consequent sense of exhaustion, we must re-engage with chronic bone health concerns and fracture prevention. Creating triaging systems for bone mineral testing and in person visits, treating individuals designated as high risk of fracture using fracture risk assessment tools such as FRAX, maintaining telemedicine, leveraging other bone health care team members to monitor and care for osteoporotic patients, and re-engaging our primary care colleagues will remain paramount but challenging. The pandemic persists. Thus, we will summarize what we have learned about COVID-19 and bone health and provide a framework for osteoporosis diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up with the extended COVID-19 pandemic. The goal is to preserve bone health, with focused interventions to sustain osteoporosis screening and treatment initiation/maintenance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Narla
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - R A Adler
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Section (111P), McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 1201 Broad Rock Boulevard, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA.
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes Mellitus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akkawi ME, Nik Mohamed MH, Md Aris MA. The impact of a multifaceted intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing among discharged older adults: a before-and-after study. J Pharm Policy Pract 2020; 13:39. [PMID: 32695426 PMCID: PMC7367269 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-020-00236-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with the incidence of adverse drug reactions, drug-related hospitalization and other negative outcomes in older adults. After hospitalization, older adults might be discharged with several types of PIPs. Studies have found that the lack of healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge regarding PIP is one of the major contributing factors in this issue. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians' and clinical pharmacists' behavior regarding potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and potential prescribing omission (PPO) among hospitalized older adults. Methods This is a before-and-after study that took place in a tertiary Malaysian hospital. Discharge medications of patients ≥65 years old were reviewed to identify PIMs/PPOs using version 2 of the STOPP/START criteria. The prevalence and pattern of PIM/PPO before and after the intervention were compared. The intervention targeted the physicians and clinical pharmacists and it consisted of academic detailing and a newly developed smartphone application (app). Results The study involved 240 patients before (control group) and 240 patients after the intervention. The prevalence of PIM was 22% and 27% before and after the intervention, respectively (P = 0.213). The prevalence of PPO in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (42% Vs. 53.3%); P = 0.014. This difference remained statistically significant after controlling for other variables (P = 0.015). The intervention was effective in reducing the two most common PPOs; the omission of vitamin D supplements in patients with a history of falls (P = 0.001) and the omission of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with coronary artery disease (P = 0.03). Conclusions The smartphone app coupled with academic detailing was effective in reducing the prevalence of PPO at discharge. However, it did not significantly affect the prevalence or pattern of PIM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Eid Akkawi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohamad Haniki Nik Mohamed
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Aznan Md Aris
- Department of Family Medicine & Non-Communicable Disease Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torres-Bondia F, de Batlle J, Galván L, Buti M, Barbé F, Piñol-Ripoll G. Trends in the consumption rates of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in the health region of Lleida from 2002 to 2015. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:818. [PMID: 32487058 PMCID: PMC7268471 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08984-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The high prevalence and long-term use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) treatment are debated topics because of the risk they can cause to the patients. Despite the current information on the risk-benefit balance of these drugs, their consumption remains particularly high. We determined the trend in the consumption prevalence of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and drugs related to BZDs (Z-drugs) in the population of the Health Region of Lleida to explore patterns of use and the associated characteristics associated between 2002 and 2015. Methods An analysis of secular trends was carried out between 2002 and 2015; the databased included all individuals from the Health Region of Lleida, which had 358,157 inhabitants in 2015, that consumed BZDs. The consumption of BZDs was evaluated using prescription billing data from the Public Health System. All types of BZDs and BZD analogues that had been approved by the drug agency were included. Trends by age and sex were investigated. Results Over the whole study period, a total of 161,125 individuals accounted for 338,148 dispensations. Overall, 59% were women, and the mean age was 56 years. The dispensing prevalence of BZDs use in 2015 was 14.2% overall —18.8% in women and 9.6% in men—and was 36% in those over 65 years. According to the half-life of BZDs, the prevalence of short-intermediate BZD use, intermediate-long BZD use, and Z-drugs use was 9.7, 5.5 and 0.8%, respectively. The evolution of the annual prevalence of BZD dispensing showed a progressive decline, from 15.3% in 2002 to 14.2% in 2015, which was attributed to a decrease in the consumption of intermediate-long half-life BZDs (8.0% vs. 5.5%) and Z-drugs (1.4% vs. 0.8%). Conclusion The dispensing prevalence of BZDs and Z-drugs was high, although a small reduction was observed during this time period. The dispensing prevalence was especially high in the population over 65, despite the risk of cognitive decline and falls. Integral actions are required to lower the BZD prescription rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Torres-Bondia
