Etiology distribution of abnormal uterine bleeding according to FIGO classification system: A combined study of ultrasound and histopathology

Use and knowledge of the two FIGO systems for nongestational abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: A multinational survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the worldwide use of FIGO's two systems for the classification of causes and contributors to nongestational abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years by obstetrics and gynecology professionals worldwide, to identify knowledge gaps, and explore barriers to implementation.

METHODS

An electronic survey was developed by members of FIGO's Menstrual Disorders and Related Health Impacts (MDRHI) Committee to assess knowledge of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and the two FIGO AUB systems among obstetricians and gynecologists. The survey was conducted online from February 28 to June 30, 2023, and comprised demographic questions, educational content inquiries, and a knowledge assessment. Available in English, Spanish, French, and Mandarin, the survey was disseminated through representatives of the World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology (WATOG), as well as through digital platforms and trainee-focused Facebook groups.

RESULTS

Out of 1317 initial participants from 65 countries, 1114 completed the survey. The highest representation was from China (42.6%), where both trainees and clinicians participated. Participation varied across FIGO regions, with Asia-Oceania contributing the most (n = 602) and North America the least (n = 62). Most participants were in hospital-based residency programs (73.9%), graduating around 2012 with 3 years of postgraduate medical education. Nearly 70% reported being familiar with FIGO systems, while over 93% were familiar with PALM-COEIN. About one-third reported frequent use of FIGO systems by faculty, except among French-speaking respondents. Higher composite FIGO systems knowledge scores correlated with familiarity with FIGO AUB systems and PALM COEIN. Language did not significantly affect scores.

CONCLUSION

FIGO's systems for nongestational AUB are widely used but gaps persist. Targeted strategies focusing on faculty development and research are needed to improve awareness and proficiency. This study highlights the necessity for interventions in medical education to enhance trainees' understanding and utilization of standardized nomenclature.

Clinical signs and diagnosis of fibroids from adolescence to menopause

The aim of this review was to provide an updated assessment of the present diagnostic tools and clinical symptoms and signs to evaluate uterine fibroids (UFs) on the basis of current guidelines, recent scientific evidence, and a PubMed and Google Scholar search for peer-reviewed original and review articles related to clinical signs and diagnosis of UFs. Approximately 50%-75% of UFs are considered nonclinically relevant. When present, the most common symptoms are abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain and/or bulk symptoms, and reproductive failure. Transvaginal ultrasound is recommended as the initial diagnostic modality because of its accessibility and high sensitivity, although magnetic resonance imaging appears to be the most accurate diagnostic tool to date in certain cases. Other emerging techniques, such as saline infusion sonohysterography, elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, may contribute to improving diagnostic accuracy in selected cases. Moreover, artificial intelligence has begun to demonstrate its ability as a complementary tool to improve the efficiency of UF diagnosis. Therefore, it is critical to standardize descriptions of transvaginal ultrasound images according to updated classifications and to individualize the use of the different complementary diagnostic tools available to achieve precise uterine mapping that can lead to targeted therapeutic approaches according to the clinical context of each patient.

Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Thomas Cullen described bleeding abnormalities and dysmenorrhea as the "expected" presentations of adenomyomas. Adenomyosis is included within the FIGO classification of structural causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Nevertheless, this long-standing association has been questioned by some authors who reported a high incidence of adenomyosis in uteri removed for indications other than AUB or dysmenorrhea. Here, we examine evidence for the link between adenomyosis and AUB.

METHODS

A comprehensive Medline literature review of all publications to October 2023.

RESULTS

Sixty-three articles were identified and included in the review. Despite a large body of studies, the available literature does not provide conclusive evidence of a link between adenomyosis and AUB. This is because of unsuitable study design, or poor characterization of the study population or of the inclusion or exclusion criteria. Additional challenges arise because of the lack of agreed criteria for diagnosing adenomyosis and the often absence of detailed assessment of menstrual blood loss. Adenomyosis often coexists with other conditions that have also been linked to similar symptoms, and many cases of adenomyosis are asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Most of the existing literature and studies that addressed treatment outcome of adenomyosis started from the premise that a link between the condition and AUB had been proven. Yet, published information shows that aspects such a relationship is still uncertain. Further research is needed to address the relation between AUB and adenomyosis burden (or subtypes), distribution, and concomitant pathology.

