Significant therapeutic response to cysteamine cream in a melasma patient resistant to Kligman's formula

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of Microneedling Radiofrequency, In-Office and Home-Based Topical Cysteamine in Refractory Melasma: A Split Face, Vehicle-Control, Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Refractory melasma remains a challenge in dermatology, necessitating the exploration of innovative treatments.

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining radiofrequency microneedling (RFM) with Cysteamine cream, applied both in-office and as a part of a home-care regimen, to treat refractory melasma.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A vehicle-controlled, split-face trial was conducted on 30 Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV participants. Subjects received RFM and Cysteamine serum on one side of the face and RFM with saline on the contralateral side. Additionally, a random half-added Cysteamine cream was applied at home. The modified Melasma Area and Severity Index and VISIA skin analysis were used for assessment.

RESULTS

Significant improvement in melasma severity and skin texture was noted on the sides treated with RFM and Cysteamine, including observable benefits from both in-office and home-based Cysteamine use with minimal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined approach of RFM with Cysteamine provides a promising and safe modality for managing refractory melasma, showing notable improvements.

Clinical Efficacy of Cysteamine Application for Melasma: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Melasma is a challenging, acquired hyperpigmentary disorder. The gold standard treatment is Kligman's formulation, which contains hydroquinone, tretinoin, and dexamethasone, but its long-term use is limited by the risk of exogenous ochronosis. Cysteamine, a tyrosinase inhibitor, reduces melanocyte activity and melanin production, showing strong depigmenting effects in patients resistant to Kligman's formulation. Nonetheless, clinical studies have yielded inconsistent efficacy results. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of cysteamine in treating melasma and to identify potential factors that may impact its therapeutic outcomes. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL, from the earliest record until August 2024, was conducted. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized design studies related to topical cysteamine on melasma patients were included. The primary outcome was MASI or mMASI assessment after treatments. The current meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed based on baseline MASI, disease duration of melasma, patient age, and sample size of the included studies. Funnel plots and Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill method were adopted to assess the publication bias. Results: Eight studies were included for quantitative analysis. The analysis of MASI after topical cysteamine demonstrated a significant decrease compared to the placebo (p = 0.002). Compared to other melasma treatments, cysteamine did not show superior efficacy in mMASI (p = 0.277). The treatment efficacy of hydroquinone, modified Kligman's formula, and tranexamic acid mesotherapy for melasma was not statistically different when compared to cysteamine (p = 0.434). Further analyses showed no benefit when allowing extended cysteamine application time (p < 0.0001). The meta-regression revealed the efficacy of cysteamine decreased as the duration of melasma increased (coefficient = 0.38, p = 0.0001, R2 = 0.99). The funnel plot displayed some asymmetry. The trim and fill method suggested the adjusted effect size was 0.607 (95% CI = -0.720 to 1.935). Conclusions: Cysteamine exhibited efficacy in treating melasma patients; however, its depigmentation effect was comparable to hydroquinone-based regimens, tranexamic acid mesotherapy, and modified Kligman's formula. Using cysteamine in patients with a short duration of melasma may result in better efficacy.

Combination of 5% cysteamine and 4% nicotinamide in melasma: Efficacy, tolerability, and safety

BACKGROUND

Melasma is a chronic dermatosis that impacts the patient's quality of life and can present considerable challenges in terms of effective treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of 5% cysteamine combined with 4% nicotinamide in female subjects with melasma.

METHODS

This single-center, single-arm, prospective, open-label study evaluated patients with melasma using a combination cream of 5% cysteamine and 4% nicotinamide in a progressive regimen (60 min in the first month, 120 min in the second month, and 180 min in the third month).

RESULTS

Overall, 35 treated subjects exhibited reduced modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) (p < 0.001) and decreased MelasQoL scores (p < 0.001), accompanied by improved brightness, luminosity, homogeneity, and spot intensity (p < 0.001). Photographic and colorimetric analysis revealed smaller spots and improved homogeneity.

LIMITATIONS

Adherence to progressive daily treatment could not be evaluated long-term.

