The Association of Spanish Language Preference with Advance Directive Completion

The Impact of Limited English Proficiency on Healthcare Access and Outcomes in the U.S.: A Scoping Review

A majority of individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) in the U.S. are foreign-born, creating a complex intersection of language, socio-economic, and policy barriers to healthcare access and achieving good outcomes. Mapping the research literature is key to addressing how LEP intersects with healthcare. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, EconLit, and Academic Search Premier. Study selection included quantitative studies since 2000 with outcomes specified for adults with LEP residing in the U.S. related to healthcare service access or defined health outcomes, including healthcare costs. A total of 137 articles met the inclusion criteria. Major outcomes included ambulatory care, hospitalization, screening, specific conditions, and general health. Overall, the literature identified differential access to and utilization of healthcare across multiple modalities with poorer outcomes among LEP populations compared with English-proficient populations. Current research includes inconsistent definitions for LEP populations, primarily cross-sectional studies, small sample sizes, and homogeneous language and regional samples. Current regulations and practices are insufficient to address the barriers that LEP individuals face to healthcare access and outcomes. Changes to EMRs and other data collection to consistently include LEP status and more methodologically rigorous studies are needed to address healthcare disparities for LEP individuals.

Disparities in advance care planning rates persist among emergency general surgery patients: Current state and recommendations for improvement

BACKGROUND

Unanticipated changes in health status and worsening of chronic conditions often prompt the need to consider emergency general surgery (EGS). Although discussions about goals of care may promote goal-concordant care and reduce patient and caregiver depression and anxiety, these conversations, as well as standardized documentation, remain infrequent for EGS patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from patients admitted to an EGS service at a tertiary academic center to determine the prevalence of clinically meaningful advance care planning (ACP) documentation (conversations and legal ACP forms) during the EGS hospitalization. Multivariable regression was performed to identify patient, clinician, and procedural factors associated with the lack of ACP.

RESULTS

Among 681 patients admitted to the EGS service in 2019, only 20.1% had ACP documentation in the electronic health record at any time point during their hospitalization (of those, 75.5% completed before and 24.5% completed during admission). Two thirds (65.8%) of the total cohort had surgery during their admission, but none of them had a documented ACP conversation with the surgical team preoperatively. Patients with ACP documentation tended to have Medicare insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-12.23; p < 0.001) and had greater burden of comorbid conditions (adjusted odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.55-6.88; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adults experiencing a significant, often abrupt change in health status leading to an EGS admission are infrequently engaged in ACP conducted by the surgical team. This is a critical missed opportunity to promote patient-centered care and to communicate patients' care preferences to the surgical and other inpatient medical teams.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

The Association of Chinese Ethnicity and Language Preference with Advance Directive Completion Among Older Patients in an Integrated Health System

BACKGROUND

Little is known about possible differences in advance directive completion (ADC) based on ethnicity and language preference among Chinese Americans on a regional level.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the association of ethnicity and language preference with ADC among Chinese Americans.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis with direct standardization.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 31,498 Chinese and 502,991 non-Hispanic White members enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California during the entire study period between 2013 and 2017 who were 55 or older as of January 1, 2018.

MAIN MEASURES

We compared the proportion of ADC among non-Hispanic White and Chinese patients, and also analyzed the rates according to language preference within the Chinese population. We calculated ADC rates with direct standardization using covariates previously found in literature to be significant predictors of ADC such as age and utilization.

KEY RESULTS

Among Chinese members, 60% preferred English, 16% preferred another language without needing an interpreter, and 23% needed an interpreter. After standardizing for age and utilization, non-Hispanic Whites were more than twice as likely to have ADC as Chinese members (20.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.5-20.7%) vs. 10.0% (95% CI: 9.6-10.3%), respectively). Among Chinese members, there was an inverse association between preference for a language other than English and ADC (13.3% (95% CI: 12.8-13.8%) if preferring English, 6.1% (95% CI: 5.4-6.7%) if preferring non-English language but not needing an interpreter, and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.6-5.6%) if preferring non-English language and needing an interpreter).

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese members are less likely to have ADC relative to non-Hispanic White members, and those preferring a language other than English are most affected. Further studies can assess reasons for lower ADC among Chinese members, differences in other Asian American populations, and interventions to reduce differences among Chinese members especially among those preferring a language other than English.

The effect of end-of-life decision-making tools on patient and family-related outcomes of care among ethnocultural minorities: A systematic review

Background

End-of-life decision-making tools are used to establish a shared understanding among patients, families and healthcare providers about medical treatment and goals of care. This systematic review aimed to understand the availability and effect of end-of-life decision-making tools on: (i) goals of care and advance care planning; (ii) patient and/or family satisfaction and well-being; and (iii) healthcare utilization among racial/ethnic, cultural, and religious minorities.

Methods

A search was conducted in four electronic databases (inception to June 2021). Articles were screened for eligibility using pre-specified criteria. We focused on adult patients (aged ≥18 years) and included primary research articles that used quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs. Complementary quality assessment tools were used to generate quality scores for individual studies. Extracted data were synthesized by outcome measure for each type of tool, and an overall description of findings showed the range of effects.

Results

Among 14,316 retrieved articles, 37 articles were eligible. We found that advance care planning programs (eleven studies), healthcare provider-led interventions (four studies), and linguistically-tailored decision aids (three studies) increased the proportion of patients documenting advance care plans. Educational tools (three studies) strongly reduced patient preferences for life-prolonging care. Palliative care consultations (three studies) were strongly associated with do-not-resuscitate orders. Advance care planning programs (three studies) significantly influenced the quality of patient-clinician communication and healthcare provider-led interventions (two studies) significantly influenced perceived patient quality of life.

Conclusion

This review identified several end-of-life decision-making tools with impact on patient and family-related outcomes of care among ethnocultural minorities. Advance care planning programs, healthcare provider-led interventions and decision aids increased documentation of end-of-life care plans and do-not-resuscitate orders, and educational tools reduced preferences for life-prolonging care. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of tools on healthcare utilization, and with specific patient population subgroups across different illness trajectories and healthcare settings.