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive Age Women: Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics as bleeding from the uterine corpus that is abnormal in regularity, volume, frequency, or duration and occurs in the absence of pregnancy. AUB is a common condition that affects about a third of women in their lifetime. Abnormal bleeding in duration, quantity, or timing consists of 2 categories, predictable cyclical heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and irregular non-cyclical intermenstrual bleeding (IMB). The most common causes of HMB include fibroids and adenomyosis and IMB is commonly caused by ovulatory dysfunction such as in polycystic ovaries, endometrial polyp, or an IUD. A pelvic ultrasound is the initial and often only imaging modality needed in the imaging evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and can accurately identify the common causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive age group.

Contemporary evaluation of women and girls with abnormal uterine bleeding: FIGO Systems 1 and 2

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is common, often debilitating, and may affect over 50% of reproductive-aged women and girls. Whereas AUB is a collection of symptoms that include intermenstrual bleeding and abnormalities in period duration, cycle length, and regularity, it is heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) that is most contributory to iron deficiency and related anemia. It is apparent that AUB, in general, and HMB, in particular, remain underrecognized and underreported. FIGO created two systems for assessing and classifying AUB. FIGO System 1 defines the bleeding pattern using four primary descriptors: frequency, duration, regularity, and flow volume. FIGO System 2 provides a structured classification system of possible causes of AUB, using the acronym PALM-COEIN. "PALM" refers to structural causes of AUB (Polyp, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma, Malignancy), and "COEI" refers to nonstructural causes (Coagulopathy, Ovulatory dysfunction, Endometrial, and Iatrogenic). The "N" is reserved for those entities that are currently not otherwise classified. Using FIGO System 1 as a gateway to FIGO System 2 streamlines the investigation of reproductive-aged women and girls with AUB. Understanding the pathogenesis of the FIGO System 2 "PALM-COEIN" causes helps interpret investigations and the onward management of AUB. Numerous evidence gaps exist concerning AUB; however, if researchers and trialists universally adopt FIGO Systems 1 and 2 for the assessment and diagnosis of AUB, clear translatable research findings can be applied globally.

National survey of abnormal uterine bleeding according to the FIGO classification in Japan

AIM

To investigate the status of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in Japan using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification (AUB system 1 and 2; PALM-COEIN) and to clarify the relationship between AUB symptoms and the diseases causing AUB.

METHODS

In a nationwide study, we enrolled first-time patients who visited target facilities during two consecutive weeks from December 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020. The FIGO classification was used to investigate patients with symptoms and causative diseases of AUB. Based on the proportion of patients in the nationwide study, 373 cases were included in the detailed survey. Survey items included symptoms of AUB according to AUB system 1, examination details, and causative diseases according to the PALM-COEIN classification.

RESULTS

Within the study period, we encountered 61 740 first-time patients, of which 8081 (13.1%) were diagnosed with AUB. Among them, 39.9% had abnormal menstrual cycles and 56.9% had abnormal menstrual bleeding. In the survey, PALM had the highest percentage of AUB-L and COEIN had the highest percentage of AUB-O. Correspondence analysis showed that COEIN was strongly associated with abnormal menstrual cycles and PALM with abnormal menstrual bleeding.

CONCLUSION

We conducted the first nationwide survey of AUB in Japan. The FIGO classification was a useful tool for the diagnosis of AUB, with a strong correlation between symptoms of AUB by AUB system 1 and the causative disease of AUB by PALM-COEIN. Conversely, a high percentage of AUB-N and AUB-E suggests that AUB system 1 and PALM-COEIN are ambiguous as diagnostic tools.