Racial disparities in in-hospital outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation

Facilitators and Barriers to Values Discussions Following LVAD Implantation: Perspectives from Diverse Patients and Family Caregivers

BACKGROUND

Delivering care that is responsive to who or what is most important to patients and family caregivers is a key aspect of quality care, yet it remains unclear how clinicians can best support individuals in expressing their personal values. We aimed to describe patient- and family caregiver-identified facilitators and barriers to engaging in values discussions with clinicians following implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a qualitative descriptive approach, patients with an LVAD and their caregivers participated in 1-on-1 semistructured interviews and self-reported sociodemographics (January 2023-July 2023). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were computed for quantitative data.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 27; ages 30-76 years) were predominantly male (59%) and non-Hispanic Black (67%). Caregivers (n = 21; ages 27-76) were female (76%), non-Hispanic Black (67%), and a spouse/partner (62%). Facilitators (5 shared across patient/caregiver groups; 8 unique across patient/caregiver groups) included a perceived close relationship (patient/caregiver), values alignment (patient/caregiver), clinician discussion initiation (patient/caregiver), facing an impending decision (patient/caregiver), 1-on-1 dyadic interactions (patient/caregiver), being assertive (patient), positive dyadic communication (caregiver), and involvement of a third party (caregiver). Barriers (2 shared; 7 unique) included belief that their values are already known (patient/caregiver), sensitivity about values (patient/caregiver), uncertainty about timing (patient), poor clinical communication (patient), patient hopelessness (patient), perceived lack of clinician time (caregiver), and having a reserved personality (caregiver).

CONCLUSION

Findings offer insight into actionable facilitators and barriers to discussions promoting incorporation of patient and family values into LVAD maintenance and chronic disease management.

Racial and Ethnic Variations in Patients Undergoing Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Prior investigations assessing the impact of race/ethnicity on outcomes after mitral valve (MV) surgery have reported conflicting findings. This analysis aimed to examine the association between race/ethnicity and operative presentation and outcomes of patients undergoing MV and tricuspid valve (TV) surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 5984 patients (2730 female, median age 63 y) who underwent MV (n = 4,534, 76%), TV (n = 474, 8%) or both MV and TV (n = 976, 16%) surgery in a statewide collaborative from 2012 to 2021. The influence of race/ethnicity on preoperative characteristics, MV and TV repair rates, and postoperative outcomes was assessed for White (n = 4,244, 71%), Black (n = 1,271, 21%), Hispanic (n = 144, 2%), Asian (n = 171, 3%), and mixed/other race (n = 154, 3%) patients.

RESULTS

Black patients, compared to White patients, had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of morbidity/mortality (24.5% versus 13.1%; P < 0.001) and more comorbid conditions. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo an elective procedure (White 71%, Black 55%, Hispanic 58%; P < 0.001). Degenerative MV disease was more prevalent in White patients (White 62%, Black 41%, Hispanic 43%, Asian 51%, mixed/other 45%; P < 0.05), while rheumatic disease was more prevalent in non-White patients (Asian 28%, Hispanic 26%, mixed/other 25%, Black 17%, White 10%;P < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, repair rates and adverse postoperative outcomes, including mortality, did not differ by racial/ethnic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient race/ethnicity is associated with a higher burden of comorbidities at operative presentation and MV disease etiology. Strategies to improve early detection of valvular heart disease and timely referral for surgery may improve outcomes.

Intersection of social determinants of health with ventricular assist device therapy: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) may influence the clinical management of patients with heart failure. Further research is warranted on the relationship between SDOH and Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) therapy for heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize the state of knowledge on the intersection of SDOH with VAD therapy.

METHODS

Guided by Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, this literature search captured three concepts of interest including VAD therapy, SDOH, and their domains of intersection with patient selection, decision-making, treatment outcome, and resource allocation. CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched in March 2023. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed publications in English, published between 2006 and 2023, conducted in the United States, and examined VAD therapy in the context of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years).

RESULTS

22 quantitative studies meeting the inclusion criteria informed the conceptualization of SDOH using the Healthy People 2030 framework. Four themes captured how the identified SDOH intersected with different processes relating to VAD therapy: patient decision-making, healthcare access and resource allocation, patient selection, and treatment outcomes. Most studies addressed the intersection of SDOH with healthcare access and treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights substantial gaps in understanding how SDOH intersect with patient and patient selection for VAD. More research using mixed methods designs is warranted. On an institutional level, addressing bias and discrimination may have mitigated health disparities with treatment outcomes, but further research is needed for implementing system-wide change. Standardized assessment of SDOH is recommended throughout clinical practice from patient selection to outpatient VAD care.

