Thrombelastography coagulation index may be a predictor of venous thromboembolism in gynecological oncology patients

Characteristics of blood clotting on thromboelastography in patients with early burns

BACKGROUND

Thromboelastography (TEG) is a viscoelastic test that may be used to evaluate the hemostatic function of whole blood, and it may be useful for burn patients with multiple hemostatic defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients with burns between January 2019 and July 2021. Blood samples were drawn on admission and subjected to coagulation parameter assessment, including conventional coagulation tests and TEG assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to predict the occurrence of complications in patients with early burns.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients with early burns met the inclusion criteria. Patients with minor, moderate, severe, and extremely severe burns accounted for 19.4 %, 36.6 %, 16.1 %, and 27.9 % of all patients, respectively. Compared with the healthy controls, patients with early burns showed significant reductions in the R and K values, and significant elevation in the maximum amplitude (MA), coagulation index (CI), and alpha angle. Compared with minor and moderate burn patients, patients with severe and extremely severe burns had lower K values and thrombin time and higher alpha angle, CI, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, D-dimer, and fibrin degradation products. Patients with hypercoagulation had lower R and K values, longer MA, longer CI, and greater alpha angle. After ROC analysis, the areas under the ROC curve for acute lung injury, acute kidney injury, and bleeding were 0.789, 0.802, and 0.900, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TEG provides insight into the hemostatic state of patients with early burns, and can predict complications in early burn patients when combined with conventional coagulation tests.

Establishment and validation of a nomogram based on coagulation parameters to predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

In recent years, multiple coagulation and fibrinolysis (CF) indexes have been reported to be significantly related to the progression and prognosis of some cancers.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to comprehensively analyze the value of CF parameters in prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

The preoperative coagulation related data, clinicopathological information, and survival data of patients with pancreatic tumor were collected retrospectively. Mann Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied to analyze the differences of coagulation indexes between benign and malignant tumors, as well as the roles of these indexes in PC prognosis prediction.

RESULTS

Compared with benign tumors, the preoperative levels of some traditional coagulation and fibrinolysis (TCF) indexes (such as TT, Fibrinogen, APTT, and D-dimer) were abnormally increased or decreased in patients with pancreatic cancer, as well as Thromboelastography (TEG) parameters (such as R, K, α Angle, MA, and CI). Kaplan Meier survival analysis based on resectable PC patients showed that the overall survival (OS) of patients with elevated α angle, MA, CI, PT, D-dimer, or decreased PDW was markedly shorter than other patients; moreover, patients with lower CI or PT have longer disease-free survival. Further univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that PT, D-dimer, PDW, vascular invasion (VI), and tumor size (TS) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of PC. According to the results of modeling group and validation group, the nomogram model based on independent risk factors could effectively predict the postoperative survival of PC patients.

CONCLUSION

Many abnormal CF parameters were remarkably correlated with PC prognosis, including α Angle, MA, CI, PT, D-dimer, and PDW. Furthermore, only PT, D-dimer, and PDW were independent prognostic indicators for poor prognosis of PC, and the prognosis prediction model based on these indicators was an effective tool to predict the postoperative survival of PC.

Predictive factors on postoperative venous thromboembolism after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and preventable postoperative complication. However, the predictive significance of perioperative biochemical parameters for VTE after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 149 patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery were collected between October 2021 and October 2022. Biochemical parameters related to preoperative and postoperative day 1, day 3, and day 5 were collected, including D-Dimer, mean platelet volume (MPV), and maximum amplitude (MA) of thromboelastography (TEG). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to explore the predictive powers of meaningful biochemical parameters for postoperative VTE, and calibration curves were used to assess predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

The overall cumulative incidence of VTE was 8.1% (12/149). The preoperative and postoperative day 3 D-Dimer, postoperative day 3, and day 5 MPV, and postoperative day 1, day 3, and day 5 TEG-MA was significantly higher in the VTE group than in the non-VTE group (P < 0.05). The results of both the ROC curve and the calibration curve indicated that these meaningful D-Dimer, MPV, and TEG-MA had moderate discrimination and consistency for postoperative VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

D-Dimer, MPV, and TEG-MA may predict postoperative VTE in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer at specific times in the perioperative period.

