Cancer-related fatigue and treatment burden in surgically treated colorectal cancer patients - A cross-sectional study

Hematocrit Is Associated with Cancer-Related Fatigue in Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a frequent symptom in colorectal cancer survivors. It is unknown to what extent anemia may contribute to CRF in colorectal cancer survivors. This study aimed to investigate the association between hematocrit, as marker for anemia, and CRF among colorectal cancer survivors from diagnosis until two years thereafter.

METHODS

The study population included 1,506 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer survivors at any stage of disease from a prospective cohort study. Hematocrit and CRF (EORTC QLQ-C30) were assessed at diagnosis, six months, and two years after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression or multivariable linear mixed models were used to assess the associations of hematocrit with CRF prevalence, or CRF severity over time, respectively.

RESULTS

A low hematocrit (levels <40% men/<36% women) was present in a third of the survivors at diagnosis and six months thereafter, and among 16% two years after diagnosis. The prevalence of CRF was 15% at diagnosis, peaked at 27% at six months, and was 14% two years after diagnosis. Hematocrit was associated with the prevalence of CRF at diagnosis [OR, 0.92; confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.95], 6 months (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92), and 2 years (OR, 0.91; CI, 0.87-0.96) after diagnosis. Lower hematocrit was associated with higher severity of CRF over time (beta-coefficient = 1.3; CI, 1.5-1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower hematocrit levels were longitudinally associated with a higher prevalence and severity of CRF in colorectal cancer.

IMPACT

Our findings emphasize the importance of long-term anemia monitoring and a potential role of anemia in CRF among colorectal cancer survivors.

Metabolic underpinnings of cancer-related fatigue

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and detrimental complications of cancer. Emerging evidence suggests that obesity and insulin resistance are associated with CRF occurrence and severity in cancer patients and survivors. In this narrative review, we analyzed recent studies including both preclinical and clinical research on the relationship between obesity and/or insulin resistance and CRF. We also describe potential mechanisms for these relationships, though with the caveat that because the mechanisms underlying CRF are incompletely understood, the mechanisms mediating the association between obesity/insulin resistance and CRF are similarly incompletely delineated. The data suggest that, in addition to their effects to worsen CRF by directly promoting tumor growth and metastasis, obesity and insulin resistance may also contribute to CRF by inducing chronic inflammation, neuroendocrinological disturbance, and metabolic alterations. Furthermore, studies suggest that patients with obesity and insulin resistance experience more cancer-induced pain and are at more risk of emotional and behavioral disruptions correlated with CRF. However, other studies implied a potentially paradoxical impact of obesity and insulin resistance to reduce CRF symptoms. Despite the need for further investigation utilizing interventions to directly elucidate the mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue, current evidence demonstrates a correlation between obesity and/or insulin resistance and CRF, and suggests potential therapeutics for CRF by targeting obesity and/or obesity-related mediators.

A review of the impact of energy balance on triple-negative breast cancer

Cancer cells cannot proliferate without sufficient energy to generate biomass for rapid cell division, as well as to fuel their functions at baseline. For this reason, many recent observational and interventional studies have focused on increasing energy expenditure and/or reducing energy intake during and after cancer treatment. The impact of variance in diet composition and in exercise on cancer outcomes has been detailed extensively elsewhere and is not the primary focus of this review. Instead, in this translational, narrative review we examine studies of how energy balance impacts anticancer immune activation and outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We discuss preclinical, clinical observational, and the few clinical interventional studies on energy balance in TNBC. We advocate for the implementation of clinical studies to examine how optimizing energy balance-through changes in diet and/or exercise-may optimize the response to immunotherapy in people with TNBC. It is our conviction that by taking a holistic approach that includes energy balance as a key factor to be considered during and after treatment, cancer care may be optimized, and the detrimental effects of cancer treatment and recovery on overall health may be minimized.

Development and Validation of a Kidney-Transplant Specific Measure of Treatment Burden

BACKGROUND

Treatment burden refers to the work involved in managing one's health and its impact on well-being and has been associated with nonadherence in patients with chronic illnesses. No kidney transplant (KT)-specific measure of treatment burden exists. The aim of this study was to develop a KT-specific supplement to the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS), a general measure of treatment burden.

METHODS

After drafting and pretesting KT-specific survey items, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving KT recipients from Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify domains for scaling the KT-specific supplement. Construct and known-groups validity were determined.

RESULTS

Survey respondents (n = 167) had a mean age of 61 years (range 22-86) and received a KT on average 4.0 years ago. Three KT-specific scales were identified (transplant function, self-management, adverse effects). Higher scores on the KT-specific scales were correlated with higher PETS treatment burden, worse physical and mental health, and lower self-efficacy (p < 0.0001). Patients taking more medications reported higher transplant self-management burden.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a KT-specific supplement to the PETS general measure of treatment burden. Scores may help providers identify recipients at risk for nonadherence.