Risk factors of bronchial dehiscence after primary lung transplantation

Impact of Early Tracheostomy After Lung Transplantation: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prolonged mechanical ventilation is common among lung transplant recipients, affecting nearly one-third of patients. Tracheostomy has been shown as a beneficial alternative to endotracheal intubation, but delays in tracheostomy tube placement persist. To date, no large-scale study has investigated the effect of tracheostomy timing on posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

All adults receiving tracheostomy after primary, isolated lung transplantation were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Early tracheostomy was defined as placement before postoperative day 8 based on exploratory cohort analysis. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association of early tracheostomy with in-hospital mortality, select posttransplant complications, and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 11,048 patients undergoing first-time lung transplantation, 1509 required a tracheostomy in the postoperative period, with 783 (51.9%) comprising the early cohort. After entropy balancing and risk adjustment, early tracheostomy placement was associated with reduced odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97) and posttransplant infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82). Further, tracheostomy within 1 week of transplantation was associated with decreased length of stay (β-coefficient, -16.5 days; 95% CI, -25.3 to -7.6 days) and index hospitalization costs (β-coefficient, -$97,600; 95% CI, -$153,000 to -$42,100).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the safety of early tracheostomy among lung transplant recipients and highlights several potential benefits. Among appropriately selected patients, tracheostomy placement before postoperative day 8 may facilitate early discharge, lower costs, and reduced odds of posttransplant infection.

Pulmonary transplant complications: a radiologic review

Lung transplantation has become the definitive treatment for end stage respiratory disease. Numbers and survival rates have increased over the past decade, with transplant recipients living longer and with greater comorbidities, resulting in greater complexity of care. Common and uncommon complications that occur in the immediate, early, intermediate, and late periods can have significant impact on the course of the transplant. Fortunately, advancements in surgery, medical care, and imaging as well as other diagnostics work to prevent, identify, and manage complications that would otherwise have a negative impact on survivability. This review will focus on contextualizing complications both categorically and chronologically, with highlights of specific imaging and clinical features in order to inform both radiologists and clinicians involved in post-transplant care.

Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury and Long-Term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study sought to characterize perioperative risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) and report outcomes associated with its development in the immediate postoperative setting after lung transplantation.

METHODS

Study investigator performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing primary lung transplantation at a single institution from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021 AKI was defined using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria after lung transplantation and was stratified on the basis of whether patients required renal replacement therapy (RRT; AKI-no RRT vs AKI-RRT).

RESULTS

Of the 754 patients included, 369 (48.9%) any AKI developed in the postoperative period (252 AKI-no RRT vs 117 AKI-RRT). Risk factors for postoperative AKI included higher preoperative creatinine levels (odds ratio [OR], 5.15; P < .001), lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.99; P < 0.018), delayed chest closure (OR, 2.72; P < .001), and higher volumes of postoperative blood products (OR, 1.09; P < .001) in the multivariable analysis. On univariate analysis, both AKI groups were also associated with higher rates of pneumonia (P < .001), reintubation (P < .001), mortality on index admission (P < 0.001), longer ventilator duration (P < .001), longer intensive care unit length of stay (P < .001), and longer hospital length of stay (P < .001), with the highest rates in the AKI-RRT group. In a multivariable survival analysis, postoperative AKI-no RRT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; P = .006) and AKI-RRT (HR, 2.70; P < .001) were associated with significantly worse survival independent of severe grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (HR, 1.45; P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of postoperative AKI was associated with numerous preoperative and intraoperative factors. Postoperative AKI remained significantly associated with poorer posttransplantation survival. Severe cases of AKI necessitating RRT portended the worst survival after lung transplantation.

Infectious complications associated with bronchial anastomotic dehiscence in lung transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Bronchial anastomotic dehiscence (AD) is an uncommon complication following lung transplantation that carries significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to characterize fungal and bacterial infections in ADs, including whether infections following AD were associated with progression to bronchial stenosis.

METHODS

This was a single-center study of 615 lung transplant recipients between 6/1/2015 and 12/31/2021. Airway complications were defined according to ISHLT consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

22 of the 615 recipients (3.6%) developed an AD. Bronchial ischemia or necrosis was common prior to dehiscence (68.1%). Fourteen (63.6%) recipients had bacterial airway infections, most commonly with Gram-negative rods, prior to dehiscence. Thirteen (59.1%) recipients had an associated pleural infection, most commonly with Candida species (30.8%). Post-dehiscence Aspergillus species were isolated in 4 recipients, 3 of which were de novo infections. Eleven had bacterial infections prior to dehiscence resolution, most commonly with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eleven recipients developed airway stenosis requiring dilation and/or stenting. Development of secondary infection prior to AD resolution was not associated with progression to stenosis (OR = .41, 95% CI = .05-3.30, p = .41).

CONCLUSIONS

Gram-negative bacterial infections are common before and after AD. Pleural infection should be suspected in most cases. Infections prior to healing were not associated with subsequent development of airway stenosis.

Induction Strategies in Lung Transplantation: Alemtuzumab vs. Basiliximab a Single-Center Experience

Background

Induction therapy is used in about 80% of lung transplant centers and is increasing globally. Currently, there are no standards or guidelines for the use of induction therapy. At our institution, we have two induction strategies, basiliximab, and alemtuzumab. The goal of this manuscript is to share our experience and practice since this is an area of controversy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 807 lung transplants performed at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Indications for the use of the basiliximab protocol were as follows: patients over the age of 70 years, history of cancer, hepatitis C virus or human immunodeficiency virus infection history, and cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus (donor positive/ recipient negative). In the absence of these clinical factors, the alemtuzumab protocol was used.

Results

453 patients underwent alemtuzumab induction and 354 patients underwent basiliximab. There were significant differences in delayed chest closure (24.7% alemtuzumab vs 31.4% basiliximab, p = 0.037), grade 3 primary graft dysfunction observed within 72 hours (19.9% alemtuzumab vs 29.9% basiliximab, p = 0.002), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (8.8% alemtuzumab vs 14.7% basiliximab, p = 0.009), acute cellular rejection in first year (39.1% alemtuzumab vs 53.4% basiliximab, p < 0.001). The overall survival rate of the patients with alemtuzumab induction was significantly higher than those of the patients with basiliximab induction (5 years survival rate: 64.1% alemtuzumab vs 52.3%, basiliximab, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed lower 5-year survival for basiliximab induction (HR = 1.41, p = 0.02), recipient cytomegalovirus positive (HR = 1.49, p = 0.01), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (HR = 2.20, p < 0.001), and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (HR = 2.27, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this single center retrospective review, there was a significant difference in survival rates between induction strategies. This outcome may be attributable to differences in recipient characteristics between the groups. However, the Alemtuzumab group experienced less episodes of acute cellular rejection within the first year.