Characteristics of Advance Care Planning Interventions Across Dementia Stages: A Systematic Review

Caregivers' Perspectives on Discussions of Medical Treatment Preferences for People Living With Dementia Are Associated With Their Dementia Health Literacy and the Caregiving Relationship

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

People living with dementia experience progressive functional decline and increased dependence on caregivers. This study examined the influence of caregivers' dementia health literacy on perceptions of medical care preferences and advance care planning (ACP) in people living with dementia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This analysis used data from a cross-sectional survey, "Care Planning for Individuals with Dementia," administered nationwide by Alzheimer's Disease Centers. We conducted binary, ordinal, and multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

On average, surveyed caregivers (n = 431) were 78.3 years, had 16 years of education, and were mainly White (88.5%). Most lived with (76.8%) and were the designated healthcare proxy (95.1%), with high dementia knowledge scores (mean = 8.4/10). As caregivers' dementia knowledge scores increased, they were 1.27 times more likely (p = .02) to endorse comfort care. Caregivers with greater knowledge about severe dementia were less likely to need further treatment preference-related discussions (knowing a lot: odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, p < .001; knowing some things: OR = 0.37, p = .006). Caregivers live apart from patients were 2.71 times more likely to know about such discussions (p < .001). Caregivers of people in earlier stages endorsed greater needs for further conversations with clinicians (no impairment and mild cognitive impairment [MCI]: OR = 7.38, p = .002; mild impairment: OR = 5.32, p = .005) and their care recipients (no impairment and MCI: OR = 5.24, p = .02).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings highlight the role of dementia-specific education in ACP discussions among people living with dementia, caregivers, and healthcare clinicians. These findings are important because evidence suggests that ACP may promote quality of life, reduce iatrogenic harm, minimize healthcare overutilization, and alleviate care-related burdens.

Evaluating the pragmatic characteristics of advance care planning outcome measures in dementia clinical trials: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that involves discussing a person's goals, values, and preferences; it is particularly important for persons living with dementia (PLWD) given that dementia is incurable and progressive. To ensure results that will impact real-world practices, ACP outcome measures must be psychometrically strong, meaningful to key partners, and pragmatic to collect. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of outcome measures utilized in ACP randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling PLWD or their care partners and evaluated their pragmatic characteristics.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed ACP RCTs enrolling PLWD or their care partners from 2011 to 2021. We abstracted characteristics of primary and secondary outcome measures, including pragmatic characteristics using an adapted Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale and ACP outcome domains using the standardized ACP Outcome Framework (i.e., process, action, healthcare, or quality of care).

RESULTS

We included 21 ACP RCTs. Trials included 103 outcome measures (39 primary and 64 secondary), of which 11% measured process, 14% measured action, 49% measured healthcare, and 26% measured quality of care. Twenty-four (23%) outcome measures were highly pragmatic, the majority of which (67%) reflected healthcare outcome measures. Sixty-one (59%) outcomes were assessed as highly relevant to PLWD or their care partners. Only 20% (n = 21) of outcome measures were embedded into clinical practice. Most (62%) RCTs were conducted in nursing homes, and 33% were focused PLWD with advanced stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In RCTs testing ACP interventions to support PLWD, only 23% of outcome measures were highly pragmatic, and most of these measured healthcare utilizations. Outcome assessments were rarely integrated into the EHR during routine clinical care. New outcome measures that address the lived experience of PLWD and their care partners plus have high pragmatic characteristics are needed for embedded pragmatic clinical trials.

End-of-Life Care Planning in Diverse Individuals Across Age Groups: A Proposed Conceptual Model of Nursing

BACKGROUND

End-of-life planning helps nurses meet the needs of their patients at a crucial time of life.

PURPOSE

This article presents a conceptual model of end-of-life care planning for nurses, especially those in palliative and hospice care, focusing on holistic nursing views.

METHODS

Based on a literature review, we developed a new conceptual model illustrating the concepts and dimensions of end-of-life care planning among diverse individuals across countries, life spans and age groups, ethnographies, and residential statuses.

RESULTS

This conceptual model includes 3 concepts: personal factors, stakeholders, and environmental and social factors. Each concept encompasses multiple dimensions. The concepts are interrelated and directly related to end-of-life care planning.

CONCLUSION

This work addresses the need for a comprehensive end-of-life care planning model and can help enhance the quality of end-of-life care. This article identifies implications for nursing education, practice, and research.

Teaching and learning about dementia care among undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review

AIM

Review available evidence on teaching methods and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students regarding care for people with dementia.

