The change of causative pathogens in toenail onychomycosis

Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology-confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) populations-based studies, and studies that included (b) clinically un-suspected and (c) clinically suspected patients.

RESULTS

A total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined clinically un-suspected patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3-5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0-16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7-8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3-6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4-4.9]), HIV-positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2-6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4-3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9-4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in clinically suspected patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of population-based studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non-dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.

CONCLUSION

Onychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further population-based studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.

A comprehensive review of nondermatophyte mould onychomycosis: Epidemiology, diagnosis and management

Nondermatophyte moulds (NDMs) are widely distributed and can be detected in association with mycotic nails; however, sometimes it can be challenging to establish the role of NDMs in the pathogenesis of onychomycosis (i.e. causative vs. contaminant). In studies where the ongoing invasive presence of NDMs is confirmed through repeat cultures, the global prevalence of NDMs in onychomycosis patients is estimated at 6.9% with the 3 most common genus being: Aspergillus, Scopulariopsis and Fusarium. NDM onychomycosis can, in many cases, appear clinically indistinguishable from dermatophyte onychomycosis. Clinical features suggestive of NDMs include proximal subungual onychomycosis with paronychia associated with Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp. and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, as well as superficial white onychomycosis in a deep and diffused pattern associated with Aspergillus and Fusarium. Longitudinal streaks seen in patients with distal and lateral onychomycosis may serve as an additional indicator. For diagnosis, light microscopic examination should demonstrate fungal filaments consistent with an NDM with at least two independent isolations in the absence of a dermatophyte; the advent of molecular testing combined with histological assessment may serve as an alternative with improved sensitivity and turnover time. In most instances, antifungal susceptibility testing has limited value. Information on effective treatments for NDM onychomycosis is relatively scarce, unlike the situation in the study of dermatophyte onychomycosis. Terbinafine and itraconazole therapy (continuous and pulsed) appear effective to varying extents for treating onychomycosis caused by Aspergillus, Fusarium or Scopulariopsis. There is scant literature on oral treatments for Neoscytalidium.

Clinical Diagnosis and Laboratory Testing of Abnormal Appearing Toenails: A Retrospective Assessment of Confirmatory Testing for Onychomycosis in the United States, 2022-2023

Onychomycosis is an under-recognized healthcare burden. Despite the risk of misdiagnosis, confirmatory laboratory testing is under-utilized. Histopathologic examination with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently the most effective diagnostic method; it offers direct detection and identification of a fungal invasion. In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed confirmatory testing results, with matching clinical diagnoses, in 96,293 nail specimens submitted during a 9-month period from 2022 to 2023. Toenail specimens were examined using fungal culture, histopathology and/or PCR. Clinical diagnoses were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. For clinically diagnosed onychomycosis patients, the overall positivity rate was 59.4%; a similar positivity rate (59.5%) was found in patients with clinically diagnosed non-fungal nail dystrophy. Performing a histopathologic examination with PCR was more likely to provide pathogen identification results than using fungal culture. Male patients had a higher rate of onychomycosis overall; however, female patients had more non-dermatophyte mold onychomycosis caused by Aspergillus. Clinically diagnosed onychomycosis patients with a co-diagnosis of tinea pedis were more likely to test positive for onychomycosis by PCR (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-6.4), histopathology (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 2.0-3.1) and fungal culture (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5-6.6). Our results support the use of confirmatory laboratory testing when there is a clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis.

A 5-year single-center study about onychomycosis with a focus on Aspergillus spp. in Albania

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a common nail infection caused by dermatophytes, nondermatophytes molds (NDM), and yeasts. The prevalence of Aspergillus spp. is increasing worldwide. This study aims to describe the epidemiological and microbiological features of onychomycosis, especially for Aspergillus spp.

METHODS

This is a 5-year retrospective study of clinically suspected onychomycosis in one microbiological clinic in Albania. The mycological examination, which included direct microscopic examination of nail scrapings with 20% KOH and culture, was performed on 411 patients. After incubation, we studied the macroscopic characteristics of the colonies, size, shape, and color, and their microscopic examination. We evaluated positive cases for Aspergillus, all cases where Aspergillus was grown in the culture, the microscopy was positive, and the culture was negative for dermatophyte.