- Pharmacy Department, Clinical Neuroscience Research, IRBLleida, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | - J de Batlle
- Biomedical Research Networking Center in Respiratory Diseases (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.,Group of Translational Research in Respiratory Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital and Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - L Galván
- Pharmacy Department, Servei Català de la Salut (Catalan Health Services), Lleida, Spain
| | - M Buti
- Unitat d'Avaluació Clínica (Clinical Evaluation Unit), Institut Català de la Salut (Catalan Institute of Health), Lleida, Spain
| | - F Barbé
- Biomedical Research Networking Center in Respiratory Diseases (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.,Group of Translational Research in Respiratory Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital and Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - G Piñol-Ripoll
- Unitat Trastorns Cognitius (Cognitive Disorders Unit), Clinical Neuroscience Research, IRBLleida, Santa Maria University Hospital, Rovira Roure n° 44, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in an Irish University Teaching Hospital: A Mixed-Methods Study. PHARMACY 2020; 8:pharmacy8010014. [PMID: 32019094 PMCID: PMC7151682 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy8010014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Medication review (MR) is a vital part of the pharmacist’s role in hospital. However, in the South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital (SIVUH), Cork, Ireland, this has not been fully implemented due to resource issues. In addition, the cost of providing this service has not been evaluated. Moreover, it is not clear how other members of the multidisciplinary team e.g., Nurses, value any interventions made as a result of the MR. This mixed methods study assessed the impact of MR in terms of (i) potential clinical harm, (ii) cost avoidance and (iii) the views of nursing staff on the role of the pharmacist. The setting is a 192-bed, voluntary, acute hospital, in the Munster region of Ireland. Study I: The pharmacist provided MR to patients conventionally once a week. Any interventions were then assessed for potential clinical harm and to calculate cost avoidance. Study II: Semi-structured interviews, guided by a topic guide were completed with 12 nurses (11 female). Thematic analysis was used to code the main themes. Main outcome measure: To estimate the cost, cost avoidance, and the net cost benefit ratio of MR provided by pharmacists. Study I: Of 128 patients who received the MR, 113 interventions were made. The estimated cost of providing the MR was €2559 (senior pharmacist). Using €1084 as the cost of an adverse drug event (ADE), the cost avoidance was calculated at €42,330. This led to a net cost benefit of €39,771 (senior pharmacist) which equated to a net cost benefit ratio of 16.5:1. Study II: The main themes were (i) perceptions of pharmacy services, (ii) the role of the pharmacist—past, present and future, and (iii) teamwork and communication. Nurses expressed a desire to have more pharmacists present on the wards.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rankin A, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC, Ryan C, Hughes C. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 9:CD008165. [PMID: 30175841 PMCID: PMC6513645 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008165.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, hence interest in appropriate polypharmacy, where many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients, is growing. This is the second update of this Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES To determine which interventions, alone or in combination, are effective in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and two trials registers up until 7 February 2018, together with handsearching of reference lists to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in people aged 65 years and older, prescribed polypharmacy (four or more medicines), which used a validated tool to assess prescribing appropriateness. These tools can be classified as either implicit tools (judgement-based/based on expert professional judgement) or explicit tools (criterion-based, comprising lists of drugs to be avoided in older people). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. We pooled study-specific estimates, and used a random-effects model to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We identified 32 studies, 20 from this update. Included studies consisted of 18 randomised trials, 10 cluster randomised trials (one of which was a stepped-wedge design), two non-randomised trials and two controlled before-after studies. One intervention consisted of computerised decision support (CDS); and 31 were complex, multi-faceted pharmaceutical-care based approaches (i.e. the responsible provision of medicines to improve patient's outcomes), one of which incorporated a CDS component as part of their multi-faceted intervention. Interventions were provided in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals such as general physicians, pharmacists and geriatricians, and all were conducted in high-income countries. Assessments using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, found that there was a high and/or unclear risk of bias across a number of domains. Based on the GRADE approach, the overall certainty of evidence for each pooled outcome ranged from low to very low.It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care improves medication appropriateness (as measured by an implicit tool), mean difference (MD) -4.76, 95% CI -9.20 to -0.33; 5 studies, N = 517; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.22, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.05; 7 studies; N = 1832; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the proportion of patients with one or more PIMs, (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.02; 11 studies; N = 3079; very low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may slightly reduce the number of potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) (SMD -0.81, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.64; 2 studies; N = 569; low-certainty evidence), however it must be noted that this effect estimate is based on only two studies, which had serious limitations in terms of risk bias. Likewise, it is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the proportion of patients with one or more PPOs (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.85; 5 studies; N = 1310; very low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may make little or no difference in hospital admissions (data not pooled; 12 studies; N = 4052; low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may make little or no difference in quality of life (data not pooled; 12 studies; N = 3211; low-certainty evidence). Medication-related problems were reported in eight studies (N = 10,087) using different terms (e.g. adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions). No consistent intervention effect on medication-related problems was noted across studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS It is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy, such as reviews of patients' prescriptions, resulted in clinically significant improvement; however, they may be slightly beneficial in terms of reducing potential prescribing omissions (PPOs); but this effect estimate is based on only two studies, which had serious limitations in terms of risk bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Rankin
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Pharmacy97 Lisburn RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT9 7BL
| | - Cathal A Cadogan
- Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandSchool of PharmacyDublinIreland
| | - Susan M Patterson
- No affiliationIntegrated Care40 Dunmore RoadBallynahinchNorthern IrelandUKBT24 8PR
| | - Ngaire Kerse
- University of AucklandDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health CarePrivate Bag 92019AucklandNew Zealand
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthSchool of MedicineDentistry and Biomedical SciencesBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Marie C Bradley
- National Cancer Institute9609 Medical Center DriveRockvilleMDUSA20850
| | - Cristin Ryan
- Trinity College DublinSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences111 St Stephen’s GreenDublin 2Ireland
| | - Carmel Hughes
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Pharmacy97 Lisburn RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT9 7BL
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scott IA, Pillans PI, Barras M, Morris C. Using EMR-enabled computerized decision support systems to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications: a narrative review. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2018; 9:559-573. [PMID: 30181862 PMCID: PMC6116772 DOI: 10.1177/2042098618784809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) that pose more risk than benefit in older patients is a common occurrence across all healthcare settings. Reducing such prescribing has been challenging despite multiple interventions, including educational campaigns, audits and feedback, geriatrician assessment and formulary restrictions. With the increasing uptake of electronic medical records (EMRs) across hospitals, clinics and residential aged care facilities (RACFs), integrated with computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and e-prescribing, opportunities exist for incorporating clinical decision support systems (CDSS) into EMR at the point of care. This narrative review assessed the process and outcomes of using EMR-enabled CDSS to reduce the prescribing of PIMs. We searched PubMed for relevant articles published up to January 2018 and focused on those that described EMR-enabled CDSS that assisted prescribers to make changes at the time of ordering PIMs in adults. Computerized systems offering only medication reconciliation, dose checks, monitoring for medication errors, or basic formulary information were not included. In addition to outcome measures of medication-related processes and adverse drug events, qualitative data relating to factors that influence effectiveness of EMR-enabled CDSS were also gathered from selected studies. We analysed 20 studies comprising 10 randomized trials and 10 observational studies performed in hospitals (n = 8), ambulatory care clinics (n = 9) and RACFs (n = 3). Studies varied in patient populations (although most involved older patients), type of CDSS, method of linkage with EMR, study designs and outcome measures. However, assuming little publication bias, the totality of evidence favoured EMR-enabled CDSS as being effective in reducing the prescribing of PIMs in hospitals, although results were more mixed for ambulatory care settings and RACFs. While absolute effects in most positive studies were modest, they suggest EMR-enabled CDSS are feasible and acceptable to clinicians, and if certain design features are adhered to, there is potential for even greater impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian A. Scott
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical
Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Brisbane, QLD
4102, Australia
| | - Peter I. Pillans
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Princess
Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia School of Clinical Medicine,
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Barras
- Department of Pharmacy, Princess Alexandra
Hospital, Brisbane, Australia School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland,
Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christopher Morris
- Department of General Medicine, Redlands
Hospital, Cleveland, Australia Queensland Digital Healthcare Improvement