BACKGROUND

The debilitating nature and the rapidly growing number of dementia cases will cause significant increase in the demand of healthcare services. Nurses play an essential role in improving the quality of care for people with dementia, although some evidence suggests that training in dementia care among nurses is poor.

DESIGN

A scoping review of the literature. following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The source of evidence selection adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review.

METHODS

Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Education Resources Information Centre and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were studies found through database search up to 15th December 2020, published in English or Spanish with data regarding any method used for dementia education among undergraduate nursing students.

RESULTS

19 studies were included in this review. The identified methods were simulation (n = 5), awareness-raising activities (n = 4), placement (n = 3), home visits (n = 3), combined activities (n = 3) and service learning (n = 1). Learning outcomes were measured in terms of knowledge, attitudes, preparedness, empathy, self-confidence, self-efficacy, awareness and students´ perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review has found high heterogeneity among dementia education programs and learning outcomes. Nursing education can be enhanced by designing and measuring effective and evidence-based educational interventions so that nursing students develop competencies which make it easier to deliver quality care for people with dementia.

Towards personalized dementia care through meaningful activities supported by technology: A multisite qualitative study with care professionals

BACKGROUND

Person-centred care is widely recognised as important for helping people with dementia maintain a sense of self and purpose in life - especially for those living in care facilities. Despite this, most care practices still adopt a medical approach in which physical needs are prioritized over psychosocial well-being. Addressing the need to find ways of promoting person-centred approaches in care, this study explored care professionals' reflections on a novel, technological intervention (SENSE-GARDEN) that combines multisensory stimuli and digital media to create personalized environments for people with dementia. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of care professionals who had used SENSE-GARDEN for approximately 1 year.

METHODS

Three care homes in Norway, Belgium, and Portugal and 1 hospital in Romania used the SENSE-GARDEN with residents/patients with moderate to severe dementia over the course of 1 year. Qualitative data - including observations and interviews with 2 care professionals - were collected at the beginning of the study period from the Norwegian care home to explore initial impressions of the new SENSE-GARDEN room. At the end of the study period, 8 care professionals across the 4 facilities were interviewed for an in-depth exploration of their experiences. The two sets of data were analysed separately through reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

At the beginning of the study period, the staffs' focus was mainly on the novelty of the new SENSE-GARDEN room and how it provided opportunities for meaningful experiences. Post-intervention, the care professionals provided reflective accounts on how care could be delivered in alternative ways to standard practice. The themes generated from the post-intervention interviews were: "shifting focus onto personalized care", "building and fostering relationships", and "continuous discoveries". Through delivering person-centred care, the professionals reported a sense of purpose and achievement in their work.

CONCLUSIONS

Professionals from care facilities across 4 different countries highlighted the value of interventions such as SENSE-GARDEN as a way of creating opportunities to better know people with dementia. Thus, they experienced improved relationships and greater job satisfaction. However, delivering person-centred interventions is time-consuming, and future research should evaluate the feasibility of sustaining them on a long-term basis.

Interventions for improving self-direction in people with dementia: a systematic review

Background

Dementia is a progressive disease that affects people’s everyday functioning, including the ability to express values, needs and wishes, which can be considered key elements of self-direction.

For the purpose of this review, self-direction refers to the organization and/or coordination of your own life, including professional and other care, with the objective of having what you perceive to be a good life. The aim of this systematic review was to assess and describe interventions that aim to improve self-direction of people with dementia.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Library. Empirical studies up to April 2020 were included that used qualitative and/or quantitative methods and reported on interventions for people with dementia aimed at improving self-direction. Stepwise study selection and the assessment of methodological quality were conducted independently by two authors. Data on study and intervention characteristics, outcomes related to self-direction and well-being of people with dementia and factors influencing the feasibility were extracted systematically and described narratively.

Results

Ten studies were identified describing a total of nine interventions. Interventions varied in terms of goals, content, target population and duration. Overall, interventions consisted of multiple components focusing on identifying “Who am I?” (beliefs, strengths, values, goals), identifying “What is important to me?” (meaningful activities and goal setting) and/or communicating about preferences with professionals and/or caregivers. The review provides indications that people with dementia may benefit from the interventions included. Overall, positive effects were found in studies on outcomes related to self-direction and wellbeing. However, outcomes measured using quantitative methods showed inconsistent effects between the studies.

Conclusions

Although the methodological quality of all the studies included was ‘good’ or at least ‘fair’, the evidence base of interventions aiming to improve self-direction is still limited due to the low number of studies, the low number of participants and the frequent use of and their authors’ own non-standardized measures. Nevertheless, the review points towards positive effects on self-direction and well-being. Identifying individual beliefs, strengths, values, goals and meaningful activities can be essential components of these interventions, as well as communication about the desired care and support.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02133-w.