Inadvertent intra-arterial injection of deoxycholic acid: A case report and proposed protocol for treatment

Management of Serious Adverse Events Following Deoxycholic Acid Injection for Submental and Jowl Fat Reduction: A Systematic Review and Management Recommendations

Pivotal Phase 3 randomized control trials have demonstrated a favorable safety profile for ATX-101 in submental fat (SMF) reduction; however, in real-world settings, several serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported, most of which are procedure related and avoidable. Current understanding of the management of uncommon AEs and SAEs is based on the aesthetic surgeon's discretion, and overzealous protocols for sclerosis agents are being applied for ATX-101-induced arterial injury. This review focuses on showcasing the management of SAEs reported previously and updating it with personal clinical experiences with ATX-101 for SMF and jowl fat reduction. Along with adherence to the standard procedures for ATX-101 administration, the authors recommend investigating other potential causes of SMF accumulation and jowling mechanism, appropriate demarcation of the surface area to determine the number of vials, and assessment of the fat pad thickness to determine the number of required treatment cycles for optimal therapeutic outcomes. Surgery is preferable for jowling caused by compartment displacement (ptosis), whereas fat-reducing treatments such as ATX-101 are contraindicated for jowling caused by subcutaneous tissue atrophy. Some proactive measures that can be employed to prevent AEs include avoiding intradermal injections to prevent skin ulceration/necrosis, injecting lidocaine to check for smile asymmetry as an indication of marginal mandibular nerve proximity, administering 1 to 2 mm deeper injections in males to prevent alopecia, employing good aseptic techniques to prevent abscess formation, injecting 1 product at a time using correctly labeled syringes, and confirming the diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum before treating it as an infection.

Level of Evidence 3

Nonsurgical Rejuvenation of the Neck

Nonsurgical skin tightening in the neck is an area of significant growth with seemingly countless devices. Optimal treatment choice depends on the patient's concerns, anatomy, and lifestyle. Patients with minimal skin laxity, but dynamic platysmal bands may benefit from botulinum toxin injections. Mild to moderately lax skin can be addressed with microfocused ultrasound or radiofrequency with microneedling. Significant sun damage and laxity can both be addressed with fractional ablative lasers. Options for submental preplatysmal fat include percutaneous radiofrequency, radiofrequency-helium plasma, deoxycholic acid injections, and cryolipolysis. Of these, percutaneous radiofrequency has the highest patient satisfaction and lowest complication rate.

Chronic Infection and Nodule Formation following Deoxycholate Injection

Aqualyx (Marllor International Ltd, Rimini, Italy) was originally developed in Italy by Professor Pasquale Motolese and has been commercially available since 2009. It is a deoxycholate, aqueous gelatinous solution mixed with saline and buffering compounds. It is the only drug approved by the European Union for the reduction in localized fat. Aqualyx is sold exclusively to doctors and nurses trained in intralipotherapy. In the case of our patient, the product administered was advertised as Aqualyx, but was not administered by a trained health professional and was administered too superficially. The patient developed severe pain following the injection and was unable to sit for several weeks. There was localized skin necrosis, and palpable collections where the injection was administered. Our initial suspicion was development of an abscess or hematoma. To characterize further, we arranged an ultrasound scan that showed a “superficial hypoechoic lesion” but no deeper infection or spread. The numerous painful nodules ruptured onto the skin surface, resulting in purulent and bleeding lesions. This case demonstrates the importance of appropriate training and competence in performing cosmetic procedures including injections and fat dissolving treatments.

Adverse effects of deoxycholic acid in submandibular glands, submental, inguinal and subplantar regions: a study in rats

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effects of the deoxycholic acid (DCA) in the submental and subplantar regions of rats, and to histologically analyze the changes caused in the submandibular glands, soft tissues of the paw, and inguinal adipose tissue.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty male Wistar rats were divided into DCA and control (CG) groups. DCA was injected in the submental, inguinal, and subplantar regions, and saline was injected in the CG. The animals were euthanized after 24 h and at 7 and 21 days.

RESULTS

The DCA group showed edema in the submental region in 24 h and in the paw in all experimental times. In the paw there were also erythema and ulceration in 7 days, and alopecia after 21 days. At 21 days, a few animals also showed erythema and ulceration in paw; however, there was no significant difference from CG. Histological analysis of the paw showed an intense inflammatory process, with a predominance of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells in 24 h and 7 days. In the adipose tissue, we observed loss of architecture and inflammatory infiltrate, followed with a lower number of adipose cells, and at 21 days, fibroplasia. In the submandibular glands we observed inflammatory infiltration, loss of tissue architecture, and fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

DCA produces a significant inflammatory process in the structures. It can cause skin ulcerations and, in salivary glands, it causes loss of tissue architecture and fibrosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There has been growing increase in the use of DCA for aesthetic purposes by health care providers. Due to the presence of important anatomical structures in the submental region, constant vigilance is required to report new adverse effects.

Efficacy and safety of injectable deoxycholic acid for submental fat reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of deoxycholic acid (DOC) for SMF reduction.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases until June 2020. Efficacy outcomes: Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale; Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale; Subject Self-Rating Scale; SMF reduction measured using caliper and resonance magnetic imaging; Early therapeutic success. Safety outcomes: Withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs), Rates of AEs, Skin laxity.Results: Five studies were included, comprising 1,838 participants. DOC (1 or 2 mg/cm²) had greater improvement in all efficacy measures compared to placebo. No differences were seen between both doses of DOC. Withdrawals due to AEs were low with 1 and 2 mg/cm² of DOC (6.8% vs. 9.9%, respectively), and there was no difference between the two doses (p = 0.22). AEs were usually associated with the injection site, were predominantly transient, and commonly resolved within the treatment session interval. Injection site pain, hematoma, anesthesia/numbness, erythema, and swelling/edema were the most common AEs. There was no difference in their prevalence between both doses of DOC.Conclusions: DOC is effective and safe for SMF reduction with no differences between doses of 1 and 2 mg/cm².

Deoxycholic acid in the submental fat reduction: A review of properties, adverse effects, and complications

BACKGROUND

Deoxycholic acid (DCA) was developed by the pharmaceutical industry for aesthetical use in submental fat reduction. It represents the first lipolytic substance approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for fat reduction in that area.

AIMS

This study presents an update of properties and the use of DCA, as well as adverse events and possible complications.

METHODS

A search in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Bireme/LILACS databases was performed using the terms: "deoxycholic acid" OR "ATX-101" AND "injection" NOT "amphotericin" NOT "biliary" NOT "bile." Experimental studies developed in animals, clinical trials, literature reviews, case reports, and letters to the editor that included the DCA mechanism of action, dose, manner of use, adverse effects, and complications were selected.

RESULTS

The most frequent adverse events are edema, local pain, bruise, and numbness, which usually spontaneously regress. However, complications, including, skin necrosis, nerve injury, alopecia, and vascular events, can occur, demanding complex management without specific protocols.

CONCLUSION

Although DCA is beneficial for lysis of adipose tissue, clinicians should be aware about the adverse effects and risks involved with the use of this substance. The knowledge of local anatomy, properties, and adverse effects are fundamental to treatment with DCA.