Split-face comparison study of transcutaneous pneumatic injection therapy with isotonic and hypertonic glucose solutions

Efficacy and safety of needle-free jet injector-assisted intralesional treatments in dermatology-a systematic review

Needle-free jet injectors are used for the intralesional treatment of various dermatological indications. However, a systematic review that evaluates the efficacy and safety of these treatments has not been published. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of needle-free jet injections for dermatological indications and to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations. An electronic literature search was conducted in April 2022. Two reviewers independently selected studies based on predefined criteria and performed a methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaborations risk-of-bias 2.0 assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Thirty-seven articles were included, involving 1911 participants. Dermatological indications included scars, alopecia areata, hyperhidrosis, nail diseases, non-melanoma skin cancer, common warts, local anesthesia, and aesthetic indications. Keloids and other types of scars (hypertrophic, atrophic, and burn scars) were investigated most frequently (n = 7). The included studies reported favorable efficacy and safety outcomes for intralesional jet injector-assisted treatment with triamcinolone acetonide/hexacetonide, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, or hyaluronic acid. Two high-quality studies showed good efficacy and tolerability of intralesional jet injections with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone acetonide in hypertrophic scars and with saline in boxcar and rolling acne scars. No serious adverse reactions and good tolerability were reported in the included studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies was low. Limited evidence suggests that needle-free jet injector-assisted intralesional treatment is efficacious and safe for hypertrophic and atrophic acne scars. More well-powered RCTs investigating the efficacy and safety of jet injector treatment in dermatology are warranted to make further evidence-based recommendations.

Needle-free pneumatic injection device; histologic assessment using a rat model and parameter comparison in predicting collagen synthesis degree

BACKGROUND

Needle-free pneumatic injections have been recently introduced to the field of dermatology to inject such substances as hyaluronic acid. However, data on the influence of various pneumatic injection parameters on collagen synthesis are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the effect of diameter, pressure, and volume of a pneumatic injection jet on collagen synthesis and fluid dispersion pattern using a rat model. Investigate if the total work force of the injection jet is useful in predicting the degree of collagen synthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We injected fluid with 1 mg/ml of hyaluronic concentration to adult rats. Different injection pressures and volumes were tested using devices with nozzles of different diameters. Collagen synthesis areas were then measured, and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The area of collagen fibers increased for up to two months. The injection pressure and volume did not correlate with the degree of collagen synthesis. The nozzle diameter showed a significant after two and four weeks of injection. The total work force correlated with collagen synthesis 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-injection. (P = 0.043, 0.027, and 0.000, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Collagen formation is more prominent 2 months post-hyaluronic acid injection than after 1 month when using a needle-free pneumatic injection device. The total work force, which is affected by both the nozzle diameter and injection pressure, can be helpful in predicting the degree of collagen synthesis. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:278-285, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.