Oral health‐related quality of life, oral aesthetics and oral function in head and neck cancer patients after oral rehabilitation

Quality of Life After Microvascular Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Subsequent Dental Rehabilitation

Background/Objectives: Defects in maxillary and mandibular alveolar ridges are common in maxillofacial practice. Reconstruction with microvascular bone grafts and subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation is the gold standard treatment. This study investigated patients' quality of life (QoL) after microvascular alveolar ridge reconstruction with subsequent dental rehabilitation. The effect of the underlying disease and success rates of the prosthetic treatment on QoL were analysed. Methods: OHIP-49 was used to evaluate oral health-related QoL (OHrQoL). The SF-36 was used to assess disease-nonspecific QoL. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and divided into four diagnostic (malignancy, osteoradionecrosis, benign disease, and cleft palate) and five prosthetic groups (no prosthetics, removable partial dentures, complete dentures, implant-supported removable dentures, and implant-supported fixed dentures). There was a significant difference between the diagnostic groups in the total score of their OHIP-49 (p = 0.008). Patients with malignant disease and osteoradionecrosis had worse QoL scores than those with benign diseases and cleft palate. Implant-supported prostheses had the best OHrQoL. Removable partial dentures and patients in whom dental rehabilitation was not possible had the worst OHrQoL (p = 0.042). The SF-36 subscale score showed no statistically significant differences between the diagnostic and prosthetic groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: OHrQoL after microvascular alveolar ridge reconstruction differs significantly based on underlying diagnoses and prosthetic restorations. Benign diseases and implant-supported dentures have the highest scores.

Long-Term Outcomes of Dental Rehabilitation and Quality of Life after Microvascular Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Background/Objectives: Dental rehabilitation after extended tumour resection and jaw reconstruction is challenging. The present study aimed to report the prosthetic outcome and quality of life (QoL) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) after microvascular alveolar ridge reconstruction. Methods: The prosthetic outcomes of all consecutive patients with HNC who underwent microvascular alveolar ridge reconstruction at the University Hospital Salzburg between 2011 and 2018 were investigated. Oral health-related QoL (OHrQoL) and overall QoL were assessed using the validated Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49) and Short Form-36 questionnaires. Results: During the study period, 115 consecutive patients with head and neck cancer underwent microvascular jaw reconstruction. Among them, 23.3% and 27.4% received conventional tissue-borne prostheses and implant-supported prostheses, respectively, while 48.7% did not undergo dental rehabilitation. The prosthetic outcome was not associated with tumour stage (p = 0.32). Oral health-related quality of life (OHrQoL) was best in patients with implant-supported dental rehabilitation (OHIP-49 median score = 7) and worst in those with conventional removable dentures (OHIP-49 median score = 54). The corresponding OHIP-49 median score for patients who could not undergo dental rehabilitation was 30.5. All Short Form-36 subscale scores were equal to or higher than the malignancy norm scores. Conclusions: After microvascular jaw reconstruction, approximately one-third of the HNC patients received adequate implant-supported dental rehabilitation. However, the risk of dental rehabilitation failure was 50%. The different prosthetic outcomes affected OHrQoL, but not overall QoL.

Radiotherapy in the head and neck region influences the chemical and mechanical properties of intraradicular dentin

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the chemical and mechanical properties of intraradicular dentin submitted to radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen mandibular incisors were divided into two groups (n = 8): non-irradiated and irradiated. The irradiated teeth were obtained from head and neck radiotherapy patients, with a total dose ranging from 70.2 to 72 Gy divided into 1.8 Gy daily. After sample preparation, intraradicular dentin slices of each root third were evaluated by Raman spectroscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy and Knoop microhardness test. Data were analyzed by Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

In Raman spectroscopy, carbonate and amide III showed a significant difference for irradiation and third (carbonate p = 0.021 and p < 0.001; amide III p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). For amide I, there was a significant difference for third (p < 0.001). For carbonate/mineral ratio, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p = 0.0016) and third (p < 0.001), with the irradiated middle third showing the lowest values. For amide I/amide III ratio, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p = 0.005) in the cervical third. In energy dispersive spectroscopy, carbon (p = 0.004; p = 0.020), phosphorus (p < 0.001; p = 0.009) and calcium (p = 0.008; p = 0.007) showed differences for irradiation and third, with the irradiated groups presenting lower values in cervical and middle thirds. For calcium/phosphorus ratio, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p < 0.001) in cervical and middle thirds. Regarding microhardness, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p < 0.001), with all irradiated groups showing lower microhardness values.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiotherapy altered the chemical and mechanical properties of intraradicular dentin, mainly in the cervical and middle root thirds.

