1
|
Elias-Neto A, Trindade TF, do Carmo MH, Lopes RN, Dos Santos Cruz MRM, Gonzaga APFC, de Oliveira FPCB, Talans A, E Silva GS, Matsumoto CA, Pacheco EO, Bekhor D, Torres US, D'Ippolito G. Abdominal Inflammatory Lesions Mimicking Malignancy: Imaging Pitfalls and Clues. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2025:S0887-2171(25)00016-2. [PMID: 40216035 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2025.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
Abdominal inflammatory lesions may closely mimic malignancies on imaging, leading to diagnostic uncertainty and potentially unnecessary interventions. This pictorial review presents a series of cases involving diverse inflammatory conditions-including autoimmune pancreatitis, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, diverticulitis, peritoneal tuberculosis, and others-that radiologically resembled neoplastic processes. Key imaging findings, such as mass-forming patterns, enhancement characteristics, and diffusion restriction, are discussed alongside clinical and laboratory correlations. Recognizing these mimickers is essential, as accurate diagnosis often depends on a multidisciplinary approach that integrates imaging expertise with clinical context, ultimately improving patient care and avoiding misdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrahão Elias-Neto
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Thais Fellinger Trindade
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mariana Helena do Carmo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Raquel Nascimento Lopes
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Ana Paula Fraga Cintra Gonzaga
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gabriella Souza E Silva
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Oliveira Pacheco
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel Bekhor
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ulysses S Torres
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil..
| | - Giuseppe D'Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siebert T, Moersdorf G, Colberg T. Laparoscopic application of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose barrier in abdominopelvic surgery: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Systematic Review Protocols-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2024; 175:1358-1367. [PMID: 38429164 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate the incidence of postoperative adhesion formation and adhesion-related consequences (eg, bowel obstruction) after placement of a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier after laparoscopic abdominopelvic surgery. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect, BIOSIS Previews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Clinical Trial Registries. A manual search (eg, Google Scholar and professional association websites) was also conducted to supplement the electronic database results. Two reviewers independently identified relevant studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. RESULTS A total of 28 studies were included in the systematic qualitative review. Three of the 28 studies included had comparable outcome measures, interventions, and control groups, allowing the pooling of study data. A total of 938 patients (490 patients in the sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose barrier group and 448 in the no adhesion barrier group) from these 3 studies were included in the meta-analyses, which found the incidence of bowel obstruction was significantly lower (65% risk reduction) in the sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose barrier group compared with the control group (relative risk = 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.63; P = .005) with extremely low heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0; P = .41). The placement of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose barrier laparoscopically did not create new safety signals nor did it increase the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis found that laparoscopic application of a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose barrier in abdominopelvic surgery reduces the risk of bowel obstruction where applied during the early postoperative phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri Siebert
- Medical Affairs, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL.
| | | | - Torben Colberg
- Medical Affairs, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiamset I, Uttraporn P, Suphasynth Y. Comparative outcomes between transvaginal endoscopic hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with benign uterine disease: A single-center, retrospective, cohort, interrupted time-series study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 164:1080-1085. [PMID: 37731329 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and transvaginal endoscopic hysterectomy (TVEH) for benign uterine diseases. METHODS This retrospective, cohort, interrupted time-series study included patients who underwent TLH between January 2013 and September 2016 and TVEH between October 2016 and June 2020. Median difference regression was used to compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) and operative time between the groups. Risk difference regression was used to analyze the proportion of patients who developed postoperative fever or vaginal stump infection. RESULTS Of the total 171 patients enrolled, 101 and 70 underwent TVEH and TLH, respectively. The mean ages of patients in the TVEH and TLH groups were 46.49 and 46.17 years, respectively. No conversion was observed. Ureteric injury occurred in one patient in the TVEH group, whereas there was no organ injury in any of the patients in the TLH group. Compared with those in the TLH group, patients in the TVEH group had a significantly shorter median operative time, shorter hospital LOS, lower morphine use, and lower postoperative febrile morbidity rates. However, no significant difference was observed in the rate of vaginal stump infection between the groups. CONCLUSION Given the shorter operative time, shorter hospital LOS, less febrile morbidity, and lower morphine use in patients with TVEH than in those with TLH, TVEH should be considered as an alternative hysterectomy procedure for benign uterine diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingporn Jiamset
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Pawara Uttraporn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Yuthasak Suphasynth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dawodu O, Baxter B, Kim JH. Update on antiadhesion barriers and therapeutics in gynecological surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 35:352-360. [PMID: 37387697 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postoperative adhesions remain a clinical challenge to both patients and providers, as they are associated with significant complications and a high economic burden. This article provides a clinical review of currently available antiadhesive agents and promising new therapies that have advanced past animal studies. RECENT FINDINGS Several agents have been investigated on their ability to reduce adhesion formation; however, there is no widely acceptable option. The few available interventions are barrier agents and while low-quality evidence suggests that they may be more effective than no treatment, there is no general agreement on their overall efficacy. There is an abundance of research on new solutions; however, their clinical efficacy is yet to be determined. SUMMARY Although a wide range of therapeutics have been investigated, majority are halted in animal models with only a select few being studied in humans and ultimately available in the market. Many agents have shown effectiveness in reducing adhesion formation, however, that has not been translated to improvement in clinically relevant outcomes; hence the need for high-quality large randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olanrewaju Dawodu
- Division of Gynecologic Specialty Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|