Clinical judgement in nursing - An evolutionary concept analysis

Nurse by numbers: The impact of early warning systems on nurses' higher-order thinking, a quantitative study

AIM

To evaluate registered nurses' perceptions of whether the mandated use of the early warning system vital signs tool impacts the development of nurses' higher-order thinking skills.

DESIGN

A concurrent mixed methods study design.

METHOD

Using an online survey, registered nurses' perceptions were elucidated on whether early warning system algorithmic tools affected the development of their higher-order thinking. Likert-type matrix questions with additional qualitative fields were used to obtain information on nurse's perceptions of the tool's usefulness, clinical confidence in using the tool, compliance with escalation protocols, work environment and perceived compliance barriers.

RESULTS

Most of the 305 (91%) participants included in the analysis had more than 5 years of nursing experience. Most nurses supported the early warning tool and were happy to comply with escalation protocols if the early warning score concurred with their assessment of the patient (63.6%). When the score and the nurse's higher-order thinking did not align, some had the confidence to override the escalation protocol (40.0%), while others omitted (69.4%) or inaccurately documented vital signs (63.3%) to achieve the desired score. Very few nurses (3.6%) believe using early warning tools did not impede the development of higher-order thinking.

CONCLUSION

Although experienced nurses appreciate the support of early warning tools, most value patient safety above the tools and rely on their higher-order thinking. The sustained development and use of nurses' higher-order thinking should be encouraged, possibly by adding a critical thinking criterion to existing algorithmic tools.

IMPACT

The study has implications for all nurses who utilize algorithmic tools, such as early warning systems, in their practice. Relying heavily on algorithmic tools risks impeding the development of higher-order thinking. Most experienced nurses prioritize their higher-order thinking in decision-making but believe early warning tools can impede higher-order thinking.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Registered nurses participated as survey respondents.

Exploring nurses' clinical judgment concerning the relative importance of fall risk factors: A mixed method approach using the Q Methodology

BACKGROUND

Nurses are pivotal in averting patient falls through their assessment of cues presented by patients and their environments, rendering clinical judgments regarding the risk of falling, and implementing tailored interventions. Despite the intricate cognitive processes entailed in nurses' judgment, no prior studies have explored their approach to assessing the risk of falling.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine how nurses judge the risk of falling among patients with different conditions, whether there are differences in the importance of risk factors as judged by nurses, how they justify their judgments, and what attributes of the nurses influence their judgments.

DESIGN

A mixed method approach using the Q Methodology was employed.

SETTING(S)

Three public and private hospitals in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen nurses participated in the study.

METHODS

Participants were tasked with ranking 36 patient scenarios, each featuring a distinct set of fall risk factors. Subsequently, post-sorting interviews were conducted to gather insights into their typical approach to assessing fall risk and the rationale behind their ranking decisions. A by-person principal component factor extraction was employed to examine differences in the rankings of the scenarios. The interview data were analyzed descriptively to elucidate the reasons behind these discrepancies.

RESULTS

Nurses engage in complex cognitive manipulations when evaluating the risk of patient falls, drawing extensively from their wealth of experience while utilizing assessment tools to support their judgments. In essence, nurses identify patients' tendency to act alone without calling a nurse, impaired gait and cognition, sedative use, drains, and limited information sharing among healthcare professionals as key fall risks. In addition, nurses vary in the importance they attribute to certain risk factors, leading to the discrimination of three distinct judgment profiles. One group of nurses judges patients with cognitive impairment and acting alone as high risk. Another group of nurses considers patients with unstable gait and acting alone as high risk. The last group of nurses sees patients wearing slippers as high risk. The post-sorting interviews revealed that their judgments are closely related to the healthcare context and patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses operate within diverse contexts, wherein they interact with patients of varying characteristics, collaborate with professionals from diverse disciplines, and have access to varying levels of human and physical resources. This nuanced understanding empowers the formulation of judgments that are finely attuned to the specific context at hand.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Not registered.

Exploring clinical judgment ability in second-degree baccalaureate of science nursing students: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

As they have not yet embarked on clinical practice, most students who already have a bachelor's degree but require a bachelor's degree in nursing occasionally perceive the educator's instruction on clinical situations as abstract and challenging for making accurate clinical judgments.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to implement a clinical judgment model and case scenarios in classroom teaching to evaluate improvements in students' clinical judgment and critical thinking abilities.

DESIGN

A mixed-method design.

SETTING

A second-degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing at a university in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

First-year undergraduate nursing students.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study featured a survey at the beginning and end of a course, followed by one-on-one online interviews. A purposive sample of sophomore nursing students was recruited from a university in northern Taiwan between March 2020 and May 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after a preliminary analysis of the collected quantitative data.