Network, Queensland Health Department, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Deprescribing Benzodiazepines in Older Patients: Impact of Interventions Targeting Physicians, Pharmacists, and Patients. Drugs Aging 2018; 35:493-521. [PMID: 29705831 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0544-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Benzodiazepines (BZDs; including the related Z-drugs) are frequently targets for deprescribing; long-term use in older people is harmful and often not beneficial. BZDs can result in significant harms, including falls, fractures, cognitive impairment, car crashes and a significant financial and legal burden to society. Deprescribing BZDs is problematic due to a complex interaction of drug, patient, physician and systematic barriers, including concern about a potentially distressing but rarely fatal withdrawal syndrome. Multiple studies have trialled interventions to deprescribe BZDs in older people and are discussed in this narrative review. Reported success rates of deprescribing BZD interventions range between 27 and 80%, and this variability can be attributed to heterogeneity of methodological approaches and limited generalisability to cognitively impaired patients. Interventions targeting the patient and/or carer include raising awareness (direct-to-consumer education, minimal interventions, and 'one-off' geriatrician counselling) and resourcing the patient (gradual dose reduction [GDR] with or without cognitive behavioural therapy, teaching relaxation techniques, and sleep hygiene). These are effective if the patient is motivated to cease and is not significantly cognitively impaired. Interventions targeted to physicians include prescribing interventions by audit, algorithm or medication review, and providing supervised GDR in combination with medication substitution. Pharmacists have less frequently been the targets for studies, but have key roles in several multifaceted interventions. Interventions are evaluated according to the Behaviour Change Wheel. Research supports trialling a stepwise approach in the cognitively intact older person, but having a low threshold to use less-consultative methods in patients with dementia. Several resources are available to support deprescribing of BZDs in clinical practice, including online protocols.
Collapse
|
12
|
Flynn A, Mo H, Nguyen JV, Chaffee BW. Initial study of clinical pharmacy work prioritization tools. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2018; 75:1122-1131. [DOI: 10.2146/ajhp170398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Allen Flynn
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Jerika V. Nguyen
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, OR
| | - Bruce W. Chaffee
- Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adeola M, Azad R, Kassie GM, Shirkey B, Taffet G, Liebl M, Agarwal K. Multicomponent Interventions Reduce High-Risk Medications for Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:1638-1645. [PMID: 30035315 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Delirium threatens the functional independence and cognitive capacity of patients. Medications, especially those with strong anticholinergic effects, have been implicated as a preventable cause of delirium. We evaluated the effect of multicomponent interventions aimed at reducing the use of 9 target medications in hospitalized older adults at risk of delirium. This continuous quality improvement program was undertaken at a tertiary care facility and 4 community hospitals in a hospital system. We included 21, 541 hospital admissions with patients aged 70 and older on acute care medical or surgical units from the preintervention (2012) period, and 27,764 from the postintervention (2015) period. Implemented interventions include formulary and policy changes, technology-assisted medication review, age-conditional order set modifications, best practice alerts, and education. The proportion of hospital admissions with individual's receiving at least 1 target medication declined from 45.6% to 31.3% (relative reduction (RR)=31.4%) from before to after the intervention, meaning that target medication exposure was avoided in approximately 4,000 older adults. The greatest effect was observed for zolpidem (11.2% to 5.3%, RR=52.6%) and diphenhydramine (12.9% to 7.1%, RR=45%). Furthermore, the mean number of doses administered during all hospital admissions was reduced for 7 of 9 medications. Multicomponent interventions implemented in our hospital system were effective at reducing exposure to target medications in hospitalized older adults at risk of delirium. These systematic changes applied throughout the medication use process are sustained today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mobolaji Adeola
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Rejena Azad
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Gizat M Kassie
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Beverly Shirkey
- Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - George Taffet
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Liebl
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathryn Agarwal
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Houston Methodist Hospital System, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Falconer N, Barras M, Cottrell N. Systematic review of predictive risk models for adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 84:846-864. [PMID: 29337387 PMCID: PMC5903258 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Revised: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM An emerging approach to reducing hospital adverse drug events is the use of predictive risk scores. The aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise models developed for predicting adverse drug event risk in inpatients. METHODS Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus databases were used to identify studies of predictive risk models for hospitalized adult inpatients. Studies had to have used multivariable logistic regression for model development, resulting in a score or rule with two or more variables, to predict the likelihood of inpatient adverse drug events. The Checklist for the critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) was used to critically appraise eligible studies. RESULTS Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Ten described the development of a new model, whilst one study revalidated and updated an existing score. Studies used different definitions for outcome but were synonymous with or closely related to adverse drug events. Four studies undertook external validation, five internally validated and two studies did not validate their model. No studies evaluated impact of risk scores on patient outcomes. CONCLUSION Adverse drug event risk prediction is a complex endeavour but could help to improve patient safety and hospital resource management. Studies in this review had some limitations in their methods for model development, reporting and validation. Two studies, the BADRI and Trivalle's risk scores, used better model development and validation methods and reported reasonable performance, and so could be considered for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazanin Falconer
