Preliminary evaluation of the short-term outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse

Transvaginal Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: One-Year Safety and Efficacy Results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh by comparing conventionally used polypropylene (PP) mesh in tension-free vaginal mesh (TVM) surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of patients who underwent TVM using a PTFE or PP mesh. PTFE was used from June 2019 to May 2021, and PP mesh from January 2018 to May 2019. Outcomes included POP recurrence, perioperative complications, and patient satisfaction. Restricted mean survival time was used to analyze POP recurrence, comparing the time to recurrence between the two groups at 1year after TVM.

RESULTS

Of 171 patients, 104 underwent PP mesh placement (PP group) and 67 underwent PTFE mesh placement (PTFE group). POP recurrence was observed in 10 and nine patients in the PP and PTFE groups, respectively. The mean time until the recurrence in the PTFE group was significantly shorter than that in the PP group (restricted mean survival time difference: -20.3days; 95% CI, -40.1 to -0.5; P = .044). Subgroup analysis revealed the meantime until recurrence was significantly shorter in the PTFE group for postoperative periods 3months or less, ages >70years, and POP stage ≥3. There were no intervention cases in either group and no significant differences in the perioperative complications. Patient satisfaction was greater in the PTFE group after 3months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

TVM surgery with a PTFE mesh is more prone to recurrence than that with a PP mesh, but with higher patient satisfaction. Within 3months of surgery, elderly patients and those with advanced-stage POP require care to prevent recurrence.

Efficacy of Transvaginal Surgery Using an ORIHIME Mesh With Wider Arms and Adjusted Length

INTRODUCTION

Transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) is an effective treatment measure for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, the ORIHIME mesh (Kono Seisakusho, Japan, Tokyo), which has the disadvantage of poor adherence to tissues, is currently the only product available for this procedure. Our research team has previously developed a modified ORIHIME mesh with wider arms with the aim of minimizing the risk of POP recurrence. Additionally, the length of the mesh behind the anterior vaginal wall has been adjusted to prevent urinary incontinence. The current study aims to examine the efficacy of this modified mesh in minimizing postoperative complications in patients undergoing uphold-type TVM.

METHODS

The data of 84 patients who underwent TVM using ORIHIME at our hospital since July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups as follows: (a) normal arms (NA; arm width < 6 cm; n = 29 cases); (b) wide arms without length adjustment (WA and LA (-); arm width > 6 cm; n = 27 cases); and (c) wide arms with length adjustment (WA and LA (+); n = 28 cases). Data were collected using various questionnaires, and the residual urine volume was measured before and after surgery. Additionally, the 60-minute pad test was performed where possible, and the recurrence and complication rates were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of mesh exposure and urinary incontinence in daily life tended to be lower in the WA and LA (+) groups, although this difference was not statistically significant. The one-year postoperative POP recurrence rate, residual urine volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score were significantly lower in the WA and LA (+) groups compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Uphold-type TVM using the modified ORIHIME mesh with wider arms and adjusted length was associated with better postoperative treatment outcomes compared to TVM using the traditional ORIHIME mesh.

Unilateral levator avulsion increases the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence after cystocele repair

INTRODUCTION

Patients without concurrent baseline stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can develop de novo SUI after transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) for cystocele repair. Surgeons should be aware of de novo SUI risk factors after TVM.

METHODS

A total of 1124 women who were underwent TVM surgeries were recruited and assessed for eligibility from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2021. All data related to patients and surgeries was collected, which included general conditions, clinical examination, surgery records, and follow-up results. Patients were divided into three groups according to follow-up results and data were compared with each group. The relative risk (RR) of de novo SUI with levator avulsion was also calculated.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-six patients were included in this study. They were divided into no complication group (n = 249), de novo SUI group (n = 68), and other complications group (n = 19). It seemed elder or obese women had a higher risk of de novo SUI after TVM (p < 0.05). In de novo SUI group, incidence of levator avulsion before surgery were higher than the other two groups (p = 0.001). TVM can significantly change a prolapse to point Aa and Ba on POP-Q quantification system (p < 0.05). RR ratios of de novo SUI with unilateral avulsion group is 2.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-4.87), and 2.58 (95%CI 0.82-8.15) for bilateral group.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral levator avulsion, instead of bilateral levator avulsion, is a risk factor of de novo SUI after cystocele repair surgery.