RESULTS

In total, 48 participants completed the study questionnaire, and 20 were interviewed. The results show that the students' ability to make clinical judgment and identify individual health problems from case scenarios significantly improved after completing the course. However, critical thinking did not differ significantly after the course. Qualitative data analysis revealed three key themes relevant to the participants' learning experiences: (1) establishing the context of clinical judgment, (2) building a bridge between basic medical science and clinical nursing, and (3) having a broader perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating clinical judgment measurement model and case scenarios in the curriculum may benefit second-degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing students who have not yet begun their clinical practice. Additionally, the result provides educators with valuable learning goals and evaluation strategies in the classroom and clinical practice.

Effect of Unfolding Case-Based Learning on Clinical Judgment Among Undergraduate Nursing Students

BACKGROUND

To prepare students for Next Generation National Council Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse (NCLEX-RN), nurse educators need to develop teaching strategies to foster students' clinical judgment.

PURPOSE

This study examined the effects of unfolding case-based learning (CBL) on baccalaureate nursing students' clinical judgment upon graduation.

METHODS

A prospective cohort design was adopted. Students' self-reported responses to the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric were compared between the unfolding CBL (n = 140) and non-CBL (n = 126) cohorts at a school of nursing in the United States.

RESULTS

While students' responses were similar between the study cohorts, a trend was noted for improved clinical judgment among students in the unfolding CBL cohort. Furthermore, unfolding CBL significantly enhanced students' perceived proficiency in conducting focused observation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support early introduction and consistent use of the unfolding CBL throughout the undergraduate nursing program so that students have ample opportunities and contexts to cultivate clinical judgment skills in the classroom.

Relationship of high-fidelity simulation experience, clinical reasoning, and clinical competence of new nurses: A cross-sectional study

AIM

This study aimed to determine which high-fidelity simulation (HFS) experiences were associated with clinical reasoning and clinical competence among new nurses.

BACKGROUND

HFS has been actively used in nursing education. It is necessary to verify the effects of HFS transfer to the clinical environment.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study reported following STROBE criteria.

METHODS

Data were collected on new nurses (n = 224) who experienced HFS in their fourth-year undergraduate courses. The number of HFSs, the inclusion of simulation elements, the importance of elements to learning, clinical reasoning, and clinical competence were measured. Hierarchical regression models examined factors associated with clinical reasoning and clinical competence.

RESULTS

Feedback was the most sufficiently included element of the HFS learning, and participants perceived it as the most important. A significant factor associated with clinical competence was clinical reasoning, and HFS design indirectly affected clinical competence through clinical reasoning.

CONCLUSIONS

HFS learning is one of the best ways to improve clinical reasoning. Improving students' clinical reasoning should be an important goal of HFS learning in undergraduate courses to prepare students to be clinically competent nurses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The ultimate goal of nursing education is to prepare nursing students to be competent nurses. Validating the outcomes of nursing education in the clinical environment setting is an essential task to improve clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY

Nurse educators and leaders can increase nurses' clinical competence by emphasizing education to foster nurses' clinical reasoning in nursing education policies.

The impact of mandated use early warning system tools on the development of nurses' higher-order thinking: A systematic review

AIM

Ascertain the impact of mandated use of early warning systems (EWSs) on the development of registered nurses' higher-order thinking.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review was conducted, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist (Page et al., 2021).

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PyscInfo.

REVIEW METHODS

Eligible articles were quality appraised using the MMAT tool. Data extraction was conducted independently by four reviewers. Three investigators thematically analysed the data.

RESULTS

Our review found that EWSs can support or suppress the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. EWS supports the development of higher-order thinking in two ways; by confirming nurses' subjective clinical assessment of patients and/or by providing a rationale for the escalation of care. Of note, more experienced nurses expressed their view that junior nurses are inhibited from developing effective higher-order thinking due to reliance on the tool.

CONCLUSION

EWSs facilitate early identification of clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients. The impact of EWSs on the development of nurses' higher-order thinking is under-explored. We found that EWSs can support and suppress nurses' higher-order thinking. EWS as a supportive factor reinforces the development of nurses' heuristics, the mental shortcuts experienced clinicians call on when interpreting their subjective clinical assessment of patients. Conversely, EWS as a suppressive factor inhibits the development of nurses' higher-order thinking and heuristics, restricting the development of muscle memory regarding similar presentations they may encounter in the future. Clinicians' ability to refine and expand on their catalogue of heuristics is important as it endorses the future provision of safe and effective care for patients who present with similar physiological signs and symptoms.

IMPACT

This research impacts health services and education providers as EWS and nurses' development of higher-order thinking skills are essential aspects of delivering safe, quality care.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This is a systematic review, and therefore, comprises no contribution from patients or the public.

Thinking strategies used by registered nurses during drug administration in nursing homes-An observational study

AIM

To explore registered nurses' thinking strategies during the drug administration process in nursing homes.

DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative design.

METHODS

Eight registered nurses, one male and seven female, in five nursing home wards in Mid-Norway were observed during 15 drug dispensing rounds (175 drug dispensing episodes). Think Aloud sessions with follow-up individual interviews were conducted. The Think Aloud data were analysed using deductive qualitative content analysis based on Marsha Fonteyn's description of 17 thinking strategies. Interview data were used to clarify missing information and validate the content of Think Aloud data.

