Effects of videoconferencing intervention on stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies

The clinical effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation interventions on balance and activities of daily living in post-stroke survivors: an umbrella review of systematic reviews

Purpose: The clinical effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation (TR) for improving motor function and activities of daily living (ADLs) has been regularly debated in post-stroke survivors. The objective was to harmonize the current evidence-base by performing an umbrella review. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials examining the impact of exercise-based TR interventions in people following stroke were interrogated. We assessed the individual quality of the systematic reviews by applying the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist (AMSTAR-2). Results: Evidence from six (for balance) to seven (ADLs) high quality systematic reviews with meta-analyses indicated that TR was effective for improving balance (n = 443; SMD = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.52-1.91; eOR = 9.08, 95% CI: 2.57-32.7), and ADLs (n = 1342; SMD = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.06-0.54; eOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.12-2.66), compared to usual-care controls. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the positive impact of TR interventions, supporting their adoption as a front-line post-stroke rehabilitation strategy. Benefits of improved balance may reduce falls risk leading to increased safety and independence. Enhanced ability to perform ADLs contribute to better quality of life, allowing stroke survivors to perform daily tasks more easily and confidently.

Physician referrals of patients with neck and low back pain for physical therapy in outpatient clinics: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patients commonly seek outpatient physical therapy services for musculoskeletal disorders. Understanding these patient groups in Israel provides valuable insights into the healthcare system. We aimed to investigate physician referral patterns for physical therapy across different age and sex groups, focusing on neck and low back pain. Additionally, we sought to explore the therapeutic interventions provided by physical therapists for these conditions.

METHODS

For this retrospective, cross-sectional study we utilized data from a national health maintenance organization covering > 4 million people at 100 physical therapy outpatient clinics. We measured the prevalence rates of physicians' referral patterns for neck and low back pain according to age and sex, as well as therapeutic interventions prescribed by physical therapists. We used Z-tests to assess the differences in prevalence rates between women and men within the same age group. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the likelihood of patients of a specific age group being referred to physical therapy compared with the total sample. We analyzed prevalence rates of different treatment protocols used by physical therapists according to these referrals.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,593,592 physician referrals for physical therapy were made over 6 years for all musculoskeletal conditions. Of those, 32.4% were for spine disorders, with 21.2% for low back pain and 11.1% for neck pain, mostly chronic (80.6% and 72.7%, respectively). Women were more likely than men to be referred for both low back pain (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval = 1.34-1.38, p < 0.001) and neck pain (1.40, 1.37-1.43, p < 0.001). All referral rates increased with age. The most common treatment provided by physical therapists for neck and low back pain was education and advice for an active lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides comprehensive data that highlight significant trends related to age, acuteness, and sex. Chronic low back and neck pain are the predominant reasons for physical therapy referrals, particularly among women and older adults. Physician referrals for neck and low back pain aligned with the epidemiology of such conditions in the Israeli population, underscoring the need for targeted rehabilitation strategies, early intervention programs, and effective healthcare service planning.

Telerehabilitation in post-stroke care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis introduces tele-medicine in time-sensitive conditions like stroke and the challenges hindering at-home rehabilitation. It aims to consolidate evidence supporting telerehabilitation effectiveness in post-stroke patients, with a focus on ADL, balance, mobility, and motor control.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane central databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria involved studies that employed randomized controlled trial (RCT) designs, specifically evaluating various telerehabilitation models in patients diagnosed with a stroke, excluding those with mixed etiology and non-randomized or single-arm designs. Two independent reviewers assessed study quality and bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 before inclusion.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies (n = 417) with a predominantly male sample (n = 196). The mean age of the pooled sample of 8 studies was 64.87 (13.01) years. Our meta-analysis showed that telerehabilitation may have modest effects on Berg Balance Scale (SMD 0.08 [-0.23; 0.40]; p = 0.54), and trunk impairment scale (SMD 0.26 [-1.00; 1.52]; p = 0.05), slightly inferior effects on Barthel index (SMD -0.34 [-1.00; 0.32]; p = 0.31), but demonstrated a favorable impact on trunk impairment (SMD -0.21 [-1.18; 0.76]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

We found that telerehabilitation may have modest effects on balance and mobility, and slightly inferior results in Activities of daily living but may have a positive effect on trunk impairment. However, more studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm our results.