Favorable Postoperative Outcomes After Transvaginal Mesh Surgery Using a Wide-Arm ORIHIME® Mesh

Introduction Transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) is an effective treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although ORIHIME®, the only available mesh product, is thin, soft, and easy to handle, it has the disadvantages of sliding off or mildly adhering to the surrounding tissues. The current study compared the efficacy of using wide-arm ORIHIME (Kono Seisakusho, Japan, Tokyo), non-wide arm ORIHIME, Gynemesh PS (Johnson and Johnson, Japan, Tokyo), and Polyform (Boston Scientific Japan, Japan, Tokyo) meshes for TVM. Methods The study included 116 patients who underwent TVM (Prolift with Gynemesh PS (n = 14); Elevate with Polyform (n = 43); Uphold with non-wide-arm ORIHIME (n = 24); Uphold with wide-arm ORIHIME (n = 35)) at our hospital. Pre- and post-surgical changes in symptoms were measured using questionnaires and 60-minute pad weight testing and compared by mesh type and surgical methods used. Results The residual urine volume, 60-minute pad weight testing, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form score (ICIQ-SF) significantly improved one year postoperatively in the TVM with the wide-arm ORIHIME group. Comparison of pre and one-year postoperative findings by mesh type and surgical methods used showed no significant differences in the 60-minute pad test, IPSS, Quality of Life (QOL), OABSS, and urinary incontinence in daily life scores, and improvement in residual urine volume, ICIQ-SF, and mesh exposure and POP recurrence rates in the TVM with the wide-arm ORIHIME group. Conclusion TVM with wide-arm ORIHIME had better postoperative outcomes compared to TVM with other mesh products.

Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without blind maneuver

AIM

To present the techniques of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without the blind maneuver and elucidate its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 45 women with a mean age of 77.9 years old. We investigated surgical outcomes including complications, anatomical recurrence rates, and changes in both subjective symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

The surgery required 111 ± 18 min and blood loss was 40 ± 24 g. Minor injuries of the bladder and rectum occurred in two and one patient, respectively. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1.1 and patients were discharged on postoperative day 4.4. No one experienced voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization. Wound infections occurred in two patients but they subsided with only antibiotics administered. Five patients had anatomical recurrence during a median follow-up of 17 months. Of these, two underwent reoperation and the remaining three were solely followed-up because there were no or few associated problems. Chronic pain, mesh erosion, and exposure were absent in all cases. Subjective symptoms and quality of life significantly improved after surgery at 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

It is considered that transvaginal mesh surgery without the blind maneuver is a safe and effective way to treat women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Quality of Life Following Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatments in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) improvement is one of the main outcomes in the management of pelvic organ prolapse as a chronic illness in women. This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of surgical or pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on quality of life. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was applied. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for original articles that evaluated the QoL before and after surgical interventions or pessary in pelvic organ prolapse from 1 January 2012 until 30 June 2022 with a combination of proper keywords. Included studies were categorized based on interventions, and they were tabulated to summarize the results. Results: Overall, 587 citations were retrieved. Of these, 76 articles were found eligible for final review. Overall, three categories of intervention were identified: vaginal surgeries (47 studies), abdominal surgeries (18 studies), and pessary intervention (11 studies). Almost all interventions were associated with improved quality of life. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant association between the employment of surgical approach techniques (including vaginal and abdominal surgeries) and the quality of life (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) (MD: −48.08, 95% CI: −62.34 to −33.77, p-value < 0.01), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) (MD: −33.41, 95% CI: −43.48 to −23.34, p < 0.01)) and sexual activity of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ) (MD: 4.84, 95% CI: 1.75 to 7.92, p < 0.01)). Furthermore, narrative synthesis for studies investigating the effect of the pessary approach showed a positive association between the use of this instrument and improvement in the quality of life and sexual activity. Conclusions: The results of our study revealed a significant improvement in the women’s quality of life following abdominal and vaginal reconstructive surgery. The use of pessary was also associated with increased patient quality of life.

Long-term follow up in two cases of pelvic reconstruction using a combined VRAM flap-sacrocolpopexy for severe perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection

Perineal hernia is an infrequent complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and, currently, there is no consensus as to the optimal operative technique. Surgical repair can be achieved by either cerclage or the use of mesh or autologous tissue, and it has been reported that the recurrence rate after repair using autologous tissue is 33%. We present two post-APR cases of severe perineal hernia with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) which did not improve after repair using mesh. We regenerated the pelvic floor using a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap and performed a concomitant sacrocolpopexy to fix the POP. Drooping of the perineum and pelvic floor was greatly improved, and the patients have not experienced any recurrence for 6 years. This dual procedure has not been previously mentioned in the literature, and we consider this the first report of its kind.