Reduced pain with injection of hyaluronic acid with pre-incorporated lidocaine for nasolabial fold correction: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, split-face designed, clinical study

Assessment of Pain and Satisfaction After Orofacial Harmonization Procedures

AIMS

This long-term study assessed satisfaction and pain levels following facial aesthetic procedures. The study also aimed to correlate expectations, and psychological and social well-being immediately and after one month, describe perceived age, and assess differences in satisfaction between injectable fillers and other Orofacial Harmonization procedures such as hyaluronic acid treatments (for dark circles, nasolabial fold lips, malar, jaw), botulinum toxin injections, enzymatic lipolysis of the double chin, micro-needling, and PDO threads.

METHODS

Data were collected immediately after the procedures and then again 30 days later. Among the participants, 159 (92.4%) were females and 13 (7.6%) were males, who completed FACE-Q questionnaires addressing perceived age, expectations, psychological and social well-being, satisfaction, and facial appearance, as well as the visual pain scale.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients treated in the Dental Clinics in Brazil was 40.4 years (SD± 12.7), with 48.8% of participants perceiving themselves as older immediately after the procedures, decreasing to 47.7% after 30 days, and pain intensity was reported as low. The total number of Orofacial Harmonization procedures performed was 256. Satisfaction after 30 days was high, especially among those who received fillers. The psychological and social function scales were positively correlated with satisfaction with the decision, result, and appearance scales. Fillers showed a significant improvement in perceived age appearance, with half of the patients feeling younger after 30 days. The patients exhibited high satisfaction levels in one-month post-aesthetic orofacial harmonization procedures. Despite initially high expectations, patients reported enhanced psychological and social well-being, along with minimal pain during interventions CONCLUSION: Positive correlations were observed between satisfaction, decision-making, result perception, and appearance. Injectable fillers notably improved perceived aging, with a significant portion of patients initially perceiving themselves as older than their actual age, but later feeling younger post-procedure. Fillers also yielded superior satisfaction and pain relief compared to alternative interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers With or Without Lidocaine in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To update the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hyaluronic acid gel combined with lidocaine for treating nasolabial folds.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science using subject headings and keywords associated with hyaluronic acid and lidocaine in the context of nasolabial folds. Inclusion criteria were met by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid gel with or without lidocaine. Outcomes measured included visual pain analog scale (VAS) scores, wrinkle severity scale scores, and adverse events. The quality of RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane Randomized Controlled Trials Scale, which encompasses criteria such as randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, dropout, and withdrawal rates, and was assessed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

No significant difference in overall wrinkle severity rating scale scores was observed between HA with lidocaine and HA without lidocaine [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (- 0.09, 0.24), P = 0.36]. However, there was a significant reduction in pain scale scores (VAS) [SMD = -2.47, 95% CI (- 4.15, - 0.79), P = 0.004]; no significant differences were noted in the ncidence of at least one adverse event [RR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.90, 1.05), P = 0.51]; and there were no significant differences in swelling [RR =  0.99, 95% CI (0.92, 1.06), P = 0.80], erythema [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.91, 1.11), P = 0.91], bruising [RR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.89, 1.13), P = 0.86], itching [RR = 1.03, the 95% CI (0.88, 1.21), P = 0.74], induration [RR = 1.04, 95% CI (0.92, 1.17), P = 0.55], and papules [RR = 0.77, 95% CI (0.58, 1.02), P = 0.07]. There was a significantly lower incidence of tenderness [RR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.86, 0.97), P = 0.002] only in the control group. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results across all outcome indicators with low sensitivity and high confidence. Subgroup analysis indicated higher wrinkle severity scores among East Asians compared to Europeans and Americans.

CONCLUSIONS

HA containing lidocaine significantly reduces pain and is comparable in effectiveness and safety of HA without lidocaine. The clinical effects appear more pronounced in East Asians. Due to the limited number of related studies, further research is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pain Management in Dermatology

BACKGROUND

The dermatologist has to deal with many situations where the patient feels pain and must therefore know how to manage it.

SUMMARY

The aim of this review was to explore the treatments available to manage pain in dermatology in different circumstances, with an emphasis on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions specifically studied in dermatology.

Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Maximizing patient comfort during hyaluronic acid gel injection is a common concern that is usually addressed by selecting fillers with lidocaine.