Longitudinal alterations in nutrient intake and food pattern in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer during anti‐neoplastic treatment: a cohort study

Adequate calorie and protein administration via enteral nutrition may contribute to improved 30-day survival in patients with solid tumors at nutritional risk

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer receiving adequate enteral nutrition (EN) have improved clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, discrepancies may exist between the amounts prescribed and received. This study aimed to investigate: (1) the receiving exclusive EN, (2) the relationship between inadequacy and unfavorable outcomes, and (3) the impact of inadequate EN administration on the survival of patients with cancer.

METHODS

This study included hospitalized patients with solid tumors who exclusively received EN and were evaluated using data extracted from electronic medical records. Nutritional risk was evaluated using Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS - 2002). EN adequacy was assessed from days 3-7 of hospitalization. Calorie and protein delivery by EN was classified as adequate (≥80 % of EN administration) or inadequate (<80 % of EN administration). Data were analyzed using dispersion and Bland-Altman plots, Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were evaluated (63.9 ± 13.1 years of age, 67.5 % male, 32.5 % with head and neck cancer, and 86.8 % at nutritional risk). During the 5-day evaluation period, only 14 % of the patients received the mean volume, proteins, and calories according to the EN prescription. A relationship was observed between inadequate EN (<80 %) and 30-day in-hospital mortality. This result was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.020), which showed a survival benefit in patients at nutritional risk who received adequate calories and protein.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significant caloric and protein deficits related with EN. Furthermore, adequate calorie and protein administration could contribute to improved survival in patients with cancer who are at a risk of malnutrition, however, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm whether adequate calorie administration could contribute to improved survival.

Current Insights in Nutrition Assessment and Intervention for Malnutrition or Muscle Loss in People with Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Up to 70% of people with lung cancer may be affected by cancer-related malnutrition or muscle loss, depending on treatment modality and disease stage. This narrative review explores recent studies on malnutrition and muscle loss as well as nutritional and multimodal interventions to treat these conditions in the context of the changing treatment landscape in lung cancer. Various types of interventions, including individualized counseling, protein and other specific nutrient supplementation, as well as multimodal interventions to treat malnutrition and muscle loss, have been investigated. Overall, individualized dietary counseling, increasing protein intake, and supplementation with omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids appear to be beneficial for some, albeit varying, patient outcomes. Multimodal interventions, generally including a nutrition and exercise component, show promising results; however, the impact on patient outcomes is mixed. A key finding of this review is a lack of large, randomized trials to guide nutrition intervention specifically in people with lung cancer. Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition and muscle loss in people with lung cancer and the known adverse outcomes, current evidence for nutrition intervention is limited. A targeted effort is required to improve the quality of evidence for nutrition intervention in this population to provide support for clinicians to deliver effective nutrition care.

Do people change their eating habits after a diagnosis of cancer? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

People who live with and beyond cancer are thought to be motivated to change their diet. However, there is a lack of reviews conducted on what specific dietary changes people make and further evaluation may inform future interventional studies. Hence, we aim to summarise the evidence on dietary changes in observational studies before and after a cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Electronic searches were conducted in four databases to identify cohort and cross-sectional studies on dietary changes before and after a cancer diagnosis, excluding studies that evaluated an intervention. Quality assessment was undertaken, and meta-analyses were conducted where suitable.

RESULTS

We identified 14 studies with 16,443 participants diagnosed with cancer, age range 18-75 years. Dietary change was assessed <1-5 years before diagnosis and up to 12-years post-diagnosis. Meta-analyses showed that the standard mean difference (SMD) for energy (SMD-0.32, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.17) and carbohydrate consumption (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.14). Studies showed inconsistent findings for fat, protein, and fibre, most food groups, and supplement intake. A small decrease in red and processed meat consumption was consistently reported.

CONCLUSION

All studies reported some positive changes in dietary intake and supplement consumption after receiving a cancer diagnosis without any intervention. However, differences for food groups and nutrients were mainly small and not necessarily clinically meaningful. Evidence demonstrates that a cancer diagnosis alone is insufficient to motivate people to change their dietary intake, indicating that most people would benefit from a dietary intervention to facilitate change. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Dealing with loss: food and eating in women with ovarian cancer on parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Malignant bowel obstruction is a common complication of ovarian cancer, resulting in limited oral intake. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) may be offered to patients in this condition to meet nutritional requirements. However, it is not known how they experience being unable to eat. The present study reports how patients related to food when receiving HPN.

METHODS

The investigation was a qualitative study underpinned by phenomenology with women with advanced ovarian cancer in bowel obstruction receiving parenteral nutrition. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically guided by the techniques of Van Manen.

RESULTS

We recruited 20 women to the study. Participants were interviewed a maximum of four times and a total of 39 in-depth longitudinal interviews were conducted. Participants could tolerate minimal amounts of food, if they had a venting gastrostomy. Not being able to eat engendered a sense of sadness and loss, and most women found it challenging to be in the presence of others eating. They adopted strategies to cope, which included fantasising about food and watching cookery programmes. These approaches were not a long-term solution; either participants came to terms with their loss or the strategies became less effective in providing relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Home parenteral nutrition meets the nutritional requirements of patients with malignant bowel obstruction but cannot replace the non-nutritive functions of food. Healthcare professionals can offer a patient-centred approach by acknowledging the difficulties that patients may face and, wherever possible, encourage them to focus on the positive benefits of interacting with people rather than the loss of eating on social occasions.

Feasibility of a multimodal intervention on malnutrition in patients with lung cancer during primary anti-neoplastic treatment

BACKGROUND

Wasting of body mass and skeletal muscle frequently develops in patients with cancer and is associated with impaired functional ability and poor clinical outcome and quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and explore the effect of a multimodal intervention targeting nutritional status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving primary anti-neoplastic treatment. Additionally, predictive and prognostic factors of gaining skeletal muscle were explored.

METHODS

This was a single-centre multimodal intervention trial using a historical control group. The multimodal intervention involved fish oil intake (2 g of eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid daily), regular dietary counselling and unsupervised physical exercise twice weekly during the first three cycles of primary anti-neoplastic treatment. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment rate, completion rate and compliance rate with the intervention. Differences in skeletal muscle, body weight, and physical function between the intervention and historical control groups were analysed. Factors contributing to increased skeletal muscle were explored using univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The recruitment and completion rates were 0.48 (n = 59/123) and 0.80 (n = 46/59), respectively. The overall compliance rate with all five individual interventions was 0.60 (n = 28/47). The individual compliance rates were 0.81 (n = 38/47) with fish oil intake, 0.94 (n = 44/47) with energy intake, 0.98 (n = 46/47) with protein intake, 0.51 (n = 24/47) with resistance exercise and 0.57 (n = 27/47) with aerobic exercise. No mean differences in skeletal muscle, body weight, or physical function were found between the intervention and control groups. However, a larger proportion of patients in the intervention group gained skeletal muscle (p < 0.02). The identified contributing factors of muscle gain were weight gain (OR, 1.3; p = 0.01), adherence to treatment plan (OR, 4.6; p = 0.02), stable/partial response (OR, 3.3; p = 0.04) and compliance to the intervention (OR, 7.4; p = 0.01). Age, sex, tumour stage, performance status, treatment type and baseline cachexia did not predict muscle gain.

CONCLUSION

This three-dimensional intervention in patients with lung cancer undergoing primary anti-neoplastic treatment was feasible and increased the proportion of patients gaining skeletal muscle. Dietary counselling and fish oil use were useful strategies. The motivation for conducting unsupervised physical intervention was low. Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT04161794.