"Things That You Thought Mattered, None of That Matters": A Qualitative Exploration of Family Caregiver Values following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Intentional exploration, or elicitation, of patient and family values-who/what matters most-is critical to the delivery of person-centered care, yet the values elicitation experiences of family caregivers have been understudied. Understanding caregiver experiences discussing, reflecting upon, and acting on their values is critical to optimizing health decisions after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the values elicitation experiences of family caregivers of individuals with an LVAD in the postimplantation period.

METHODS

This was a qualitative descriptive study of LVAD caregivers recruited from an outpatient clinic in the southeast United States. After completing one-on-one semistructured interviews, participants' transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Interviewed caregivers (n = 21) were 27 to 76 years old, with 67% African American, 76% female, 76% urban-dwelling, and 62% a spouse/partner. LVAD implantation was an impactful experience prompting caregiver reevaluation of their values; these values became instrumental to navigating decisions and managing stressors from their caregiving role. Three broad themes of caregiver values elicitation experiences emerged: (1) caregivers leverage their values for strength and guidance in navigating their caregiving role, (2) LVAD implantation prompts (re)evaluation of relationships and priorities, and (3) caregivers convey their goals and priorities when deemed relevant to patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a care recipient undergo LVAD implantation prompted caregivers to reevaluate their values, which were used to navigate caregiving decisions and stressors. Findings highlight the need for healthcare professionals to engage and support caregivers after LVAD implantation.

"When I do have some time, rather than spend it polishing silver, I want to spend it with my grandkids": a qualitative exploration of patient values following left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Values are broadly understood to have implications for how individuals make decisions and cope with serious illness stressors, yet it remains uncertain how patients and their family and friend caregivers discuss, reflect upon, and act on their values in the post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation context. This study aimed to explore the values elicitation experiences of patients with an LVAD in the post-implantation period.

METHODS

Qualitative descriptive study of LVAD recipients. Socio-demographics and patient resource use were analyzed using descriptive statistics and semi-structured interview data using thematic analysis. Adult (> 18 years) patients with an LVAD receiving care at an outpatient clinic in the Southeastern United States.

RESULTS

Interviewed patients (n = 27) were 30-76 years, 59% male, 67% non-Hispanic Black, 70% married/living with a partner, and 70% urban-dwelling. Three broad themes of patient values elicitation experiences emerged: 1) LVAD implantation prompts deep reflection about life and what is important, 2) patient values are communicated in various circumstances to convey personal goals and priorities to caregivers and clinicians, and 3) patients leverage their values for strength and guidance in navigating life post-LVAD implantation. LVAD implantation was an impactful experience often leading to reevaluation of patients' values; these values became instrumental to making health decisions and coping with stressors during the post-LVAD implantation period. Patient values arose within broad, informal exchanges and focused, decision-making conversations with their caregiver and the healthcare team.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider assessing the values of patients post-implantation to facilitate shared understanding of their goals/priorities and identify potential changes in their coping.

Patients' and physicians' beliefs and attitudes towards integrating personalized risk estimates into patient education about left ventricular assist device therapy

BACKGROUND

Personalized risk (PR) estimates may enhance clinical decision making and risk communication by providing individualized estimates of patient outcomes. We explored stakeholder attitudes toward the utility, acceptability, usefulness and best-practices for integrating PR estimates into patient education and decision making about Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

As part of a 5-year multi-institutional AHRQ project, we conducted 40 interviews with stakeholders (physicians, nurse coordinators, patients, and caregivers), analyzed using Thematic Content Analysis. All stakeholder groups voiced positive views towards integrating PR in decision making. Patients, caregivers and coordinators emphasized that PR can help to better understand a patient's condition and risks, prepare mentally and logistically for likely outcomes, and meaningfully engage in decision making. Physicians felt it can improve their decision making by enhancing insight into outcomes, enhance tailored pre-emptive care, increase confidence in decisions, and reduce bias and subjectivity. All stakeholder groups also raised concerns about accuracy, representativeness and relevance of algorithms; predictive uncertainty; utility in relation to physician's expertise; potential negative reactions among patients; and overreliance.

CONCLUSION

Stakeholders are optimistic about integrating PR into clinical decision making, but acceptability depends on prospectively demonstrating accuracy, relevance and evidence that benefits of PR outweigh potential negative impacts on decision making quality.

