Participation of family members and quality of patient care - the perspective of adult surgical patients

Introduction and Systematic Review of the Good Nursing Care Scale

AIM(S)

To provide an introduction to the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) and systematically review the application of the scale in health research.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Empirical studies published in English or Finnish in peer-reviewed journals or as a summary of a PhD thesis where the scale was used for data collection amongst patients were included. Analysis was made by using descriptive statistics, narrative analysis, and evaluation of psychometric properties.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus in October 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 26 full-text studies and summaries of PhD theses were included in the review. The GNCS has been developed systematically, and the theoretical structure has remained stable. The studies indicate a high level of patient-centered quality of nursing care. Validity and reliability evaluation and reporting were systematic in the studies and mainly indicate sufficient level. Variations between countries are not large, supporting the international use of the GNCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-centered quality of nursing care is predominantly at high levels. However, systematic evaluation is needed to provide longitudinal data. For that purpose, the GNCS is one potential instrument.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Support for the use of existing, tested instruments is encouraged to provide critical ideas for the future needs of nurse practitioners, managers, teachers and researchers.

IMPACT

This paper impacts researchers interested in systematic evaluation of the patient-centered quality of nursing care and for practitioners taking care of patients. For researchers, it introduces a relevant instrument, the GNCS, for analysing the quality or for comparing the quality with other instruments. For practitioners, it produces evidence of the usability of the GNCS.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA guided the systematic review, and the COSMIN guideline was used for quality appraisal of included studies.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public contribution.

The Family Involvement in Care Questionnaire-An instrument measuring family involvement in inpatient care

BACKGROUND

Family involvement in care can be seen as a prerequisite for high-quality family-centered care. It has been identified to improve both patient safety and the quality of care by reducing patient complications and hospital length of stay.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate the content validity of a questionnaire measuring family involvement in inpatient care.

METHODS

The study followed a systematic approach in building a rigorous questionnaire: identification of domain, item generation, and assessment of content validity. The content validity index was calculated based on ratings of item relevance by an expert group consisting of seven senior nurses. Subsequently, 19 online cognitive interviews using the Think-aloud method were conducted with family members of former patients who had undergone open-heart surgery.

RESULTS

Five aspects of family involvement were identified, and the initial pool of items were selected from two preexisting questionnaires. The experts' ratings resulted in item content validity of 0.71-1.00, and the scale content validity/averaging was 0.90, leading to rewording, exclusion, and addition of items. The pretesting of items through two rounds of cognitive interviews with family members resulted in the identification of three main problem areas: defining family involvement, misinterpretation of different terms, and underuse of the not relevant response option. The problems were adjusted in the final version of the questionnaire, which consists of 16 items with a four-point Likert scale and two open-ended items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Family Involvement in Care Questionnaire has demonstrated potential in evaluating family involvement in inpatient care. Further psychometric properties regarding reliability and validity need to be established.

Hospital and homecare nurses' experiences of involvement of patients and families in transition between hospital and municipalities: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Involving patients and families in nursing care is essential to improve patients' health outcomes. Furthermore, families play an essential role in supporting patients by helping nurses understand the patient's everyday life. However, families also need support. Involvement of patients and families is especially important when patients are transferred between hospital and home as transitions heighten the risk of compromising quality and safety in care. However, no consensus exists on how to involve them. Consequently, this may challenge a systematic approach toward patient and family involvement.

AIM

To describe hospital and homecare nurses' experiences with involving patients and their family members in nursing care in the transition between hospital and municipalities.

METHOD

Focus group interviews were conducted in the Gastro unit at a large university hospital in Denmark. Participants included 10 hospital nurses from three wards at the Gastro unit and six homecare nurses from one of three municipalities in the hospital catchment area (total n = 16). Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The study is reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.

FINDINGS

Our analysis revealed one overall theme - "The complexity of involvement" - based on four categories: gap between healthcare sectors increases the need for patient and family involvement, lack of time is a barrier to patient and family involvement, involvement is more than information, and involvement as a balancing act.

CONCLUSION

The nurses experienced patients' and families' involvement as essential, but a discrepancy was found between nurses' intentions and their actions. Aspects related to a gap between healthcare sectors and various understandings of involvement challenged the systematic involvement of patients and families in the transition between healthcare sectors. However, the nurses were highly motivated to achieve a close cross-sectoral collaboration and to show commitment towards patients and families.

Family participation in the care of older hospitalised patients: Patients', family caregivers' and nurses' preferences on family caregivers performing care tasks

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that there are 101 million older care-dependent people (60+). This group is expected to double by 2050 due to the ageing of the world's population and the rise in life expectancy. Although people tend to live longer, there is little evidence that they live their later years in better health. In the future, this might put even more stress on an already overburdened acute care health system. Hospitals therefore need to focus on preventive measures to avoid rehospitalisation of older people. Family participation could be part of the solution.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to gain insight into the preferences of family caregivers, patients and nurses towards family caregivers taking up care tasks during hospitalisation, after receiving education.

