Conservative surgery of uterine adenomyosis via laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach in a single institution

Updates on adenomyosis and fertility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis, characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium, causes chronic pelvic pain, heavy bleeding, and reduced fertility. Nowadays, diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, primarily transvaginal ultrasound, supplemented by MRI. While hysterectomy remains a definitive treatment, the rise in younger patients desiring fertility necessitates uterine-sparing approaches. This review aimed to evaluate these approaches in relation to their impact on fertility and obstetrical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research highlights the association between adenomyosis and increased risk for pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and pre-eclampsia. Minimally invasive thermal ablation therapies and hysteroscopic techniques, including adenomyomectomy, offer promising fertility-sparing options, although long-term data on fertility outcomes and potential complications like uterine rupture remain limited. Advances in laparoscopic and laparotomy-based cytoreductive surgeries are also explored, but large-scale studies comparing efficacy and safety are lacking.

SUMMARY

This review examines recent advancements in understanding and managing adenomyosis, focusing on fertility-sparing interventions. Studies show varying success rates for these interventions, highlighting the need for larger, well-designed trials with standardized diagnostic criteria, to assess long-term fertility outcomes, and refine patient selection for optimal results. A consistent challenge across all approaches is the potential for uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum, demanding careful patient selection and close monitoring.

The present adenomyosis treatment status in Luzhou, China: a small scope observational cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current treatment status and management deficiencies of adenomyosis in Luzhou, China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A small-scale observational cross-sectional study of patients whose imaging suggests adenomyosis from July 2018 to February 2022 at a teaching hospital in Luzhou, China. All participants (1542 patients) completed a questionnaire of 14 items, including basic information, symptoms, treatment options, outcomes, and costs. The patients' treatment options and the hysterectomy rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

The treatment options of hormone agents included combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs), gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and dienogest for 2.07, 46.04, 63.49, and 4.67% of patients, respectively. The treatment options under uterus-sparing surgery included adenomyectomy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment, presenting in 3.76 and 33.27% of patients, respectively. Finally, 458 (29.70%) patients chose a hysterectomy. The hysterectomy rate between the hormone and uterus-sparing surgery sequential hormone groups (surgery group) was not significantly different (14.8 vs. 12.7%, χ2 = 0.344, P > 0.05). However, for the focal type and patients with > 24 months delayed treatment interval, the hysterectomy rate of the hormone group was significantly higher than that of the surgery group (8.5% vs. 1.3%, χ2 = 11.722, P < 0.01 and 26.7% vs. 18.5%, χ2 = 4.906, P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There were treatment delays and treatment selection bias in managing adenomyosis in Luzhou, China. Popular science education and early individualized hormone therapy are needed. Uterine-sparing surgery should be carefully selected.

Expert Consensus on the Management of Adenomyosis: A Modified Delphi Method Approach by the Taiwan Endometriosis Society

Objectives

To establish the expert opinions and consensus recommendations from the Taiwanese Endometriosis Society on managing adenomyosis.

Materials and Methods

This study employed a two-round modified Delphi method incorporating a national panel of expert gynecologists to form the consensus on managing adenomyosis. The first round of the Delphi procedure involved an expert panel from the board members to evaluate the relevance of each item. In the subsequent round of votes, gynecologists affiliated with the Taiwan Endometriosis Society participated and used a 5-point Likert scale to cast votes and approve each statement. The rating scales for each item of the key recommendations were analyzed for the distribution of degrees of agreement.

Results

The consensus for managing adenomyosis was developed, encompassing various aspects including imaging diagnosis, hormonal treatment, surgical treatment, noninvasive/minimally invasive treatment, infertility concerns, and obstetric considerations. In the first round of voting, all 25 recommendations received approval from the board members, advancing them to the second round. During the second round of voting, the majority of recommendations received either a "strongly agree" or "agree" response. There was divergence regarding the similarity of effectiveness in alleviating adenomyosis-related pain by either laparotomic or laparoscopic approaches (55% strongly agree or agree vs. 21% disagree or strongly disagree).

Conclusion

The Taiwan Endometriosis Society expert panel has established a set of consensus guidelines for the management of adenomyosis. There are diverging opinions among experts regarding the optimal surgical approaches for resection of adenomyosis.

