Incidence, characteristics and risk factors of delirium in the intensive care unit: An observational study

Prevalence and variability in use of physical restraints in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the varying perspectives on the use of physical restraint (PR) over the past decades and the provided protocols to minimise its occurrence in intensive care units (ICUs), a comprehensive study was deemed necessary to examine the prevalence and variation of PR use in ICUs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the overall proportions of PR utilised in adult ICUs whilst examining the various factors contributing to the variability of these estimates.

METHODS

A search of five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) was performed. Studies published in English and available online from inception to December 18, 2024, were included. A pooled estimate with a 95% confidence interval was calculated, and the data were represented by the random-effect model. Analysis was performed using the STATA statistical software (version 17).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 39 studies, with a sample size of 21 665 patients. The overall prevalence of patients exposed to PRs was 41.6% (95% confidence interval: 33.8%-49.5%). The heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 99.61%), and the Q Cochrane test for homogeneity was significant (p value < 0.001), indicating substantial variability between studies. Subgroup analysis regarding the continent and restraint method contributed to a lowered heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable variation in reported estimates of PR prevalence in adult ICUs. Despite valid guidelines and recommendations supporting the reduction of PR, the results of our study show its significant prevalence. Additionally, our study demonstrated a relationship between PR use and delirium, sedation use, and mechanical ventilation. This study emphasises the importance of managing and focussing on PRs in ICUs. Also, it is crucial to evaluate barriers to guideline implementation.

REGISTRATION

The systematic review protocol has been prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42024566480.

Construction and application of a stratified nursing intervention program for postoperative delirium after Stanford type A aortic dissection: a quasi-experimental trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium is a common and significant consequence in patients with type A aortic dissection following surgery; however, there is currently no effective postoperative care plan.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate the practical implementation of a stratified nursing intervention program for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

A stratified nursing intervention program for postoperative delirium was created using a literature review, group discussions, and the Delphi method via expert mail inquiry. A quasi-experimental design was used, with patients admitted to the general ward of a tertiary hospital in Wenzhou, China, functioning as subjects. From September to December 2022, 43 patients were included in the control group and given standard treatment. From January to June 2023, 37 patients were recruited in the intervention group, receiving both routine care and the intervention plan. The intervention's effects were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

The intervention group had considerably shorter delirium and hospital stays than the control group (P < 0.05), as well as higher patient satisfaction levels. There were no inadvertent extubations in the intervention group. When the incidence and beginning time of delirium in the general ward were compared, there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Implementing this nurse intervention in the ward context can shorten postoperative delirium and hospital stays, increase patient satisfaction with care, and improve patient prognosis and quality of life. This intervention will also serve as a great resource for future clinical management of postoperative delirium.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The National Health Security Information Platform's Medical Research Registration Information System has registered this study under the registration number MR-33-22-022978.

A Mendelian randomization-based study of the causal relationship between leisure sedentary behavior and delirium

BACKGROUND

Delirium is an acute or subacute change in mental status caused by various factors. We evaluated the causal relationship between leisure sedentary behaviors (LSBs) and delirium.

METHODS

A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was performed to evaluate the causal relationship between sedentary behaviors (time spent watching television, time spent using computer, and time spent driving) and delirium. Statistical information for the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the traits of interest was obtained from independent consortia that focused on European populations. The dataset for LSBs was acquired from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) comprising a substantial sample size: 437887 samples for time spent watching television, 360,895 for time spent using computer, and 310,555 for time spent driving. A GWAS with 1269 delirium cases and 209,487 controls was used to identify genetic variation underlying the time of LSBs. We used five complementary MR methods, including inverse variance weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode.

RESULTS

Genetically predicted time spent watching television (odds ratio [OR]: 2.921, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.381-6.179) demonstrated significant association with delirium (P = 0.005), whereas no significant associations were observed between time spent using computer (OR: 0.556, 95 % CI: 0.246-1.257, P = 0.158) and time spent driving (OR: 1.747, 95 % CI: 0.09-3. 40, P = 0.713) and delirium. Sensitivity analyses supported a causal interpretation, with limited evidence of significant bias from genetic pleiotropy. Moreover, our MR assumptions appeared to be upheld, enhancing the credibility of our conclusions.

LIMITATIONS

Larger sample sizes are needed to validate the findings of our study.

CONCLUSION

Time spent watching television is a significant risk factor for delirium. Reducing television time may be an important intervention for those at higher risk of delirium.