RESULTS

The registered nurses used all 17 thinking strategies described by Fonteyn, including several variants of each strategy. The three most frequent were 'providing explanations', 'setting priorities' and 'drawing conclusions'. In addition, we found two novel thinking strategies that did not fit into Fonteyn's template, which were labelled 'controlling' and 'interacting'. Among all strategies, 'controlling' was by far the most used, serving as a means for the registered nurses to stay on track and navigate through various interruptions, while also minimising errors during drug dispensing.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the diverse thinking strategies employed by registered nurses in nursing homes during medication administration. The findings emphasise the multifaceted nature of medication administration and underscore the importance of skilled personnel in ensuring medication safety. Recognising the significance of these findings is crucial for maintaining patient well-being and upholding medication safety standards in healthcare settings.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Understanding the thinking strategies employed by registered nurses can inform training programmes and enhance the clinical judgements of health care professionals involved in medication administration, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced medication errors in practice.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients were involved in this study as recipients of drugs which the nurses distributed during the observations. The patients were involved as a third party and consent to the observations was either given by the patients themselves or relatives in cases where the patient was not competent to consent. No personal information was collected about the patients.

REPORTING METHOD

The reporting of this study adhered to the COREQ checklist.

Evaluating the Importance of Clinical Judgment in Entry-Level Nursing

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the extent to which clinical judgment is important in entry-level nursing practice.

METHOD

A task analysis linkage study methodology based on a large-scale, comprehensive practice analysis was used for the study. The practice analysis validated more than 200 entry-level nursing tasks, and the linkage study sought to evaluate the importance of clinical judgment overall and for each specific task expectation.

RESULTS

The results provide confirmatory evidence of the importance of clinical judgment. In addition, the work provides a comprehensive list of entry-level tasks and their associated clinical judgment importance.

CONCLUSION

Clinical judgment is a vital skill at entry into the profession and is expected to grow over time. This study offers insights on the extent to which clinical judgment is a necessary skill and provides direct evidence of its importance for specific entry-level tasks. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):156-162.].

[Development of Nursing Clinical Judgment Scale]

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a nursing clinical judgment scale (NCJS) and verify its validity and reliability in assessing the clinical judgment of nurses.

METHODS

A preliminary instrument of the NCJS comprising 38 items was first developed from attributes and indicators derived from a literature review and an in-depth/focus interview with 12 clinical nurses. The preliminary tool was finalized after 7 experts conducted a content validity test based on a data from a preliminary survey of 30 hospital nurses in Korea. Data were collected from 443 ward, intensive care unit, emergency room nurses who voluntarily participated in the survey through offline and online for the verification of the construct validity and reliability of the scale.

RESULTS

The final scale comprised 23 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Six factors- integrated data analysis, evaluation and reflection on interventions, evidence on interventions, collaboration among health professionals, patient-centered nursing, and collaboration among nurse colleagues - accounted for 64.9% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the fit of the measurement model, comprising six factors (root mean square error of approximation = .07, standardized root mean square residual = .04, comparative fit index = .90). Cronbach's α for all the items was .92.

CONCLUSION

The NCJS is a valid and reliable tool that fully reflects the characteristics of clinical practice, and it can be used effectively to evaluate the clinical judgment of Korean nurses. Future research should reflect the variables influencing clinical judgment and develop an action plan to improve it.

New graduate nurses' delivery of patient care: A focused ethnography

AIM

To explore factors influencing newly graduated nurses' delivery of direct care in acute care hospital settings.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focused ethnography.

METHODS

During the period from March to June 2022, a total of ten newly graduated nurses were purposively sampled, and data were collected through 96 h of participant observation as well as ten semi-structured interviews. This research took place in a large hospital located in Denmark. Data were analysed using LeCompte and Schensul's ethnographic content analysis.

RESULTS

Three main structures were developed from the data: 'Contrasting Intentions and Actions for care delivery', 'Organizational Constraints Block Interpersonal Aspects of Nursing Care' and 'Newly Graduated Nurses' Suppressed Need for Support Constitutes Delay in Care Actions'.

CONCLUSION

Newly graduated nurses were committed to delivering high-quality care but were aware they sometimes provided compromised care. The paradox between a commitment to care and compromised care delivery was borne out of tensions between newly graduated nurses' professional beliefs and nursing values, a desire to integrate patients' needs and preferences, and organizational constraints on everyday practices where newly graduated nurses often worked alone without the support of a more experienced nurse. Critical reflection on cultural, social and political forces that influence direct care delivery might support newly graduated nurses to deliver direct patient care more intentionally.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Establishment of onboarding programs and other support activities for newly graduated nurses to cope with contrasting intentions and actions that must address organizational constraints is essential. These development programs should include how critical reflection competency is supported to address value inconsistencies and emotional distress to ensure high-quality patient care.

REPORTING METHOD

The reporting adhered to the COREQ guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: 'No Patient or Public Contribution'.