Residual root fate after aortic surgery in bicuspid aortic valve with right-to-left fusion: A comparative risk analysis

Early surgical outcomes in the composite-valve root replacement with bioprosthesis after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of composite-valve root replacement with bioprosthesis (b-CVRR) after acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) repair.

METHODS

We included 41 patients who underwent b-CVRR after surgery for AAAD from 2007 to 2022. We excluded seven patients with VSRR, three with mechanical valve use, one with mycotic aneurysm, and one with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

RESULTS

The overlapping surgical indications for b-CVRR were pseudoaneurysm in 21 patients (51.2%), severe AI in 19 (46.3%), re-dissection in 15 (36.6%), root dilatation (> 50 mm) in 12 (41.5%), and rupture in 3 (7.3%). The coronary artery reconstruction methods were bilateral Carrel patch in 13 patients (32%), Carrel patch with Piehler in 16 patients (38%), bilateral Piehler in six patients (15%), and Piehler with coronary artery bypass (CABG) in six patients (15%). Four patients who underwent the Carrel patch technique required additional intraoperative CABG. Three hospital mortality occurred (7.3%; myonephropathic metabolic syndrome, heart failure, bleeding from the thyroid carotid artery without injury). No thrombosis of the reconstructed site was observed with the Piehler procedure.

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcomes for patients treated with b-CVRR after AAAD repair were acceptable. Intraoperative coronary artery events occurred due to stenosis caused by traction on the reconstructed coronary artery due to adhesions.

Residual root fate after aortic surgery in bicuspid aortic valve with right-to-left fusion: A comparative risk analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy might influence aortic aneurysm development, BAV-related root involvement still lacks standardized surgical management. We aimed to evaluate late clinical outcomes and risk factors for root dilation after proximal aortic replacement in patients with BAV and right-left fusion (RL-BAV).

METHODS

Clinical and echocardiographic data of all patients with intraoperative RL-BAV who underwent ascending aortic replacement with or without noncoronary sinus (NCS) replacement (Groups 1 and 2, respectively) between 1999 and 2017, were retrospectively revised. A multivariable analysis assessed hazard factors for root dilation during follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

Of 206 surgeries performed (M 81%; age: 57 ± 13 years, EuroSCORE II: 2.7 ± 1.9%), 79 (38%) required NCS replacement. One hundred fifty-seven patients (76%) underwent aortic valve replacement (with aortic regurgitation predominating in Group 1, p = .04). The preoperative aortic root was larger in patients requiring NCS replacement (43.3 ± 5.1 vs. 39.2 ± 4.8 mm, p < .001). At a median FU time of 7 years (interquartile range: 4-10), no residual root dissections occurred, and only two patients (belonging to Group 2) required redo root surgery. Preoperative mild aortic regurgitation and aortic root diameter >35 mm at discharge were risk factors for root dilation >40 mm at FU (p = .02). Aortic root did not dilate over time, irrespective of NCS replacement (p = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root in patients with RL-BAV undergoing ascending aortic replacement (±NCS replacement) does not significantly dilate over time, even if patients with preoperative aortic regurgitation and postoperative root more than 35 mm might require more surveillance.