The Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire Predicts Adult Patient Food Intake

Purpose: Describe food/beverage intake among all patients and those with low meal intake and determine if the Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire (HFEQ), or its shorter version (HFEQ-sv), predicts food intake while considering patient (e.g., gender) and hospital characteristics (e.g., foodservice model).Methods: Cross-sectional study of 1087 adult patients from 16 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. The valid and reliable HFEQ assessed patients' meal quality perceptions. Visual estimation determined overall meal and food/beverage intake using the Comstock method. Binary logistic regressions tested the association between patient and hospital characteristics and whether HFEQ or HFEQ-sv scores added utility in predicting overall meal intake (≤50% vs. ≥75%).Results: Approximately 29% of patients consumed ≤50% of their meal. Models assessing patient and hospital characteristics and either the HFEQ or the HFEQ-sv were significant (LRT(43) = 72.25, P = 0.003; LRT(43) = 93.46, P < 0.001). Men and higher HFEQ or HFEQ-sv scores demonstrated significantly higher odds of ≥75% meal consumption. Considering HFEQ or HFEQ-sv scores explained greater variance in meal intake and resulted in better model fits.Conclusions: The HFEQ and HFEQ-sv predict patient meal intake when adjusting for covariates and add utility in understanding meal intake. Either version can be confidently used to support menu planning and food delivery to promote food intake.

Insufficient Post-operative Energy Intake Is Associated With Failure of Enhanced Recovery Programs After Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Although enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been proven to be beneficial after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, some of the patients may fail to complete the ERAS program during hospitalization. This prospective study aims to evaluate the risk factors associated with ERAS failure after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods: This is a prospective study from a single tertiary referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were collected. Post-operative activity time and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were measured. Patients were divided into ERAS failure group and ERAS success according to decreased post-operative activity and 6MWD. Factors associated with ERAS failure were investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 91 patients with colorectal cancer were included. The incidence of ERAS failure is 28.6% among all patients. Patients in ERAS failure group experienced higher rate of post-operative ileus and prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that older age (p = 0.006), body mass index ≥25.5 kg/m² (p = 0.037), smoking (p = 0.002), operative time (p = 0.048), and post-operative energy intake <18.5 kcal/kg•d (p = 0.045) were independent risk factors of ERAS failure after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Conclusions: Our findings indicated that a proportion of patients may fail the ERAS program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We for the first time showed that post-operative energy intake was an independent risk factor for ERAS failure. This may provide evidence for further investigation on precise measurement of nutritional status and selected high-risk patients for enhanced nutrition support.

Putting quality food on the tray: Factors associated with patients' perceptions of the hospital food experience

INTRODUCTION

Perceptions of hospital meal quality can influence patient food intake. Understanding what patients prioritise and what they think of current meals can support menu development. The present study assessed patients' food and food-related priorities for hospital meals and their sensory experience using the Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire (HFEQ). Factors independently associated with the HFEQ were determined.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study (n = 1087 patients; 16 Ontario hospitals). Patients completed the HFEQ at a single meal. Descriptive statistics determined the importance of food traits and ratings of a served meal using 22 HFEQ questions (five-point Likert scales, total score 110). Bivariate and multivariable linear regression tested the association between patient and hospital characteristics and HFEQ score.

RESULTS

Most food traits were rated as 'important' (4) or 'very important' (5) by two-thirds or more of patients. Patients typically rated served meal items as 'good' (4). Mean HFEQ score was 90.60 (SD 10.83) and was associated with patient and hospital traits in multivariable analyses (F_42,556  = 2.34, p < 0.001). Older and woman-identifying patients were more likely to have a higher score. Foodservice models were associated with HFEQ. Cold-plated rethermed food resulted in the lowest HFEQ. Local food use > 10% was associated with lower HFEQ score, whereas larger hospitals had a higher score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients prioritised taste, freshness and food that met their dietary needs. Meal sensory ratings were average. A gap exists between what patients want in hospital meals and what they receive. Attention to patient demographics and food delivery that retains sensory properties and supports choice may increase HFEQ score.

Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire (HFEQ): Reliable, valid and predicts food intake in adult patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Low food intake is a primary contributor to iatrogenic hospital malnutrition and can be influenced by perceptions of poor food quality. Valid and reliable tools to assess the food experience of hospital patients are lacking. This study aimed to determine the internal reliability, convergent construct and predictive validity of the new Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire (HFEQ) and to methodically derive and test a shortened version of the questionnaire (HFEQ-sv).

METHODS

Data from a multi-site study on 1087 patients from 16 Ontario hospitals were used. The HFEQ was developed to assess the importance of food (n = 6) and food-related (n = 10) traits using a 5-point Likert scale anchored by "not important" (1) and "very important" (5), and ratings of a single meal served (n = 7) using a 5-point Likert scale anchored by "very poor" (1) and "very good" (5). Food intake at the same meal was assessed using visual estimation (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%). Internal reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha, and principal components analysis (PCA). Convergent validity was assessed using ordinal logistic regression with a single question on patients' overall meal quality rating. Cross validation was conducted in an attempt to shorten the questionnaire and binary logistic regression determined predictive validity with food intake.

RESULTS

The HFEQ demonstrated good internal reliability (α = .86), and all but one of the questionnaire items clustered together in PCA, revealing 5 factors. Subscales and the total HFEQ demonstrated convergent validity, with the importance of food taste, choice, easy-to-open packaging, easy-to-eat food and local food provision, in addition to meal ratings of taste, appearance, texture, temperature and combination of food served being associated with the overall meal quality rating (p < .050). These items became the basis for the HFEQ-sv, which was found to independently predict food intake (LRT(42) = 142.17, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The HFEQ is internally reliable, demonstrates convergent validity with the construct of meal quality and predicts food intake. The 11-item HFEQ-sv promotes feasibility. The HFEQ has potential to be used globally to benchmark and quantify the patient food experience in hospital, contributing to quality improvement strategies that will support food intake among patients.

Evaluation of an intervention to improve nutrition intake in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: A mixed-methods pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Timely and adequate nutrition after surgery is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an intervention, developed using an integrated knowledge translation approach, designed to improve oral intake among postoperative colorectal patients.

METHODS

A pre/post, mixed-methods pilot study was undertaken at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery and were admitted to the ward where 10 nutrition-related strategies had been implemented were included. Quantitative data, including patient demographics, timing and type of nutrition consumed, and protein and energy intake were collected pre- and post-intervention via chart audits, direct observations, and verbal clarification. Qualitative data on patient (n = 18) responses to the intervention were collected through one-on-one, semistructured interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were observed (30 pre- and 34 post-intervention). Significant improvements were seen for the following outcomes (presented as median [interquartile range], pre- versus post-intervention): time (h) to first dietary intake (15.7 [7.4-22.5] versus 4.9 [3.7-14.2]); patient energy intakes (kJ) on day 1 (1719 [947-2200] versus 3530 [2192-5169]) and day 2 (2506 [1071-3749] versus 4144 [2987-5889]); and patient protein intake (g) on day 1 (3.3 [1.8-11.2] versus 30.3 [20-45]) and day 2 (10.8 [3.5-29.9] versus 39.6 [30.7-59]). Prescription of free fluids as first diet type increased from 13% to 79% pre- and post-intervention, respectively. There were no significant differences in time (h) to first solid dietary intake (86.1 [60.1-104] versus 69.2 [46.1-115.5]) and overall proportion of patients who met both their estimated energy and protein requirements while in hospital pre- and post-intervention (22 versus 37%). Patients reported positive experiences with the intervention.

CONCLUSION

A multifaceted intervention developed using an integrated knowledge translation approach has the potential to improve oral intake in patients who undergo colorectal surgery. A larger-scale trial is required to confirm these findings and assess the effects of the intervention on clinical outcomes and costs.

