Time spatial labeling inversion pulse magnetic resonance angiography in pregnancy with adenomyosis

Possible risks and benefits of adenomyomectomy on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is associated with unfavorable perinatal outcomes; however, the effect of an adenomyomectomy on pregnancy outcomes remains unclear. Pregnancy following an adenomyomectomy has been reported to be associated with a high risk for uterine rupture; however, the actual incidence remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adenomyomectomy on pregnancy outcomes by retrospectively comparing the pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent an adenomyomectomy with those of women with adenomyosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center retrospective study in which the pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent an adenomyomectomy and for whom complete resection of the affected tissue under laparotomy was achieved were compared with those of women with adenomyosis. The following pregnancy outcomes were examined: second-trimester miscarriage, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, spontaneous preterm delivery, preeclampsia, rate of cesarean delivery, blood loss during cesarean delivery, incidence of placenta accreta spectrum, neonatal body weight, and small for gestational age infants.

RESULTS

A total of 18 pregnant women who underwent an adenomyomectomy and 105 pregnant women with adenomyosis were included in this study. All women who underwent an adenomyomectomy delivered via cesarean delivery, and among them, 1 had a uterine rupture at 30 weeks of gestation. Although there was no significant difference between pregnant women who underwent an adenomyomectomy and those with adenomyosis in the incidence of second-trimester miscarriage (0% [0/18] vs 7.6% [8/105], respectively; P=.22), preterm delivery (50% [9/18] vs 32% [34/105], respectively; P=.15), and spontaneous preterm delivery (6% [1/18] vs 15% [16/105], respectively; P=.26), a significant decrease in preterm prelabor rupture of membrane (0% [0/18] vs 12% [13/105], respectively; P<.05), preeclampsia (0% [0/18] vs 12% [13/105], respectively; P<.05), and small for gestational infants (0% [0/18] vs 15% [16/105], respectively; P<.05), as well as a significant increase in the incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (50% [9/18] vs 0% [0/105], respectively; P<.01) and blood loss during cesarean delivery (1748 mL vs 1330 mL, respectively; P<.05) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Uterine rupture following an adenomyomectomy may occur because of the high incidence of placenta accreta spectrum. However, an adenomyomectomy may reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with adenomyosis, such as preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, and small for gestational age infants. An adenomyomectomy may be a viable option for women among whom the procedure is inevitable before conception.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy on Perinatal Outcomes

Objectives

The objective of this study was to observe the influence of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy on perinatal outcomes.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective cohort study included 43 pregnant cases with adenomyosis who did not undergo laparoscopic surgery before pregnancy (nonsurgery group; 26 cases) and did (surgery group; 17 cases). To evaluate the impact of surgery on perinatal outcomes, nine obstetric complications including preterm delivery, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, placental malposition, oligohydramnios, gestational diabetes mellitus, uterine rupture, abruptio placentae, and postpartum hemorrhage were selected. One obstetric complication was counted as one point (Maximum 9 points for one person). The obstetrical morbidity was compared by adding up the number of relevant events (0-9) between the two groups. Apgar score, umbilical artery pH (UApH), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were also examined.

Results

The surgery group had a significantly lower prevalence of fetal growth restriction compared to the nonsurgery group (nonsurgery vs. surgery; 26.9%, 7/26 vs. 0%, 0/17: P = 0.031). No differences were found in the morbidity of the nine obstetric complications (19.2%, 45/234 vs. 13.7%, 21/153), gestational weeks (mean ± standard deviation, 37.2 ± 2.4 vs. 36.4 ± 3.2), birth weight (2573.6 ± 557.9 vs. 2555.4 ± 680.8 g), Apgar score (1, 5 min; 8.0 ± 0.7 vs. 7.7 ± 1.2, 8.9 ± 0.6 vs. 8.5 ± 1.8), UApH (7.28 ± 0.08 vs. 7.28 ± 0.06), NICU admission (26.9%, 7/26 vs. 41.2%, 7/17), and neonatal death (0%, 0%) between both groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy may not increase obstetric complications, although attention must be paid to uterine rupture during pregnancy.

