Should a Mechanical or Biological Prosthesis Be Used for a Tricuspid Valve Replacement? A Meta-Analysis

Tricuspid Regurgitation: Knowledge of Tricuspid Valve Morphology, Etiology of Regurgitation, and Grading of Regurgitation Severity

With the aging of the population, the number of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is increasing. Severe TR is associated with global morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular events. In recent years, the rapid development of transcatheter interventions for tricuspid valve disease has made TR a current research hotspot. More preoperative information about the patient's tricuspid valve anatomy, the etiology leading to TR, and the severity of TR will aid in intraoperative maneuvers and postoperative prognosis assessments.

Long-term outcomes after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Long-term evidence about bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement is scarce. This study aims to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses.

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study included patients from 10 high-volume centres in 7 different countries, who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses. Echocardiographic and clinical data were reviewed. Long-term outcomes were investigated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression, and competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Of 675 patients, isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 358 patients (53%), while 317 (47%) underwent concomitant procedures. Between these 2 groups, patients who underwent combined procedures reported a significantly higher incidence of infection, atrioventricular block, multi-organ failure, longer intensive care unit and hospital stay and higher 30-day mortality over patients who underwent isolated procedure. The overall 30-day mortality occurred in 70 patients (10.4%) [46 (14.6%) combined vs 24 (6.74%) isolated, P = 0.001]. During the follow-up, there was a continuous rate of attrition due to death, with cumulative incidences of death at 5, 10 and 15 years being 27.2%, 46.2% and 60.6%, respectively. In contrast, the risk of reintervention starts to significantly increase after 10 years of follow-up, with cumulative incidences of reintervention being 6.1%, 10.8% and 23.3%, respectively. Freedom from tricuspid valve reintervention, pacemaker implantation, tricuspid valve endocarditis and major thromboembolic events at 15 years were 56.5%, 77.3%, 84.0% and 86.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses is an effective treatment for valvular disease, despite being associated with relatively high early and long-term mortality. However, the risk of structural valve degeneration rises significantly after 10 years.

Preliminary Study of a Degenerated Tricuspid Bioprosthetic Valve Implanted via Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Guided by 3-Dimensional Printing

Background

The procedures of transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (TTViV) replacement are challenging, and the clinical outcomes are still unclear. Our goal was to report the short- and mid-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent a TTViV implantation guided by 3-dimensional (3D) printing.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 6 patients who had TTViV implantation from May 2021 to March 2022. The median age was 51 years (range: 18-71 years), and 50.0% of the patients were male. Imaging assessments and 3D printing were performed on all 6 patients before the procedures. The perioperative data were evaluated, and the patients were followed up.

Results

Among the 6 patients, the etiologies of conditions affecting the tricuspid valves at baseline varied widely, including 1 case of Ebstein anomaly, 2 cases of infective endocarditis, 1 case of ventricular septal defect, and 2 cases of rheumatic heart disease. TTViV implantation was successfully performed in all 6 patients via the femoral vein approach; postoperative tricuspid regurgitation disappeared immediately, and the hemodynamic results were satisfactory. During the follow-up, all patients had significant improvement in symptoms and functional status.

Conclusions

TTViV implantation for the treatment of degenerated tricuspid bioprostheses should be considered safe and effective. Multimodal imaging and 3D printing may provide effective guidance for conducting the procedure.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System (NCT02917980).

Emerging Transcatheter Therapies for Valvular Heart Disease: Focus on Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Procedures

The emergence of percutaneous treatment options provides novel therapeutic alternatives for older and feeble patients who are at high risk for any surgical procedure. The purpose of our review was to offer an up-to-date analysis of the rapidly expanding field of percutaneous technologies for mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary procedures. Edge-to-edge repair is an established treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), while transcatheter mitral valve replacement is a potential and expanding option for managing both secondary and primary MR. However, additional advancements are necessary to enhance the safety and feasibility of this procedure. Transcatheter tricuspid intervention is an emerging option that was conceived after the success of transcatheter procedures in aortic and mitral valves, and it is currently still in the early stages of advancement. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the previously overlooked effect of tricuspid regurgitation on patient outcomes. The development of edge-to-edge repair represents the forefront of innovations in transcatheter procedures. There is a scarcity of data about tricuspid annuloplasty and replacement, and further study is necessary. Transcatheter mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary procedures show prospects for the future, while their role in clinical practice has not been definitively established.