CONCLUSION

A combination cream comprising 5% cysteamine and 4% nicotinamide was effective, tolerable, and safe for treating melasma.

Successful treatment of solar lentigines by topical application of stabilized cysteamine: A vehicle-controlled, double-blind randomized study

Background

Solar lentigines are common hyperpigmented lesions typically appearing after 50 years of age and associated with negative psychological effects in affected individuals. Topical depigmenting products, such as hydroquinone and even the Kligman's formula, are usually ineffective for treating lentigines. Stabilized cysteamine has been recently shown to be as effective as the modified Kligman's formula for treating melasma. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of a stabilized cysteamine on solar lentigines.

Methods

A vehicle-controlled, double-blind, and randomized study was performed on 30 patients with solar lentigines. Stabilized cysteamine or vehicle control creams were applied on solar lentigines on the dorsum of the hands daily for 12 weeks. Clinical measurements with colorimetry and visual analog scale were performed at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Results

Statistically significant results were obtained in the cysteamine group versus the vehicle control group. Stabilized cysteamine provided a 40% reduction in colorimetric values (p < 0.002) versus a 2% reduction in the vehicle group (p < 0.405). Cysteamine also provided a 40% reduction in VAS (p < 0.001) versus a 2% reduction in the vehicle group (p < 0.245).

Conclusion

Significant improvement of solar lentigines was observed after 12 weeks of application of stabilized cysteamine by all evaluation methods. Stabilized cysteamine represents a highly effective topical treatment for solar lentigines and can be considered as one of the first topical therapies effective on this hyperpigmentary disorder.

Disorders of hyperpigmentation. Part II. Review of management and treatment options for hyperpigmentation

Key challenges in the management of pigmentary disorders such as melasma and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation are their resistance to treatment, tendency to recur after treatment, and the risk of exacerbating hyperpigmentation with many treatment modalities. The second article in this 2-part continuing medical education series on pigmentary disorders focuses on the evidence behind medical and procedural treatments of dyschromias, including photoprotection, topical lightening agents, oral agents, chemical peels, and laser therapy.

Is cysteamine use effective in the treatment of melasma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Melasma is a recurrent hypermelanosis disorder characterized by the appearance of brownish and symmetrical spots on the skin. It affects the quality of life and is resistant to available treatment approaches. Cysteamine has been reported as a promising depigmenting agent for melasma treatment and following formulation enhancement, its use is being reported. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the use of depigmenting formulations containing 5% cysteamine in the treatment of patients with melasma. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Science Direct, and Scielo databases until December 27, 2021, based on criteria selected by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4 software. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials. A total of six studies containing 120 melasma patients treated with 5% cysteamine were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that 5% cysteamine is effective for the treatment of patients with melasma (MD 6.26 [95% CI 3.68-8.83], p < 0.0001, I²  = 86%). In this review, through meta-analysis allows concluding that 5% cysteamine is effective in the treatment of melasma and presents a low probability of side or adverse effects.

Medical therapies for melasma

Melasma is a common malady affecting all races with a higher incidence in Hispanics, Middle Eastern, Asians, and African origin females (Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III-V). Women are affected much more often than men. Melasma remains a significant cause of cosmetic morbidity and psychosocial embarrassment affecting quality of life necessitating effective and reliable treatment. Unfortunately, treatment remains unsatisfactory due to limited efficacy, adverse effects, and relapses after stopping treatment. Although chemical peels, laser and light therapies and dermabrasion may have utility, the evidence available for their efficacy is limited and they often cause post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, particularly in individuals with darker skin types. Medical therapies remain mainstay in the management of melasma. The triple combination, hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%, and fluocinolone acetonide 0.01% (Triluma, Galderma, Ft. Worth Texas, often modified incorporating different corticosteroids) remains the only US FDA-approved treatment for melasma and is the gold standard due its demonstrated efficacy across ethnicities. Oral tranexamic acid alone or in combination with other modalities has also shown significant efficacy. Several cosmeceuticals and botanical extracts used as skin lightening agents have been demonstrated to be useful. Physical sunscreens containing zinc oxide, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, and silicones provide photoprotective and camouflage effect. We propose that a multimodality approach to the treatment of melasma is the most effective treatment approach. This review is focused on the medical therapies for melasma.