Relation of Sociodemographic Factors With Primary Cause of Hospitalization Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices (from the National Inpatient Sample 2012 to 2017)

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an established intervention for end-stage heart failure (HF). Rehospitalization for serious complications remains common during the continuous-flow LVAD era. Whether sociodemographic factors are associated with differences in the frequency of severe complications leading to hospitalization remains unclear. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample, we identified all hospitalizations from 2012 to 2017 of adults aged ≥18 years with previous LVAD placement. We categorized the primary cause of hospitalizations into key adverse diagnoses, including bleeding, HF, arrhythmias, LVAD complications, stroke, and a composite of device-related infection or sepsis. We assessed the association of sociodemographic markers with primary diagnoses using modified Poisson regression. We identified 62,630 hospitalizations during the study period (41% aged ≥65, 77% men, 26% Black, 5% Hispanic). Bleeding (18%), infections (15%), and HF (15%) were the most common primary diagnoses. In the multivariable analyses, gastrointestinal bleeding was more likely among older adults (relative risk [RR] 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.69 [3.57 to 6.16]; age ≥65 vs 18 to 44 years), among Black than White patients (RR 95% CI 1.17 [1.04 to 1.32]), and less likely for the highest income quartile than the lowest (RR 95% CI 0.79 [0.69 to 0.91]). Device-related infection/sepsis was also less likely for patients with higher income (RR 95% CI 0.80 [0.67 to 0.96]). Ventricular arrhythmias were less frequent diagnoses for women than men (RR 95% CI 0.59 [0.46 to 0.75]). LVADs complications were less likely in older adults than younger adults (RR 95% CI 0.70 [0.50 to 0.98]). In conclusion, after LVAD implantation, the frequency in which specific adverse events are the primary cause of rehospitalization varies significantly by sociodemographic factors. Further study is needed to determine if there are opportunities for targeted preventive measures based on sociodemographic markers.

Long-term survival on LVAD support: Device complications and end-organ dysfunction limit long-term success

BACKGROUND

Preoperative variables can predict short term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) survival, but predictors of extended survival remain insufficiently characterized.

METHOD

Patients undergoing LVAD implant (2012-2018) in the Intermacs registry were grouped according to time on support: short-term (<1 year, n = 7,483), mid-term (MT, 1-3 years, n = 5,976) and long-term (LT, ≥3 years, n = 3,015). Landmarked hazard analyses (adjusted hazard ratio, HR) were performed to identify correlates of survival after 1 and 3 years of support.

RESULTS

After surviving 1 year of support, additional LVAD survival was less likely in older (HR 1.15 per decade), Caucasian (HR 1.22) and unmarried (HR 1.16) patients (p < 0.05). After 3 years of support, only 3 preoperative characteristics (age, race, and history of bypass surgery, p < 0.05) correlated with extended survival. Postoperative events most negatively influenced achieving LT survival. In those alive at 1 year or 3 years, the occurrence of postoperative renal (creatinine HR MT = 1.09; LT HR = 1.10 per mg/dl) and hepatic dysfunction (AST HR MT = 1.29; LT HR = 1.34 per 100 IU), stroke (MT HR = 1.24; LT HR = 1.42), infection (MT HR = 1.13; LT HR = 1.10), and/or device malfunction (MT HR = 1.22; LT HR = 1.46) reduced extended survival (all p ≤ 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Success with LVAD therapy hinges on achieving long term survival in more recipients. After 1 year, extended survival is heavily constrained by the occurrence of adverse events and postoperative end-organ dysfunction. The growth of destination therapy intent mandates that future LVAD studies be designed with follow up sufficient for capturing outcomes beyond 24 months.

Mitigating Racial Bias in Machine Learning

When applied in the health sector, AI-based applications raise not only ethical but legal and safety concerns, where algorithms trained on data from majority populations can generate less accurate or reliable results for minorities and other disadvantaged groups.

Impact of Race on Clinical Outcomes After Implantation With a Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis From the MOMENTUM 3 Trial

BACKGROUND

Heart failure disproportionately affects Black patients. Whether differences among race influence outcomes in advanced heart failure with use of a fully magnetically levitated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device remains uncertain.

METHODS

We included 515 IDE (Investigational Device Exemption) clinical trial patients and 500 Continued Access Protocol patients implanted with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in the MOMENTUM 3 study (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3). Outcomes were compared between Black and White left ventricular assist device recipients for the primary end point of survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years, overall survival, adverse events, 6-minute walk distance, and quality of life scores.

