Investigating Cardiac Temperature During Heart Transplantation Using the Static Cold Storage Paradigm

BACKGROUND

Static cold storage is a mainstay of the heart transplantation (HTx) process. However, the temperature distribution within the organ at each stage of HTx is unknown. In this study, we aimed to quantify how long it took for the heart to warm up and cool down and the nature of temperature distribution with the organ at each stage of HTx.

METHODS

We used high-fidelity computational time-varying biothermal modeling on an anatomical human heart model to model the HTx process in 5 interdependent stages, including cardioplegia, back-table preparation, static cold storage ice box storage and transport, back-table preparation at the recipient institution and warm-up within the recipient body before cross-clamp release.

RESULTS

Results indicate that the heart experiences roller-coaster-like temperature changes in stage, including rapid cool down from body temperature to <10 °C within 15 min in stage 1 with a maximum cooling rate of 5 °C/min. This was followed by cooling and extended duration of temperatures <2 °C in the ice box and rapid warming up to body temperature within 10 min at rates of 2 °C/min and 4 °C/min for the left and right sides, respectively, during implantation. Temperature distribution throughout the heart was heterogeneous, with right-sided temperature change occurring nearly 2× faster than on the left side.

CONCLUSIONS

We present, for the first time, detailed temperature distributions and evolution at each stage of HTx. Quantification of the rapid and heterogeneous temperature changes is crucial to optimize HTx and improve organ viability.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part II: Cardiac Transplantation

These highlights focus on research published in the year 2022 and is divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative sections. The preoperative section includes research on the assessment and optimization of candidates for heart transplantation; donor optimization and the use of extended donors; organ protection systems; donation after circulatory death allografts; recipient factors including cannabis use, sex, race, and comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy; the effects of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on waitlist and postoperative mortality; updates on heart transplantation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019; in pediatric patients; and those who require a bridge to transplant. The intraoperative section includes the use of a multidisciplinary team, a proposed transfusion algorithm, bench surgery on the allograft, and size matching. The postoperative section focuses on the research on the development and management of tricuspid regurgitation, echocardiography, arrhythmia management, and, finally, xenotransplantation.

Effects of Nighttime Procurement and Transplantation on Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the effects of nighttime procurement and transplantation on outcomes following heart transplantation.

METHODS

The UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent isolated orthotopic heart transplantation between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2022. The cohort was stratified into daytime (4 am-8 pm) and nighttime (8 pm-4 am) transplant groups. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Propensity score-matching was performed. Risk adjustment was performed using multivariable Cox regression. Restricted cubic spline was used to model the association between the time of transplantation and the likelihood of 1-year mortality. Sub-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of nighttime procurement.

RESULTS

Altogether 30 426 recipients were analyzed, where 10 807 recipients (35.5%) underwent nighttime transplantation. The nighttime recipients had reduced 1-year post-transplant survival compared to the daytime recipients (90.6% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.019), and this lower survival persisted in the propensity score-matched comparison. After adjusting for established predictors for post-transplant mortality, nighttime transplantation continued to have a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.21, p = 0.005). The spline model demonstrated increased odds of 1-year mortality between 5 pm and 4 am, with the highest odds at 11 pm (odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.47), compared to the reference transplantation time of 7 am. When assessing the impact of procurement timing, nighttime procurement negatively impacted 1-year post-transplant survival among the daytime recipients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the adverse impact of nighttime heart procurement and transplantation on early post-transplant survival. With emerging organ perfusion and thermal protection systems, additional studies are warranted to assess the safety of extending the heart preservation period to optimize the timing of transplantation.

Innovations in transplant techniques for complex anomalies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With advances in the field of congenital cardiac surgery and in the management of congenital heart defects in early life, the population of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is increasing. End-stage heart failure is currently the main cause of cardiovascular mortality and is expected to increase in the coming years. This review summarizes recent innovations in transplant techniques, with special attention to what is known in the population of ACHD recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of machine perfusion for heart preservation enables longer preservation times. Normothermic (organ care system - OCS) and hypothermic (hypothermic oxygenated perfusion - HOPE) machine perfusion will alleviate the time pressure associated with heart transplantation in the ACHD population, may allow for expansion of the geographical range in which donors can be matched and may improve graft quality. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation, either through direct procurement-machine perfusion (DP-MP) or thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) is a viable strategy to further expand the donor pool.

SUMMARY

The use of machine perfusion and DCD donors in ACHD is feasible and shows promise. Time pressure and shortage of donors is even more critical in ACHD than in other patient populations, making these innovations particularly relevant. Further clinical experience and research is needed to elucidate their impact.