Increased risk of obstetric complications in patients with adenomyosis: A narrative literature review

Background

Reproductive‐age women occasionally face the pathological condition of adenomyosis, which is often concurrent with endometriosis. It is believed that endometriosis and adenomyosis increases the risk of obstetric complications. Although new insights into the mechanism of obstetric complications due to endometriosis are emerging, there is little information on the etiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with adenomyosis.

Methods

We performed a literature review focusing on the pathophysiological pathways of obstetric complications in women with adenomyosis using currently available basic and clinical studies. We used the internet search engines PubMed and Google Scholar to search for studies published between January 2000 and June 2021. We carefully read pertinent sections within each document to ensure relevancy.

Main findings

The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis is increased after adjusting for conceiving by assisted reproductive technology. Thus, adenomyosis emerges as a relevant factor associated with several obstetric complications such as preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, small for gestational age/fetal growth restriction, and preeclampsia.

Conclusion

It is plausible that the impact of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes is not always the same; rather it is dependent on the degree of uterine involvement and subtypes.

Adenomyosis and infertility: the role of the junctional zone

OBJECTIVE

Adenomyosis is a benign uterine disorder characterized by the invasion of the endometrium within the myometrium, starting from the junctional zone (JZ), the inner hormone dependent layer of the myometrium that plays an important role in sperm transport, implantation and placentation. The resulting histological abnormalities and functional defects may represent the pathogenic substrate for infertility and pregnancy complications. The objective of this paper is to review the literature to evaluate the correlation between inner myometrium alterations and infertility and to assess the role of JZ in the origin of adverse obstetric outcomes of both spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies.

METHODS

we searched Pubmed for all original and review articles in the English language from January1962 until December 2019, using the MeSH terms of 'adenomyosis', 'junctional zone', combined with 'infertility', 'obstetrical outcomes', 'spontaneous conception', 'in vitro fertilization' and 'classification'. The review was divided into three sections to assess this pathogenic correlation, evaluating also the importance of classification of the disease.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Absent or incomplete remodeling of the JZ can affect uterine peristalsis, alter vascular plasticity of the spiral arteries and activate inflammatory pathways, all related to adverse obstetric outcomes. Despite these observations, there is still limited evidence whether adenomyosis is a cause of infertility. However, it is reasonable to screen patients for adenomyosis, to consider pregnant women with diffuse adenomyosis at high risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, and to evaluate the importance of a noninvasive validated classification in the management of women with adenomyosis.

Perinatal outcomes associated with the positional relationship between the placenta and the adenomyosis lesion

INTRODUCTION

Although various perinatal complications have been reported to be increased in the pregnant patients with adenomyosis, it is not clear what type of patients with adenomyosis is more likely to cause obstetric complications. In this study, we focused on the positional relationship between the placenta and adenomyosis lesion in evaluating perinatal prognosis of pregnant patients with adenomyosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2019 in a single institution. Adenomyosis was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). To evaluate the influence of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes, we classified the positional relationship between the placenta and the adenomyosis lesion into two groups and examined the perinatal prognosis of the patients with adenomyosis by analyzing their clinical records. Group I (n = 9) was defined when the placenta was not overlaid on adenomyosis lesion. Group II (n = 11) was defined when a part of the placenta was overlaid on adenomyosis lesion.