Changes in oral function, swallowing function, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective cohort study

Background

Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment can cause oral morbidities, such as oral dryness and dysphagia, affecting the patient’s quality of life (QOL). The relationship between oral functions and QOL in patients with early-stage HNC remains poorly studied. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the QOL of patients with early-stage HNC and identify factors that affect the QOL of these patients.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 37 patients who underwent early-stage (Stage I/Stage II) HNC treatment were evaluated for their oral function, swallowing function, and the QOL score at baseline (BL) and 12 months after surgical treatment (12 M). The participants were divided into two groups: patients who returned to the BL QOL score at 12 M (RE; n = 26) and those who did not (NR; n = 11).

Results

In total, 29.7% (11/37) patients with early-stage HNC did not return to the BL QOL score at 12 M. There was no significant difference between the RE and NR groups regarding the oral and swallowing function. Moreover, oral and swallowing function of all patients returned to the BL at 12 M. The NR group showed lower QOL scores than the RE group in the global health status, and “sticky saliva” parameters in the questionnaires.

Conclusion

Restoration of the oral function is insufficient to improve the QOL of patients with early-stage HNC. The treatment of these patients should instead consider several factors that affect their QOL.

Chemical analysis of irradiated root dentin and its interaction with resin cements

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the chemical changes in root dentin submitted to ionizing radiation and how it affects the interaction with resin cements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty human premolars were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20): non-irradiated and irradiated. They were randomly subdivided according to the type of resin cement (n = 10): conventional (RelyX ARC, 3 M ESPE) or self-adhesive (RelyX U200, 3 M ESPE). After cementation of the fiberglass posts, the roots were sectioned to be analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The data obtained from FTIR and Raman were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed Tukey's test (α = 0.05). For CLSM, a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In the FTIR, there was a significant difference between the non-irradiated and irradiated groups for phosphate (p = 0.011), carbonate (p < 0.001), amide III (p = 0.038), and carbonate/mineral ratio (p < 0.001). Regarding the root third, there was a difference for amide I (p = 0.002), mineral/matrix ratio (p = 0.001), and amide I/CH₂ (p = 0.026) between the cervical and the others. Raman spectroscopy revealed no difference between groups for 961/1458 cm^-1 in the diffusion zone. CLSM showed a different interaction pattern for the two cements with the irradiated dentin from the cervical third.

CONCLUSIONS

Ionizing radiation altered the chemical composition of root dentin, especially in the cervical third. The resin cements showed less interaction with the irradiated root dentin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As radiotherapy alters the chemical composition of root dentin, the interaction of resin cement with dentin can compromise the success of rehabilitation with fiberglass posts.

Patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy: Their experiences after 6 months of prophylactic tooth extractions and temporary removable dentures

OBJECTIVES

The impact of dental occlusion on the experiences of head and neck cancer patients and their oral, social and psychological functioning has been sparsely investigated. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the experience of tooth loss and dentures among patients treated for head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of head and neck cancer patients of prophylactic tooth extractions and temporary removable dentures, 6 months after radiotherapy treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An individual interview with 25 patients 6 months after radiotherapy was subjected to a qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Two categories, Impaired oral function and Belief in the future, and seven subcategories described the patients' experiences of temporary removable dentures during the first 6 months after prophylactic tooth extractions. The temporary removable dentures affected the patients' ability to chew, swallow and speak, caused pain, and were experienced as an enemy. Despite that, the patients were hopeful and had a wish for recovery, which gave them the energy to live.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic tooth extractions and temporary removable dentures 6 months after radiotherapy treatment affect head and neck cancer patients' recovery and everyday life. However, they have the will to take on these challenges, pertaining not only to themselves, but also to relatives and health professionals. At the individual level, the patient needs individualized professional support to get through the arduous procedure, from the acute situation until the end of the rehabilitation phase.