Extended follow-up of the standard Hancock porcine bioprosthesis

Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Follow-up Studies

BACKGROUND

Porcine and pericardial valves exhibited similar freedom from structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement. Limited data exist regarding their durability at long-term follow-up in the mitral position.

METHODS

A literature search was performed through online databases. Papers reporting freedom from tissue valve deterioration after mitral valve replacement with a follow-up longer than 5 years were retrieved. Four porcine valves (Carpentier-Edwards [Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA] and Hancock, Hancock II, and Mosaic [Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN]) and 1 pericardial prosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards) were the objects of the study. The structural valve deterioration (SVD) rate per year was calculated for each type of prosthesis. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test analysis were performed to compare the long-term durability of porcine and pericardial valves.

RESULTS

Forty full-text papers including more than 15,000 patients were considered for the meta-analysis. Porcine valves were generally implanted in younger patients in the first period after their introduction. The mean age of the patients receiving a mitral bioprosthesis increased from 50 to 70 years over the decades. In patients operated after 1980 who had similar mean age at the time of implant, freedom from SVD was higher in the group of porcine valves with Mosaic prosthesis, showing the lowest rate of SVD. Long-term survival was higher for Mosaic porcine and Carpentier pericardial valves.

CONCLUSIONS

In surgical populations that underwent mitral valve replacement after 1980 with new generation tissue valves and similar mean age at the implant time, we found, at long-term follow-up, a higher freedom from SVD in the group of porcine prostheses.

Biosa bileaflet pericardial valve

BACKGROUND

BIOSA is a single sheet, two-cuspal-shaped ("bileaflet") glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardial valve prosthesis (BP), designed to minimize stress and prevent mechanical failure. We tested this device in the adult sheep model.

METHODS

Seven BIOSA and two Baxter Carpentier-Edwards (Perimount) pericardial BPs, 25 mm in size, were implanted in the tricuspid position of adult sheep. A mid term BIOSA explant (81 days) died of infective endocarditis. The remaining BPs were divided in three early explants (0-3 days: two BIOSA and one Perimount) and five late explants (162-189 days: four BIOSA and one Perimount). Protocol of the study included gross examination, mammography X-ray (score 0-4), histology, scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy and atomic absorption spectroscopy.

RESULTS

(a) Early explants: The mesothelium was detached, collagen-elastic fibers and pericardiocytes of the fibrosa showed optimal preservation. Calcium content in BIOSA BPs was 6.22 mg/g dry weight (mean) versus 7.75 mg/g of the Perimount BP. (b) Late explants: At naked eye all BPs showed regular cusp pliability and coaptation, without tears, perforations, fibrous pannus or calcific deposits. X-ray was either negative (three BPs) or exhibited score 1 (two BPs). Microscopic features were excellent both in terms of collagen-elastic fibers preservation and absence of inflammation. The calcium content was 4.95 mg/g dry weight (mean) in BIOSA BPs versus 5.29 mg/g in the Perimount BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue characteristics of BIOSA BPs were optimal, without difference with Perimount BPs and in this animal model no case of structural valve deterioration occurred in the long term.

Over twenty-year follow-up of the standard Hancock porcine bioprosthesis implanted in the mitral position

BACKGROUND

To define the long-term results of 331 standard Hancock porcine bioprostheses implanted in the mitral position between 1973 and 1980.

METHODS

Of 331 patients (225 male patients, 68%), mean age 49+/-10 years (range 14 to 69 years), 88% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and 77% were in atrial fibrillation. Follow-up time extended more than 20 years (mean 13.9 years, range 0.3 to 24.7 years) for a total of 4,601 patient-years.