Recurrence rates and associated risk factors after conservative surgery for adenomyosis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Conservative surgery for adenomyosis has been shown to be effective. However, risk factors for postoperative recurrence have yet to be clarified. In this study, we aimed to determine the recurrence rate after conservative surgery for adenomyosis and identify the risk factors for recurrence.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Patients who underwent conservative surgery for adenomyosis between January 2013 and April 2023 were identified. Eligible patients were assigned to either the recurrent or non-recurrent group. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-squared test. Risk factors for recurrence were identified by Cox proportional risk analysis.

RESULTS

Data for 133 eligible patients who underwent conservative surgery for adenomyosis were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 52 months. The recurrence rate after conservative surgery was 39.1% (52/133). Cox proportional risk analysis identified adenomyosis involving the posterior uterine wall (hazard ratio [HR] 6.505, P = 0.018), two or more adenomyotic lesions (HR 6.310, P = 0.030), laparotomy (HR 2.490, P = 0.029), and concomitant endometriosis (HR 2.313, P = 0.036) to be risk factors for recurrence after conservative surgery. Postoperative combined progestogen therapy (HR 0.126, P < 0.001) or treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) (HR 0.237, P = 0.004) prevented recurrence of adenomyosis.

CONCLUSION

Adenomyosis continues to have a relatively high long-term recurrence rate after conservative surgery. Patients with adenomyosis involving the posterior wall of the uterus, those with two or more adenomyotic lesions, and those with concomitant endometriosis are at high risk for recurrence after conservative surgery. Postoperative progestogen or GnRHa therapy may reduce the risk of recurrence of adenomyosis. Considering the retrospective nature of this study and its small sample size, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm its findings.

Case Report: The first case of successful pregnancy and live birth following laparoscopic resection of adenomyosis under real-time intraoperative ultrasound elastography guidance

Objective

Adenomyosis-related infertility is increasingly being diagnosed, and surgical intervention has been suggested to improve fertility. Elastography, a noninvasive ultrasound technique, is promising for diagnosing and guiding the resection of adenomyosis. This report presents the first case of successful delivery after twin pregnancies achieved with IVF following intraoperative elastography-guided laparoscopic adenomyomectomy.

Case report

A 35-year-old Japanese woman with uterine adenomyosis received a gonadotropin analog before surgery. Preoperative MRI revealed a 5.0 × 7.0 cm adenomyoma, leading to scheduled laparoscopic adenomyomectomy with intraoperative elastography. During surgery, elastography ensured the complete resection of the adenomyotic tissue while preserving the endometrium. Postoperative MRI confirmed the absence of residual adenomyosis. The patient underwent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, leading to a successful twin pregnancy after double blastocyst transfer. Despite a stable perinatal course, she required hospitalization to prevent preterm labor. At 32 weeks, an elective cesarean section delivered healthy twins. The intra- and post-operation was uncomplicated, and the patient and infants had an optimal health.

Conclusion

This is the first reported case of a twin pregnancy resulting from vitrified-warmed embryo transfer after elastography-guided laparoscopic adenomyomectomy, culminating in a successful delivery via cesarean section. This technique allows precise resection and mitigates the risks of uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Although promising, further studies are required to validate the safety and efficacy of this innovative surgical approach.

Conservative surgical treatment for adenomyosis: New options for looking beyond uterus removal

Adenomyosis is a common benign uterine disorders and patients may present dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and infertility. The treatment is very complex, including medical, surgical or radiological approaches. Hormonal drugs represent the first line therapy of adenomyosis, highly effective on symptoms and uterine volume reduction. Radiological procedures (UAE and HIFU), RFA and hysteroscopy may be proposed in those cases in which medical therapy is ineffective. Considering surgical treatment, hysterectomy remains the only existing definitive treatment but in the last decades the desire of uterus preservation is becoming more and more diffuse. On the other hand, surgical conservative treatments of adenomyosis are very effective in ameliorating AUB and pelvic pain and in reducing uterine volume, with some post-operative risks and obstetrics complications. Cytoreductive surgery for adenomyosis may be very complex, therefore it should be performed by experienced surgeons in dedicated centers, above all in case of concomitant endometriosis.