METHODS

Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey of nursing staff, family caregivers and older patients in nine wards for older people within three hospitals. Data collection ran from October 2019 till March 2020 using a questionnaire of 25 care tasks with three answer options (perform alone, together with a nurse, do not perform). A consecutive sample of 330 patients and 133 family caregivers (81 dyads could be formed) next to a convenience sample of 67 nurses was obtained.

RESULTS

Patients (65%) are more prepared to let their family caregiver perform tasks alone than family caregivers (59%) and nurses (52%). Only few patients (3.8%) and family caregivers (13%) prefer the family caregiver to perform a task together with a nurse. The latter answer thus rather dichotomously, while nurses answer more dynamically over the three answer options. Of all family caregivers, 50% indicate willingness and ability to perform tasks on a regular basis. Significant correlations indicate that patients, family caregivers and nurses agree on which care tasks would be more preferable to be performed by a family caregiver. Looking at the dyads, preferences of a patient are not suspected to be more similar with his family caregiver than with a random family caregiver.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients, FCGs and nurses indicate to be prepared to engage in family participation. Further research needs to concentrate on the different attitudes and perceptions towards performing care tasks through qualitative research and how a successful implementation can be set up.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Our study indicates that implementation of family participation in physical care within the hospital could be viable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Ghent University Hospital (B670201940430).

Instruments for Patient Education: Psychometric Evaluation of the Expected Knowledge (EKhp) and the Received Knowledge of Hospital Patients (RKhp)

Purpose

In patient education, there is a need for valid and reliable instruments to assess and tailor empowering educational activities. In this study, we summarize the process of producing two parallel instruments for analyzing hospital patients’ expectations (Expected Knowledge of Hospital Patients, EKhp) and received knowledge (Received Knowledge of Hospital Patients, RKhp) and evaluate the psychometrics of the instruments based on international data. In the instruments, six elements of empowering knowledge are included (bio-physiological, functional, experiential, ethical, social, and financial).

Patients and Methods

The original Finnish versions of EKhp and RKhp were tested for the first time in 2003, after which they have been used in several national studies. For international purposes, the instruments were first translated into English, then to languages of the seven participating European countries, using double-checking procedure in each one, and subsequently evaluated and confirmed by local researchers and language experts. International data collection was performed in 2009–2012 with a total sample of 1,595 orthopedic patients. Orthopedic patients were selected due to the increase in their numbers, and need for educational activities. Here we report the psychometrics of the instruments for potential international use and future development.

Results

Content validities were confirmed by each participating country. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original theoretical, six-dimensional structure of the instruments. For some subscales, however, there is a need for further clarification. The summative factors, based on the dimensions, have a satisfactory internal consistency. The results support the use of the instruments in patient education in orthopedic nursing, and preferably also in other fields of surgical nursing care.

Conclusion

EKhp and RKhp have potential for international use in the evaluation of empowering patient education. In the future, testing of the structure is needed, and validation in other fields of clinical care besides surgical nursing is especially warranted.

In the Shadows of Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: An Interview Study with Next of Kin about Their Experiences Participating in Surgical Cancer Care

The study aimed to explore the experiences of participation among the next of kin of patients who had surgery for upper abdominal tumours. This study had a qualitative research design and data were analysed by thematic analysis. Eleven qualitative interviews were conducted with next of kin to patients who had surgery for liver, bile duct or pancreatic malignancy. The following themes emerged: from the shadows to an important role and an inviting and inhibiting environment for participation. Next of kin were a central part of their loved one’s care but often in the shadows. The next of kin described how they were not always invited and often they had to struggle to get involved. Next of kin often have a major psychosocial role to supporting the patient during and after discharge, and therefore need to be invited and involved in the whole care process.

Measuring Quality of Care: A Rasch Validity Analysis of the Good Nursing Care Scale

BACKGROUND

Patient-centeredness is emphasized in both health policies and practice, calling for reliable instruments for the evaluation of the quality of nursing care.

PURPOSE

The purpose was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) in a sample of surgical patients and nurses.

METHODS

An explorative cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected with the 40-item GNCS from surgical patients (n = 476) and nurses (n = 167) in Finland. The data were analyzed with Rasch analysis.

RESULTS

The GNCS provided evidence of unidimensionality with acceptable goodness-of-fit to the Rasch model in both samples. Person-separation validity was acceptable. Person misfit was reasonable. The Rasch-equivalent Cronbach α was 0.81 (patient data) and 0.88 (nurse data).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support that the GNCS is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used in measuring the quality of nursing care, from the perspective of both patients and nurses.