- School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Australia Centre of ExcellenceThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLD4102Australia
| | - Michael Barras
- School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Australia Centre of ExcellenceThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLD4102Australia
- Princess Alexandra HospitalMetro South Health199 Ipswich Road, WoolloongabbaBrisbaneQLD4102Australia
| | - Neil Cottrell
- School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Australia Centre of ExcellenceThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLD4102Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zullo AR, Gray SL, Holmes HM, Marcum ZA. Screening for Medication Appropriateness in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2018; 34:39-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
16
|
Reduction in targeted potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly inpatients: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 73:1237-1245. [PMID: 28717929 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-017-2293-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in hospitalized older adults is a complex problem, but the use of computerized alert systems (CAS) has shown some potential. The study's objective is to assess the change in PIM use with a CAS-based pharmacist-physician intervention model compared to usual clinical care. METHODS Pragmatic single-site randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Hospitalizations identified with selected Beers or STOPP criteria were randomized to usual clinical care or to the CAS-based pharmacist-physician intervention. The primary outcome was PIM drug cessation or dosage decrease. Clinical relevance of the CAS alerts was assessed. RESULTS Analyses included 231 patients who had 128 and 126 hospitalizations in the control and intervention groups, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 81, and 60% were female. In the intervention compared to the control group, drug cessation or dosage decrease were more frequent at 48 h post-alert (45.8 vs 15.9%; absolute difference 30.0%; 95%CI 13.8 to 46.1%) and at discharge from the hospital (48.1 vs 27.3%; absolute difference 20.8%; 95%CI 4.6 to 37.0%). In a post hoc analysis of all alerts, regardless of their clinical relevance, the absolute difference in drug cessation or dosage decrease between the intervention and control groups was 16.2% (95%CI 2.9 to 29.6%) at 48 h and 8.0% (95%CI -4.0 to 20.0%) at discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS In hospitalized older adults, a CAS-based pharmacist-physician intervention, compared to usual clinical care, resulted in significant higher number of drug cessation and dosage reductions for targeted PIMs.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lord-Adem W, Brandt NJ. Clinical Alerts to Decrease High-Risk Medication Use in Older Adults. J Gerontol Nurs 2017. [DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20170614-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
18
|
Anticholinergic burden: considerations for older adults. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
19
|
Munson JC, Bynum JPW, Bell JE, Cantu R, McDonough C, Wang Q, Tosteson TD, Tosteson ANA. Patterns of Prescription Drug Use Before and After Fragility Fracture. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:1531-1538. [PMID: 27548843 PMCID: PMC5048505 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients who have a fragility fracture are at high risk for subsequent fractures. Prescription drugs represent 1 factor that could be modified to reduce the risk of subsequent fracture. OBJECTIVE To describe the use of prescription drugs associated with fracture risk before and after fragility fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study conducted between February 2015 and March 2016 using a 40% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2007 through 2011 in general communities throughout the United States. A total of 168 133 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries who survived a fracture of the hip, shoulder, or wrist were included. Cohort members were required to be enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare with drug coverage (Parts A, B, and D) and to be community dwelling for at least 30 days in the immediate 4-month postfracture period. EXPOSURES Prescription drug use during the 4-month period before and after a fragility fracture. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prescription fills for drug classes associated with increased fracture risk were measured using Part D retail pharmacy claims. These were divided into 3 categories: drugs that increase fall risk; drugs that decrease bone density; and drugs with unclear fracture risk mechanism. Drugs that increase bone density were also tracked. RESULTS A total of 168 133 patients with a fragility fracture (141 569 women; 84.2%) met the inclusion criteria for this study; 91.8% were white. Across all fracture types, the mean (SD) age was 80.0 (7.7) years, and 53.2% of the fracture cohort was hospitalized at the time of the index fracture, although this varied significantly depending on fracture type (100% of hip fractures, 8.2% of wrist fractures, and 15.0% of shoulder fractures). The frequency of discharge to an institution for rehabilitation following hospitalization also varied by fracture type, but the mean (SD) duration of acute rehabilitation did not: 28.1 (19.8) days. Most patients were exposed to at least 1 nonopiate drug associated with increased fracture risk in the 4 months before fracture (77.1% of hip, 74.1% of wrist, and 75.9% of shoulder fractures). Approximately 7% of these patients discontinued this drug exposure after the fracture, but this was offset by new users after fracture. Consequently, the proportion of the cohort exposed following fracture was unchanged (80.5%, 74.3%, and 76.9% for hip, wrist, and shoulder, respectively). There was no change in the average number of fracture-associated drugs used. This same pattern of use before and after fracture was observed across all 3 drug mechanism categories. Use of drugs to strengthen bone density was uncommon (≤25%) both before and after fracture. