A Model Program of Community-Based Supports for Older Adults at Risk of Nursing Facility Placement

Do Interventions Reducing Social Vulnerability Improve Health in Community Dwelling Older Adults? A Systematic Review

Background

Social vulnerability occurs when individuals have been relatively disadvantaged by the social determinants of health. Complex interventions that reduce social vulnerability have the potential to improve health in older adults but robust evidence is lacking.

Objective

To identify, appraise and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of complex interventions targeting reduction in social vulnerability for improving health related outcomes (mortality, function, cognition, subjective health and healthcare use) in older adults living in the community.

Methods

A mixed methods systematic review was conducted. Five databases and targeted grey literature were searched for primary studies of all study types according to predetermined criteria. Data were extracted from each distinct intervention and quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Effectiveness data were synthesized using vote counting by direction of effect, combining p values and Albatross plots.

Results

Across 38 included studies, there were 34 distinct interventions categorized as strengthening social supports and communities, helping older adults and their caregivers navigate health and social services, enhancing neighbourhood and built environments, promoting education and providing economic stability. There was evidence to support positive influences on function, cognition, subjective health, and reduced hospital utilization. The evidence was mixed for non-hospital healthcare utilization and insufficient to determine effect on mortality.

Conclusion

Despite high heterogeneity and varying quality of studies, attention to reducing an older adult's social vulnerability assists in improving older adults' health.

Unmet needs for assistance related to subjective cognitive decline among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults in the US: prevalence and impact on health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of unmet needs for assistance among middle-aged and older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in the US and to evaluate whether unmet needs were associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

US - 50 states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling adults aged 45 years and older who completed the Cognitive Decline module on the 2015--2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System reported experiencing SCD and always, usually, or sometimes needed assistance with day-to-day activities because of SCD (n = 6,568).

MEASUREMENTS

We defined SCD as confusion or memory loss that was happening more often or getting worse over the past 12 months. Respondents with SCD were considered to have an unmet need for assistance if they sometimes, rarely, or never got the help they needed with day-to-day activities. We measured three domains of HRQOL: (1) mental (frequent mental distress, ≥14 days of poor mental health in the past 30 days), (2) physical (frequent physical distress, ≥14 days of poor physical health in the past 30 days), and (3) social (SCD always, usually, or sometimes interfered with the ability to work, volunteer, or engage in social activities outside the home). We used log-binomial regression models to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs). All estimates were weighted.

RESULTS

In total, 40.2% of people who needed SCD-related assistance reported an unmet need. Among respondents without depression, an unmet need was associated with a higher prevalence of frequent mental distress (PR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12-2.13, p = 0.007). Frequent physical distress and social limitations did not differ between people with met and unmet needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle-aged and older adults with SCD-related needs for assistance frequently did not have those needs met, which could negatively impact their mental health. Interventions to identify and meet the unmet needs among people with SCD may improve HRQOL.

Embedded Health Systems Science as a driver of care improvement within an integrated delivery organization

BACKGROUND

Embedded Health Systems Science (HSS) has the potential to reduce gaps between research and delivery of evidence-based medicine. Models are needed to guide the development of embedded HSS in health care delivery organizations particularly with the rise of value-based care.

METHODS

The development of HSS infrastructure at a large nonprofit health care delivery organization is described, along with an embedded HSS diabetes study to illustrate the integration of program specific data, electronic health records, and health care system data infrastructure. To compare diabetes outcomes across four evidenced-based programs, a control group was developed from EHR data using propensity score matching. Mixed effect adjusted models were used to estimate reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight.

RESULTS

Adjusted analyses using an EHR derived comparison group demonstrated significantly different findings than unadjusted pre to post analyses. The embedded HSS study indicates that appropriate statistical methods, staff with required expertise, and integration with health system data infrastructure are needed to develop timely and rigorous HSS outcomes that effectively improve patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Embedded HSS has the potential to inform value-based care models and contribute to evidence-based medicine approaches that improve patient care. Although developing system wide integrated data structures and staff with the appropriate skills requires substantial effort, the outcome is more reliable evaluations that lead to higher quality and higher value care.

IMPLICATIONS

Health care delivery organizations can improve patient care by dedicating resources to embed HSS into its routine operations.

The Effects of Home Care Provider Mix on the Care Recipient: An International, Systematic Review of Articles from 2000 to 2020

In this systematic review, we examine the literature from 2000 to 2020 to ascertain whether we can make strong conclusions about the relative benefit of adding informal care or formal care providers to the care mix among individuals receiving care in the home, specifically focusing on care recipient outcomes. We evaluate how informal care and formal care affect (or are associated with) health care use of care recipients, health care costs of care recipients, and health outcomes of care recipients. The literature to date suggests that informal care, either alone or in concert with formal care, delivers improvements in the health and well-being of older adults receiving care. The conclusions one can draw about the effects of formal care are less clear.

"This Is What Family Does": The Family Experience of Caring for Serious Illness

Background:

As the demographics of caregiving in United States evolve toward multigenerational, distributed family structures, the ways in which individuals and their families experience serious illness are changing. As part of a project to create an innovative model of supportive care for serious illness, a series of user interviews were conducted, forming the basis for this article.

Objective:

To understand the experience of caregiving for individuals with serious illness from an intergenerational family perspective.

Methods:

Twelve semistructured group interviews were conducted with patients, families, and professionals. Transcript data were analyzed with descriptive coding, looking for major themes and subthemes related to family experiences.

Results:

Seventy-three individuals participated in group interview sessions. While both families and individuals encountered caregiving challenges, the family unit experienced care in several unique ways. It accommodated differences in temperament and readiness, managed internal conflict, and strived to emerge as a cohesive unit. Individual struggles were often magnified or, more often, ameliorated by family context. Caregiving itself formed a legacy for future generations. Finally, care was seen as bidirectional, being tendered both by the family caregivers and in turn by the patient.

Conclusions:

When talking about care for serious illness, individuals report both rewards and challenges, often in a family context. The family enterprise manages a loved one’s care, negotiates the health-care system, and adjusts its own internal dynamics. Integrating the family narrative provides a more balanced view of the family system that provides the day-to-day care for individuals with serious illness.