Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis

Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis

Background and Aims

We investigated neurological events, graft patency, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and mortality at 1 year following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery using automated proximal anastomotic devices (APADs) and compared the overall rates with the current literature.

Methods

A systematic review of all available reports of APADs use in the literature was conducted. Cumulative incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) were the main statistical indexes. Nine observational studies encompassing a total of 718 patients were included at the end of the selection process.

Results

The cumulative event rate of neurological complications was 4.8% (lower‐upper limits: 2.8‐8.0, P < .001; I² = 72.907%, P = .002; Egger's test: intercept = –2.47, P = 0.16; Begg and Mazumdar test: τ = −0.20, p = 0.57). Graft patency was 90.5% (80.4 to 95.7, P < .001; I² = 76.823%, P = .005; Egger's test: intercept = –3.04, P = .10; Begg and Mazumdar test: τ = −0.67, P = .17). Furthermore, the overall incidence of MACEs was 3.7% (1.3‐10.4, P < .001; I² = 51.556%, P = .103; Egger's test: intercept = –1.98, P =  < .11; Begg and Mazumdar test: τ = −0.67, P = .17). Finally, mortality within 1 year was 5% (3.5‐7, P < .001; I² = 29.675%, P = .202; Egger's test: intercept = –0.91, P = .62; Begg and Mazumdar test: τ = −0.04, P = .88).

Conclusions

APADs do not seem to be correlated with a reduction of either neurological events or mortality. By contrast, these tools showed satisfactory one‐year graft patency and a low incidence of MACEs. Further research on this topic is warranted.