Early and long-term outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVES

We compared early and long-term clinical outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement in a nationwide study based on the database from the National Health Insurance Service.

METHODS

Of 1425 patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement from 2003 to 2018, 1241 patients were enrolled after excluding retricuspid valve replacement, complex congenital heart disease, Ebstein anomaly, and age less than 18 years at operation. Bioprostheses (group B) and mechanical prostheses (group M) were used in 562 patients (45.3%) and 679 patients (54.7%), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 5.6 years. Propensity score matching was performed. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients aged 50 to 65 years.

RESULTS

There was no difference in operative mortality or postoperative complications between the groups. All-cause mortality was higher in group B (7.8 vs 4.6 per 100 patient-years, hazard ratio, 1.75, 95% confidence interval, 1.33-2.30, P < .001). The cumulative incidence of stroke was higher in group M (hazard ratio, 0.65, 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.99, P = .043), whereas the cumulative incidence of reoperation was higher in group B (hazard ratio, 4.20, 95% confidence interval, 1.53-11.54, P = .005). In terms of the age-dependent hazard of all-cause mortality, group B demonstrated a higher hazard than group M below the age of 75 years, and it was statistically significant between 54 and 65 years of age. In the subgroup analysis, all-cause mortality was also higher in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement demonstrated higher long-term survival than bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement. In particular, mechanical tricuspid valve replacement showed significantly higher overall survival between 54 and 65 years of age.

Prosthesis choice for tricuspid valve replacement: Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes

OBJECTIVES

There is limited evidence evaluating valve function and right heart remodeling after tricuspid valve replacement (TVR), as well as whether the choice of prosthesis has an impact on these outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed 1043 consecutive adult patients who underwent first-time TVR; 33% had previous aortic and/or mitral valve operations. Severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) was the indication for surgery in 94% patients. A mechanical valve was used in 149 (14%) patients and a bioprosthetic valve in 894 (86%). Concomitant major cardiac procedures were performed in 57% of patients.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 68.8 (range, 25-94) years, and 57% were female. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 50% and 31%, respectively. Adjusted survival and cumulative incidence of reoperation after TVR were similar in patients with bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. Overall, right ventricular (RV) function and dilation improved postoperatively with the estimated proportion of patients with moderate or greater RV systolic dysfunction/dilatation decreasing by around 20% at 3 years follow-up. After adjusting for preoperative degree of dysfunction/dilatation, valve type had no effect on late improvement in RV function and dilation. Bioprosthetic TVR was associated with greater rates of recurrence of moderate or greater TR over late follow-up. Overall, a slight decline in tricuspid valve gradients was observed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical and bioprosthetic valves provide comparable survival, incidence of reoperation, and recovery of RV systolic function and size after TVR. Bioprosthetic valves develop significant TR over time, and mechanical valves may have an advantage for younger patients and those needing anticoagulation.

Is It Possible to Place a Pacemaker Lead Through a Bileaflet Mechanical Prosthesis?

We present a 64-year-old woman who underwent mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valve (TV) replacement with mechanical prostheses. Two months after TV surgery, she presented third-degree atrioventricular block. After attempting to place a pacemaker lead through the coronary sinus, it was placed through the mechanical valve in the tricuspid position as the last option. At 1 year of follow-up, the device shows no signs of dysfunction, and the prosthesis has moderate regurgitation.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Replacement Using a J-Valve System for a Failed Tricuspid Bioprosthesis

Background

Redo operation for failed tricuspid bioprosthetic valves is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation has become an acceptable option for high-risk patients with a failed tricuspid bioprosthesis. We present a case of successful tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation using a J-valve in a failed tricuspid bioprosthesis position. Case Summary. A 48-year-old male, who had a failed tricuspid bioprosthesis, presented with right-side heart failure, right-to-left shunting at the atrial level, severe dyspnea, cyanosis, peripheral edema, hepatauxe, and ascites. After the interdisciplinary assessment, we successfully performed transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with the J-valve system. At 34-month postoperative follow-up, the patient had no symptoms of heart failure and the echocardiogram showed good valve position and well hemodynamic status.