What Proportion of Patients With Musculoskeletal Tumors Demonstrate Thromboelastographic Markers of Hypercoagulability? A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Thromboelastography (TEG) is a point-of-care venipuncture test that measures the elasticity and strength of a clot formed from a patient's blood, providing a more comprehensive analysis of a patient's coagulation status than conventional measures of coagulation. TEG includes four primary markers: R-time, which measures the time to clot initiation and is a proxy for platelet function; K-value, which measures the time for said clot to reach an amplitude of 20 mm and is a proxy for fibrin cross-linking; maximum amplitude (MA), which measures the clot's maximum amplitude and is a proxy for platelet aggregation; and LY30, which measures the percentage of clot lysis 30 minutes after reaching the MA and is a proxy for fibrinolysis. Analysis of TEG-derived coagulation profiles may help surgeons identify patient-related and disease-related factors associated with hypercoagulability. TEG-derived coagulation profiles of patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions have yet to be characterized.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What TEG coagulation profile markers are most frequently aberrant in patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions presenting for surgery? (2) Among patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions presenting for surgery, what factors are more common in those with TEG-defined hypercoagulability? (3) Do patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions with preoperative TEG-defined hypercoagulability have a higher postoperative incidence of clinically symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) than those with a normal TEG profile?

METHODS

In this retrospective, pilot study, we analyzed preoperatively drawn TEG assays on 52 patients with either primary bone sarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, or metastatic disease to bone who were scheduled to undergo either tumor resection or nail stabilization. Between January 2020 and December 2021, our orthopaedic oncology service treated 410 patients in total. Of these, 13% (53 of 410 patients) had preoperatively drawn TEG assays. TEG assays were collected preincision as part of a division initiative to integrate the assay into a clinical care protocol for patients with primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma or metastatic disease to bone. Unfortunately, failures to adequately communicate this to our anesthesia colleagues on a consistent basis resulted in a low overall rate of assay draws from eligible patients. One patient on therapeutic anticoagulation preoperatively for the treatment of active VTE was excluded, leaving 52 patients eligible for analysis. We did not exclude patients taking prophylactic antiplatelet therapy preoperatively. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively. We analyzed factors (age, sex, tumor location, presence of metastases, and soft tissue versus bony disease) in reference to hypercoagulability, defined as a TEG result indicating supranormal clot formation (for example, reduced R-time, reduced K-value, or increased MA). Patients with clinical concern for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (typically painful swelling of the affected extremity) or pulmonary embolism (typically by dyspnea, tachycardia, and/or chest pain) underwent duplex ultrasonography or chest CT angiography, respectively, to confirm the diagnosis. Categorical variables were analyzed via a Pearson chi-square test and continuous variables were analyzed via t-test, with significance defined at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 60% (31 of 52) of patients had an abnormal preoperative TEG result. All abnormal TEG assay results demonstrated markers of hypercoagulability. The most frequent aberration was a reduced K-value (40% [21 of 52] of patients), followed by reduced R-time (35% [18 of 52] of patients) and increased MA (17% [9 of 52] of patients). The mean ± SD TEG markers were R-time: 4.3 ± 1.0, K-value: 1.2 ± 0.4, MA: 66.9 ± 7.7, and LY30: 1.0 ± 1.2. There was no association between hypercoagulability and tumor location or metastatic stage. The mean age of patients with TEG-defined hypercoagulability was higher than those with a normal TEG profile (44 ± 23 years versus 59 ± 17 years, mean difference 15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4 to 26]; p = 0.01). In addition, female patients were more likely than male patients to demonstrate TEG-defined hypercoagulability (75% [18 of 24] of female patients versus 46% [13 of 28] of male patients, OR 3.5 [95% CI 1 to 11]; p = 0.04) as were those with soft tissue disease (as opposed to bony) (77% [20 of 26] of patients with soft tissue versus 42% [11 of 26] of patients with bony disease, OR 4.6 [95% CI 1 to 15]; p = 0.01). Postoperatively, symptomatic DVT developed in 10% (5 of 52; four proximal DVTs, one distal DVT) of patients, and no patients developed symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Patients with preoperative TEG-defined hypercoagulability were more likely to be diagnosed with symptomatic postoperative DVT than patients with normal TEG profiles (16% [5 of 31] of patients with TEG-defined hypercoagulability versus 0% [0 of 21] of patients with normal TEG profiles; p = 0.05). No patients with normal preoperative TEG profiles had clinically symptomatic VTE.

CONCLUSION

Patients with musculoskeletal tumors are at high risk of hypercoagulability as determined by TEG. Patients who were older, female, and had soft tissue disease (as opposed to bony) were more likely to demonstrate TEG-defined hypercoagulability in our cohort. The postoperative VTE incidence was higher among patients with preoperative TEG-defined hypercoagulability. The findings in this pilot study warrant further investigation, perhaps through multicenter collaboration that can provide a sufficient cohort to power a robust, multivariable analysis, better characterizing patient and disease risk factors for hypercoagulability. Patients with TEG-defined hypercoagulability may warrant a higher index of suspicion for VTE and careful thought regarding their chemoprophylaxis regimen. Future work may also evaluate the effectiveness of TEG-guided chemoprophylaxis, as results of the assay may inform selection of antiplatelet versus anticoagulant agent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Thromboelastography: a review for radiologists and implications on periprocedural bleeding risk

Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry are emerging technologies that are gaining increasing acceptance in the medical field to evaluate the coagulation status of patients on an individual level by assessing dynamic clot formation. TEG has been proven to reduce blood product use as well as improve patient outcomes in a variety of medical settings, including trauma and surgery due to the expediated nature of the test as well as the ability to determine specific deficiencies present in whole blood that are otherwise undetectable with traditional coagulation studies. Currently, no guidelines or recommendations are in place for the utilization of TEG in interventional or diagnostic radiology although access to TEG has become increasingly common in recent years. This manuscript presents a review of prior literature on the technical aspects of TEG as well as its use in various fields and explains the normal TEG-tracing parameters. Common hemodynamic abnormalities and their effect on the TEG tracing are illustrated, and the appropriate treatments for each abnormality are briefly mentioned. TEG has the potential to be a useful tool for determining the hemodynamic state of patients in both interventional and diagnostic radiology, and further research is needed to determine the value of these tests in the periprocedural setting.

Identification of hypercoagulability with thrombelastography in patients with hip fracture receiving thromboprophylaxis

Background:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common complication after hip fracture surgery. We used thrombelastography (TEG), a wholeblood, point-of-care test that can provide an overview of the clotting process, to determine the duration of hypercoagulability after hip fracture surgery.

Methods:

In this prospective study, consecutive patients aged 51 years or more with hip fractures (trochanteric region or neck) amenable to surgical treatment who presented to the emergency department were eligible for enrolment. Thrombelastography, including calculation of the coagulation index (CI) (combination of 4 TEG parameters for an overall assessment of coagulation) was performed daily from admission until 5 days postoperatively, and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients received 28 days of thromboprophylaxis. We used single-sample t tests to compare mean maximal amplitude (MA) values (a measure of clot strength) to the hypercoagulable threshold of greater than 65 mm, a predictor of in-hospital VTE.

Results:

Of the 35 patients enrolled, 11 (31%) were hypercoagulable on admission based on an MA value greater than 65 mm, and 29 (83%) were hypercoagulable based on a CI value greater than 3.0; the corresponding values at 6 weeks were 23 (66%) and 34 (97%). All patients had an MA value greater than 65 mm at 2 weeks. Patients demonstrated normal coagulation on admission (mean MA value 62.2 mm [standard deviation (SD) 6.3 mm], p = 0.01) but became significantly hypercoagulable at 2 weeks (mean 71.6 mm [SD 2.6 mm], p < 0.001). There was a trend toward persistent hypercoagulability at 6 weeks (mean MA value 66.2 mm [SD 3.8 mm], p = 0.06).

Conclusion:

More than 50% of patients remained hypercoagulable 6 weeks after fracture despite thromboprophylaxis. Thrombelastography MA thresholds or a change in MA over time may help predict VTE risk; however, further study is needed.

Epidemiology of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Asia: A Systematic Review

The epidemiology of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in Asia is less well-studied and differs from that in the western countries. Here, we systematically examine population based and hospital-based studies reported between 1995 and 2020 to understand the epidemiology of CAT in Asia. From population-based studies, the estimated incidence of VTE in cancer patients was 1.85–9.88 per 1,000 person-years. The incidence of CAT in Asia is significantly higher than non-cancer associated VTE in the general population and cancer is perhaps the most important risk factor for VTE. Hospital-based studies were heterogeneous in study designs and reveal a wide range of prevalence of VTE among cancer patients at 0.5–44.6% while the cancer prevalence rates among VTE patients ranged from 6.1 to 65.5%. The cancer sites most associated with VTE and risk factors were similar between Asian and Western studies. CAT has a major impact on the survival of patients with cancer in Asia, but thromboprophylaxis is not commonly practiced and validated risk assessment tools are lacking. This study highlights the urgent need for large multinational epidemiological studies in Asia to establish the true burden of CAT and to guide appropriate prevention strategies.

The Role of TEG Analysis in Patients with COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy: A Systematic Review

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated coagulopathy (CAC), characterized by hypercoagulability and an increased risk of thrombotic complications, is an important consideration in the management of patients with COVID-19. As COVID-19 is a new disease, no standard of care for the diagnosis or management of its associated coagulopathy is yet established. Whole blood viscoelastic tests, such as thromboelastography (TEG^® hemostasis analyzer), analyze whole blood to provide a complete overview of the coagulation status. We conducted a systematic review of thromboelastography for management of patients with COVID-19, using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane databases. TEG^® parameter measurements and clinical outcomes data were extracted for analysis. Our review found 15 publications, with overall results showing thromboelastography can identify and assess a hypercoagulable state in patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, utilization of thromboelastography in this patient population was shown to predict thrombotic complications. The benefits of thromboelastography presented here, in addition to advantages compared with laboratory coagulation tests, position thromboelastography as an important opportunity for optimizing diagnosis of CAC and improving patient management in COVID-19. Given that the benefits of thromboelastography have already been demonstrated in several other clinical applications, we anticipate that clinical data from future studies in patients with COVID-19 will further elucidate the optimal use of thromboelastography in this patient population.

