Type A aortic dissection in the East and West: A comparative study between two hospitals from China and the US

Anzhen Risk Evaluation System for Acute Aortic Syndrome (AZSCORE-AAS): protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study in northern China

INTRODUCTION

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a group of acute and critical conditions, including acute aortic dissection (AAD), acute intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. High mortality and morbidity rates result in a poor patient prognosis. Prompt diagnoses and timely interventions are paramount for saving patients' lives. In recent years, risk models for AAD have been established worldwide; however, a risk evaluation system for AAS is still lacking in China. Therefore, this study aims to develop an early warning and risk scoring system in combination with the novel potential biomarker soluble ST2 (sST2) for AAS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, prospective, observational study will recruit patients diagnosed with AAS at three tertiary referral centres from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2023. We will analyse the discrepancies in sST2 levels in patients with different AAS types and explore the accuracy of sST2 in distinguishing between them. We will also incorporate potential risk factors and sST2 into a logistic regression model to establish a logistic risk scoring system for predicting postoperative death and prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients with AAS.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry website (http://www. chictr. org. cn/). Ethical approval was obtained from the human research ethics committees of Beijing Anzhen Hospital (KS2019016). The ethics review board of each participating hospital agreed to participate. The final risk prediction model will be published in an appropriate journal and disseminated as a mobile application for clinical use. Approval and anonymised data will be shared.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900027763.

Short- and Mid-Term Survival Prediction in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Undergoing Surgical Repair: Based on the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index

Purpose

The postoperative survival of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) remains unsatisfactory. The current study developed an easy-to-use survival prediction model and calculator.

Methods

A total of 496 patients with aTAAD undergoing surgical repair were included in this study. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and other clinical features were collected and subjected to logistic and Cox regression analyses. The survival prediction model was based on Cox regression analyses and exhibited as a nomogram. For convenience of use, the nomogram was further developed into calculator software.

Results

We demonstrated that a higher preoperative SII was associated with in-hospital death (OR: 4.116, p < 0.001) and a higher postoperative overall survival rate (HR: 2.467, p < 0.001) in aTAAD patients undergoing surgical repair. A survival prediction model and calculator based on SII and four other clinical features were developed. The overall C-index of the model was 0.743. The areas under the curves (AUCs) of the 1- and 3-month and 1- and 3-year survival probabilities were 0.73, 0.71, 0.71 and 0.72, respectively. The model also showed good calibration and clinical utility.

Conclusion

Preoperative SII is significantly associated with postoperative survival. Based on SII and other clinical features, we created the first easy-to-use prediction model and calculator for predicting the postoperative survival rate in aTAAD patients, which showed good prediction performance.

The impact of age in acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study

Background

Acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) is a lethal disease and age is an important risk factor for outcomes. This retrospective study was to analyze the impact of age stratification in aTAAD, and to provide clues for surgeons when they make choices of therapy strategies.

Methods

From January 2011 to December 2019, 1092 aTAAD patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital received surgical therapy. Patients were divided into 7 groups according to every ten-year interval (20–80 s). The differences between the groups were analyzed in terms of the baseline preoperative conditions, surgical methods and postoperative outcomes of patients of different age groups. During a median follow-up term of 17 months, the survival rates were compared among 7 groups through Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

The median age was 52.0 years old in whole cohort. The multiple comorbidities were more common in old age groups (60 s, 70 s, 80 s), while the 20 s group patients had the highest proportion of Marfan syndrome (28.1%). Preoperative hypotension was highest in 80 s (16.7%, P = 0.038). Young age groups (20–60 s) had a higher rate of root replacement and total arch replacement, which led to a longer duration of operation and hypothermic circulation arrest. The overall mortality was 14.1%, the tendency of mortality was increased with age except 20 s group (33.3% in 80 s, P = 0.016). The postoperative morbidity of gastrointestinal bleeding and bowel ischemia were 16.7% and 11.1% in 80 s group.

Conclusions

Age is a major impact factor for aTAAD surgery. Old patients presented more comorbidities before surgery, the mortality and complications rate were significantly higher even with less invasive and conservative surgical therapy. But the favorable long-term survival indicated that the simple or less extensive arch repair is the preferred surgery for patients over 70 years old.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01785-y.

Excessive DNA damage mediates ECM degradation via the RBBP8/NOTCH1 pathway in sporadic aortic dissection

Stanford type A aortic dissection (TA-AD) is a life-threatening disease. Most cases of aortic dissection (AD) are sporadic rather than inherited. Unlike that of inherited AD, the pathogenesis of sporadic AD is still unclear. In the current study, we aimed to explore the pathogenesis of sporadic AD through transcriptome sequencing data analyses. We downloaded sporadic TA-AD transcriptome profiles from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and found response to DNA damage stimulus was activated in AD. Furthermore, by conducting mouse AD tissue single cell RNA sequencing and immunostaining, we found that DNA damage mainly occurred in smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and fibroblasts. Next, we examined the repair patterns in response to DNA damage and found the linker molecules RBBP8/NOTCH1 between DNA damage/repair and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization through protein-protein interaction analysis. Thus, we proposed that DNA damage could contribute to AD by regulating ECM changes. To explore the underlying mechanism, we knocked down the DNA repair-related gene RBBP8 in aortic SMCs, which could exacerbate DNA damage, and observed decreased expression level of NOTCH1. Inhibition of NOTCH1 with crenigacestat in vivo accelerated β-aminopropionitrile-induced formation of AD and increased mortality. Meanwhile, phenotype switching of SMCs was induced by Notch1 knockdown or inhibition; this switching occurred via a pathway involving downregulation of contractile marker gene expression and upregulation of MMP2 expression, which might aggravate ECM degradation. In conclusion, excessive DNA damage is a characteristic pathological change of sporadic aortic dissection, which might contribute to ECM changes and AD development via action on the NOTCH1 pathway.

Managing acute type A aortic dissections: Is a universal approach feasible?

The goal in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is to resect the primary intimal tear while minimizing associated complications of the disease. This goal can be accomplished by different surgical techniques and operative strategies. The extent of proximal and distal aortic reconstruction and the use of cerebral perfusion adjuncts are highly variable between institutions and within institutions themselves. As operative outcomes for ATAAD have improved considerably over the past decade, the focus has shifted towards extensive aortic reconstruction to minimize aortic reinterventions. However, there remains a distinct difference in how patients with ATAAD are managed in North America when compared with those in East Asia.