RESULTS

Overall operative mortality was 6.3%. At 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, the actuarial survival rate of patients were 71%+/-2%, 46%+/-3%, 30%+/-3%, and 22%+/-2%, respectively. Actuarial estimates of freedom from structural valve deterioration were 95%+/-1%, 67%+/-3%, 32%+/-3%, and 14%+/-3%; from reoperation were 96%+/-1%, 72%+/-3%, 36%+/-4%, and 18%+/-4%; from thromboembolism were 89%+/-2%, 82%+/-3%, 74%+/-4%, and 51%+/-2%; and from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage were 98%+/-1%, 96%+/-1%, 91%+/-1%, and 86%+/-4%. Estimates of freedom from all valve-related mortality at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 89%+/-2%, 76%+/-3%, 64%+/-4%, and 48%+/-4%. Multivariate analysis showed younger age to be a significant risk factor for reoperation. Age at operation did not correlate with structural valve deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term results with the standard Hancock bioprosthesis implanted in the mitral position appear satisfactory, particularly up to 15 years from implantation. Protection from stroke, anticoagulant hemorrhage, and endocarditis was good.

Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis: predictions based on meta-analysis and microsimulation

BACKGROUND

Bioprostheses are widely used as an aortic valve substitute, but knowledge about prognosis is still incomplete. The purpose of this study was to provide insight into the age-related life expectancy and actual risks of reoperation and valve-related events of patients after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a meta-analysis of 9 selected reports on stented porcine bioprostheses, including 5837 patients with a total follow-up of 31 874 patient-years. The annual rates of valve thrombosis, thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and nonstructural dysfunction were 0.03%, 0.87%, 0.38%, and 0.38%, respectively. The annual rate of endocarditis was estimated at 0.68% for >6 months of implantation and was 5 times as high during the first 6 months. Structural valve deterioration was described with a Weibull model that incorporated lower risks for older patients. These estimates were used to parameterize, calibrate, and validate a mathematical microsimulation model. The model was used to predict life expectancy and actual risks of reoperation and valve-related events after implantation for patients of different ages. For a 65-year-old male, these figures were 11.3 years, 28%, and 47%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of meta-analysis with microsimulation enabled a detailed insight into the prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis for patients of different ages. This information will be useful for patient counseling and clinical decision making. It also could serve as a baseline for the evaluation of newer valve types.

Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years

BACKGROUND

The role of porcine bioprostheses in cardiac valve replacement has been under review for several years. The literature deals primarily with age as a determinant of durability, as well as the intermediate-term performance of various prostheses. The performance of the Carpentier-Edwards first-generation standard porcine bioprosthesis is presented over the long-term with further documentation on age determinants.

METHODS

The "Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality After Cardiac Valvular Operations" were used for definitions of valve-related complications, categorization, and statistical methods. The valve-related complications were evaluated in a time-related manner by actuarial life-table techniques. The Lee-Desu statistic test was used for comparison of performance by valve positions and age groups. Hazard function rates were demonstrated for complications and composites.

RESULTS

Of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses implanted in 1,195 patients (1,214 operations, 1,315 valves) commencing in 1975 the early mortality was 7.6% (92). The early mortality without concomitant procedures was 6.1% and with 11.7%. The late mortality was 5.3% per patient-year; 4.6% patient-year without and 7.5% per patient-year with concomitant procedures. The valve-related causes of late mortality (131) were thromboembolism (41), antithromboembolic hemorrhage (14), prosthetic valve endocarditis (20), nonstructural dysfunction (12), and structural valve deterioration (44). The valve-related deaths (early, 7; late, 124) were 21.2% of the total 617 total deaths. Reoperation for valve-related complications was performed in 406 patients (4.1% per patient-year), of which 327 were for structural valve deterioration (3.3% per patient-year). Mortality for reoperation was 0.5% per patient-year (49 patients) or 12.1%. Of the 49 deaths, 33 were caused by structural valve deterioration. The linearized occurrence rate for thromboembolism was 1.6% per patient-year (major, 0.9% per patient-year, and minor, 0.7% per patient-year). The fatal thromboembolic rate was 0.4% per patient-year (41), undifferentiated by valve position. The freedom from thromboembolism was 76% at 17 years (p = not significant by valve position) (major, 87%; fatal, 93%). The freedom from prosthetic valve endocarditis was 92% at 17 years (p = not significant by valve position). The freedom from reoperation, at 15 years, was 38%: aortic (AVR), 55%; mitral (MVR), 20%; and multiple valve replacement (MR), 24% (p < 0.05 AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom from structural valve deterioration, at 15 years, was 41%; AVR, 58%; MVR, 21%; MR, 36% (p < 0.05 AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom from structural valve deterioration was greater for advancing age groups (p < 0.05); AVR > or = 70 years 96% at 12 years, and 65 to 69 years 94% at 12 years and 82% at 15 years; MVR > or = 70 years 85% at 12 years, and 65 to 69 years 54% at 12 years. The freedom from valve-related mortality was 73% at 17 years: AVR, 80%; ; MVR, 61%; and MR, 67% (p < 0.05 AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom valve-related residual morbidity was 94% (p = not significant by valve position).