The Predictive Value of Thromboelastogram in the Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Acute Venous Thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this prospective study was to examine whether thromboelastogram (TEG) can predict the presence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who arrive at the emergency room with signs/symptoms that raise the suspicion of acute VTE.

METHODS

Every patient was tested for D-dimer and all TEG parameters, including: reaction time, clot time formation, alpha-angle, maximal amplitude, clot viscoelasticity, coagulation index, and clot lysis at 30 min. For categorical variables, χ2 or the Fisher exact test were used, and for continuous variables the t test or other non-parametric tests were used.

RESULTS

During 2016, a total of 109 patients were enrolled with a median age of 55.7 (21-89) years. Eighteen patients were diagnosed with VTE. Analyzing the different TEG parameters, both as continuous and categorical variables, did not reveal a statistically significant difference between VTE-positive and VTE-negative patients. Combining different TEG parameters or dividing the cohort according to gender, clinical suspicion of VTE (Well's criteria), or different levels of D-dimer did not change the results of the analysis.

CONCLUSION

The current study could not demonstrate a significant value of any TEG parameter as a predictor of VTE among patients who came to the emergency room with signs/symptoms that raise the suspicion of VTE.

The Diagnostic Efficacy of Thrombelastography (TEG) in Patients with Preeclampsia and its Association with Blood Coagulation

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of thrombelastography (TEG) in patients with preeclampsia.

Methods

One hundred and seventeen pregnant women were recruited from Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of 1^st affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Of the 117 patients, 59 were normal late gestation (control group), 32 were mild preeclampsia and other 26 cases were severe preeclampsia. All the patients were received thrombelastography (including: K time, Reaction time, Clot angel, MA value, CI value) and blood coagulation examination (including: PT, APTT, Fib, TT, D-dimer and AT-III).

Results

The R time, K time, Coagulation Index value and Clot Angle in preeclampsia group were significant different between control and preeclampsia groups with statistical difference (p<0.05). Moreover, the R and K time value in severe preeclampsia group were significant higher than those of control groups (p<0.05); however, the Coagulation Index value and Clot Angle in severe preeclampsia group were significant higher than those of mild preeclampsia group with statistical difference (p<0.05). Coagulation Index had the highest diagnostic sensitivity [87.93 (76.70-95.01) %] and specificity [83.83 (79.17-96.18)%] compared to other parameters with the AUC of 0.94 (0.90-0.98). The K time and the Coagulation Index had the highest diagnostic sensitivity (96.15%) and specificity (0.75%) respectively with the AUC of 0.68 and 0.75 respectively in differential diagnosis of severe preeclampsia from mild preeclampsia. However, there were no statistical difference in the aspects of platelet count and parameters relevant to coagulation test for the control, mild and sever preeclampsia groups(p>0.05).

Conclusion

TEG provides more accurate information in monitoring the blood coagulation of preeclampsia patients and can be used as a reliable marker for assessing the severity of preeclampsia.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism after oncologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk and prognosis of VTE associated with oncologic surgery need to be quantified to guide patient management. We aimed to examine the availability of data and to report the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients after surgery, as well as the clinical outcomes of VTE following oncologic surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for terms related to VTE after oncologic surgery from inception to November 1, 2017. A random-effects meta-analysis was done to calculate the pooled incidence of VTE.

RESULTS

Of the 8611 citations identified, 136 studies including 1,481,659 patients met the eligibility criteria. The overall incidence of VTE was estimated to be 2.3% (95% CI 2.1-2.5). Bone and soft tissue cancer (10.6%, 95% CI 2.9-18.2) and lung cancer (8.1%, 95% CI 3.7-12.6) were associated with the highest and second highest risk of postoperative VTE, respectively. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.53; I² = 93.8%), radiation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62; I² = 34.6%), transfusion (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.48-2.59; I² = 57.0%), and operative time (SMD = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.16; I² = 100%) were possible risk factors for postoperative VTE. Patients with VTE versus those without had increased odds of all-cause fatal events (11.15, 95% CI 4.07-30.56; I² = 92.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTE after oncologic surgery remains high, and this risk varied according to the cancer type, study region, surgical location, and thromboprophylactic strategy. VTE is associated with increased mortality at the early stage of cancer surgery.