RESULTS

Of 1015 HeartMate 3 patients, 675 were self-identified as White and 285 as Black individuals. The Black patient cohort was younger, more obese and with a history of hypertension, and more nonischemic cause of heart failure, relative to the White patient group. Black and White patients did not experience a difference in the primary end point (81.1% versus 77.9%; hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.76-1.54], P=0.6568). Black patients were at higher risk of adverse events (calculated as events per 100 patient-years), including bleeding (75.4 versus 63.5; P<0.0001), stroke (9.5 versus 7.2; P=0.0183), and hypertension (10.1 versus 3.2; P<0.0001). The 6-minute walk distance was not different at baseline and 6 months between the groups, however, the absolute change from baseline was greater for White patients (median: +183.0 [interquartile range, 42.0-335.3] versus +163.8 [interquartile range, 42.3-315.0] meters, P=0.01). The absolute quality of life measurement (EuroQoL group, 5-dimension, 5-level instrument visual analog scale) at baseline and 6 months was better in the Black patient group, but relative improvement from baseline to 6 months was greater in White patients (median: +20.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-40.0] versus +25.0 [interquartile range, 10.0-45.0]; P=0.0298).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace/remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years with the HM 3 left ventricular assist device did not differ by race, Black HeartMate 3 patients experienced a higher morbidity burden and smaller gains in functional capacity and quality of life when compared with White patients. These findings require efforts designed to better understand and overcome these gaps through systematic identification and tackling of putative factors. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02224755 and NCT02892955.

Utilization of Left Ventricular Assist Device for Congestive Heart Failure: Inputs on Demographic and Hospital Characterization From Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Objectives The first goal of the study is to provide a descriptive overview of the utilization of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) and determine the rates of LVAD use stratified by patients' demographic and hospitals' characteristics in the United States. Next, is to measure the hospitalization outcomes of length of stay (LOS) and cost in inpatients managed with LVAD. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using the nationwide inpatient sample and included 184,115 patients (age ≥65 years) with a primary discharge diagnosis of hypertensive and non-hypertensive CHF and was further classified by inpatients who were managed with LVAD. We compared the distributions of demographic and hospital characteristics in CHF inpatients with versus without LVAD by performing Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables, and independent sample t-test for continuous variables. Results The inpatient utilization of LVAD was 0.93% (1690 out of 184,115) in CHF patients. The LVAD cohort were younger compared to non-LVAD group (mean age, 69.9 years vs. 79.4 years). The utilization rate of LVAD was also almost four times higher in males (1.50%) compared to females (0.36%). Although whites (78.5%) accounted for majority of LVAD recipients, the rate of LVAD utilization was highest in blacks (1.04%) and lowest in Hispanics (0.58%) with whites having utilization rate of 0.89%. Medicare was the dominant primary payer to cover the LVAD inpatients (91.1%), though the rate of LVAD utilization is highest in private (2.22%) and lowest in those covered by public insurance (medicaid/medicare). CHF patients in public hospitals (1.79%) were more than twice more likely to receive LVAD than in private hospitals (0.83%) due to higher utilization rate. LVAD utilization rate was approximately 55 times higher in teaching hospitals (1.67%) compared to non-teaching hospitals (0.03%), and 20 times higher in large bed hospitals (1.41%) compared to small bed-size hospitals (0.07%). CHF patients that received LVAD had a significantly longer LOS (34.6 days vs 9.8 days) and higher inpatient treatment costs ($802,118 vs. $86,302) compared to non-LVAD group. Conclusion The inpatient utilization of LVAD was in CHF patients is higher in males, blacks and private health insurance beneficiaries. In terms of hospital characteristics, the utilization of LVAD for CHF management was higher in large bed sized, and public type and teaching hospitals compared to their counterparts. This data will allow us to devise strategies to improve LVAD utilization and increase its outreach for heart failure patients, especially those on the transplant waiting list. Despite its effectiveness, aggressive usage of LVAD is restricted due to cost-effectiveness and lack of technical confidence among medical professional due to complications.

Racial differences in outcomes after receiving advanced heart failure therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in medical and device-based therapies for advanced heart failure as well as public policy, disparities by race/ethnicity persist in heart failure clinical outcomes. The purpose of this review is to describe disparities in outcomes by race--ethnicity in patients after receipt of heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and the current understanding of factors contributing to these disparities.

RECENT FINDINGS

The proportion of black and Latinx patients receiving advanced heart failure therapies continues to rise, and they have worse hemodynamic profiles at the time of referral for heart transplantation and LVAD. Black patients have lower rates of survival after heart transplantation, in part because of higher rates of cellular and humoral rejection that may be mediated through unique gene pathways, and increased risk for allosensitization and de-novo donor-specific antibodies. Factors that have previously been cited as reasons for worse outcomes in race--ethnic minorities, including psychosocial risk and lower SES, may not be as strongly correlated with outcomes after LVAD.

SUMMARY

Black and Latinx patients are sicker at the time of referral for advanced heart failure therapies. Despite higher psychosocial risk factors among race--ethnic minorities, outcomes after LVAD appear to be similar to white patients. Black patients continue to have lower posttransplant survival, because of a complex interplay of immunologic susceptibility, clinical and socioeconomic factors. No single factor accounts for the disparities in clinical outcomes for race--ethnic minorities, and thus consideration of these components together is critical in management of these patients.