RESULTS

Twenty pregnant patients with adenomyosis were analyzed. There were no differences in clinical backgrounds between group I and group II. There was a significant increase in the obstetric morbidity in group II than that of Group I(group I: 6.3%, 4/63 vs group II: 18.6%, 26/77; P < 0.001). In group II, fetal growth restriction (FGR) was more frequent (0%, 0/9 vs 45.5%, 5/11; P = 0.042) and the birth weight was significantly lower than that in group I (2951.1 g ± 326.5 g vs 2318.9 ± 656.1 g; P = 0.037). There was a trend of lighter weight of the placenta in group II (550.6 ± 66.5 g vs 437.5 ± 117.8 g; P = 0.063) and the volume of bleeding during delivery was a higher trend in group II than that in group I (845.1 ± 367.1 g vs 1356 ± 604.8 g; P = 0.083). Group II was furtherly subdivided into group IIa (less than half the major axis of the placenta overlaid on adenomyosis lesion) and group IIb (more than half the major axis of placenta overlaid on adenomyosis lesion). The obstetric morbidity tended to be higher in group IIb than in group IIa (group IIa: 22.9%, 8/35 vs group IIb: 42.9%, 18/42); P = 0.09). In group IIb, the frequency of FGR was significantly higher (group IIa: 0%, 0/5 vs IIb: 83.3%, 5/6; P = 0.020) and the birth weight was significantly lower than those in group IIa (2656.8 ± 231.9 g vs 2037 ± 780.1 g; P = 0.040). All cases of FGR, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), and oligohydramnios were observed in group IIb.

CONCLUSION

Placental localization near adenomyosis may increase the risk of perinatal complications.

Adverse obstetrical outcomes for women with endometriosis and adenomyosis: A large cohort of the Japan Environment and Children's Study

BACKGROUND

Because of the increased number of diagnosed cases of endometriosis or adenomyosis resulting in infertility, many women require assisted reproductive technology (ART) to become pregnant. However, incidences of obstetric complications are increased for women who conceive using ART. There has been no prospective cohort study examining the influence of endometriosis and adenomyosis on obstetric outcomes after adjusting for the confounding influence of ART therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the impact of endometriosis and adenomyosis on the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were obtained from a prospective cohort study, known as the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS), of the incidence of obstetric complications for women with endometriosis and adenomyosis. The data of 103,099 pregnancies that resulted in live birth or stillbirth or that were terminated through abortion between February 2011 and July 2014 in Japan were included.

RESULTS

Women with endometriosis or adenomyosis were at increased risk for complications during pregnancy compared to those without a medical history of endometriosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.41) or adenomyosis (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.16). Our analysis showed that the adjusted ORs for obstetric complications of pregnant women who conceived naturally or after infertility treatment that did not involve ART therapy were 1.26 (CI, 1.17 to 1.35) for pregnant women with a history of endometriosis and 1.52 (CI, 1.19 to 1.94) for those with a history of adenomyosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of endometriosis and adenomyosis significantly increased the prevalence of obstetric complications after adjusting for the influence of ART outcomes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes after uterine adenomyosis

BACKGROUND

Studies on the impact of adenomyosis and its pregnancy complications have yielded conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with adenomyosis relative to women without adenomyosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to June 15, 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Observational studies with medically confirmed pregnancy outcomes as endpoints.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two researchers independently screened and selected relevant studies. Dichotomous data for all adverse pregnancy outcomes were expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and combined in a meta-analysis by using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies (322 cases and 9420 controls) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Women with adenomyosis had an increased likelihood of preterm birth (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 2.08-4.47; P˂0.001), small for gestational age (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.71-6.08; P˂0.001), and pre-eclampsia (OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.07-17.72; P=0.042).

CONCLUSION

Adenomyosis seems to have a detrimental impact on pregnancy outcomes, resulting in a higher likelihood of preterm birth, small for gestational age, and pre-eclampsia.

Influence of adenomyosis on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have investigated the correlation between endometriosis and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. However, the role of adenomyosis as a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in women with endometriosis has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to explore if fetal and maternal outcomes, in particular the incidence of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant, are different in pregnant women with endometriosis only from in those with the concomitant presence of diffuse or focal adenomyosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively during a 3-year period. We included 206 pregnant women with endometriosis: 148 (71.8%) with endometriosis only, 38 (18.4%) with focal adenomyosis and 20 (9.7%) with diffuse adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was diagnosed using ultrasonography and was classified as focal or diffuse. The study included patients who conceived spontaneously or by an assisted reproductive technique. Demographics, ultrasound variables and outcome were compared between women with endometriosis only and those with diffuse and those with focal adenomyosis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of variables with SGA at birth in women with diffuse and those with focal adenomyosis.