Efficacy of Cysteamine and Methimazole in Treating Melasma A Comparative Narrative Review

Melasma is a chronic and acquired pigmentary condition that primarily affects women and undermines patient satisfaction and confidence. Melasma mostly affects females, accounting for 90% of all cases. It affects people of all races, particularly those with skin types IV and V who live in areas with lots of UV radiation. According to the studies, Melasma lesions are seen throughout the face in centrofacial, malar, and mandibular patterns. Melasma lesions on the forehead, cheeks, nose, upper lip, and/or chin are the most prevalent centrofacial pattern. Melasma lesions can also be detected along the periorbital area, especially in Asian people. Melasma is notably resistant to treatment, with many patients experiencing only temporary relief and relapses. Combining therapies that target numerous pathologic components, including photodamage, inflammation, aberrant vascularity, and abnormal pigmentation, generally results in the most dramatic therapeutic improvements. Treatments for dark circles include topical depigmenting medicines like hydroquinone, kojic acid, azelaic acid, and topical retinoic acid, and physical treatments such as chemical peels, surgical adjustments, and laser therapy. The objective of therapy should be to figure out what's causing the hyperpigmentation and what's contributing to it. This article provides an overview of melasma therapies and the efficacy of methimazole and cysteamine for melasma therapy.

Comparison of the efficacy of cysteamine 5% cream and hydroquinone 4%/ascorbic acid 3% combination cream in the treatment of epidermal melasma

BACKGROUND

Few safe and effective treatments are available for melasma. Cysteamine, a non-melanocytotoxic molecule is a safer alternative to hydroquinone and usable for the long-term use.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of cysteamine 5% cream in the treatment of melasma METHODS: Sixty-five of 80 patients completed this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The patients received cysteamine 5% or hydroquinone 4%/ascorbic acid 3% (HC) cream. The therapeutic response was evaluated by modified MASI (mMASI) and melanin index (SkinColorCatch) after 2 and 4 months of treatment. Effect of treatment on the quality of life was also assessed.

RESULTS

The decrease for mMASI score was from 6.69±2.96 to 4.47±2.16 in cysteamine group and from 6.26±3.25 to 3.87±2.00 in HC group after 4 months (p values<0.001). The melanin index decreased from 37.72±10.17 to 31.47±11.90 in the cysteamine group and from 36.37±10.80 to 23.16±8.83 in HC group after 4 months (p-value=0.003 and <0.001, respectively). The difference between mMASI score at baseline and month 4 was not significant between both groups (p-value>0.05).The difference between melanin index at baseline and month 4 was significantly more pronounced in HC group (p-value=0.002). Quality of life improved in both groups (p-value<0.05), but was not significantly different between groups (p-value>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cysteamine was confirmed to be an effective treatment for melasma, with equivalent results to HC in reducing mMASI score and improving quality of life, despite lesser melanin index reduction observed. Cysteamine and HC efficacy was confirmed in patients recalcitrant to previous treatments, by a significant reduction of mMASI and melanin index.

Systematic review of clinical studies assessing the needling for treatment of melasma: Focusing on efficacy, safety, and recurrence rate

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Melasma is common, chronic and treatment-challenging cosmetic concern and the aim of this study was to systematically evaluate clinical studies assessing the treatment of melasma through needling while focusing on efficiency, safety, and recurrence.

METHOD

After e-search a total of 54 articles were reviewed and 12 published articles (February 2011-September 2020) in terms of content, topic, and purpose, were finalized. Articles were open pilot trials, case reports, case series, retrospective studies, quasi-experimental trials, randomized clinical trials, and split face comparative studies.

RESULTS

The highest decrease in MASI score was 85.71% and allocated to microneedling method following only 3 sessions with an interval of 30 days. On the other hand, the lowest decrease in this score was 3.7% and allocated to microneedling treatment and its use for vitamin C delivery at the end of the fourth week of treatment. No side effects were reported in included studies, and the various needling methods used were safe. Recurrence after treatment was reported in none of these articles, and only one of them reported a 4% recurrence in the second phase of treatment, but no recurrence was reported in the last phase of that study.