Conclusions

This case demonstrated that the J-valve system may be a new option for high-risk patients with a failed tricuspid bioprosthetic valve.

Current Status of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies

Tricuspid regurgitation is a complex disease that carries a poor prognosis, and surgical repair is associated with high mortality. In light of the success of other transcatheter-based valve interventions, transcatheter tricuspid therapy has recently seen exponential use both clinically and in innovation. Given the rapid development of many tricuspid systems and multiple on-going clinical trials, the aim of this review is to highlight the current state of transcatheter tricuspid therapeutics and to provide an up-to-date view of their clinical use, outcomes and future directions.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with bioprosthetic balloon expandable valve

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of the transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves with transcatheter aortic valves.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled all consecutive patients who were considered high risk for reoperations by the heart team and who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves in Tehran Heart Center, Tehran, Iran. All the procedures were performed via the transfemoral venous route under echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance with Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent successful transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position without any major complications or need for emergency surgical interventions. The mean age was 54.1 ± 17.1 years, and 8 patients were female. The median follow-up was 19.5 months (16-32.25 mon). The mean period between the last tricuspid valve replacement and transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation was 4.9 ± 2.2 years. The bioprosthetic valves were Hancock in three patients, Mosaic in the other three patients, and Biocor, Pericarbon, Perimount, and Epic in the other patients. After the procedure, the clinical and functional status improved significantly in all the patients. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased from 6.75 ± 2.66 mm Hg to 2.85 ± 0.89 (P < 0.001), and the postoperative tricuspid regurgitation severity decreased significantly in almost all the patients. The hospitalization period after the procedure was 4.4 ± 1.7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients, transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation seems to be a safe and minimally invasive alternative to reoperations for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves.

Neonatal Marfan syndrome with missense variant of c.3706T>C undergoing bilateral atrioventricular valve replacement

Neonatal Marfan syndrome is a rare condition with poor prognosis because of severe mitral and/or tricuspid valve insufficiency. Mitral valve replacement is sometimes required in early infancy, while tricuspid valve replacement is rarely done. We report the first infant neonatal Marfan syndrome case with a missense variant of c.3706T>C in the fibrillin-1 gene that was successfully managed by mitral and tricuspid valve replacement. Early multiple-valve replacement may sometimes be required during infant age in this genetic syndrome.

Editorial commentary: Cutting the Gordian knot of right-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis

With limited data available for the tricuspid valve, there are no stringent recommendations in the current guidelines (ESC 2021). Valve replacement for the right-sided heart is inherently problematic and bears the potential for complications - including prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT). The purpose of this editorial is to review the key features of this clinical scenario and to outline the essential aspects for optimized patient management and improved outcome. Depending on the clinical presentation of PVT, either immediate surgery, thrombolysis, or anticoagulation may be considered - with the sole intensification of anticoagulation likely being the most inferior. Given the high risk of re-thrombosis, a dedicated follow-up program is essential to identify complications early and offer adequate treatment.

Transfemoral Tricuspid Valve Replacement in Patients With Tricuspid Regurgitation: TRISCEND Study 30-Day Results

OBJECTIVES

The TRISCEND study (Edwards EVOQUE Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy after Replacement of Tricuspid Valve with Transcatheter Device) is evaluating the safety and performance of transfemoral transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in patients with clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and elevated surgical risk.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter valve replacement could lead to a paradigm shift in treating TR and improving patient quality of life.

METHODS

In the prospective, single-arm, multicenter TRISCEND study, patients with symptomatic moderate or greater TR, despite medical therapy, underwent percutaneous transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the EVOQUE system. A composite rate of major adverse events, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical, functional, and quality-of-life measures were assessed at 30 days.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (mean age of 79.3 years, 76.8% female, 91.1% TR severe or greater, 91.1% atrial fibrillation, and 87.5% New York Heart Association functional class III or IV) were treated. At 30 days, TR was reduced to mild or less in 98%. The composite major adverse events rate was 26.8% at 30 days caused by 1 cardiovascular death in a patient with a failed procedure, 2 reinterventions after device embolization, 1 major access site or vascular complication, and 15 severe bleeds, of which none were life-threatening or fatal. No myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, major cardiac structural complications, or device-related pulmonary embolism were observed. New York Heart Association significantly improved to functional class I or II (78.8%; P < 0.001), 6-minute walk distance improved 49.8 m (P < 0.001), and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved 19 points (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early experience with the transfemoral EVOQUE system in patients with clinically significant TR demonstrated technical feasibility, acceptable safety, TR reduction, and symptomatic improvement at 30 days. The TRISCEND II randomized trial (NCT04482062) is underway.