Stroke Rehabilitation: Synopsis of the 2024 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines

DESCRIPTION

In July 2024, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) released a joint update of their 2019 clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of stroke rehabilitation. This synopsis is a condensed version of the 2024 CPG, highlighting the key aspects of the guideline development process and describing the major recommendations.

METHODS

The VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group convened a joint VA/DOD guideline development work group (WG) that included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the Institute of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy CPGs. The guideline WG conducted a patient focus group, developed key questions, and systematically searched and evaluated the literature (English-language publications from 1 July 2018 to 2 May 2023). The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to evaluate the evidence. The WG developed 47 recommendations along with algorithms for stroke rehabilitation in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Stakeholders outside the WG reviewed the CPG before approval by the VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group.

RECOMMENDATIONS

This synopsis summarizes where evidence is strongest to support guidelines in crucial areas relevant to primary care physicians: transition to community (case management, psychosocial or behavioral interventions); motor therapy (task-specific practice, mirror therapy, rhythmic auditory stimulation, electrical stimulation, botulinum toxin for spasticity); dysphagia, aphasia, and cognition (chin tuck against resistance, respiratory muscle strength training); and mental health (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, psychotherapy, mindfulness-based therapies for treatment but not prevention of depression).

Telerehabilitation and Its Impact Following Stroke: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

Objectives: To summarize the impact of various telerehabilitation interventions on motor function, balance, gait, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QoL) among patients with stroke and to determine the existing telerehabilitation interventions for delivering physiotherapy sessions in clinical practice. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched to identify relevant quantitative systematic reviews (SRs). Due to substantial heterogeneity, the data were analysed narratively. Results: A total of 28 systematic reviews (n = 245 primary studies) were included that examined various telerehabilitation interventions after stroke. Motor function was the most studied outcome domain across the reviews (20 SRs), followed by ADL (18 SRs), and balance (14 SRs) domains. For primary outcomes, our findings highlight moderate- to high-quality evidence showing either a significant effect or no significant difference between telerehabilitation and other interventions. There was insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion regarding feasibility outcomes, including participant satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and cost. Most reviews under this umbrella included patients with stroke in the subacute or chronic phase (12 SRs). Simple and complex telerehabilitation interventions such as telephone calls, videoconferencing, smartphone- or tablet-based mobile health applications, messaging, virtual reality, robot-assisted devices, and 3D animation videos, either alone or in combination with other interventions, were included across reviews. Conclusions: Various telerehabilitation interventions have shown either a significant effect or no significant difference compared to other interventions in improving upper and lower limb motor function, balance, gait, ADLs, and QoL, regardless of whether simple or complex approaches were used. Further research is needed to support the delivery of rehabilitation services through telerehabilitation intervention following a stroke.

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Interactive Telerehabilitation with Remote Monitoring and Guidance on Balance and Gait Performance in Older Adults and Individuals with Neurological Conditions

Recognizing the growing interests and benefits of technology-assisted interactive telerehabilitation in various populations, the aim of this review is to systematically review the effects of interactive telerehabilitation with remote monitoring and guidance for improving balance and gait performance in older adults and individuals with neurological conditions. The study protocol for this systematic review was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) with the unique identifier CRD42024509646. Studies written in English published from January 2014 to February 2024 in Web of Science, Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were examined. Of the 247 identified, 17 were selected after initial and eligibility screening, and their methodological quality was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies. All 17 studies demonstrated balance and gait performance improvement in older adults and in individuals with stroke, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis following 4 or more weeks of interactive telerehabilitation via virtual reality, smartphone or tablet apps, or videoconferencing. The findings of this systematic review can inform the future design and implementation of interactive telerehabilitation technology and improve balance and gait training exercise regimens for older adults and individuals with neurological conditions.

Evidence-based position paper on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) professional practice on telerehabilitation. The European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section)

INTRODUCTION

The evidence on the utility and effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions delivered via telerehabilitation is growing rapidly. Telerehabilitation is expected to have a key role in rehabilitation in the future.

AIM

The aim of this evidence-based position paper (EBPP) is to improve PRM physicians' professional practice in telerehabilitation to be delivered to improve functioning and to reduce activity limitations and/or participation restrictions in individuals with a variety of disabling health conditions.