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Exposure to prescription drugs associated with fracture risk is infrequently reduced following fragility fracture occurrence. While some patients eliminate their exposure to drugs associated with fracture, an equal number initiate new high-risk drugs. This pattern suggests there is a missed opportunity to modify at least one factor contributing to secondary fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C Munson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire2Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Julie P W Bynum
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire2Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - John-Erik Bell
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire3Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Robert Cantu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Qianfei Wang
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Tor D Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire5Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire2Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Arvisais K, Bergeron-Wolff S, Bouffard C, Michaud AS, Bergeron J, Mallet L, Brazeau S, Joly-Mischlich T, Bernier-Filion N, Lanthier L, Ricard G, Rodrigue MC, Cossette B. A Pharmacist-Physician Intervention Model Using a Computerized Alert System to Reduce High-Risk Medication Use in Elderly Inpatients. Drugs Aging 2016; 32:663-70. [PMID: 26248475 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-015-0286-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prescription is a complex challenge facing clinicians caring for elderly inpatients. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use frequently leads to adverse drug events and geriatric syndromes. Strategies to reduce PIM use are thus urgently needed. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to assess (1) the applicability of a pharmacist-physician intervention model to reduce the use of high-risk medications; and (2) the clinical relevance of the alerts generated by a computerized alert system (CAS). METHODS The study was conducted in patients aged 65 years or older admitted to a teaching hospital between April and June 2014. In the intervention model, the pharmacist determined the clinical relevance of the Beers criteria-based CAS alerts, analyzed the patient's pharmacotherapy, and developed a geriatric pharmacotherapeutic plan to be discussed with the treating physician. The main outcome was the change rate, defined as the number of patient-days with a change in at least one medication out of the number of patient-days with a pharmacist intervention. RESULTS The CAS identified at least one alert in 200 patient-days, i.e., 4.3% of screened patient-days. In 74.5% of those patient-days, at least one alert was judged to be clinically relevant. The change rate was 77.7%. The most frequent changes were drug discontinuation (42.4%) and dose reduction (29.1%). The inpatient geriatric consultation team was involved in only 24% of the hospitalizations with at least one change in medication. CONCLUSION The intervention model reduced high-risk medication use in older inpatients. Most of the vulnerable inpatients identified by CAS alerts would not have otherwise had a geriatric medication review.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cross AJ, George J, Woodward MC, Ames D, Brodaty H, Ilomäki J, Elliott RA. Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Anticholinergic Burden in Older People Attending Memory Clinics in Australia. Drugs Aging 2015; 33:37-44. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-015-0332-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
22
|
Kim FJ, da Silva RD, Gustafson D, Nogueira L, Harlin T, Paul DL. Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review. Patient Saf Surg 2015; 9:26. [PMID: 26045717 PMCID: PMC4455056 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-015-0067-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Current surgical safety guidelines and checklists are generic and are not specifically tailored to address patient issues and risk factors in surgical subspecialties. Patient safety in surgical subspecialties should be templated on general patient safety guidelines from other areas of medicine and mental health but include and develop specific processes dedicated for the care of the surgical patients. Safety redundant systems must be in place to decrease errors in surgery. Therefore, different surgical subspecialties should develop a specific curriculum in patient safety addressing training in academic centers and application of these guidelines in all practices. Clearly, redundant safety systems must be in place to decrease errors in surgery, in analogy to safety measures in other high-risk industries. Specific surgical subspecialties are encouraged to develop a specific patient safety curriculum that address training in academic centers and applicability to daily practice, with the goal of keeping our surgical patients safe in all disciplines. The present review article is designed to outline patient safety practices that should be adapted and followed to fit particular specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando J. Kim
- />Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA
| | - Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva
- />Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA
| | - Diedra Gustafson
- />Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA
| | - Leticia Nogueira
- />Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA
| | - Timothy Harlin
- />Administration, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, Denver, CO USA
| | - David L. Paul
- />Department of Business Information & Analytics, Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, Denver, CO USA
| |
Collapse
|