Early Outcomes in Patients With LVAD Undergoing Heart Transplant via Use of the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant (HT) in recipients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is associated with poor early post-HT outcomes, including primary graft dysfunction (PGD). As complicated heart explants in recipients with LVADs may produce longer ischemic times, innovations in donor heart preservation may yield improved post-HT outcomes. The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System is an organ preservation technology that maintains donor heart temperatures between 4 °C and 8 °C, which may minimize ischemic and cold-induced graft injuries. This analysis sought to identify whether the use of SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage was associated with differential outcomes among patients with durable LVAD undergoing HT.

METHODS

Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation-Heart (NCT04141605) is a multicenter registry assessing post-HT outcomes comparing 2 methods of donor heart preservation: SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage. A retrospective review of all patients with durable LVAD who underwent HT was performed. Outcomes assessed included rates of PGD, post-HT mechanical circulatory support use, and 30-day and 1-year survival.

RESULTS

SherpaPak (n=149) and traditional cold storage (n=178) patients had similar baseline characteristics. SherpaPak use was associated with reduced PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.99]; P=0.045) and severe PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.75]; P=0.009), despite an increased total ischemic time in the SherpaPak group. Propensity matched analysis also noted a trend toward reduced intensive care unit (SherpaPak 7.5±6.4 days versus traditional cold storage 11.3±18.8 days; P=0.09) and hospital (SherpaPak 20.5±11.9 days versus traditional cold storage 28.7±37.0 days; P=0.06) lengths of stay. The 30-day and 1-year survival was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SherpaPak use was associated with improved early post-HT outcomes among patients with LVAD undergoing HT. This innovation in preservation technology may be an option for HT candidates at increased risk for PGD.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04141605.

A Paradigm Shift in Heart Preservation: Improved Post-transplant Outcomes in Recipients of Donor Hearts Preserved With the SherpaPak System

Traditional ice storage has been the historic standard for preserving donor's hearts. However, this approach provides variability in cooling, increasing risks of freezing injury. To date, no preservation technology has been reported to improve survival after transplantation. The Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) is a controlled hypothermic technology clinically used since 2018. Real-world evidence on clinical benefits of SCTS compared to conventional ice cold storage (ICS) was evaluated. Between October 2015 and January 2022, 569 US adults receiving donor hearts preserved and transported either in SCTS (n = 255) or ICS (n = 314) were analyzed from the Global Utilization And Registry Database for Improved heArt preservatioN (GUARDIAN-Heart) registry. Propensity matching and a subgroup analysis of >240 minutes ischemic time were performed to evaluate comparative outcomes. Overall, the SCTS cohort had significantly lower rates of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) ( p = 0.03). When propensity matched, SCTS had improving 1-year survival ( p = 0.10), significantly lower rates of severe PGD ( p = 0.011), and lower overall post-transplant MCS utilization ( p = 0.098). For patients with ischemic times >4 hours, the SCTS cohort had reduced post-transplant MCS utilization ( p = 0.01), reduced incidence of severe PGD ( p = 0.005), and improved 30-day survival ( p = 0.02). A multivariate analysis of independent risk factors revealed that compared to SCTS, use of ice results in a 3.4-fold greater chance of severe PGD ( p = 0.014). Utilization of SCTS is associated with a trend toward increased post-transplant survival and significantly lower severe PGD and MCS utilization. These findings fundamentally challenge the decades-long status quo of transporting donor hearts using ice.

Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using a Temperature-controlled Hypothermic Storage System

BACKGROUND

The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System is a novel technology that provides stable, optimal hypothermic control during organ transport. The objectives of this study were to describe our experience using the SherpaPak system and to compare outcomes after heart transplantation after using SherpaPak versus the conventional static cold storage method (non-SherpaPak).

METHODS

From 2018 to June 2021, 62 SherpaPak and 186 non-SherpaPak patients underwent primary heart transplantation at Stanford University with follow-up through May 2022. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points were postoperative complications. Optimal variable ratio matching, cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Before matching, the SherpaPak versus non-SherpaPak patients were older and received organs with significantly longer total allograft ischemic time. After matching, SherpaPak patients required fewer units of blood product for perioperative transfusion compared with non-SherpaPak patients but otherwise had similar postoperative outcomes such as hospital length of stay, primary graft dysfunction, inotrope score, mechanical circulatory support use, cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, new renal failure requiring dialysis, postoperative bleeding or tamponade requiring reoperation, infection, and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this is one of the first retrospective comparison studies that evaluated the outcomes of heart transplantation using organs preserved and transported via the SherpaPak system. Given the excellent outcomes, despite prolonged total allograft ischemic time, it may be reasonable to adopt the SherpaPak system to accept organs from a remote location to further expand the donor pool.