Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the in-hospital and medium-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in the real-world setting compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

All patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) who underwent conventional CABG and HCR in our institution between January 2018 to January 2021 were evaluated in terms of length of intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital stay, repeat revascularization rates, bleeding, stroke, and in-hospital mortality. Clinical outcomes (mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) were assessed at average follow up of 3.6 years.

RESULTS

Pre-procedural characteristics were balanced between the groups after propensity score matching. There was no significant difference in MACCE [Odds ratio: 0.57; 95 % CI: 0.05 to 1.52; p = 0.66], in-hospital mortality [n = 2 (1.9 %) vs n = 0; p = 0.80], post procedure stroke [n = 2 (1.9 %) vs n = 2 (3.7 %); p = 0.86], post-procedural myocardial infarction requiring repeat revascularization [n = 2 (1.9 %) versus n = 1 (1.9 %); p = 1] during the in-hospital stay of the patients in the CABG vs HCR groups respectively. HCR was associated with significantly lower requirement for blood transfusions, bleeding risk, in-hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. Analysis of the outcomes after 3.6 years revealed no significant difference in MACCE [Odds ratio: 1.40; 95 % CI: 0.46 to 4.30; p = 0.55], and post discharge mortality [n = 0 vs n = 0; p = 1]. Both groups had similar rates of post-procedural myocardial infarction requiring repeat revascularization [n = 0 vs n = 4 (7.4 %); p = 0.278], and rate of re-intervention [n = 0 vs n = 3 (5.6 %); p = 0.41].

CONCLUSION

HCR may be considered as a safe and feasible alternative to conventional CABG in selected individuals with MV-CAD.

Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus drug-eluting stents for patients with stable isolated proximal left anterior descending disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare the midterm outcomes of patients with isolated left anterior descending disease (iLAD) who underwent robotically assisted coronary artery bypass graft (R-CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stents (DES).

METHOD

Clinic data was collected in 223 patients who underwent R-CABG in our hospital between July, 2007 to November, 2014. Cardiology Database System of our hospital was used to identify 4047 patients who underwent PCI with DES for LAD lesion between April, 2011 to November, 2014. Total 496 patients received DES and 108 patients underwent R-CABG after screening. Patients were propensity matched into 108 R-CABG and DES pairs according to vital statistic. Mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat target lesion revascularization (r-TLR), main adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), and angina relief were compared across pairs.

RESULT

Kaplan-Meier estimates for R-CABG and DES had no significant difference in mortality (p = 1.00), MI (p = .32), Stroke (p = .80), and MACCE (p = .47), but the rate of r-TLR (p = .03) were lower in R-CABG group. Patients who underwent R-CABG had better angina relief (p = .02), lower rate of arrhythmia (p < .001), and recurrent angina (p = .02) after operation compared patients received DES.

CONCLUSION

R-CABG offers lower r-TLR rate and better angina relief compared with DES for revascularization in patients with isolated proximal LAD stenosis and there was no difference in mortality, MI, stroke, and MACCE between them.