First Case of Tricuspid Valve Surgery in a Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Patient

The neurofibromatosis is a large class of different genetic disorders: Neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, type 3 (or Schwannomatosys), which have different clinical characterization. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), also known as Von Recklinghausen disease, represents 95% of the total cases. It is a complex autosomal dominant disorder with multisystem involvement, frequently associated to cardiac malformation. We present the case of a 52-years-old male affected by NF-1 with severe tricuspid regurgitation and atrial septal defect (ASD). No previous report about tricuspid valve surgery in NF-1 are available in the literature. A complete perioperative assessment was performed, including dermatologist evaluation, angio-CT scan and transesophageal echocardiography. The patient underwent uneventfully tricuspid valve replacement and ASD closure, with no wound complication even at 6-months follow-up. Treating congenital malformation in patient with complex genetic disorders like NF-1 is safe and can be resolutive, permitting to reduce long-term risk of complications for the patients. Preoperative assessments are fundamental, as well as in-hospital care and expertise on congenital heart defects.

Contemporary review in the multi-modality imaging evaluation and management of tricuspid regurgitation

The tricuspid valve has gained interest recently because of the poor outcomes with current treatments and advances in percutaneous valve interventions. A sound understanding of the anatomy and pathologies of the tricuspid valve is critical in its evaluation and management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). A multi-modality imaging approach with transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging all have their individual and collective roles in the evaluation of TR and guidance of surgical and percutaneous procedures. This combined with clinical factors will contribute to defining timing, indications, modality selection and risk stratification for tricuspid valve interventions, which currently remains controversial.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve-in-valve replacement in tricuspid position in a patient with pre-existing permanent dual-chamber pacemaker

Graphic abstract

Which is the best prosthesis in an isolated or combined tricuspid valve replacement?

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

From January 1999 to December 2018, 338 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement. Patients were divided into an isolated group or a combined group according to whether their surgery was combined with a left heart valve surgery. Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 142 patients (isolated group: 41 vs combined group: 101), and 196 patients underwent bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement (isolated group: 145 vs combined group: 51). Operative results, long-term survival and tricuspid valve-related events were compared.

RESULTS

Early mortality in the combined group was higher (n = 6, 4%) than that in the isolated group (n = 3, 2%), but no significant difference was observed between the mechanical and biological subgroups. In the isolated group, there was a higher event-free rate in the biological subgroup than in the mechanical subgroup (P = 0.042) and a similar result was also observed for patients without Ebstein’s anomaly (P = 0.039). In the combined group, no significant difference was observed (P = 0.98). Survival rates were similar between the mechanical and biological subgroups in both the isolated (P = 0.54) and combined (P = 0.81) groups. Mechanical valves in isolated tricuspid valve replacement were more prone to valve thrombosis and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Every decision regarding tricuspid valve prostheses should be individualized, but biological prostheses may be an optimal choice for patients, especially for patients without Ebstein’s anomaly, in isolated tricuspid valve replacement.

Right-sided double valve replacement in an adult patient who underwent surgery for pulmonary stenosis in childhood: a case report

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary regurgitation and the subsequent functional tricuspid regurgitation are frequently observed in adult patients who previously underwent pulmonary valvular operations. Pulmonary valve replacement, in combination with tricuspid annuloplasty, is frequently performed in adult patients. However, postoperative worsening or recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation is a major concern after pulmonary valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we describe the case of a 56-year-old woman with severe pulmonary regurgitation and functional tricuspid regurgitation after congenital pulmonary stenosis surgery in childhood. Functional tricuspid regurgitation was due to tricuspid annular dilatation, marked right ventricle enlargement, and significant tethering. We performed a bioprosthetic double valve replacement, and the postoperative course was uneventful. The patient is doing well one year after the surgery without prosthetic valve dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

When functional tricuspid regurgitation is severe and is associated with right ventricular dilatation and subsequent tethering, tricuspid valve replacement rather than annuloplasty should be considered.