Reproductive surgery remains an essential element of reproductive medicine

Background

Reproductive surgery has long been neglected and is perceived to be simple surgery that can be undertaken by all gynaecologists. However, given the ever-expanding knowledge in the field, reproductive surgery now comprises surgical interventions on female reproductive organs that need to be carefully planned and executed with consideration given to the individuals symptoms, function of the organ and fertility concerns.

Objectives

To discuss the different perspectives of reproductive surgeons and other gynaecological surgeons, e.g., gynaecological oncologists, and advanced minimally invasive surgeons, regarding diagnosis and management of pelvic pathology that affects reproductive potential. Furthermore, to highlight the gaps in knowledge and numerous controversies surrounding reproductive surgery, while summarising the current opinion on management.

Materials and Methods

Narrative review based on literature and the cumulative experience of the authors.

Main outcome measures

The paper does not address specific research questions.

Conclusions

Reproductive surgery encompasses all reproductive organs with the aim of alleviating symptoms whilst restoring and preserving function with careful consideration given to alternatives such as expectant management, medical treatments, and assisted reproductive techniques. It necessitates utmost technical expertise and sufficient knowledge of the female genital anatomy and physiology, together with a thorough understanding of and respect to of ovarian reserve, tubal function, and integrity of the uterine anatomy, as well as an up-to-date knowledge of alternatives, mainly assisted reproductive technology.

What is new?

A holistic approach to infertile women is only possible by focusing on the field of reproductive medicine and surgery, which is unattainable while practicing in multiple fields.

Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation.

DATA SOURCES

We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: "adenomyosis," "recurrence," "reintervention," "relapse," and "recur."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9-16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4-41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6-14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9-4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2-18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6-11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses.

CONCLUSION

Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021261289.

The Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis guidelines for managing adenomyosis

This is the first guidelines for adenomyosis from the Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis.

Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach

OBJECTIVE

The present study assessed the safety and benefits of laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy compared to laparoscopic or laparotomic adenomyomectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective comparative study. A total of 277 patients underwent adenomyomectomy between January 2016 and January 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ulsan University Hospital, including 25 with laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy, 82 with laparoscopic adenomyomectomy, and 170 with laparotomic adenomyomectomy. Laparoscopic-assisted adenomyomectomy consisted of a laparoscopic uterine artery procedure to reduce blood loss and a minimal incisional for laparotomic adenomyomectomy. An additional laparoscopic surgery was performed for possible pelvic pathology.

RESULTS

Data on patient demographics, surgical indications, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), short-term complications, and postoperative hospital stays were compared. The laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) and laparotomic groups were comparable in average EBL (208.0 ± 128.8 vs. 193.6 ± 193.0 ml, p = 0.11), weight of removed mass (85.5 ± 71.7 vs. 108.2 ± 91.9 g, p = 0.39), and postoperative hospital days (HDs) (4.5 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.27). These values were lower in the laparoscopic group (EBL 119.5 ± 79.6 ml, mass weight 39.3 ± 25.9 g, HD 3.6 ± 0.8 days). Additional procedures, including myomectomy and combined severe endometriosis surgery, were more frequently performed in the LAS group than the laparotomic group. The mean operating time was longer in the LAS group (179.8 ± 36.6 min) than the other groups (laparoscopy 99.9 ± 40.6 min, p < 0.00; laparotomy 133.0 ± 41.1 min, p < 0.00). The three groups did not differ significantly in transfusion rates, hemoglobin changes, or perioperative complications. However, febrile morbidity was lower in the laparoscopic group than the LAS and laparotomic groups.

CONCLUSION

LAS adenomyomectomy allows for maximal debulking of adenomyosis via extracorporeal and intracorporeal procedures while retaining the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Additional pelvic surgery for benign uterine and adnexal pathology may easily be performed with this approach.

Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in the women who have received adenomyomectomy: Performed by a single surgeon by a uniform surgical technique

OBJECTIVE

Although adenomyomectomy for fertility-sparing is an expanding procedure worldwide, there is no guideline or consensus about how to manage the pregnant women who have previously received conservative surgery for adenomyosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate antenatal care and delivery outcomes in pregnant women after adenomyomectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2011 and May 2019, the medical record was reviewed in all delivery of pregnant women received adenomyomectomy performed by a single surgeon by a uniform surgical technique. The evaluating parameters consisted of antenatal care outcomes, delivery outcomes, intrapartum outcome, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were evaluated to monitor pregnancy and delivery outcomes after the adenomyomectomy. Mean age of delivery was 37.0 years old (SD = 3.1, range 32-45, median 37). All were delivered by cesarean section. Mean gestational age was 36.2 weeks (SD = 3.6, range 27.4-39.4, median 37.3). The mean birth weight was 2560.9 g (SD = 771.8, range 1100-3920, median 2550) and the number of preterm births admitted for prematurity care was seven (31.8%, 7/22). Placental abnormality was found in the four cases, which included two placenta accreta and two previa. However, there were no cases of hysterectomy or intervention. We identified one case of uterine rupture during pregnancy (4.5%, 1/22) at 27 weeks of gestation. Except for preterm birth, adverse neonatal outcomes were not found in this study.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of pregnant women who received adenomyomectomy can obtain safe perinatal outcomes under close monitoring of preterm labor and surveillance of catastrophic pregnancy related complications.

Current and Future Surgical and Interventional Management Options for Adenomyosis

Historically, hysterectomy has been the recommended treatment for patients with adenomyosis. However, in the past two decades, various uterine-sparing treatment methods have emerged. These range from excisional techniques such as adenomyomectomy or wedge resection to uterine artery embolization, radiofrequency thermal ablation, hysteroscopic excision, endometrial ablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. While largely investigative for the treatment of adenomyosis, these procedures have demonstrated improvement in symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and overall quality of life. However, long-term data including fertility and obstetric outcomes are needed. Future research is needed to better understand the impact of these uterine-preserving techniques to expand our armamentarium for the treatment of adenomyosis.

Comparisons of the efficacy and recurrence of adenomyomectomy for severe uterine diffuse adenomyosis via laparotomy versus laparoscopy: a long-term result in a single institution

Purpose

Studies have shown that adenomyomectomy can effectively treat women with adenomyosis in a short period of time. However, the long-term efficacy of adenomyomectomy has rarely been reported. The objective of this study was to determine whether laparotomy is superior to laparoscopic surgery in the long-term efficacy of double-flap method adenomyomectomy for severe diffuse adenomyosis.

Methods

Between March 2011 and September 2018, a total of 148 patients with severe uterine diffuse adenomyosis who underwent laparoscopic (group A, n=72) and laparotomic (group B, n=76) double-flap adenomyomectomy were recruited. Adenomyomectomy efficacy and adenomyosis recurrence after surgery between groups A and B were comparatively analyzed.

Results

The effective rate at 6-year follow up after surgery was higher in group B (75.0%) than that in group A (62.1%), while the 6-year cumulative recurrence rate was higher in group A (27.8%) than that in group B (17.1%), but the differences did not reach statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05). The recurrence rate was lower in patients who were treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) plus Mirena or oral contraceptives post-surgically than that in patients who were treated with only GnRHa post-surgically in groups A (51.6% vs 9.8%, P<0.01) and B (33.3% vs 6.5%, P<0.05). Moreover, the recurrence rate of adenomyosis patients with endometriosis was higher than that of adenomyosis patients without endometriosis in group A (55.0% vs 17.3%, P<0.05) and group B (36.0% vs 7.8%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and laparotomic double-flap adenomyomectomy can be achieved for severe diffuse uterine adenomyosis, but laparotomy seems to have advantages over laparoscopy. Postoperative drug use may be beneficial to reduce the recurrence of adenomyosis, especially for adenomyosis with endometriosis.

[Stratified treatment and management of adenomyosis]

In recent years, surgical and non-surgical excision and drug therapy have replaced hysterectomy as the main therapeutic modalities for adenomyosis. It is suggested that the precise clinical diagnosis should be based on the reconstruction of digitized three-dimensional model with original image data of adenomyosis. Patients' age and clinical manifestations should also be considered, and the patients should be stratified according to reproductive requirements, so as to determine the best treatment. In view of the infiltration and diffuse growth of adenomyosis lesions in the myometrium of the uterus, it is suggested that long-term drug management should be adopted after surgical or non-surgical lesion resection.Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, dienogest and short-acting oral contraceptives should be recommended to consolidate the curative effect in order to delay the progress of the disease and prevent recurrence.