1
|
Zeyen T, Böhm L, Paech D, Schäfer N, Tzaridis T, Duffy C, Nitsch L, Schneider M, Potthoff AL, Schneider-Rothhaar JL, Steinbach JP, Hau P, Kowalski T, Seidel C, Krex D, Grauer O, Goldbrunner R, Zeiner PS, Tabatabai G, Galldiks N, Stummer W, Hattingen E, Glas M, Gkika E, Vatter H, Radbruch A, Herrlinger U, Weller J, Schaub C. Quantitative assessment of residual tumor is a strong and independent predictor of survival in methylated glioblastoma following radiochemotherapy with lomustine/temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 2025; 27:557-566. [PMID: 39351820 PMCID: PMC11812022 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maximum tumor resection improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma. The extent of resection (EOR) is historically dichotomized. The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) resects group recently proposed criteria for volumetry-based EOR assessment in patients that were treated according to Stupp´s protocol. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate the prognostic value of EOR in patients receiving combined chemotherapy with lomustine (CCNU)/temozolomide (TMZ), and (2) to analyze the prognostic performance of binary EOR assessment compared to volumetric assessment. METHODS Seventy-eight patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-methylated GBM undergoing tumor resection followed by radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ were included in this study. Residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor volume after the first resection was measured and its influence on OS and progression-free survival was analyzed using uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis as well as two-sided log-rank test. Patients were divided into residual tumor volume (RTV) ≤1 cm³, >1-≤5 cm³, and >5 cm³ following the proposed criteria of the RANO resect group. RESULTS Prolonged OS was associated with age <60 years, low RTV, and gross total resection. RTV had a superior prognostic value compared to binary EOR assessment. Patients with total or near total resection of CE tumor (≤ 1 cm³ RTV) showed prolonged OS (median 54.4 months, 95% CI: 46.94-not reached), with a 5-year survival rate of 49%. CONCLUSIONS Low RTV is associated with increased survival in glioblastoma patients undergoing radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ. This study demonstrates the applicability of the recently proposed RANO resect criteria in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zeyen
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Laura Böhm
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Daniel Paech
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Theophilos Tzaridis
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cathrina Duffy
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Louisa Nitsch
- Department of Vascular Neurology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Anna-Laura Potthoff
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Javen Lennard Schneider-Rothhaar
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kowalski
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr UniversityBochum, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery,Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Oliver Grauer
- Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center of Neurosurgery Department of General Neurosurgery University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pia Susan Zeiner
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie, Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Juelich, Germany
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Medicine Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Medicine Essen, Hufelandstr, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Radbruch
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Johannes Weller
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Vascular Neurology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Schaub
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waheed A, Singh B, Watts A, Kaur H, Singh H, Dhingra K, Ahuja C, Madan R, Singh A, Radotra BD. 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for In Vivo Imaging of CXCR4 Receptors in Glioma Demonstrating a Potential for Response Assessment to Radiochemotherapy: Preliminary Results. Clin Nucl Med 2024; 49:e141-e148. [PMID: 38350065 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for in vivo CXCR4 receptors imaging in glioma and its possible role in response assessment to radiochemotherapy (R-CT). METHODS Nineteen (12 men, 7 women) patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) underwent 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT, contrast-enhanced MR, and MR spectroscopy. Patients were divided in to 2 groups, that is, group I was the presurgical (n = 9) group in which the scanning was done before surgery, and PET findings were correlated with CXCR4 receptors' density. The group II was the postsurgical (n = 10) group in which the scanning was done before and after R-CT and used for treatment response evaluation. The quantitative analysis of 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT evaluated the mean SUV max , SUV mean , SUV peak , and T/B values. MR spectroscopy data evaluated the ratios of tumor metabolites (choline, NAA, creatine). RESULTS 68 Ga-Pentixafor uptake was noted in all (n = 19) the patients. In the group I, the mean SUV max , SUV mean , SUV peak , and T/B values were found to be 4.5 ± 1.6, 0.60 ± 0.26, 1.95 ± 0.8, and 6.9 ± 4.6, respectively. A significant correlation ( P < 0.005) was found between SUV mean and choline/NAA ratio. Immunohistochemistry performed in 7/9 showed CXCR4 receptors' positivity (intensity 3 + ; stained cells >50.0%). In the group II, the mean SUV max at baseline was 4.6 ± 2.1 and did not differ (4.4 ± 1.6) significantly from the value noted at post-R-CT follow-up PET/CT imaging. At 6 months' clinical follow-up, 4 patients showed stable disease. SUV max and T/B ratios at follow-up imaging were lower (3.70 ± 0.90, 2.64 ± 1.35) than the corresponding values (4.40 ± 2.8; 2.91 ± 0.93) noted at baseline. Six (6/10) patients showed disease progression, and the mean SUV max , and T/B ratio in these patients were significantly ( P < 0.05) higher than the corresponding values at baseline and also higher than that noted in the stable patients. CONCLUSIONS 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT can be used for in vivo mapping of CXCR4 receptors in GBM. The technique after validation in a large cohort of patients may have added diagnostic value for the early detection of GBM recurrence and for treatment response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bishan D Radotra
- Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|