Risk factors for hypoactive delirium in patients with nontraumatic ARDS: a prospective observational study

To investigate the incidence, characteristics and risk factors for hypoactive delirium in patients with nontraumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to explore the independent risk factors associated with hypoactive delirium and provide new ideas for early prediction and treatment. Hypoactive delirium is a known serious complication in ARDS patients, and currently, there are no effective early detection models or clinical prediction tools, and there is a lack of clinical treatment. This study included nontraumatic ARDS patients who stayed in the intensive care unit (ICU) for more than 24 h and were older than 18 years. A total of 205 ARDS patients admitted to the ICU of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital between December 2021 and February 2023 were selected. Demographic data, clinical characteristics and laboratory test results were collected within 24 h after the patients entered the ICU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors, evaluate the clinical prediction effect of the model and construct a nomogram for visual display. The incidence of hypoactive delirium among the patients included in the study was 41%. Patients with hypoactive delirium had hypertension; diabetes mellitus; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores ≥ 15; and increased procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactic dehydrogenase and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels compared with those without hypoactive delirium. Logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (OR 3.305, 95% CI: 1.866-12.616; p = 0.047), CRP level (OR 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.023; p = 0.044), and IL-6 level (OR 1.045, 95% CI: 1.017-1.063; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for hypoactive delirium. After receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plot and decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed that the clinical prediction ability of this study model was satisfactory, and a nomogram was drawn for visual display. Hypoactive delirium is a common serious complication in nontraumatic ARDS patients. Our logistic regression model not only effectively predicts hypoactive delirium early but also reveals potential clinical therapeutic targets.

Cognitive Impairment, Physical Impairment, and Psychological Symptoms in Intensive Care Unit Survivors

BACKGROUND

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) affects 25% to 50% of adults who survive an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Although the compounding of PICS impairments (cognitive, physical, and psychological) could intensify the syndrome, research on relationships among impairments is limited, particularly in patients with delirium.

OBJECTIVES

To examine associations among PICS impairments and examine delirium status and its relationship to PICS impairments at ICU discharge and 1 month later.

METHODS

A descriptive, correlational study of adults who survived an ICU stay. Participants completed measures for depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, physical function, functional status, and cognition at ICU discharge and 1 month later. Relationships among PICS impairments were examined with Spearman correlations; differences in impairments by delirium status were assessed with t tests.

RESULTS

Of 50 enrolled participants, 46 were screened for PICS impairment at ICU discharge and 35 were screened 1 month later. Cognitive impairment was the most common impairment at both time points. A positive correlation was found between cognition and functional status at ICU discharge (ρ = 0.50, P = .001) and 1 month later (ρ = 0.54, P = .001). Cognition and physical functioning were positively correlated 1 month after discharge (ρ = 0.46, P = .006). The group with delirium had significantly lower functional status scores than the group without delirium at ICU discharge (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest a moderate correlation between cognitive and physical impairments. This relationship should be explored further; ICU survivors with undiagnosed cognitive impairment may have delayed physical recovery and greater risk for injury.

Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding hypoactive delirium among ICU nurses: A nationwide cross-sectional study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in patients with hypoactive delirium in China.

BACKGROUND

The presentation of hypoactive delirium is not obvious and tends to be ignored. However, it has a high incidence and can cause critical impairment. Although nurses are the primary caregivers of patients, the evidence of the current status of KAP of hypoactive delirium among ICU nurses is insufficient in China.

DESIGN

The study participants were 2835 ICU nurses from 201 hospitals in 69 cities from 31 provinces in China.

METHODS

The current status of KAP of hypoactive delirium among ICU nurses was determined using a self-reported structured questionnaire, including 52 questions covering general personal information; three dimensions of KAP; and relevant issues. Descriptive analyses of the sample distribution were reported as percentages and medians. The factors were detected using univariate and multivariate analyses. To guide the reporting of the research, a STROBE checklist of cross-sectional studies was used.

RESULTS

Of the 3101 returned questionnaires, 2835 were analyzed. Approximately 64. 94 % and 53. 30 % of them were identified with a positive attitude and appropriate practice, respectively, whereas only 1. 48 % showed a good level of knowledge. The regression analysis showed that age, years of working in the ICU, educational background, professional title, caring for patients with delirium, attending training on hypoactive delirium and hospital grading were significantly associated with their KAP status(P＜005).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoactive delirium is an ignored entity by nursing professionals, with no definite nursing procedure. This study shows that receiving relevant training is a factor affecting KAP status, indicating that training should be strengthened. Additionally, appropriate screening and nursing procedures should be developed to standardize the behavior of ICU nurses and improve the quality of care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

ICU nurses have poor knowledge of hypoactive delirium and related training should be strengthened, especially for middle-aged nurses. Screening and nursing procedures should be set up, which is critical to promote nursing practice.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

None.

The efficacy and safety of haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

Delirium is common during critical illness and is associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials enrolling critically ill adult patients to compare haloperidol with placebo were searched from inception through to February 20th, 2023. The primary outcome were delirium-free days and overall mortality, secondary outcomes were length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, and adverse events.

Results

Nine trials were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 3,916 critically ill patients. Overall, the pooled analyses showed no significant difference between critically ill patients treated with haloperidol and placebo for the delirium-free days (MD -0.01, 95%CI -0.36 to 0.34, p = 0.95, I2 = 30%), overall mortality (OR 0.89, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.04, p = 0.14, I2 = 0%), length of intensive care unit stay (MD -0.06, 95%CI -0.16 to 0.03, p = 0.19, I2 = 0%), length of hospital stay (MD -0.06, 95%CI -0.61 to 0.49, p = 0.83, I2 = 0%), and adverse events (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.60 to 1.37, p = 0.63, I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

Among critically ill patients, the use of haloperidol as compared to placebo has no significant effect on delirium-free days, overall mortality, length of intensive care unit and/or hospital stay. Moreover, the use of haloperidol did not increase the risk of adverse events.