RESULTS

The three groups were similar in demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, mode of conception). Patients with diffuse adenomyosis compared with those with endometriosis only had significantly lower pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (0.61 vs 0.88 multiple of the median, P < 0.001), higher mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the first (2.23 vs 1.67, P < 0.001) and second (1.30 vs 0.94, P < 0.001) trimesters of pregnancy, and higher incidence of SGA (40% vs 10.8%, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in patients with focal adenomyosis compared with those with endometriosis only. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that diffuse adenomyosis (odds ratio = 3.744; 95% CI, 1.158-12.099; P = 0.027) was the only independent risk factor for SGA.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of diffuse adenomyosis in pregnant women with endometriosis is strongly associated with delivery of a SGA infant. Women with diffuse adenomyosis should be treated as being at high risk of placental dysfunction, and these pregnancies might therefore need closer monitoring. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Complications and outcomes of pregnant women with adenomyosis in Japan

Purpose

To investigate the impact of adenomyosis on the complications and outcomes of pregnancy in Japan.

Methods

We carried out a multicenter retrospective questionnaire survey. A questionnaire regarding pregnancy complications and the outcomes of pregnancy was sent to 725 facilities.

Results

Data were obtained on the cases of 272 pregnant women with adenomyosis from 65 facilities. The complications of pregnancy included miscarriage before 12 weeks of pregnancy (14.8%), miscarriage after 12 weeks of pregnancy (9.9%), preterm delivery (24.4%), fetal growth restriction (11.8%), pregnancy‐induced hypertension (9.9%), intrauterine infection (7.3%), and cervical incompetency (5.3%). The rates of pregnancy complications in the three groups classified according to pretreatment for adenomyosis (no pretreatment, medication, surgery) did not differ to a statistically significant extent. The rates of miscarriage (>12 weeks) and cervical incompetency increased according to the size of the adenomyosis. The rates of pregnancy‐induced hypertension and uterine infection in patients with diffuse‐type adenomyosis were higher than that in patients with focal‐type adenomyosis.

Conclusions

Our results show that the increased size and diffuse type of adenomyosis are associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. We should be aware of the higher incidence of pregnancy‐induced hypertension and uterine infection in patients with diffuse‐type adenomyosis.

The Role of Adenomyosis in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia

INTRODUCTION

Adenomyosis can cause defective deep placentation. Preeclampsia is known to be associated with abnormal placentation. The aim of this study was to compare the presence of adenomyosis on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with and without history of preeclampsia in order to investigate the possible role of adenomyosis in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized study consisted of patients with (n = 35) and without (n = 34) history of preeclampsia. Direct (submucosal microcysts, adenomyoma and cystic adenomyoma) and indirect (maximal thickness of junctional zone, ratio of maximal thickness of junctional zone to myometrial thickness, junctional zone differential, focal thickening of junctional zone, globally enlarged uterus and non-uniform junctional zone contours) signs of adenomyosis were assessed by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

The prevalence of adenomyosis was found to be more common in patients with preeclampsia und fetal growth restriction compared to patients without fetal growth restriction (94.4 vs. 64.7 %; p = 0.041), respectively. There was a strong association between maximal thickness of junctional zone (9 vs. 13 mm, p = 0.005), ratio of maximal thickness of junctional zone to myometrial thickness (0.42 vs. 0.66, p = 0.001) and junctional zone differential (3 vs. 5 mm, p = 0.02) and late-onset preeclampsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of adenomyoma is more common in patients with preeclampsia complicated with fetal growth restriction. Indirect signs of adenomyosis detected on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging might have a role in the pathogenesis of late-onset preeclampsia.