The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

The ideal alternative for tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of using bioprosthetic and mechanical valves at the tricuspid position.

METHODS

A total of 98 consecutive patients without left-side cardiac disease or history of heart surgery who underwent first-time TVR between January 2010 and March 2017 at the West China Hospital, China were included in the study. Patient data, including all-cause death and need for tricuspid valve reoperation as the main end points, were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were enrolled into the study. The mean follow-up period was 43.3±21.9 (10-87) months. The mean age of the patients was 45.7±13.4 years. The study comprised 32.9% of male patients. During the follow-up period, 4, 3, 12, and 3 cases of death, reoperation, prosthesis dysfunctions, and prosthesis-related thrombosis were noted, respectively. Biological and mechanical valves were used in 56.6% and 43.4% of the patients, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between mechanical and biological valves with respect to echocardiographic date and survival, reoperation, prosthetic valve dysfunction, and thromboembolism rate.

CONCLUSION

TVR is not a very high-risk procedure in patients with isolated tricuspid regurgitation, and the decision for prosthesis implantation in TVR should be made on an individual basis according to suitable clinical judgment.

Uncertainties and challenges in surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy: a state-of-the-art expert review

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a frequent and complex problem, commonly combined with left-sided heart disease, such as mitral regurgitation. Significant TR is associated with increased mortality if left untreated or recurrent after therapy. Tricuspid regurgitation was historically often disregarded and remained undertreated. Surgery is currently the only Class I Guideline recommended therapy for TR, in the form of annuloplasty, leaflet repair, or valve replacement. As growing experience of transcatheter therapy in structural heart disease, many dedicated transcatheter tricuspid repair or replacement devices, which mimic well-established surgical techniques, are currently under development. Nevertheless, many aspects of TR are little understood, including the disease process, surgical or interventional risk stratification, and predictors of successful therapy. The optimal treatment timing and the choice of proper surgical or interventional technique for significant TR remain to be elucidated. In this context, we aim to highlight the current evidence, underline major controversial issues in this field and present a future roadmap for TR therapy.

Collapse

Comprehensive and Integrative Experimentation Setup for Large Animal Hybrid Valvular Heart Surgery

BACKGROUND

Experimental surgical procedures for atrioventricular valves present promising translational capabilities, and preclinical studies are necessary to assess their applicability and to train young enthusiastic heart teams. Here, we present a synopsis of experimental surgical procedures on porcine models for mitral valvular (MV) and tricuspid valvular (TV) interventions; mitral valve-in-valve implantation (MViV), transapical cardioscopic (TAC) MV replacement (MVR), TAC-MV annuloplasty, and tricuspid valve-in-a-ring (TViR) procedures.

METHODS

Twenty-five (n = 25) female Yorkshire pigs of 55-65 kg is the total number used in the four approaches; seven animals underwent MViV, six TAC-MVR, six TAC-MV annuloplasty, and six TViR, respectively. All were subjected to a first conventional valvular surgery (bioprosthetic valve replacement and/or prosthetic ring repair). Then, after 4 wk, a less-invasive second surgery was performed using the transcatheter approaches under investigation. Except for the TAC-MVR and annuloplasty procedures, all animals were followed up for additional 4 wk.