CONCLUSIONS

The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis continues to provide satisfactory clinical performance to 17 years. Thromboembolism is a more serious problem than structural failure: 92 major thromboembolic events with 41 fatalities compared with 44 fatalities of which 33 occurred with reoperation. The prosthesis is especially recommended for patients more than 65 years of age for AVR and more than 70 years of age for MVR.

Porcine valve durability: a comparison between Hancock standard and Hancock II bioprostheses

Two series of patients who received a Hancock standard (HS) (1970 to 1983) and a Hancock II (HII) (1983 to 1992) porcine bioprosthesis were reviewed to compare bioprosthetic durability. Patients with HS porcine bioprostheses (n = 769) differed from those with HII bioprostheses mostly in mean age at operation (47 +/- 12 versus 62 +/- 9 years; p < 0.001); the latter prosthesis was implanted mostly in patients older than 50 years. At 8 years after operation, actuarial survival was 57% +/- 4% after aortic, 61% +/- 3% after mitral, and 39% +/- 7% after mitral-aortic valve replacement with the HS bioprosthesis; actuarial survival was 51% +/- 9% after aortic, 66% +/- 6% after mitral, and 49% +/- 10% after mitral and aortic valve replacement with an HII bioprosthesis. No cases of structural deterioration of HII bioprostheses were observed at 8 years in any patients. Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 78% +/- 4% after aortic, 88% +/- 3% after mitral, and 79% +/- 7% after mitral-aortic valve replacement with an HS bioprosthesis at 8 years. In all patients greater than 50 years of age, actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration at 8 years was 90% +/- 3% in patients with an HS bioprosthesis and 100% in those with an HII bioprosthesis (p = 0.08). A trend to an improved durability of the HII bioprosthesis compared with the HS was observed during the first 8 postoperative years. Because these results could be influenced partly by the age difference in the two series of patients, a longer follow-up is needed to confirm these data.

Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to twelve years

The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis, a second-generation biologic prosthesis, has had clinical performance assessment to 12 years. This bioprosthesis was used in 2,489 operations in 2,444 patients between 1982 and 1992, inclusive (mean age 64.1 years, age range 6 to 89 years). There were 1,335 aortic valve replacements (AVR), 938 mitral valve replacements (MVR), and 200 multiple valve replacements (MR). Concomitant procedures were performed in 1,017 cases (40.9%). The age group distribution was: 35 years or younger, 83 patients; 36 to 50 years, 245; 51 to 64 years, 728; 65 to 69 years, 458; and 70 years and older, 975. The total follow-up was 12,785 patient-years (mean, 5.1 years) and was 96% complete. The early mortality rate was 7.4% (185 patients), and the late mortality was 4.9%/patient year (623). Concomitant procedures influenced both early and late mortality (p < 0.05). The overall patient survival at 12 years was 44% +/- 3% (p < 0.05, AVR > MVR, MR). The freedom from thromboembolism was not different by valve position. The freedom from major thromboembolism at 12 years was 82% +/- 4% (p = not significant by valve position). The overall freedom from antithromboembolic hemorrhage was 96% +/- 1% at 12 years (p < 0.05, AVR > MVR > MR). The overall freedom from valve-related reoperation at 12 years was 58% +/- 5% (p < 0.05, AVR > MVR, MR), and from valve-related mortality 89% +/- 2% (p < 0.05, AVR > MVR > MR). The freedom from residual morbidity (permanent impairment) at 12 years was 87% +/- 4% (p = not significant by valve position).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Structural deterioration in Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses

The Carpentier-Edwards standard (CE-S) porcine bioprosthesis was implanted in 1214 operations (1975 to 1985) and the Carpentier-Edwards supraannular (CE-SAV) bioprosthesis was implanted in 2,489 operations (1982 to 1992 inclusive). The early mortality was 7.6% and 7.4% for the CE-S and CE-SAV groups, respectively; the late mortality was 5.3% per patient-year and 4.9% per patient-year, respectively. The cumulative follow-up was 9,968 patient-years for the CE-S group and 12,784 patient-years for the CE-SAV group. Concomitant procedures were performed in 26.8% of the patients who received a CE-S and in 40.9% of those who received a CE-SAV (p < 0.05). The mean age of the patients receiving a CE-S was 57.3 years (range, 8 to 85 years) and was 64.1 years (range, 6 to 89 years) in those receiving a CE-SAV. The CE-S group consisted of 578 atrial valve replacements (AVRs), 512 mitral valve replacements (MVRs), and 115 multiple valve replacements (MRs). The CE-SAV group consisted of 1,335 AVRs, 938 MVRs, and 200 MRs. There was a total of 165 cases of structural valve deterioration (SDV) in the CE-SAV group (AVR, 35; MVR, 98; and MR, 32). The effect of trimming the aortic wall was also considered: 20 of the 931 trimmed prostheses used for MVRs and MRs and none of the 207 reduced-trimmed prostheses exhibited SVD. The cumulative follow-up was 5,422 years for the patients with trimmed prostheses and 470 for those with reduced-trimmed prostheses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis: excellent durability at intermediate-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the clinical performance and durability of a new generation of porcine valve, the Hancock II bioprosthesis, at intermediate-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND

Standard porcine bioprostheses undergo progressive structural deterioration, mainly due to cusp and commissural calcification, affecting durability and requiring reoperation. The Hancock II bioprosthesis, which is currently undergoing clinical investigation, is made from a porcine aortic valve treated with a calcium-retarding agent (sodium dodecyl sulfate [T6]), which should delay onset of calcification and increase durability.

METHODS

From May 1983 to December 1992, we used the Hancock II bioprothesis in aortic (59 patients), mitral (101 patients) and mitral-aortic (25 patients), valve replacement procedures. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 8.7 years (mean [+/- SD] 4.5 +/- 2.6 years) and was 100% complete. Freedom from major postoperative events was calculated at 7 years for patients with aortic valve replacement and at 8 years for those with mitral and mitral-aortic valve replacement.

RESULTS

The actuarial survival rate was 48 +/- 10%, 76 +/- 3% and 63 +/- 6%; freedom from valve-related mortality was 91 +/- 4%, 94 +/- 2% and 89 +/- 6%; freedom from thromboembolism was 80 +/- 11%, 90 +/- 2% and 79 +/- 7%; and freedom from reoperation was 100%, 97 +/- 1% and 89 +/- 6% after aortic, mitral and mitral-aortic valve replacement, respectively. No structural valve deterioration occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

At intermediate-term follow-up the Hancock II bioprosthesis showed excellent durability in all positions. However, the effectiveness of anticalcification treatment must be assessed with longer follow-up studies.