METHODS

To produce recommendations for PRM physicians on telerehabilitation, a systematic review of the literature and a consensus procedure by means of a Delphi process have been performed involving the delegates of all European countries represented in the UEMS PRM Section.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review is reported together with the 32 recommendations resulting from the Delphi procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that PRM physicians deliver rehabilitation services remotely, via digital means or using communication technologies to eligible individuals, whenever required and feasible in a variety of health conditions in favor of the patient and his/her family, based on evidence of effectiveness and in compliance with relevant regulations. This EBPP represents the official position of the European Union through the UEMS PRM Section and designates the professional role of PRM physicians in telerehabilitation.

The stroke transitional care intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: a multisite pragmatic randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to test, in real-world clinical practice, the effectiveness of a Transitional Care Stroke Intervention (TCSI) compared to usual care on health outcomes, self-management, patient experience, and health and social service use costs in older adults (≥ 55 years) with stroke and multimorbidity (≥ 2 chronic conditions).

METHODS

This pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) included older adults discharged from hospital to community with stroke and multimorbidity using outpatient stroke rehabilitation services in two communities in Ontario, Canada. Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care (control group) or usual care plus the 6-month TCSI (intervention group). The TCSI was delivered virtually by an interprofessional (IP) team, and included care coordination/system navigation support, phone/video visits, monthly IP team conferences, and an online resource to support system navigation. The primary outcome was risk of hospital readmission (all cause) after six-months. Secondary outcomes included physical and mental functioning, stroke self-management, patient experience, and health and social service use costs. The intention-to-treat principle was used to conduct the primary and secondary analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety participants were enrolled (44 intervention, 46 control); 11 (12%) participants were lost to follow-up, leaving 79 (39 intervention, 40 control). No significant between-group differences were seen for baseline to six-month risk of hospital readmission. Differences favouring the intervention group were seen in the following secondary outcomes: physical functioning (SF-12 PCS mean difference: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.58-8.62, p = 0.005), stroke self-management (Southampton Stroke Self-Management Questionnaire mean difference: 6.00; 95% CI: 0.51-11.50, p = 0.03), and patient experience (Person-Centred Coordinated Care Experiences Questionnaire mean difference: 2.64, 95% CI: 0.81, 4.47, p = 0.005). No between-group differences were found in total healthcare costs or other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although participation in the TCSI did not impact hospital readmissions, there were improvements in physical functioning, stroke self-management and patient experience in older adults with stroke and multimorbidity without increasing total healthcare costs. Challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including the shift from in-person to virtual delivery, and re-deployment of interventionists could have influenced the results. A larger pragmatic RCT is needed to determine intervention effectiveness in diverse geographic settings and ethno-cultural populations and examine intervention scalability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04278794 . Registered May 2, 2020.

Personalised Online Upper-Limb Physiotherapy for Stroke Survivors during the Inpatient Phase: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

After a stroke, inpatients often receive less than the recommended dose of therapy. Telerehabilitation may assist by providing personalised rehabilitation programmes without face-to-face therapy time. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an individualised programme of upper-limb rehabilitation that is delivered via an online rehabilitation platform for inpatient stroke survivors.

METHODS

Stroke survivors were recruited from three stroke units in one NHS Board in Scotland and randomised to the intervention (personalised upper-limb exercise programme delivered via an online physiotherapy platform for four weeks, up to 30 min five times per week, in addition to usual care) or the control group (usual care). The main outcomes are related to recruitment, attrition, adherence and safety. The clinical measures were the Action Research Arm Test, Trunk Impairment Scale and Modified Ashworth Scale. The intervention participants, their carers and physiotherapists completed questionnaires on the acceptability of the intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-six participants, 42% males, were recruited around three weeks post-stroke, on average. There were 13 participants in each group, with a mean age of 69 years (SD of 12) and 67 years (SD of 11) for the control and intervention groups, respectively. Overall, 47% of those screened for eligibility were randomised, and attrition was 23% in the intervention group mainly due to discharge before the end of the intervention. Participants who adhered to their programme (completed more than two-thirds), generally those with an engaged carer, demonstrated a trend toward improved clinical outcomes. Overall, the patients, carers and physiotherapists were positive regarding the intervention. There was a total of five reported adverse events, none of which were related to the study.

CONCLUSION

An upper-limb unsupervised exercise intervention using an online physiotherapy platform for inpatient stroke survivors is feasible, safe and acceptable to patients, carers and physiotherapists. A fully powered RCT is warranted to investigate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of such interventions for this patient group.