RESULTS

(1) MViV (n = 7): Standard MVR was successfully performed in all animals. Transvalvular pressure gradients and flow velocities were (P_max 3.77 ± 0.8 mmHg; P_mean 2.1 ± 0.6 mmHg, V_max 97 ± 13 cm/s; V_mean 68 ± 21 cm/s). Effective MViV followed (P_max 16.7 ± 1.8 mmHg; P_mean 6.2 ± 1.2 mmHg, V_max 216 ± 32 cm/s; V_mean 110 ± 24 cm/s). (2) TAC-MVR (n = 6): The overall bypass time was 177.2 ± 44.2 min. Transprosthetic P_mean was 4.6 ± 2.4 mmHg; no paravalvular leaks in all animals. (3) TAC-MV annuloplasty (n = 6): The implantation time was 47 ± 6 min. MV was competent, left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF%) was 63 ± 4%. (4) TViR (n = 6): Conventional TV ring repair was performed in all animals (P_max 2.42 ± 0.7 mmHg; P_mean 1.3 ± 0.6 mmHg, V_max 82 ± 10.4 cm/s; V_mean 65.4 ± 21 cm/s). All TViRs were implanted efficiently (P_max 4.7 ± 1.6 mmHg; P_mean 2.7 ± 0.8 mmHg, V_max 105 ± 31 cm/s; V_mean 81 ± 16 cm/s). A mild paravalvular leak was observed in one animal (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

All studied experimental valvular interventions are feasible, within the context of well-trained cardiac surgery specialists, and all possibilities should be considered when treating a patient to determine which one suits best his individual challenges and scope.

Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in Mitral Valve Disease

Functional tricuspid regurgitation is a common finding in patients with left-sided heart disease. If left untreated, it may reduce survival, limit functional capacity and cause end-organ dysfunction. Annulus dilation and leaflet tethering due to right ventricle remodeling are 2 major pathophysiologic mechanisms in functional tricuspid regurgitation. Even if surgical treatment remains the gold standard, indication and timing of surgical interventions remain the object of debate in the medical community. More recently, numerous transcatheter therapies have been developed in order to offer less invasive options to patients who otherwise would have a high risk of mortality and morbidity with surgical interventions.

Surgical Techniques for Tricuspid Valve Disease

Tricuspid valve disease affects millions of patients worldwide. It has always been considered less relevant than the left-side valves of the heart, but this “forgotten valve” still represents a great challenge for the cardiac surgeons, especially in the most difficult symptomatic scenarios. In this review we analyze the wide spectrum of surgical techniques for the treatment of a diseased tricuspid valve.

Risk factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality following isolated tricuspid valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Reports of isolated tricuspid valve replacement (iTVR) are relatively rare. The present study aimed to evaluate independent risk factors of perioperative morbidity and mortality after iTVR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 118 consecutive patients (42 males; mean age, 49.1 ± 12.9 y) who underwent iTVR from May 2003 to April 2016 in our center. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the independent risk factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality following iTVR.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients (85.6%) were classified as New York Heart Association functional class III or IV preoperatively. The overall perioperative mortality was 11.8% (14/118), and a significant difference was observed between the nonreoperative group and the reoperative group (6.7% versus 18.3%, P = 0.047). The multivariate logistic regression analyses identified that preoperative New York Heart Association functional class IV (OR [odds ratio] = 15.43, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 3.46-68.83, P = 0.000) and ascites (OR = 4.88, 95% CI = 1.24-19.27, P = 0.024) were independent risk factors of perioperative deaths. The previous cardiac surgery (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.41-7.62, P = 0.006) was independently associated with perioperative major adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed that iTVR has relatively high mortality and morbidity rates. Timely surgery may be recommended for this high-risk cohort of patients before the development of severe heart and end-organ failure.

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation: outcomes and therapeutic interventions

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) can be caused by primary valvular abnormalities such as flail leaflet or secondary annular dilation as is seen in atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension and left heart disease. There is an increasing recognition of a subgroup of patients with isolated TR in the absence of other associated cardiac abnormalities. Left untreated isolated TR significantly worsens survival. Stand-alone surgery for isolated TR is rarely performed due to an average operative mortality of 8%–10% and a paucity of data demonstrating improved survival. When surgery is performed, valve repair may be preferred over replacement; however, there is a risk of significant recurrent regurgitation after repair. Existing society guidelines do not fully address the management of isolated TR. We propose that patients at low operative risk with symptomatic severe isolated TR and no reversible cause undergo surgery prior to the onset of right ventricular dysfunction and end-organ damage. For patients at increased surgical risk novel percutaneous interventions may offer an alternative treatment but further research is needed. Significant knowledge gaps remain and future research is needed to define operative outcomes and provide comparative data for medical and surgical therapy.