Impact of nutritional status/risk and post-operative nutritional management on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is prevalent in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery and has been linked to adverse outcomes. The present study aimed to determine the association between early post-operative nutritional status/risk, post-operative nutritional management and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted in GI surgical patients with a minimum 3-day post-operative length of stay (LOS). Data on patient demographics, nutritional status/risk, post-operative nutritional management and clinical outcomes were collected. Four markers of nutritional status and risk were assessed: preoperative weight loss, nutrition risk, malnutrition status and hand grip strength. Clinical outcomes included: post-operative LOS, complication and readmissions rates. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to test for associations with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen patients (55% female) with mean (SD) age of 60.8 (16.2) years were included. Median (IQR) post-operative LOS was 8.0 days (4.5-11.5), 37% of participants developed at least one complication post-operatively and 24% were readmitted within 30-days of discharge. Mean number of nil-by mouth (NBM) days post-operatively was 0.7 (1.2) and the average time to commence feeding was 3.3 (2.2) days after surgery. Poor nutritional status/risk between days 3-5 post-operatively assessed through all four markers was associated with longer post-operative LOS (all P < 0.05). No association was found between number of NBM days, time to feeding and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Poor early post-operative nutritional status/risk is associated with longer post-operative LOS in patients undergoing GI surgery, which may facilitate simple identification of patients at high priority for nutritional intervention. The present study highlights the heterogeneity in post-operative nutritional management practices.

Hospital Staffs' Perceptions of Postoperative Nutrition Among Colorectal Patients: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

After lower gastrointestinal surgery, few patients start eating within timeframes outlined by evidence-based guidelines or meet their nutrition requirements in hospital. The present study explored hospital staffs' perceptions of factors influencing timely and adequate feeding after colorectal surgery to inform future interventions for improving postoperative nutrition practices and intakes.

METHODS

This qualitative exploratory study was conducted at an Australian hospital where Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines had not been formally implemented. One-on-one semistructured interviews were conducted with hospital staff who provided care to patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Interviews lasted from 21 to 47 minutes and were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Emergent themes and subthemes were discussed by all investigators to ensure consensus of interpretation.

RESULTS

Eighteen staff participated in interviews, including 9 doctors, 5 nurses, 2 dietitians, and 2 foodservice staff. Staffs' responses formed 3 themes: (1) variability in perceived acceptability of postoperative feeding; (2) improving dynamics and communication within the treating team; and (3) optimizing dietary intakes with available resources.

CONCLUSION

Staff and organizational factors need to be considered when attempting to improve postoperative nutrition among patients who undergo colorectal surgery. Introducing a feeding protocol, enhancing intraprofessional and interdisciplinary communication, and ensuring the availability of appropriate, nutrient-dense foods are pivotal to improve nutrition practices and intakes.

Early oral feeding after colorectal surgery: A mixed methods study of knowledge translation

AIM

Evidence-based guidelines recommend early oral feeding (EOF) as prescription of an unrestricted diet within 24 hours after colorectal surgery. The present study aimed to understand local postoperative feeding practices after colorectal surgery; identify barriers to EOF implementation; select, tailor and implement stakeholder engagement strategies to facilitate EOF uptake; and evaluate changes to practice.

METHODS

A longitudinal, mixed methods study was undertaken, guided by the knowledge-to-action framework. Phase 1 assessed the nature of the problem using postoperative diet Audits 1 and 2. In Phase 2, staff interviews identified barriers to EOF implementation. Results from Phases 1 and 2 were fed back to inform Phase 3 strategies. Knowledge uptake was monitored in Audits 3 and 4. Phase 4 evaluated outcomes from Audit 5.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, median time to commencement of full diet was postoperative Days 4 and 3 in Audits 1 and 2, respectively. Phase 2 identified EOF barriers, including disparities in diet upgrade practices and variable understanding of hospital diets. In Phase 3, planned strategies were implemented to improve EOF (i) educational session describing local hospital diets; (ii) consultant decision to prescribe a full diet on operation notes; and (iii) educational sessions with nursing staff describing changes to EOF practice. In Phase 4, median time to commencement of full diet improved to postoperative Day 0. Patients prescribed a full diet on operation notes increased from 0% to 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study successfully identified and overcame local barriers to improve EOF practices to align with guideline recommendations.