RESULTS

Onychomycosis resulted positive in 267 patients (52.9% females vs. 47.1% males). A total of 62.2% resulted infected by dermatophytes, 29.6% by yeasts, and 8.2% by NDM. Onychomycosis resulted more frequent in the age group 15-64 years old (63%). Aspergillus spp. were found in 19 patients from 22 patients with NDM onychomycosis. Males (11 patients) and the age group 15-64 years old (14 patients) were more vulnerable to Aspergillus spp. A. niger, A. flavus, and A. terreus isolated from the nail cultures in our study. The culture resulted more superior to KOH examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that NDM, including Aspergillus spp., are still rare findings from fungal examinations. However, dermatologist's clinical suspicion and microbiologist's skills are mandatory in diagnosing and properly managing patients with Aspergillus spp.

Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally

BACKGROUND

Conventional testing methods for dermatophytes are time-consuming, and resource limitations in our institution have prompted curtailed access to these diagnostics.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of our hospital's dermatological mycology diagnostic services and similar services nationally.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study on skin, hair and nail mycology samples in our institution comparing twenty five-year periods (2011-2015 and 2016-2021), including analysis of dermatology clinic data and correspondence related to fungal infection. A survey of national public hospitals' laboratories was conducted to evaluate their mycology testing capabilities.

RESULTS

The total 5 year test count prior to curtailment was 4851 specimens comprising 90% (n = 4344) from general practice and 6% (n = 290) from dermatology clinics. For the 5 years post curtailment, 64.5% (582/903) of specimens were from dermatology clinics. Dermatology clinic data demonstrated doubling of attendances (for all conditions) and of correspondence related to fungal infection. During this time also, national dermatological antifungal purchasing increased 11%. Ten of 28 Irish public hospital laboratories reported the provision of in-house dermatological mycology testing, and none had routine availability of susceptibility or molecular testing of dermatophytes.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to report an appraisal of dermatological fungal diagnostic services in Ireland. Insufficient testing capacity implies that patients are either being treated for fungal infection without appropriate diagnostic confirmation, or being left untreated because of the lack of access to diagnostics. The introduction of molecular detection methods and susceptibility systems would enhance testing capabilities and reduce the requirement for the external referral.

Epidemiology of dermatomycoses and onychomycoses in Ireland (2001 to 2020): A single-institution review

Background

Fungal skin infections are recognised as one of the most common health disorders globally, and dermatophyte infections of the skin, hair and nails are the most common fungal infections. Dermatophytes can be classified as anthropophilic, zoophilic or geophilic species based on their primary habitat association, and this classification makes epidemiological analysis useful for the prevention and control of these infections. The Irish contribution to the epidemiology of these infections has been scant, with just two papers (both reporting paediatric tinea capitis only) published in the last 20 years, and none in the last seven.

Objectives

To perform a comprehensive retrospective epidemiological analysis of all dermatological mycology tests performed in University Hospital Limerick over a 20‐year period.

Methods

All mycology laboratory test results were extracted from the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS, iLab, DXC Technologies) from 2001 to 2020 inclusive for analysis. Specimen types were categorised according to the site of sampling. The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel.

Results

About 12,951 specimens of skin, hair and nails were studied. Median patient age was 42 years (IQR 26–57) with a slight female preponderance (57.2%). Two thirds of samples (67%, n = 8633) were nail, 32% were skin scrapings (n = 4118) and 200 hair samples (1.5%) were received. Zoophilic dermatophytes were more commonly present in females (38% F, 23% M, proportion of dermatophytes) and in those under 10 years of age or from 45 to 70 years (36% and 34% zoophiles, respectively, proportion of dermatophytes), although anthropophiles predominated every age and gender category. Anthropophiles had their highest prevalence in the 10–20 years age category (80% anthropophiles, proportion of dermatophytes), and yeast infections were more prevalent in older patients (29% of >60 year olds vs. 17% of <60 year olds, proportion of all fungal positives). Trichophyton rubrum was the most prevalent pathogen detected, accounting for 53% of all dermatophytes detected, 61% of those detected from nail samples and 34% from skin and hair samples. Trichophyton tonsurans was the most prevalent dermatophyte in tinea capitis, accounting for 37% of dermatophytes detected. Both of these organisms are anthropophilic, and this group showed consistently increased prevalence in proportion to all fungal isolates. The proportion of this dermatophyte class (anthropophiles) increased among both nail samples and skin/hair samples during the study period, from 55% of samples in the first 5 years of the study (2001–2005) to 88% (proportion of dermatophytes) in the final 5 years. Conversely, yeast detection decreased.

Conclusions

This study provides a detailed overview of the epidemiology of the fungal cultures of skin, nail and hair samples in the Mid‐West of Ireland over a 20‐year period. Monitoring this changing landscape is important in identifying likely sources of infections, to identifying potential outbreaks, and may help guide empiric treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first detailed analysis from Ireland of fungal detections from skin, hair and nail samples, and is the first epidemiological fungal report of any kind in over 7 years.