Current Treatment Strategies for Tricuspid Regurgitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tricuspid regurgitation is common; however, recognition and diagnosis, clinical outcomes, and management strategies are poorly defined. Here, we will describe the etiology and natural history of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), evaluate existing surgical outcomes data, and review the evolving field of percutaneous interventions to treat TR.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previously, the only definitive corrective therapy for TR was surgical valve repair or replacement which is associated with significant operative mortality. Advances in percutaneous valve repair techniques are now being translated to the tricuspid valve. These novel interventions may offer a lower-risk alternative treatment in patients at increased surgical risk. Significant TR adversely impacts survival. Surgery remains the only proven therapy for treatment of TR and may be underutilized due to mixed outcomes data. Early experience with percutaneous interventions is promising, but large clinical experience is lacking. Further study will be required before these therapies are introduced into broader clinical practice.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Anticoagulation in Pregnant Women With Mechanical Heart Valves

Background

Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves during pregnancy is essential to prevent thromboembolic events. Each regimen has drawbacks with regard to maternal or fetal risk.

Objectives

This meta-analysis sought to estimate and compare the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves who received different methods of anticoagulation.

Methods

Studies were identified using a Medline search including all publications up to June 5, 2016. Study inclusion required reporting of maternal death, thromboembolism, and valve failure, and/or fetal spontaneous abortion, death, and congenital defects in pregnant women treated with any of the following: 1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) throughout pregnancy; 2) low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy; 3) LMWH for the first trimester, followed by a VKA (LMWH and VKA); or 4) unfractionated heparin for the first trimester, followed by a VKA (UFH and VKA).

Results

A total of 800 pregnancies from 18 publications were included. Composite maternal risk was lowest with VKA (5%), compared with LMWH (16%; ratio of averaged risk [RAR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 7.5), LMWH and VKA (16%; RAR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2 to 7.5), or UFH and VKA (16%; RAR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.5 to 7.1). Composite fetal risk was lowest with LMWH (13%; RAR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8), compared with VKA (39%), LMWH and VKA (23%), or UFH and VKA (34%). No significant difference in fetal risk was observed between women taking ≤5 mg daily warfarin and those with an LMWH regimen (RAR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 2.4).

Conclusions

VKA treatment was associated with the lowest risk of adverse maternal outcomes, whereas the use of LMWH throughout pregnancy was associated with the lowest risk of adverse fetal outcomes. Fetal risk was similar between women taking ≤5 mg warfarin daily and women treated with LMWH.

Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed

For the year 2016, more than 20,000 published references can be found in Pubmed when entering the search term "cardiac surgery". Publications last year have helped to more clearly delineate the fields where classic surgery and modern interventional techniques overlap. The field of coronary bypass surgery (partially compared to percutaneous coronary intervention) was enriched by five large prospective randomized trials. The value of CABG for complex coronary disease was reconfirmed and for less complex main stem lesions, PCI was found potentially equal. For aortic valve treatment, more evidence was presented for the superiority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with intermediate risk. However, the 2016 evidence argued against the liberal expansion to the low-risk field, where conventional aortic valve replacement still appears superior. For the mitral valve, many publications emphasized the significant impact of mitral valve reconstruction on survival in structural mitral regurgitation. In addition, there were many relevant and other interesting contributions from the purely operative arena in the fields of coronary revascularization, surgical treatment of valve disease, terminal heart failure (i.e., transplantation and ventricular assist devices), and aortic surgery. While this article attempts to summarize the most pertinent publications it does not have the expectation of being complete and cannot be free of individual interpretation. As in recent years, it provides a condensed summary that is intended to give the reader "solid ground" for up-to-date decision-making in cardiac surgery.

Tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation for failing bioprosthetic valves: an evolving standard of care

Redo surgery for bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (VIV) therapy utilizing ballon-expandable transcatheter valves has become available. The tricuspid Valve-in-Valve International Data (VIVID) registry initial results represent the largest experience with tricuspid VIV therapy, demonstrating high procedural success rates with low 30 days mortality and excellent survival free of repeat tricuspid intervention in 1 year. Although longer clinic and hemodynamic follow-up will be needed to fully understand the role of this therapy, these data support the safety, feasibility and beneficial effects of tricuspid VIV therapy. For patients with bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure, tricuspid VIV is likely to become a first-line treatment option.