CONCLUSION

Non-aggressive microneedling with topical depigmenting agents was more effective than topical depigmenting agents alone, so that the mean MASI score was significantly higher than those who used lightening serum alone. So needling can be suggested as an effective and safe method with low recurrence rate for the treatment of melasma.

Efficacy of topical cysteamine hydrochloride in treating melasma: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Melasma remains a recurrent, chronic, therapeutically challenging, and psychologically burdening condition. Several different modalities and approaches have been utilized, and some with notable success to experimentally manage the condition. Cysteamines, with their depigmentation properties, have only recently been intensely studied. One such formulation is the topical 5% cysteamine hydrochloride, the structure of which is notably more stable and with a less foul odor than its prior counterparts. We, therefore, aimed to assess the efficacy of the mentioned formulation in the treatment of melasma.

METHODS

The PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Science, and Embase, Cochrane, and Proquest databases were thoroughly searched for English studies evaluating the effects of the topical agent mentioned.

RESULTS

Eight studies (five RCTs, two case reports, and one case series) were included after three rounds of screening, most of which were carried out in Iran. Statistical significance was noted when assessing decreased melanin content and satisfaction rates.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the cysteamine cream could be comparably efficient in treating melasma while accompanied only by minor and transient adverse events. However, current evidence is limited by insufficient sample size, long-term follow-up, and only to epidermal melasma, highlighting the need for appropriately designed randomized controlled clinical trials to draw a conclusive image of the cysteamine's role in treating this recalcitrant condition.

The pathogenesis of melasma and implications for treatment

BACKGROUND

Melasma is a complex and poorly understood disorder, with high rates of treatment failure and recurrences.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to review the current knowledge of the pathogenesis of melasma and apply this knowledge to clinical implications on relevant therapeutic interventions.

METHODS

A systematic PubMed search was performed using the search term "((melasma[Text Word]) OR facial melanosis[Text Word]) AND (pathogenesis OR causality[MeSH Terms])" for articles published between 1990 and 2020. Included articles were then evaluated by two authors and assessed for relevant pathomechanistic pathways, after which they were divided into groups with minimal overlap. We then reviewed current treatment modalities for melasma and divided them according to the involved pathomechanistic pathway.

RESULTS

A total of 309 search results were retrieved among which 76 relevant articles were identified and reviewed. Five main pathomechanisms observed in melasma were identified: (1) melanocyte inappropriate activation; (2) aggregation of melanin and melanosomes in dermis and epidermis; (3a) increased mast cell count and (3b) solar elastosis; (4) altered basement membrane; and (5) increased vascularization. Treatment modalities were then divided based on these five pathways and detailed in 6 relevant tables.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology of melasma is multifactorial, resulting in treatment resistance and high recurrence rates. This wide variety of pathomechanisms should ideally be addressed separately in the treatment regimen in order to maximize results.

Emerging topical therapies to treat pigmentary disorders: an evidence-based approach

BACKGROUND

Hyperpigmentation disorders are commonly encountered in dermatology clinics. The use of prescription-grade and over-the-counter topical lightening agents has increased in popularity, leading to a substantial growth of research over the past decade.

OBJECTIVE

We seek to review clinical studies evaluating the use of different Rx-grade and OTC ingredients in treating hyperpigmentation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A comprehensive search on PubMed was conducted to identify patient-based evidence on the most common ingredients used as topical lightening agents: arbutin, ascorbic acid, cysteamine, hydroquinone, kojic acid, niacinamide, retinoids, and triple-combination therapy. The topicals were classified as either prescription-grade or over-the-counter.

RESULTS

Varying levels of evidence support the use of topicals in treating hyperpigmentation. There were more clinical trials examining Rx-grade products than OTC products. Mild but tolerated side effects are noted in many of these agents.

CONCLUSION

Careful monitoring and adjustment of doses will be needed to maximize skin lightening benefits and minimize side effects.